Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ipsec-secgw inline test fail

Bug 1106 [email protected] 1 participant 2 messages Oct 17, 2022 – Oct 18, 2022

lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author Acked-by Akhil Goyal
#0 lore raw

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1106

            Bug ID: 1106
           Summary: ipsec-secgw inline test fail
           Product: DPDK
           Version: 22.11
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: examples
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Reporter: [email protected]

Target Milestone: ---

To reproduce:
NIC used with test:
Network devices using DPDK-compatible driver
============================================
0000:af:00.1 '82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection 10fb' drv=vfio-pci unused=ixgbe

running command:
./examples/ipsec-secgw/test/run_test.sh -4i
starting inline test trs_aesgcm

Test environment configuration:
[enabled] library mode
[disabled] extended sequence number
[disabled] sequence number atomic behavior
[enabled] inline crypto mode
[disabled] crypto fallback mode
[disabled] multi-segment test

...
ERROR: ./examples/ipsec-secgw/test/linux_test.sh failed for dst=192.168.31.14, sz=1
inline test IPv4 trs_aesgcm finished with status 1
ERROR inline test trs_aesgcm FAILED

First bad commit:
commit 4edcee19fc20be7c28da3e06e3be5e8567162f01

Author: Nithin Dabilpuram <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu Jul 21 21:01:31 2022 +0530

examples/ipsec-secgw: use Tx checksum offload conditionally

Use Tx checksum offload only when all the ports have it enabled as the qconf for a particular lcore stores ipv4_offloads for all the Tx ports and each lcore can Tx to any port.

Fixes 03128be4cd4d ("examples/ipsec-secgw: allow disabling some Rx/Tx

offloads")
Cc: [email protected]

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
#1 lore raw

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1106

Vladimir ([email protected]) changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Vladimir ([email protected]) --- This patch fixes the problem:
https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/[email protected]/

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.