Skip to contentSkip to conversation

/proc & xml data

DISCUSSION [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Oct 30, 2000

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Um, I'd have to say that putting one value in a file with a directory as a grouping would probably be a nightmare to maintain as well as navigate through. In essance you could end up with more files in the /proc than on the rest of the filesystem filesystem (excluding the /dev dir). It would start to have the whole proc tree look like something from /proc/sys/net/ipv4. Although the /proc/sys/net/ipv4 probably needs to have one value in a file as some of these are settable on from the console, other fiels that are not changable (like /proc/meminfo, proc/cpuinfo etc) would be a waste in one value per file.

Isn't the /proc supposed to be a 'friendly' interface into the kernel?

Anyway it was a more of a question.

Quoted 7 lines

I
was wondering if anyone had ever considered storing some of the data in xml format rather than its current format? Things like /proc/meminfo and cpuinfo may work good in this format as then it would be easy to write a generic xml parser that could then be used to parse any of the data. "MemTotal: %8lu kB\n"

Quoted 8 lines

In the case of the meminfo it would be a matter of changing the lines in fs/proc/array.c function get_meminfo(char * buffer) from

"MemTotal: %8lu kB\n"

to something like

"%8lu kB\n"

The general consensus is that if we have a major reorganization, in proc the rule will be one value per file. And let directories do the grouping.

Eric

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/