New: 2.6.35-r5 ext3 corruptions
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16401
Summary: 2.6.35-r5 ext3 corruptions
Product: File System
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.35-rc5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: ext3
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [email protected]
CC: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Regression: YesSubject : 2.6.35-r5 ext3 corruptions
Submitter : Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-15 10:57
Message-ID : 20100715105745.GI30737@dastard
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127919148825845&w=2
This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.34. Please don't close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline.
Signature · 3 lines
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
[Bug 16401] 2.6.35-r5 ext3 corruptions
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16401
Maciej Rutecki <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |16055
Signature · 3 lines
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
[Bug 16401] 2.6.35-r5 ext3 corruptions
In reply to [email protected]https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16401
--- Comment #1 from Dave Chinner <[email protected]> 2010-07-19 23:41:54 --- The problem appears to have been specific to a single filesystem that was corrupted in some way that e2fsck did not detect. e2fsck would report the fs as clean (even with a forced check) but the problem would come back, always on inodes around the 211,000 number.
The filesystem eventually trashed itself, but I made a fat-fingered mistake and backed up the wrong image whenthe problem first manifested. Hence I can't reproduce the problem now because I had to re-image the root drive.
Quoted 1 line
From this, I'd say this is not a regression, so closing this bug is fine by
me...
Signature · 3 lines
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
[Bug 16401] 2.6.35-r5 ext3 corruptions
In reply to [email protected]https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16401
Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID--- Comment #2 from Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> 2010-07-20 15:18:06 --- Closing, then.
Signature · 3 lines
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
[Bug 16401] 2.6.35-r5 ext3 corruptions
In reply to [email protected]https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16401
Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
Signature · 3 lines
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.