drbdadm_parser.c:1968:63: error: 'glob_t' has no member named 'gl_flags'
Hi,
[ Please Cc to me, I'm not subscribed to this mailing list ]
I'm trying to build drbd-tools 9.22.0 on Alpine Linux which is based on musl libc (and not glibc).
Build fail with this error:
-----------------------------drbdadm_parser.c: In function 'include_stmt':
drbdadm_parser.c:1968:63: error: 'glob_t' has no member named 'gl_flags'
1968 | } else if (errno == ENOENT && glob_buf.gl_flags & GLOB_MAGCHAR) {
| ^
drbdadm_parser.c:1968:75: error: 'GLOB_MAGCHAR' undeclared (first use in this function)
1968 | } else if (errno == ENOENT && glob_buf.gl_flags & GLOB_MAGCHAR) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
drbdadm_parser.c:1968:75: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in make[1]: *** [<builtin>: drbdadm_parser.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/mps/aports/main/drbd-utils/src/drbd-utils-9.22.0/user/v9'
make: *** [Makefile:90: tools] Error 2
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
ERROR: drbd-utils: build failed
-----------------------------
Musl libc glob.h doesn't have gl_flags nor GLOB_MAGCHAR because it is non standard glibc extension.
I reverted https://github.com/LINBIT/drbd-utils/commit/4a1b590090bf676cdfb10c198505b95b9eeb3120
commit and then drbd-tools builds fine.
Not sure is this revert safe to push drbd-utils in next Alpine release (which planned for next week) or there is better fix.
TIA
Signature · 1 line
Kind regards
Quoted 11 lines · Milan P. Stanić
Hi,
[ Please Cc to me, I'm not subscribed to this mailing list ]
I'm trying to build drbd-tools 9.22.0 on Alpine Linux which is based on musl libc (and not glibc).
[...]
Musl libc
glob.hdoesn't havegl_flagsnorGLOB_MAGCHARbecause it is non standard glibc extension.
thanks for reporting, this should be fixed in
https://github.com/LINBIT/drbd-utils/commit/33d5e8f7066116bd0a706c7cdda4950895164d34
Quoted 5 lines
I reverted https://github.com/LINBIT/drbd-utils/commit/4a1b590090bf676cdfb10c198505b95b9eeb3120
commit and then drbd-tools builds fine.Not sure is this revert safe to push drbd-utils in next Alpine release (which planned for next week) or there is better fix.
I think reverting for now is perfectly fine, this deserved a fix, but I don't think it actually happened in the wild that often... Or you pick the proposed fix, which would be a good test for us as well. Currently I'm not sure when the next official release will be done, current gut feeling is not enough interesting things people would wait for has have happened.
Regards, rck
Hi,
[ Please Cc to me, I'm not subscribed to this mailing list ]
Quoted 19 lines · Roland Kammerer
Quoted 11 lines · Milan P. Stanić
Hi,
[ Please Cc to me, I'm not subscribed to this mailing list ]
I'm trying to build drbd-tools 9.22.0 on Alpine Linux which is based on musl libc (and not glibc).
[...]
Musl libc
glob.hdoesn't havegl_flagsnorGLOB_MAGCHARbecause it is non standard glibc extension.thanks for reporting, this should be fixed in
https://github.com/LINBIT/drbd-utils/commit/33d5e8f7066116bd0a706c7cdda4950895164d34Quoted 3 lines
I reverted https://github.com/LINBIT/drbd-utils/commit/4a1b590090bf676cdfb10c198505b95b9eeb3120
commit and then drbd-tools builds fine.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Not sure is this revert safe to push drbd-utils in next Alpine release (which planned for next week) or there is better fix.
I think reverting for now is perfectly fine, this deserved a fix, but I don't think it actually happened in the wild that often... Or you pick the proposed fix, which would be a good test for us as well. Currently
I picked above commit and build with it passed fine. Thank you for fix.
Quoted 3 lines
I'm not sure when the next official release will be done, current gut feeling is not enough interesting things people would wait for has have happened.
Signature · 1 line
Kind regards
Quoted 2 lines
Regards, rck