Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Feature Request for Multihomed Endpoints

DISCUSSION Markus Grundmann 2 participants 2 messages Apr 17, 2019 – Apr 19, 2019

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi!

I have build some complex wireguard setups in the past based on Debian Linux (OSPF meshed [..]) but currently I miss a configuration option like 'address' or 'outgoing-address' in my configuration files. The current wireguard endpoint server is a "small cluster" with two nodes. Each node has a 802.3ad-channel (IX-uplink) and a etherchannel-bond to the other node. Both nodes are in the same 19"-Case (2x PCEngines APU4C4 boards).

I wish the endpoint was able to pick a explicit outgoing IP address to connect the other endpoint over the 802.3ad interface but the uplink interface address is not recommend for me. What do you think about it?

Best regards,

Markus

_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

#1 lore raw

Markus Grundmann <[email protected]>

Quoted 1 line

I wish the endpoint was able to pick a explicit outgoing IP address to connect the other endpoint over the 802.3ad interface but the uplink interface address is not recommend for me. What do you think about it?

if you search the mail list, you will find this had been discussed several times these years. last year under rhel7 I could make a multi-home environment which wireguard can not work reliably. however I can not reproduce it under netns so can not debug it further.

I wonder if there is simple netns configuration to force wireguard binding specific ip address?
_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard