mm: mmap: Fix general protection fault in unlink_file_vma()
Quoted 52 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 36 lines · On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 05:07:33 -0400 Miaohe Lin <[email protected]> wrote:
The syzbot reported the below general protection fault:
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe00eeaee0000003b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0x00777770000001d8-0x00777770000001df] CPU: 1 PID: 10488 Comm: syz-executor721 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3-syzkaller #0 Trace: free_pgtables+0x1b3/0x2f0 mm/memory.c:415 exit_mmap+0x2c0/0x530 mm/mmap.c:3184 __mmput+0x122/0x470 kernel/fork.c:1076It's because the ->mmap() callback can change
vma->vm_fileand fput the original file. But the commitd70cec898324("mm: mmap: merge vma aftercall_mmap()if possible") failed to catch this case and alwaysfput()the original file, hence add an extrafput()....
mm/mmap.c +5
-1@@ -1815,7 +1815,11 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, merge =vma_merge (mm, prev, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, vma->vm_flags,NULL , vma->vm_file, vma->vm_pgoff,NULL ,NULL_VM_UFFD_CTX );if (merge) { -fput (file); +/* ->mmap() can change vma->vm_file and fput the original file. So +* fput the vma->vm_file here or we would add an extra fput for file +* and cause general protection fault ultimately. +*/ +fput (vma->vm_file);vm_area_free (vma); vma = merge;/* Update vm_flags and possible addr to pick up the change. We Quoted 1 line
don't
What about the case where this code block does its `goto
unmap_writable'?/* Once vma denies write, undo our temporary denial count */ if (file) { unmap_writable: if (vm_flags & VM_SHARED) mapping_unmap_writable(file->f_mapping); if (vm_flags & VM_DENYWRITE) allow_write_access(file); } file = vma->vm_file;
Quoted 2 lines
is this using the correct file? I think it is, but please do check.
Many thanks for your reply.
Yes, I think so too. We do deny_write_access and mapping_map_writable on @file, so we should undo all of this on @file. Since @file is unchanged over the second vma_merge() time, we'are using the correct @file to undo our temporary denial count.
But how should I check this explicitly ? I can't find out a way to do this. Could you please figure it out for me? Thanks again.
Andrew Morton
maintainerQuoted 29 lines · On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 07:17:18 +0000 linmiaohe <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 21 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 19 lines · On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 05:07:33 -0400 Miaohe Lin <[email protected]> wrote:
The syzbot reported the below general protection fault:
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe00eeaee0000003b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0x00777770000001d8-0x00777770000001df] CPU: 1 PID: 10488 Comm: syz-executor721 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3-syzkaller #0 Trace: free_pgtables+0x1b3/0x2f0 mm/memory.c:415 exit_mmap+0x2c0/0x530 mm/mmap.c:3184 __mmput+0x122/0x470 kernel/fork.c:1076It's because the ->mmap() callback can change
vma->vm_fileand fput the original file. But the commitd70cec898324("mm: mmap: merge vma aftercall_mmap()if possible") failed to catch this case and alwaysfput()the original file, hence add an extrafput()....
Quoted 3 lines
is this using the correct file? I think it is, but please do check.
Quoted 6 lines
Many thanks for your reply.
Yes, I think so too. We do
deny_write_accessandmapping_map_writableon @file, so we should undo all of this on @file. Since @file is unchanged over the secondvma_merge()time, we'are using the correct @file to undo our temporary denial count.But how should I check this explicitly ? I can't find out a way to do this. Could you please figure it out for me?
I meant "please check (review) the code as it now is", not "please add a check" ;)