New: quad G5 fails to shut down
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]/
Quoted 26 lines · On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:20:55 -0700 (PDT) [email protected] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629
Summary: quad G5 fails to shut down
Product: Platform Specific/Hardware
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.27-rc6+wireless bits
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: PPC-64
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [email protected]Latest working kernel version: don't remember, pretty sure 2.6.26 worked but have been running development kernels forever
Earliest failing kernel version: n/a, haven't checked, has been failing for a while
Distribution: debian/unstable
Hardware Environment: quad G5 powermac
Software Environment: ?
Problem Description: machine fails to shut down,
Quoted 5 lines
Steps to reproduce:
shut down the machine, see it fail.
That went splat in the clockevents code.
I saw a pull request with several fixes float past this morning:
From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
To: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>, "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>, Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Subject: [git pull] timer fixes
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:41:00 +0200
Fingers crossed..
I'll mark this as a post-2.6.26 regression, although you seem a bit wobbly on that.
Quoted 4 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 2 lines
That went splat in the clockevents code.
Yup.
Quoted 9 lines
I saw a pull request with several fixes float past this morning:
From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
To: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>, "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>, Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Subject: [git pull] timer fixes
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:41:00 +0200Fingers crossed..
Ah, cool, I'll pull it in once I've verified this other problem I have with ftrace on the same box.
Quoted 2 lines
I'll mark this as a post-2.6.26 regression, although you seem a bit wobbly on that.
I was fairly sure it was ok with 2.6.26 but after checking it appears that the crash is a post-2.6.26 regression, but the failure to shutdown is not. Sorry, I've been following wireless-testing.git on this box for so long it slipped my mind.
johannes
Quoted 7 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 2 lines
That went splat in the clockevents code.
I saw a pull request with several fixes float past this morning:
Quoted 7 lines
From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
To: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>, "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>, Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Subject: [git pull] timer fixes
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:41:00 +0200Fingers crossed..
Well, that does seem to fix the regression. That is, it no longer crashes. It still doesn't shut down, but that seems older and possibly partially my fault as I wrote the CPU hotplug implementation (thought it works fine for hibernate, never mind the fact that resuming from hibernate hangs)
johannes
Quoted 2 lines · Johannes Berg
Well, that does seem to fix the regression. That is, it no longer crashes.
Spoke too early, it seems that the crash isn't exactly reproducible all the time nor happens at the same spot all the time. I'd suspect that the timer code isn't to blame but something in the IPI code or so.
johannes
Johannes Berg
Acked-by Thomas GleixnerQuoted 7 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 5 lines
Steps to reproduce:
shut down the machine, see it fail.That went splat in the clockevents code.
This is still strange, it appears that when the CPUs fail to offline, we still call into the clockevents code and it rightfully crashes, but I'll check that out separately.
I've found the problem, below is a tentative fix. The problem has been around for quite a while, here's the whole commit that "caused" it (because it's so short):
commit 4047727e5ae33f9b8d2b7766d1994ea6e5ec2991
Author: Mark Lord <[email protected]> Date: Mon Oct 1 01:20:10 2007 -0700
Fix SMP poweroff hangs
We need to disable all CPUs other than the boot CPU (usually 0) before attempting to power-off modern SMP machines. This fixes the hang-on-poweroff issue on my MythTV SMP box, and also on Thomas Gleixner's new toybox.
kernel/sys.c +2 -0
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@#include <linux/getcpu.h> #include <linux/task_io_accounting_ops.h> #include <linux/seccomp.h> +#include <linux/cpu.h> #include <linux/compat.h> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
@@ -878,6 +879,7 @@ void kernel_power_off(void)kernel_shutdown_prepare (SYSTEM_POWER_OFF );if (pm_power_off_prepare)pm_power_off_prepare (); +disable_nonboot_cpus ();sysdev_shutdown ();printk (KERN_EMERG "Power down.\n" );machine_power_off ();
And here's the fix.
From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
Subject: powerpc: fix shutdown
I tracked down the shutdown regression to CPUs not dying when being shut down during power-off. This turns out to be due to the system_state being SYSTEM_POWER_OFF, which this code doesn't take as a valid state for shutting off CPUs in.
This has never made sense to me, but when I added hotplug code to implement hibernate I only "made it work" and did not question the need to check the system_state. Thomas Gleixner helped me dig, but the only thing we found is that it was added with the original commit that added CPU hotplug support.
--- arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c +1 -3
@@ -36,9 +36,7 @@#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU /* this is used for software suspend, and that shuts down * CPUs even while the system is still booting... */ -#define cpu_should_die () (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()) && \ - (system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING \ - || system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING)) +#define cpu_should_die () cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())#else #define cpu_should_die () 0#endif
Quoted 1 line · I wrote:
And here's the fix.
Well, that should of course remove that comment there too. New version below.
From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
Subject: powerpc: fix shutdown
I tracked down the shutdown regression to CPUs not dying when being shut down during power-off. This turns out to be due to the system_state being SYSTEM_POWER_OFF, which this code doesn't take as a valid state for shutting off CPUs in.
This has never made sense to me, but when I added hotplug code to implement hibernate I only "made it work" and did not question the need to check the system_state. Thomas Gleixner helped me dig, but the only thing we found is that it was added with the original commit that added CPU hotplug support.
--- arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c +1 -5
@@ -34,11 +34,7 @@#include <asm/smp.h> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU -/* this is used for software suspend, and that shuts down -* CPUs even while the system is still booting... */ -#define cpu_should_die () (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()) && \ - (system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING \ - || system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING)) +#define cpu_should_die () cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())#else #define cpu_should_die () 0#endif
Joel Schopp
Acked-byQuoted 17 lines
From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
Subject: powerpc: fix shutdownI tracked down the shutdown regression to CPUs not dying when being shut down during power-off. This turns out to be due to the
system_statebeingSYSTEM_POWER_OFF, which this code doesn't take as a valid state for shutting off CPUs in.This has never made sense to me, but when I added hotplug code to implement hibernate I only "made it work" and did not question the need to check the
system_state. Thomas Gleixner helped me dig, but the only thing we found is that it was added with the original commit that added CPU hotplug support.
Quoted 5 lines
Signed-off-by Johannes Berg <[email protected]>Cc Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>Cc Joel Schopp <[email protected]>Cc Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Tested this patch on a Power6 partition with cpu hotplug online/offline and some shutdown and reboot cycles. Didn't see any ill effects.