New: nodejs won't build on Fedora 35
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=14451
Bug ID: 14451
Summary: nodejs won't build on Fedora 35
Product: buildroot
Version: 2021.08
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Other
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]Target Milestone: ---
Although I'm using host-python, the nodejs build cycle uses at some point the system python instead of the host python.
On Fedora 35 this is Python 3.10, causing problems. Switching to Python 3.9 system-wide fixes the issue.
Signature · 6 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
[Buildroot] [Bug 14451] nodejs won't build on Fedora 35
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=14451
--- Comment #1 from Vincent Fazio <[email protected]> --- Certain parts of the build invoke "python" and aren't using a full path to the bin to do so. While PATH has been set to include the host built python3 and PYTHON is set to host-python3 built bin, the build process is not respecting that. We do not have a symlink python -> python3 (afaik most distros do not include python by default, just python3) so when the build stage gets invoked it's using the "python" available from PATH
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/mnt/development/buildroot/output/build/nodejs-14.18.1/out/Release/lib.host:/mnt/development/buildroot/output/build/nodejs-14.18.1/out/Release/lib.target:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH; export LD_LIBRARY_PATH; cd ../tools/v8_gypfiles; mkdir -p /mnt/development/buildroot/output/build/nodejs-14.18.1/out/Release/obj/gen/generate-bytecode-output-root/builtins-generated;
python ../../deps/v8/tools/run.py
"/mnt/development/buildroot/output/build/nodejs-14.18.1/out/Release/v8-qemu-wrapper" "/mnt/development/buildroot/output/build/nodejs-14.18.1/out/Release/bytecode_builtins_list_generator" "/mnt/development/buildroot/output/build/nodejs-14.18.1/out/Release/obj/gen/generate-bytecode-output-root/builtins-generated/bytecodes-builtins-list.h"
Signature · 6 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
[Buildroot] [Bug 14451] nodejs won't build on Fedora 35
In reply to [email protected]https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=14451
--- Comment #2 from Arnout Vandecappelle <[email protected]> --- We can use the same approach as in qt5webkit:
# QtWebkit's build system uses python, but only supports python2. We work
# around this by forcing python2 early in the PATH, via a python->python2
# symlink.
QT5WEBKIT_CONF_ENV = PATH=$(@D)/host-bin:$(BR_PATH)
QT5WEBKIT_MAKE_ENV = PATH=$(@D)/host-bin:$(BR_PATH)
define QT5WEBKIT_PYTHON2_SYMLINK
mkdir -p $(@D)/host-bin
ln -sf $(HOST_DIR)/bin/python2 $(@D)/host-bin/python
endef
QT5WEBKIT_PRE_CONFIGURE_HOOKS += QT5WEBKIT_PYTHON2_SYMLINKSignature · 6 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
PATCH 1/1 package/mesa3d: don't disable DRI3 for some Gallium drivers
Certain Gallium drivers need DRI3 support, otherwise opengl won't work. On the Raspberry Pi 4, for example, glxgears will complain about
'Failed to open bo 1: permission denied'
These drivers must not be selected to disable DRI3 support. It seems to be the same for Lima and Panfrost, please check bug 13831.
--- package/mesa3d/mesa3d.mk | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
package/mesa3d/mesa3d.mk +5 -1
@@ -121,7 +121,11 @@ MESA3D_CONF_OPTS += \ -Dgallium-extra-hud=true endif -ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI_DRIVER),) +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI_DRIVER) \ + $(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_GALLIUM_DRIVER_V3D) \ + $(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_GALLIUM_DRIVER_VC4) \ + $(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_GALLIUM_DRIVER_LIMA) \ + $(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_GALLIUM_DRIVER_PANFROST),) MESA3D_CONF_OPTS += \ -Ddri-drivers= -Ddri3=disabled else
Signature · 6 lines
2.30.2 _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/mesa3d: don't disable DRI3 for some Gallium drivers
Hi Michael,
Quoted 18 lines · Michael Taubert
Certain Gallium drivers need DRI3 support, otherwise opengl won't work. On the Raspberry Pi 4, for example, glxgears will complain about
'Failed to open bo 1: permission denied'
These drivers must not be selected to disable DRI3 support. It seems to be the same for Lima and Panfrost, please check bug 13831.
