of atmel_pmecc_destroy_user
Hi Boris and co,
One of my scripts noticed that 'atmel_pmecc_destroy_user'
isn't called anywhere; I was going to delete it, but hmm, I wonder if it's actually a missing call and leaking (in the unlikely case the device was ever removed).
It was added by your:
commit f88fc122cc34c2545dec9562eaab121494e401ef
Author: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]>
Date: Thu Mar 16 09:02:40 2017 +0100
mtd: nand: Cleanup/rework the atmel_nand driver
and I see the allocation in:
user = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
in
nand->pmecc = atmel_pmecc_create_user(nc->pmecc, &req);
called in atmel_nand_pmecc_init
from atmel_nand_ecc_init
from atmel_hsmc_nand_ecc_initBut I don't see any freeing.
(I don't knowingly have hardware to test a fix, although I guess there's probably one somewhere....)
Suggestions?
Thanks,
Dave
Signature · 4 lines
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \ \ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
Hi David,
Quoted 21 lines · On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 17:05:01 +0000 "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"…
Hi Boris and co,
One of my scripts noticed that 'atmel_pmecc_destroy_user'
isn't called anywhere; I was going to delete it, but hmm, I wonder if it's actually a missing call and leaking (in the unlikely case the device was ever removed).It was added by your:
commitf88fc122cc34c2545dec9562eaab121494e401ef
Author: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]>
Date: Thu Mar 16 09:02:40 2017 +0100mtd: nand: Cleanup/rework the
atmel_nanddriverand I see the allocation in:
user = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); in nand->pmecc = atmel_pmecc_create_user(nc->pmecc, &req); called in atmel_nand_pmecc_init from atmel_nand_ecc_init from atmel_hsmc_nand_ecc_init
Quoted 6 lines
But I don't see any freeing.
(I don't knowingly have hardware to test a fix, although I guess there's probably one somewhere....)
Suggestions?
There's definitely a leak. I haven't looked at NAND stuff for a while though, so I'll let Miquel advise you on where atmel_pmecc_destroy_user() should be called.
Regards,
Boris
Quoted 28 lines · * Boris Brezillon ([email protected]) wrote:
Hi David,
Quoted 23 lines · On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 17:05:01 +0000 "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"…
Hi Boris and co,
One of my scripts noticed that 'atmel_pmecc_destroy_user'
isn't called anywhere; I was going to delete it, but hmm, I wonder if it's actually a missing call and leaking (in the unlikely case the device was ever removed).It was added by your:
commitf88fc122cc34c2545dec9562eaab121494e401ef
Author: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]>
Date: Thu Mar 16 09:02:40 2017 +0100mtd: nand: Cleanup/rework the
atmel_nanddriverand I see the allocation in:
user = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); in nand->pmecc = atmel_pmecc_create_user(nc->pmecc, &req); called in atmel_nand_pmecc_init from atmel_nand_ecc_init from atmel_hsmc_nand_ecc_initBut I don't see any freeing.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
(I don't knowingly have hardware to test a fix, although I guess there's probably one somewhere....)
Suggestions?
There's definitely a leak. I haven't looked at NAND stuff for a while though, so I'll let Miquel advise you on where
atmel_pmecc_destroy_user()should be called.
I see Miquel has posted a fix.
Thanks to both of you!
Dave
Quoted 4 lines
Regards,
Boris
Signature · 4 lines
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \ \ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
Miquel Raynal
maintainerHi,
[email protected] wrote on Tue, 1 Oct 2024 20:37:18 +0000:
Quoted 34 lines · * Boris Brezillon ([email protected]) wrote:
Quoted 33 lines
Hi David,
Quoted 27 lines · On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 17:05:01 +0000 "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"…
Hi Boris and co,
One of my scripts noticed that 'atmel_pmecc_destroy_user'
isn't called anywhere; I was going to delete it, but hmm, I wonder if it's actually a missing call and leaking (in the unlikely case the device was ever removed).It was added by your:
commitf88fc122cc34c2545dec9562eaab121494e401ef
Author: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]>
Date: Thu Mar 16 09:02:40 2017 +0100mtd: nand: Cleanup/rework the
atmel_nanddriverand I see the allocation in:
user = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); in nand->pmecc = atmel_pmecc_create_user(nc->pmecc, &req); called in atmel_nand_pmecc_init from atmel_nand_ecc_init from atmel_hsmc_nand_ecc_initBut I don't see any freeing.
(I don't knowingly have hardware to test a fix, although I guess there's probably one somewhere....)
Suggestions?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
There's definitely a leak. I haven't looked at NAND stuff for a while though, so I'll let Miquel advise you on where
atmel_pmecc_destroy_user()should be called.I see Miquel has posted a fix.
Thanks to both of you!
Looks like you've been too fast :) I was waiting for the lore link to be available, so yes, I looked into it and decided to fix it this way:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]/T/#u
Thanks for the report,
Miquèl