linuxabi
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 9 lines · Andries Brouwer
Possibly. So we need discussion.
I have registered comment #1: Al prefers the enum style. A possibility.
Now you come with comment #2: write
LINUX_MS_RDONLYinstead ofMS_RDONLY. You have not convinced me.
My 0.02 euro.
LINUX_* - not right stuff. It makes a lot of sence to have the same
name for same thing, even in different contexts. Or you are going to create a hell for some-one who may wish to make a documentation.
Headers are going to be used in different context (hopefully) so
would be no collisions (hopefully).
Another question does GCC have something like C++'s namespace for C? That's would be good. Changing names - bad.
And #define LINUX_NS(x) doesn't make sound - you will lose ability to
grep over defines and [ce]tags will not work on this anymore. cpp is not correct tool for namespace implementation.
Signature · 5 lines
Ihar 'Philips' Filipau / with best regards from Saarbruecken.
--
"... and for $64000 question, could you get yourself vaguely
familiar with the notion of on-topic posting?"
-- Al Viro @ LKML