Skip to contentSkip to conversation

IPC socket of 2 primary processes may conflict

Bug 215 [email protected] 1 participant 2 messages Feb 26, 2019

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215

Bug ID: 215
Summary: IPC socket of 2 primary processes may conflict
Product: DPDK
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: core
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Target Milestone: ---

After some code reading, it seems we do not use hugefile_prefix in the path name of the IPC socket.
So the channel to communicate with its secondary processes will be the same for two different primary processes.

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
#1 lore raw

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215

Anatoly Burakov ([email protected]) changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Anatoly Burakov ([email protected]) --- This is incorrect. Socket path is generated from create_socket_path() call at eal_common_proc.c:135. That, in turn, will call eal_mp_socket_path(), which uses rte_eal_get_runtime_dir() to get its path. That path includes the hugefile prefix.

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.