Enabling Static builds
I have been looking at a number of the packages in the system. Do people think that -enable-static is a good idea as it seems to be used in a log of package configures.
would a global enable-static option and enable-shared option be good idea? This would mean that if you choose it it passes --enable-option to configure else --disable-option this could be helpful for embedded systems What do people think?
Signature · 2 lines
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Enabling-Static-builds-tf3188244.html#a8849503 Sent from the BuildRoot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Quoted 8 lines · Daniel Laird
I have been looking at a number of the packages in the system. Do people think that -enable-static is a good idea as it seems to be used in a log of package configures.
would a global enable-static option and enable-shared option be good idea? This would mean that if you choose it it passes --enable-option to configure else --disable-option this could be helpful for embedded systems What do people think?
I don't use that myself, but from the looks we should clean this up a bit to better support flat, no?
+1
Quoted 21 lines · Daniel Laird
I have been looking at a number of the packages in the system. Do people
think that -enable-static is a good idea as it seems to be used in a log of
package configures.
would a global enable-static option and enable-shared option be good idea?
This would mean that if you choose it it passes --enable-option to configure
else --disable-option this could be helpful for embedded systems What do people think?Signature · 8 lines
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Enabling-Static-builds-tf3188244.html#a8849503 Sent from the BuildRoot mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot at uclibc.org http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot