Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ARM subarch submissions for next merge window

DISCUSSION Kevin Hilman 3 participants 3 messages Aug 24, 2009 – Aug 25, 2009

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Linus,

After some discussions on linux-arm-kernel during the last merge window, a suggestion from Alan Cox[1], and a willingness to try it from Russell[2], some ARM subarch maintainers would like to push our platform-specific code directly to you for the next merge window.

Any changes that affect common ARM code will still be pushed via Russell, only our platform-specific code will be submitted directly.

Also our platform code is still posted and reviewed on linux-arm-kernel as well as being included in linux-next. Only the merge path will change slightly.

Any problems with this?

Kevin
maintainer: arch/arm/mach-davinci/*
developer: arch/arm/mach-omap2/*

[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=124472557106678&w=2
[2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124472614607233&w=2

#1 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Kevin Hilman

After some discussions on linux-arm-kernel during the last merge window, a suggestion from Alan Cox[1], and a willingness to try it from Russell[2], some ARM subarch maintainers would like to push our platform-specific code directly to you for the next merge window.

Quoted 8 lines

Any changes that affect common ARM code will still be pushed via Russell, only our platform-specific code will be submitted directly.

Also our platform code is still posted and reviewed on linux-arm-kernel as well as being included in linux-next. Only the merge path will change slightly.

Any problems with this?

I don't have any issues with it, as long as the subarch trees are clean and clear.

Part of that is the normal "git cleanliness" issue in general (ie I don't want to see ugly back-merges of my random kernel-of-the-day or see that something was rebased just five minutes ago and clearly had no testing), but the other part is obviously that if there then ends up being complaints where people end up stepping on each others toes, I would want a top-level maintainer to step in.

But I guess that as long as it's clearly just platform-specific files, that won't be a problem.

Linus

#2 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Linus Torvalds
Quoted 5 lines · Kevin Hilman

After some discussions on linux-arm-kernel during the last merge window, a suggestion from Alan Cox[1], and a willingness to try it from Russell[2], some ARM subarch maintainers would like to push our platform-specific code directly to you for the next merge window.

How do you define "subarch maintainer"? If I have a new platform port, but am heretofore unknown to linux-arm-kernel, do I still send a pull request to Linus directly? Or are the subarch maintainers the guys like Russell, Nico, Tony, etc. and _they_ are the ones that get to send pull requests directly to the Benevolent Dictator for Life?

b.g.

Signature · 2 lines
Bill Gatliff
bgat at billgatliff.com