Skip to contentSkip to conversation

app/test compile failed with gcc and clang

dpdk-dev [email protected] 1 participant 2 messages Apr 28, 2020 – Apr 30, 2020

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465

            Bug ID: 465
           Summary: app/test compile failed with gcc and clang
           Product: DPDK
           Version: 20.05
          Hardware: x86
                OS: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: testpmd
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Reporter: [email protected]

Target Milestone: ---

---------------------------------Description----------------------------------- build ./app/test failed on dpdk 20.05 ---------------------------------reproduce steps------------------------------- Steps:

1. cd /root/dpdk
2. export RTE_TARGET=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc;export RTE_SDK=pwd;make
install T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc -j70
3. sed -i -e 's/#define MAX_TRAFFIC_BURST 2048/#define
MAX_TRAFFIC_BURST 32/' app/test/test_pmd_perf.c
4. sed -i -e 's/lpbk_mode = 1/lpbk_mode = 0/' app/test/test_pmd_perf.c
5. rm -rf ./app/test/test_resource_c.res.o
6. rm -rf ./app/test/test_resource_tar.res.o
7. rm -rf ./app/test/test_pci_sysfs.res.o
8. make -j 70 -C app/test

Output:

...
test_mbuf.c:2670:2: error: ‘rte_mbuf_dyn_dump’ is deprecated: Symbol is not yet part of stable ABI [-Werror=deprecated-declarations] rte_mbuf_dyn_dump(stdout);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from test_mbuf.c:35:0:
/root/dpdk/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_mbuf_dyn.h:235:6: note:
declared here
void rte_mbuf_dyn_dump(FILE *out);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test_flow_classify.c: At top level:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wno-address-of-packed-member’ [-Werror]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors /root/dpdk/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:114: recipe for target 'test_flow_classify.o' failed
make: *** [test_flow_classify.o] Error 1
test_stack_perf.c: At top level:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wno-address-of-packed-member’ [-Werror]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors /root/dpdk/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:114: recipe for target 'test_stack_perf.o' failed
make: *** [test_stack_perf.o] Error 1
test_timer_secondary.c: At top level:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wno-address-of-packed-member’ [-Werror]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors /root/dpdk/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:114: recipe for target 'test_timer_secondary.o' failed
make: *** [test_timer_secondary.o] Error 1
test_stack.c: At top level:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wno-address-of-packed-member’ [-Werror]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors /root/dpdk/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:114: recipe for target 'test_stack.o' failed
make: *** [test_stack.o] Error 1
test_mbuf.c: At top level:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wno-address-of-packed-member’ [-Werror]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors /root/dpdk/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:114: recipe for target 'test_mbuf.o' failed
make: *** [test_mbuf.o] Error 1
test_ring_perf.c: At top level:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wno-address-of-packed-member’ [-Werror]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors /root/dpdk/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:114: recipe for target 'test_ring_perf.o' failed
make: *** [test_ring_perf.o] Error 1
test_ring.c: At top level:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wno-address-of-packed-member’ [-Werror]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors /root/dpdk/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:114: recipe for target 'test_ring.o' failed
make: *** [test_ring.o] Error 1

Comments: clang has the same issue with gcc

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
#1 lore raw

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465

David Marchand ([email protected]) changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #7 from David Marchand ([email protected]) --- Ok.

The XXX_sub targets have been working from the start in dpdk and should be preferred over jumping into a XXX directory with -C.

Thanks.

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.