bpf: add security_file_mprotect() to sleepable_lsm_hooks BTF set
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 bpf: add security_file_mprotect() to sleepable_lsm_hooks BTF set
security_file_mprotect() is missing from the sleepable_lsm_hooks BTF set. Add it so that operations performed by a BPF program which may result in the thread being put to sleep are permitted.
Building a kernel with the DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP confiuration option enabled and running reasonable workloads stimulating a BPF program attached to security_file_mprotect() which could end up performing an operation that could sleep resulted in no splats.
--- kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c +3 -1
@@ -277,10 +277,13 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bprm_creds_from_file) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_capget) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_capset) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_cred_prepare) + BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_ioctl) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_lock) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_open) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_receive) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_mmap_file) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_mprotect) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_inode_create)BTF_ID (func, bpf_lsm_inode_free_security)
@@ -316,7 +319,6 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_path_chown) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_key_free)#endif /* CONFIG_KEYS */ -BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_mmap_file) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_netlink_send) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_path_notify)BTF_ID (func, bpf_lsm_release_secctx)
Signature · 3 lines
2.43.0.429.g432eaa2c6b-goog /M
Quoted 8 lines · Matt Bobrowski
security_file_mprotect()is missing from thesleepable_lsm_hooksBTF set. Add it so that operations performed by a BPF program which may result in the thread being put to sleep are permitted.Building a kernel with the
DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEPconfiuration option enabled and running reasonable workloads stimulating a BPF program attached tosecurity_file_mprotect()which could end up performing an operation that could sleep resulted in no splats.
Actually, no, please disregard this patch. It was only a matter of timing before something had popped up.
This was sent out far too prematurely and I failed to realize that __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable() calls might_fault() and security_file_mprotect() is being called from a context whereby a mmap_lock is already being held. In essence, this also means that it's not possible to run sleepable BPF programs in contexts where a mmap_lock is already held as the page fault handler also attempts to take the mmap_lock, and well all know what happens when you have the same thread attempting to acquire the same lock whilst already holding that lock.
Quoted 33 lines
Signed-off-by Matt Bobrowski <[email protected]>--- kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c +3
-1@@ -277,10 +277,13 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bprm_creds_from_file) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_capget) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_capset) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_cred_prepare) + BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_ioctl) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_lock) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_open) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_receive) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_mmap_file) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_mprotect) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_inode_create)BTF_ID (func, bpf_lsm_inode_free_security)@@ -316,7 +319,6 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_path_chown) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_key_free)#endif /* CONFIG_KEYS */ -BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_mmap_file) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_netlink_send) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_path_notify)BTF_ID (func, bpf_lsm_release_secctx)Signature · 1 line
2.43.0.429.g432eaa2c6b-goog
/M