Skip to contentSkip to conversation

testing-board branch: rebase to RMK's devel-stable?

DISCUSSION Kevin Hilman 3 participants 4 messages Sep 2, 2011 – Sep 5, 2011

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi Tony,

Your testing-board branch currently has a couple new boards that are missing the boot_params to atag_offset conversion (patch below.)

There's a patch below to fix this, but maybe it's better to just rebase your testing-board branch onto Russell's devel-stable branch (where he's merged the seris from Nico) so any board stuff we add is sure to do it correctly.

Kevin

#1 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · Kevin Hilman

Hi Tony,

Your testing-board branch currently has a couple new boards that are missing the boot_params to atag_offset conversion (patch below.)

There's a patch below to fix this, but maybe it's better to just rebase your testing-board branch onto Russell's devel-stable branch (where he's merged the seris from Nico) so any board stuff we add is sure to do it correctly.

I would suggest that too.

Nicolas

#2 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Nicolas Pitre
Quoted 5 lines · Kevin Hilman

Hi Tony,

Your testing-board branch currently has a couple new boards that are missing the boot_params to atag_offset conversion (patch below.)

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines

There's a patch below to fix this, but maybe it's better to just rebase your testing-board branch onto Russell's devel-stable branch (where he's merged the seris from Nico) so any board stuff we add is sure to do it correctly.

I would suggest that too.

Better yet, if your bootloader does pass the address of the ATAG list via r2 already (contemporary u-Boot versions do) then the boot_params/atag_offset entry is redundant and can simply be dropped upfront.

Nicolas

#3 lore raw
Quoted 14 lines · Nicolas Pitre
Quoted 12 lines · Nicolas Pitre
Quoted 9 lines · Kevin Hilman

Hi Tony,

Your testing-board branch currently has a couple new boards that are missing the boot_params to atag_offset conversion (patch below.)

There's a patch below to fix this, but maybe it's better to just rebase your testing-board branch onto Russell's devel-stable branch (where he's merged the seris from Nico) so any board stuff we add is sure to do it correctly.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line

I would suggest that too.

Better yet, if your bootloader does pass the address of the ATAG list via r2 already (contemporary u-Boot versions do) then the boot_params/atag_offset entry is redundant and can simply be dropped upfront.

Yes we should be able to drop it then.

Tony