Atomic lock
PATCH 1/1 Atomic lock
I think atomic lock is needed for SMP code.
drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c +2 -4
@@ -578,11 +578,9 @@ count = bh->b_size >>9 ; sector = bh->b_rsector; -/* Uhhuh.. Nasty dead-lock possible here.. */ -if (buffer_locked (bh)) +if (test_and_set_bit (BH_Lock, &bh->b_state)) {/* Does atomic lock resolv problems? */ return ; -/* Maybe the above fixes it, and maybe it doesn't boot. Life is interesting */ -lock_buffer (bh); + }if (blk_size[major]) {unsigned long maxsector = (blk_size[major][MINOR (bh->b_rdev)] <<1 ) +1 ;
drivers/block/md.c +2 -2
@@ -778,9 +778,9 @@int md_make_request (int minor,int rw,struct buffer_head * bh) {if (md_dev [minor].pers->make_request) { -if (buffer_locked (bh)) +if (test_and_set_bit (BH_Lock, &bh->b_state)) {/* atomic lock */ return 0 ; -set_bit (BH_Lock, &bh->b_state); + }if (rw ==WRITE || rw ==WRITEA ) {if (!buffer_dirty (bh)) { bh->b_end_io (bh,test_bit (BH_Uptodate, &bh->b_state));
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/