build failure of next-20220906 due to 8bfc149ba24c ("scsi: qla2xxx: Enhance driver tracing with separate tunable and more")
Subsystems (3)
Hi All,
The builds of loongarch loongson3_defconfig have failed to build next-20220906 with the error:
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c: In function 'qla_trace_init':drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c:2854:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_array_get_by_name'; did you mean 'trace_array_set_clr_event'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2854 | qla_trc_array = trace_array_get_by_name("qla2xxx");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| trace_array_set_clr_eventdrivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c: In function 'qla_trace_uninit':drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c:2869:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_array_put' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2869 | trace_array_put(qla_trc_array);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~git bisect pointed to 8bfc149ba24c ("scsi: qla2xxx: Enhance driver tracing with separate tunable and more").
I will be happy to test any patch or provide any extra log if needed.
--
Regards
Sudip
Hi Sudip,
Quoted 16 lines · Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
External Email
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi All,The builds of loongarch
loongson3_defconfighave failed to build next-20220906 with the error:
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c: In function 'qla_trace_init':drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c:2854:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_array_get_by_name'; did you mean 'trace_array_set_clr_event'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]2854 | qla_trc_array = trace_array_get_by_name("qla2xxx"); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | trace_array_set_clr_event
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c: In function 'qla_trace_uninit':drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c:2869:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_array_put' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Quoted 9 lines
2869 | trace_array_put(qla_trc_array); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~git bisect pointed to
8bfc149ba24c("scsi: qla2xxx: Enhance driver tracing with separate tunable and more").I will be happy to test any patch or provide any extra log if needed.
This looks like is happening due to CONFIG_TRACING not being enabled (same as what kernel test bot reported). Could you try out the fix attached?
@Steven, please see the patch attached. Do you think the fix belongs better in linux/trace.h ?
Regards,
-Arun
From ae4603712c9f3a49d67015f6386c520a77319ffa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arun Easi <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 17:53:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] fixup! qla2xxx: Enhance driver tracing with separate tunable
and more
Fix this compilation error seen when CONFIG_TRACING is not enabled:
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c: In function 'qla_trace_init':drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c:2854:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_array_get_by_name'; did you mean 'trace_array_set_clr_event'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2854 | qla_trc_array = trace_array_get_by_name("qla2xxx");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| trace_array_set_clr_eventdrivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c: In function 'qla_trace_uninit':drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c:2869:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_array_put' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2869 | trace_array_put(qla_trc_array);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h +7 -0
@@ -35,6 +35,13 @@#include <uapi/scsi/fc/fc_els.h> +#ifndef CONFIG_TRACING +#ifndef trace_array_get_by_name +#define trace_array_get_by_name (_trc_arr) NULL +#define trace_array_put (_trc_arr) +#endif /* trace_array_get_by_name */ +#endif /* CONFIG_TRACING */ +/* Big endian Fibre Channel S_ID (source ID) or D_ID (destination ID). */ typedef struct { uint8_t domain;
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
Quoted 5 lines · On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 09:05:38 -0700 Arun Easi <[email protected]> wrote:
This looks like is happening due to
CONFIG_TRACINGnot being enabled (same as what kernel test bot reported). Could you try out the fix attached?@Steven, please see the patch attached. Do you think the fix belongs better in
linux/trace.h?
Yes, of course. Feel free to send me a patch.
Thanks!
-- Steve
Sudip Mukherjee
Tested-byQuoted 25 lines · Arun Easi
Hi Sudip,
Quoted 20 lines · Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
External Email
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi All,The builds of loongarch
loongson3_defconfighave failed to build next-20220906 with the error:
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c: In function 'qla_trace_init':drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c:2854:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_array_get_by_name'; did you mean 'trace_array_set_clr_event'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]2854 | qla_trc_array = trace_array_get_by_name("qla2xxx"); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | trace_array_set_clr_event
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c: In function 'qla_trace_uninit':drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c:2869:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_array_put' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]2869 | trace_array_put(qla_trc_array); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
git bisect pointed to
8bfc149ba24c("scsi: qla2xxx: Enhance driver tracing with separate tunable and more").I will be happy to test any patch or provide any extra log if needed.
This looks like is happening due to
CONFIG_TRACINGnot being enabled (same as what kernel test bot reported). Could you try out the fix attached?
Thanks, that fixed the build for me. The patch did not apply directly on next-20220906, so I had to modify it a little bit.
Signature · 2 lines
Regards Sudip
Quoted 4 lines · On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 21:57:10 +0100 Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>…
Thanks, that fixed the build for me. The patch did not apply directly on next-20220906, so I had to modify it a little bit.
Tested-by Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>
Well, the change needs to go into include/linux/trace.h though.
-- Steve
Quoted 10 lines · Steven Rostedt
Quoted 4 lines · On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 21:57:10 +0100 Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>…
Thanks, that fixed the build for me. The patch did not apply directly on next-20220906, so I had to modify it a little bit.
Tested-by Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>Well, the change needs to go into
include/linux/trace.hthough.
Steve, I was thinking both the fixes stay at least for a short term the one in qla2xxx to avoid tree dependencies.
Since, the qla_def.h change goes as:
+#ifndef CONFIG_TRACING
+#ifndef trace_array_get_by_name
..it should co-exist when the "#define trace_array_get_by_name" gets merged in include/linux/trace.h. BTW, I will send out the changes to trace.h today.
Other alternatives/suggestions welcome.
Regards,
-Arun
Quoted 8 lines · On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 14:26:31 -0700 Arun Easi <[email protected]> wrote:
Steve, I was thinking both the fixes stay at least for a short term the one in qla2xxx to avoid tree dependencies.
Since, the
qla_def.hchange goes as:drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h +2
-0+#ifndef CONFIG_TRACING +#ifndef trace_array_get_by_name
Quoted 5 lines
..it should co-exist when the "#define
trace_array_get_by_name" gets merged ininclude/linux/trace.h. BTW, I will send out the changes totrace.htoday.Other alternatives/suggestions welcome.
I doubt I'll have anything that conflicts with an update to include/linux/trace.h, as it is seldom modified.
Just sent a patch out that updates that file and I'll review it, and then you can push it through your tree.
-- Steve
Quoted 15 lines · Steven Rostedt
Quoted 12 lines · On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 14:26:31 -0700 Arun Easi <[email protected]> wrote:
Steve, I was thinking both the fixes stay at least for a short term the one in qla2xxx to avoid tree dependencies.
Since, the
qla_def.hchange goes as:drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h +2
-0+#ifndef CONFIG_TRACING +#ifndef trace_array_get_by_name..it should co-exist when the "#define
trace_array_get_by_name" gets merged ininclude/linux/trace.h. BTW, I will send out the changes totrace.htoday.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Other alternatives/suggestions welcome.
I doubt I'll have anything that conflicts with an update to
include/linux/trace.h, as it is seldom modified.Just sent a patch out that updates that file and I'll review it, and then you can push it through your tree.
Sounds good. Thanks Steve.
Regards,
-Arun