New: Scope 1 in multicast addresses in IPV6 should be node local
Subsystems (2)
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]/
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface).
Quoted 25 lines · On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:06:29 GMT [email protected] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13443
Summary: Scope 1 in multicast addresses in IPV6 should be node local Product: Networking Version: 2.5 Kernel Version: 2.6.27 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: IPV6 AssignedTo: [email protected] ReportedBy: [email protected] Regression: NoI think scope 1 in multicast addresses in IPV6 should be node local (according to all the documentation + rfc I found on the web) and therefore pkt's with such destination address should not go on the wire.
When I try to send a udp pkt withsock_dgramto such ipv6 address with scope 1 I see the pkt is going on the wire and I can catch it on the other side by joining this multicast address.
David Miller
maintainerFrom: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:40:31 -0700
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
I think scope 1 in multicast addresses in IPV6 should be node local (according to all the documentation + rfc I found on the web) and therefore pkt's with such destination address should not go on the wire.
When I try to send a udp pkt withsock_dgramto such ipv6 address with scope 1 I see the pkt is going on the wire and I can catch it on the other side by joining this multicast address.
It looks like we need an addr_type and device check in ip6_output().
But in my opinion this is a pretty bogus requirement. It's so easy for things like netfilter, the packet scheduler classifier, or other entities to get the packet to be rewritten from loopback to an externally visible interface.