Skip to contentSkip to conversation

New: epoll_wait has it wrong about timeout and EINTR

Bug 66571 bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/[email protected] 1 participant 2 messages Dec 5, 2013 – Jan 22, 2014 1 message not in the archive Man-pages: manual pages for Linux -- Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66571

Bug ID: 66571
Summary: epoll_wait has it wrong about timeout and EINTR
Product: Documentation
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: P1
Component: man-pages
Assignee: documentation_man-pages-ztI5WcYan/[email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
Regression: No

The epoll_wait(2) man page says:

"EINTR The call was interrupted by a signal handler before either any
of the requested events occurred or the timeout expired; see signal(7)."

Looking at the code of the kernel, EINTR is only returned when there is a pending signal. If the timeout expires, it will simply return without an error.

Simply removing the "or the timeout expired" part should be enough.

Signature · 6 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
#2 lore raw

[Bug 66571] epoll_wait has it wrong about timeout and EINTR

In reply to a message not in the archive

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66571

Michael Kerrisk <[email protected]> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
         Resolution|---                         |CODE_FIX

--- Comment #1 from Michael Kerrisk <[email protected]> --- The problem is that the wording is a little ambiguous. The meaning is this:

EINTR The call was interrupted by a signal handler before either (1) any
of the requested events occurred or (2) the timeout expired; see signal(7).

I've updated the page to have the text as shown above.

Signature · 6 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html