Skip to contentSkip to conversation

linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the iio-fixes tree

DISCUSSION Thierry Reding 3 participants 3 messages May 7

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:

drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c

between commit:

cba48e44357b ("iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: fix stack leak in tagged FIFO buffer")

from the iio-fixes tree and commit:

7216b9f7e9fe ("iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Fix check for invalid samples from FIFO")

from the iio tree.

I fixed it up by using the version from the iio tree. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 14 lines · On Thu, 07 May 2026 12:05:27 +0200 Thierry Reding <[email protected]>…

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:

drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c

between commit:

cba48e44357b ("iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: fix stack leak in tagged FIFO buffer")

from the iio-fixes tree and commit:

7216b9f7e9fe ("iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Fix check for invalid samples from FIFO")

Quoted 8 lines

from the iio tree.

I fixed it up by using the version from the iio tree. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

Thanks. That's the correct conflict resolution.

#2 lore raw
Quoted 19 lines · Jonathan Cameron
Quoted 16 lines · On Thu, 07 May 2026 12:05:27 +0200 Thierry Reding <[email protected]>…

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:

drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c

between commit:

cba48e44357b ("iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: fix stack leak in tagged FIFO buffer")

from the iio-fixes tree and commit:

7216b9f7e9fe ("iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Fix check for invalid samples from FIFO")

from the iio tree.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines

I fixed it up by using the version from the iio tree. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

Thanks. That's the correct conflict resolution.

Thanks for confirming. I was halfway tempted not to report this because it's pretty obvious that the issue addressed in iio-fixes is also fixed by the commit in iio. I don't know if Mark or Stephen would usually not report these, so thought I'd better play it safe just in case.

Thierry