Signed-off-by Michael Taubert <[email protected]>--- package/mesa3d/mesa3d.mk | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)package/mesa3d/mesa3d.mk +0
-0
package/mesa3d/mesa3d.mk MESA3D_CONF_OPTS += \ · line 128
Quoted 9 lines
package/mesa3d/mesa3d.mk +5
-1@@ -121,7 +121,11 @@ MESA3D_CONF_OPTS += \ -Dgallium-extra-hud=true endif -ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI_DRIVER),) +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI_DRIVER) \ + $(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_GALLIUM_DRIVER_V3D) \ + $(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_GALLIUM_DRIVER_VC4) \ + $(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_GALLIUM_DRIVER_LIMA) \ + $(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_GALLIUM_DRIVER_PANFROST),)
The mesa3d stuff goes way over my head, actually, but I would think that the
proper solution here would be that these configs select BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI_DRIVER.
I know it sounds weird that a gallium driver is also a DRI driver, but I guess
that's what it is...
Bernd, can you comment?
Regards,
Arnout
package/mesa3d/mesa3d.mk MESA3D_CONF_OPTS += \ · line 131
Quoted 3 lines
package/mesa3d/mesa3d.mk +0
-0MESA3D_CONF_OPTS += \ -Ddri-drivers= -Ddri3=disabled else
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/mesa3d: don't disable DRI3 for some Gallium drivers
In reply to a message not in the archiveAm Thu, 16 Dec 2021 18:28:56 +0100 schrieb Arnout Vandecappelle:
Quoted 1 line
Bernd, can you comment?
Hi Arnout,
no, because I do not use buildroot on rbpi hardware.
But the topic was already discussed this summer, with no solution afaics:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/?
series=248555&submitter=&state=*&q=&archive=&delegate=
Regards, Bernd
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/mesa3d: don't disable DRI3 for some Gallium drivers
In reply to Arnout VandecappelleHi Arnout,
I'm not that familiar with these configs, yet. But if I understand it right, your advice is to have the selection of these Gallium drivers should also select BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI_DRIVER.
I will have a look on how to do that tomorrow and provide another patch then.
Kind regards,
Michael
Am 16.12.2021 um 18:28 schrieb Arnout Vandecappelle:
Quoted 34 lines
Hi Michael,
Quoted 21 lines · Michael Taubert
Certain Gallium drivers need DRI3 support, otherwise opengl won't work. On the Raspberry Pi 4, for example, glxgears will complain about
'Failed to open bo 1: permission denied'
These drivers must not be selected to disable DRI3 support. It seems to be the same for Lima and Panfrost, please check bug 13831.
Signed-off-by Michael Taubert <[email protected]>---
package/mesa3d/mesa3d.mk | 6 +++++-1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)package/mesa3d/mesa3d.mk +0
-0@@ -121,7 +121,11 @@ MESA3D_CONF_OPTS += \-Dgallium-extra-hud=true
endifpackage/mesa3d/mesa3d.mk MESA3D_CONF_OPTS += \ · line 128
Quoted 6 lines
package/mesa3d/mesa3d.mk +5
-1-ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI_DRIVER),) +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI_DRIVER) \ + $(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_GALLIUM_DRIVER_V3D) \ + $(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_GALLIUM_DRIVER_VC4) \ + $(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_GALLIUM_DRIVER_LIMA) \ + $(BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_GALLIUM_DRIVER_PANFROST),)The mesa3d stuff goes way over my head, actually, but I would think
that the proper solution here would be that these configs selectBR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI_DRIVER.
Quoted 11 lines
I know it sounds weird that a gallium driver is also a DRI driver, but
I guess that's what it is...Bernd, can you comment?
Regards,
ArnoutQuoted 3 lines
MESA3D_CONF_OPTS += \
-Ddri-drivers= -Ddri3=disabled
else
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/mesa3d: don't disable DRI3 for some Gallium drivers
In reply to Bernd KuhlsQuoted 11 lines · Bernd Kuhls
Am Thu, 16 Dec 2021 18:28:56 +0100 schrieb Arnout Vandecappelle:
Quoted 1 line
Bernd, can you comment?
Hi Arnout,
no, because I do not use buildroot on rbpi hardware.
But the topic was already discussed this summer, with no solution afaics:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/?
series=248555&submitter=&state=*&q=&archive=&delegate=
Good find, thanks!
