New: Conservative governor is broken in 4.14.14
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198601
Bug ID: 198601
Summary: Conservative governor is broken in 4.14.14
Product: Power Management
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 4.14.14
Hardware: IA-64
OS: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: blocking
Priority: P1
Component: cpufreq
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
Regression: NoThis is happening under Intel Core i5 2500. I'm running a single instance of the flac utility (which has now been running for 10 minutes already).
Under the ondemand governor:
3986.1MHz
4058.03MHz
3847.3MHz
3929.33MHz
Under the conservative governor:
1700.09MHz
1700.09MHz
1700.15MHz
1700.1MHz
For some reasons the conservative governor refuses to increase CPU cores frequencies above 1700MHz. I'm _not_ using Intel's pstate driver:
CONFIG_ACPI=yCONFIG_ACPI_LEGACY_TABLES_LOOKUP=yCONFIG_ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC=yCONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM_POWER_STATES_SUPPORT=yCONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=yCONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=yCONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=yCONFIG_ACPI_FAN=mCONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS=yCONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE=yCONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE=yCONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=yCONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU=yCONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR=mCONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ACPI_TABLE_UPGRADE=yCONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT=yCONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER=yCONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_IOAPIC=yCONFIG_ACPI_HED=yCONFIG_ACPI_BGRT=yCONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI=yCONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI=yCONFIG_ACPI_APEI=yCONFIG_ACPI_APEI_GHES=yCONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER=yCONFIG_CPU_FREQ=yCONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ATTR_SET=yCONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_COMMON=yCONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT=yCONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=yCONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE=yCONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE=yCONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=yCONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=yCONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=yCONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ=yCONFIG_PNPACPI=yCONFIG_ATA_ACPI=yCONFIG_ACPI_I2C_OPREGION=yCONFIG_SENSORS_ACPI_POWER=mCONFIG_UCSI_ACPI=m
Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 198601] Conservative governor is broken in 4.14.14
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198601
Artem S. Tashkinov ([email protected]) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regression|No |Yes
Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 198601] Conservative governor is broken in 4.14.14
In reply to [email protected]https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198601
Zhang Rui ([email protected]) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
CC| |[email protected]--- Comment #1 from Zhang Rui ([email protected]) --- does the problem still exist in 4.15?
what's the earliest kernel version that does not have this problem? can you attach the cpu frequency with the good kernel?
Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 198601] Conservative governor is broken in 4.14.14
In reply to [email protected]https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198601
Viresh Kumar ([email protected]) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |[email protected]
--- Comment #2 from Viresh Kumar ([email protected]) --- Try this commit (already in Linus's master), we solved this problem sometime back
56026645e2b6 cpufreq: governor: Ensure sufficiently large sampling intervals
Not sure if your problem is a new one though.
Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 198601] Conservative governor is broken in 4.14.14
In reply to [email protected]https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198601
Artem S. Tashkinov ([email protected]) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Artem S. Tashkinov ([email protected]) --- (In reply to Viresh Kumar from comment #2)
Quoted 6 lines
Try this commit (already in Linus's master), we solved this problem sometime back
56026645e2b6cpufreq: governor: Ensure sufficiently large sampling intervalsNot sure if your problem is a new one though.
I can confirm that this patch fixes the issue.
Please submit it for 4.14.16.
Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 198601] Conservative governor is broken in 4.14.14
In reply to [email protected]https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198601
Artem S. Tashkinov ([email protected]) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kernel Version|4.14.14 |4.14.15
Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 198601] Conservative governor is broken in 4.14
In reply to [email protected]https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198601
Artem S. Tashkinov ([email protected]) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Conservative governor is |Conservative governor is
|broken in 4.14.14 |broken in 4.14Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 198601] Conservative governor is broken in 4.14
In reply to [email protected]https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198601
--- Comment #4 from Viresh Kumar ([email protected]) --- Great. I have already sent it for 4.14 today.
Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 198601] Conservative governor is broken in 4.14
In reply to [email protected]https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198601
Artem S. Tashkinov ([email protected]) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |CODE_FIX--- Comment #5 from Artem S. Tashkinov ([email protected]) --- (In reply to Viresh Kumar from comment #4)
Quoted 1 line
Great. I have already sent it for 4.14 today.
Thank you very much! Hopefully Greg KH will include it.
I'm closing this bug report.
Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.