Skip to contentSkip to conversation

writing out disk cache

DISCUSSION LA Walsh 2 participants 2 messages Nov 13, 2000

lore
Share & tools
lore

LA Walsh

author
#0 lore raw

Another question that's been bugging me -- this is behavior that seems identical in 2216/2217 and not related to my ealier performance degredation post.

I run VMware. It runs w/144Mg and writes out a 153M suspend file when I suspend it to disk. My system has a total of 512M, so the entire suspend file gets written to the disk buffers pronto (often under 1 second).

But a 'sync' done afterwards can take anywhere from 20-40 seconds. vmstat shows a maximum b/o rate of 700, with 200-500 being typical.

So, I know that the maximum write rate through the disk cache is close to 10,000 blocks/second. So why when the disk cache of a large file is 'sync'ed out, do I get such low b/o rates?

Two sample 'vmstat 5' outputs during a sync were:
1 0 0 6292 13500 254572 165712 0 0 1 0 119 282 1 1
98
2 0 0 6292 13444 254572 165716 0 0 0 702 279 534 0 2
98
1 1 0 6292 13444 254572 165716 0 0 0 501 352 669 0 1
99
0 1 0 6292 13444 254572 165716 0 0 0 520 372 697 0 2
97
1 0 0 6292 13444 254572 165716 0 0 0 510 367 694 0 2
98
0 1 0 6292 13444 254572 165716 0 0 0 694 379 715 0 2
98
1 0 1 6292 13444 254572 165716 0 0 0 618 391 964 0 2
98
0 1 1 6292 13444 254572 165716 0 0 0 441 302 765 0 1
98
0 0 0 6292 13496 254572 165716 0 0 0 63 180 355 1 1
99
0 0 0 6292 13496 254572 165716 0 0 0 0 103 195 0 1
99
----and
0 0 0 6228 18836 246036 167824 0 0 0 0 232 563 6 13
82
0 1 0 6228 18784 246036 167824 0 0 0 506 175 489 2 1
97
1 0 0 6228 18780 246036 167824 0 0 0 292 305 647 0 1
99
0 1 0 6228 18780 246036 167824 0 0 0 253 285 602 0 1
99
0 1 0 6228 18780 246036 167824 0 0 0 226 289 612 0 1
99
1 0 0 6228 18832 246036 167824 0 0 0 157 199 406 0 1
99
0 0 0 6228 18832 246036 167824 0 0 0 0 101 240 1 1
99
---
Another oddity -- If you add up the rates in the 2nd example, and multiply
the average rate by 5, you get around 5200 blocks written out (for a 152M file).
Note that a du on it shows it to use 155352, so it isn't that it is sparse.

Is vmstat an unreliable measure? The above tests were on a 2216 system.

-l

--
L A Walsh | Trust Technology, Core Linux, SGI
[email protected] | Voice/Vmail: (650) 933-5338

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

#1 lore raw

quick question regarding system time

I'm working on some timer routines to allow arbitrary numbers of timers all based off the single real timer provided by "setitimer". However, I haven't been able to figure out from the documentation what happens to the countdown timer used by setitimer when the system clock is changed (by root, for instance). If I move the system clock forward or backward a few seconds, is the itimer affected by this at all (I hope not) or can I simply ignore it (I hope so).

Thanks,

Chris

Signature · 8 lines
Chris Friesen                    | MailStop: 043/33/F10  
Nortel Networks                  | work: (613) 765-0557
3500 Carling Avenue              | fax:  (613) 765-2986
Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada        | email: [email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/