Michael, can you try that patch [1] and see if it works for you?
Peter, I think I'm just going to apply []] except that I'll makeBR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI3 a blind option (i.e. not user visible, only selected automatically by the drivers, much like BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI).
My other major comment about that patch was that I suspected that it would
need some 'select' statements, but I guess the autobuilders will inform us of that, so we can go ahead and merge it.
Does that sound OK to you?
Regards,
Arnout
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/patch/[email protected]/
Quoted 8 lines
Regards, Bernd
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/mesa3d: don't disable DRI3 for some Gallium drivers
Hello Arnout, *,
Quoted 21 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle
Quoted 11 lines · Bernd Kuhls
Am Thu, 16 Dec 2021 18:28:56 +0100 schrieb Arnout Vandecappelle:
Quoted 1 line
Bernd, can you comment?
Hi Arnout,
no, because I do not use buildroot on rbpi hardware.
But the topic was already discussed this summer, with no solution afaics:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/?
series=248555&submitter=&state=*&q=&archive=&delegate=Good find, thanks!
Michael, can you try that patch [1] and see if it works for you?
Peter, I think I'm just going to apply []] except that I'll make
BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI3a blind option (i.e. not user visible, only selected automatically by the drivers, much likeBR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI).
Quoted 5 lines
My other major comment about that patch was that I suspected that it would
need some 'select' statements, but I guess the autobuilders will inform us of that, so we can go ahead and merge it.Does that sound OK to you?
Fine with me ;-)
Regards,
Peter
Quoted 17 lines
Regards,
Arnout[1]
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/patch/[email protected]/Quoted 8 lines
Regards, Bernd
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/mesa3d: don't disable DRI3 for some Gallium drivers
In reply to Arnout VandecappelleHi!
I've applied the patch to the latest origin/master. One hunk has been rejected:
mesa3d/Config.in +2 -0
@@ -70,6 +75,8 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI_DRIVER !BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_OPENGL_GLX && \ !BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_OPENGL_EGL && \ !BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_OSMESA_GALLIUM + select BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI3 if \ + (BR2_PACKAGE_XORG7 && BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_4) select BR2_PACKAGE_XLIB_LIBXSHMFENCE if \ (BR2_PACKAGE_XORG7 && BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_4)
But it looks good for me anyway. I've tried by using raspberrypi_64_defconfig and only enabled mesa3d with Gallium drivers for V3D and VC4.
According to the build log, it has been compiled with DRI3 support.
Regards,
Michael
Am 12/16/21 um 7:33 PM schrieb Arnout Vandecappelle:
Quoted 43 lines · Bernd Kuhls
Quoted 11 lines
Am Thu, 16 Dec 2021 18:28:56 +0100 schrieb Arnout Vandecappelle:
Quoted 1 line
Bernd, can you comment?
Hi Arnout,
no, because I do not use buildroot on rbpi hardware.
But the topic was already discussed this summer, with no solution afaics:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/?
series=248555&submitter=&state=*&q=&archive=&delegate=Good find, thanks!
Michael, can you try that patch [1] and see if it works for you?
Peter, I think I'm just going to apply []] except that I'll make
BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI3a blind option (i.e. not user visible, only selected automatically by the drivers, much likeBR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI).My other major comment about that patch was that I suspected that it
would need some 'select' statements, but I guess the autobuilders will inform us of that, so we can go ahead and merge it.Does that sound OK to you?
Regards,
Arnout[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/patch/[email protected]/
Quoted 8 lines
Regards, Bernd
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Quoted 4 lines
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
[Buildroot] [Bug 14451] nodejs won't build on Fedora 35
In reply to [email protected]https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=14451
--- Comment #3 from Fabrice Fontaine <[email protected]> --- The following patch should fix this issue:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/patch/[email protected]/
Moreover, python 3.10 support has been added to nodejs 14.18.2:
https://github.com/nodejs/node/releases/tag/v14.18.2
Signature · 6 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
[Buildroot] [Bug 14451] nodejs won't build on Fedora 35
In reply to [email protected]https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=14451
Peter Korsgaard <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED--- Comment #4 from Peter Korsgaard <[email protected]> --- Fixed by
https://git.buildroot.org/buildroot/commit/?id=5ad7eb6c61d281912a8c692f0b69d46726394b10,
thanks
Signature · 6 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot