Transparent compression in the FS
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 6 lines · Jeff Garzik
Quoted 2 lines · Val Henson
of many kinds of hardware errors. Further analysis shows that this approach is not as risk-free as it seems at first glance."
I'm curious if anyone has done any work on using multiple different checksums? For example, the cost of checksumming a single block with multiple algorithms (sha1+md5+crc32 for a crazy example), and storing
With sha1 you probably have 8-9 nines reliability. You can improve this - but still adding nines doesn't mean it
(reliability) becomes 100%.
my 0.02c.
Signature · 5 lines
Ihar 'Philips' Filipau / with best regards from Saarbruecken.
--
"... and for $64000 question, could you get yourself vaguely
familiar with the notion of on-topic posting?"
-- Al Viro @ LKML