KVM: nVMX: set rflags to specify success in handle_invvpid() default case
Quoted 31 lines · Paolo Bonzini
Quoted 8 lines · Vitaly Kuznetsov
Your patch seems to do the right thing, however, I started wondering if
WARN_ON_ONCE()is the right thing to do. SDM says that "If an unsupported INVVPID type is specified, the instruction fails." and this is similar to INVEPT and I decided to check whathandle_invept()does. Well, it doesBUG_ON().Are we doing the right thing in any of these cases?
Yes, both INVEPT and INVVPID catch this earlier.
For INVEPT:
types = (vmx->nested.msrs.ept_caps >> VMX_EPT_EXTENT_SHIFT) & 6; if (type >= 32 || !(types & (1 << type))) return nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, VMXERR_INVALID_OPERAND_TO_INVEPT_INVVPID);For INVVPID:
types = (vmx->nested.msrs.vpid_caps & VMX_VPID_EXTENT_SUPPORTED_MASK) >> 8; if (type >= 32 || !(types & (1 << type))) return nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, VMXERR_INVALID_OPERAND_TO_INVEPT_INVVPID);
Quoted 8 lines
So I'm leaning towards not applying Miaohe's patch. Happy Mouse Year to everyone, here is an ASCII art (except for one Unicode character) mouse:
__()() / o)~~~~\_,__,_>°
Thanks,
Yes, it seems my patch is meaningless. And thanks for both of your review and reply. Happy Mouse Year and I catch a mickey mouse:
###########
############### __-----__ ##
################## ### \ ####
################## #### # \ # ##
#################### \~~\ \ ,##",
################# /~~\ \## \ \" :
############### \ \ \##" / :
####### \### \ / :
############# \###/ :
######## :
###### __ :
#### /\ /
############ ### \\______________/|
################## \ __ / /
####################\__ \ \---\,/ /
################### \ \_____/ /
################# \_________/
###############
###########Thanks both again.