testing-board branch: rebase to RMK's devel-stable?
Hi Tony,
Your testing-board branch currently has a couple new boards that are missing the boot_params to atag_offset conversion (patch below.)
There's a patch below to fix this, but maybe it's better to just rebase your testing-board branch onto Russell's devel-stable branch (where he's merged the seris from Nico) so any board stuff we add is sure to do it correctly.
Kevin
Quoted 9 lines · Kevin Hilman
Hi Tony,
Your testing-board branch currently has a couple new boards that are missing the
boot_paramstoatag_offsetconversion (patch below.)There's a patch below to fix this, but maybe it's better to just rebase your testing-board branch onto Russell's devel-stable branch (where he's merged the seris from Nico) so any board stuff we add is sure to do it correctly.
I would suggest that too.
Nicolas
Quoted 7 lines · Nicolas Pitre
Quoted 5 lines · Kevin Hilman
Hi Tony,
Your testing-board branch currently has a couple new boards that are missing the
boot_paramstoatag_offsetconversion (patch below.)
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
There's a patch below to fix this, but maybe it's better to just rebase your testing-board branch onto Russell's devel-stable branch (where he's merged the seris from Nico) so any board stuff we add is sure to do it correctly.
I would suggest that too.
Better yet, if your bootloader does pass the address of the ATAG list via r2 already (contemporary u-Boot versions do) then the boot_params/atag_offset entry is redundant and can simply be dropped upfront.
Nicolas
Quoted 14 lines · Nicolas Pitre
Quoted 12 lines · Nicolas Pitre
Quoted 9 lines · Kevin Hilman
Hi Tony,
Your testing-board branch currently has a couple new boards that are missing the
boot_paramstoatag_offsetconversion (patch below.)There's a patch below to fix this, but maybe it's better to just rebase your testing-board branch onto Russell's devel-stable branch (where he's merged the seris from Nico) so any board stuff we add is sure to do it correctly.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
I would suggest that too.
Better yet, if your bootloader does pass the address of the ATAG list via r2 already (contemporary u-Boot versions do) then the boot_params/atag_offset entry is redundant and can simply be dropped upfront.
Yes we should be able to drop it then.
Tony