is it worth enhancing cmd_immap.c to handle 83xx?
as i'm currently messing with MPC8360e-based board, is there any
value in submitting a patch so that cmd_immap.c can handle 83xx? it seems pretty straightforward. i'm also working on the politics of being allowed to submit a patch to deal with an MPC8360e-based system currently being ported to linux so that that cmd_immap.c enhancement would have actual value.
rday
Signature · 7 lines
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================Quoted 6 lines · Robert P. J. Day
as i'm currently messing with MPC8360e-based board, is there any
value in submitting a patch so thatcmd_immap.ccan handle 83xx? it seems pretty straightforward. i'm also working on the politics of being allowed to submit a patch to deal with an MPC8360e-based system currently being ported to linux so that thatcmd_immap.cenhancement would have actual value.
If you're able to mainline other useful things with MPC83xx yes, otherwise, probably not.
Signature · 8 lines
Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20160114/7eb47e7d/attachment.sig>