Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ipsec-secgw inline test fail

Bug 1034 [email protected] 1 participant 2 messages Jun 14, 2022 – Jul 4, 2022

lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author Acked-by Akhil Goyal Acked-by Konstantin Ananyev
#0 lore raw

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1034

Bug ID: 1034
Summary: [dpdk-22.07] ipsec-secgw inline test fail
Product: DPDK
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: examples
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
Target Milestone: ---

To reproduce:
NIC used with test:
Network devices using DPDK-compatible driver
============================================
0000:af:00.1 '82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection 10fb' drv=vfio-pci unused=ixgbe

running command:
./examples/ipsec-secgw/test/run_test.sh -4i
starting inline test trs_aesgcm

Test environment configuration:
[enabled] library mode
[disabled] extended sequence number
[disabled] sequence number atomic behavior
[enabled] inline crypto mode
[disabled] crypto fallback mode
[disabled] multi-segment test

...
ERROR: ./examples/ipsec-secgw/test/linux_test.sh failed for dst=192.168.31.14, sz=1
inline test IPv4 trs_aesgcm finished with status 1
ERROR inline test trs_aesgcm FAILED

First bad commit:
commit d24471e5786b71e0c1cb3c2362397a1a27201a74 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)

Author: Nithin Dabilpuram <[email protected]>
Date:   Sat Apr 30 02:14:11 2022 +0530

examples/ipsec-secgw: disable Tx checksum for inline

Enable Tx IPv4 checksum offload only when Tx inline crypto, lookaside crypto/protocol or cpu crypto is needed.
For Tx Inline protocol offload, checksum computation
is implicitly taken care by HW.

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
#1 lore raw

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1034

Vladimir ([email protected]) changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Vladimir ([email protected]) --- Fixed by:
https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/[email protected]/
and
https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/[email protected]/

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.