New: [SECURITY] Update openssl package to 0.9.8l
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=703
Host: i686-linux
Target: arm-softfloat-linux-uclibcgnueabi
Summary: [SECURITY] Update openssl package to 0.9.8l
Product: buildroot
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: Outdated package
AssignedTo: unassigned at buildroot.uclibc.org
ReportedBy: gustavo at zacarias.com.ar
CC: buildroot at uclibc.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Created an attachment (id=731)
--> (https://bugs.busybox.net/attachment.cgi?id=731)
Bump openssl package to 0.9.8l + security fixes
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-1377
The dtls1_buffer_record function in ssl/d1_pkt.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8k and earlier 0.9.8 versions allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large series of "future epoch" DTLS records that are buffered in a queue, aka "DTLS record buffer limitation bug."
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-1378
Multiple memory leaks in the dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message function in ssl/d1_both.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8k and earlier 0.9.8 versions allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via DTLS records that (1) are duplicates or (2) have sequence numbers much greater than current sequence numbers, aka "DTLS fragment handling memory leak."
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-1379
Use-after-free vulnerability in the dtls1_retrieve_buffered_fragment function in ssl/d1_both.c in OpenSSL 1.0.0 Beta 2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (openssl s_client crash) and possibly have unspecified other impact via a DTLS packet, as demonstrated by a packet from a server that uses a crafted server certificate.
Signature · 3 lines
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Buildroot] [Bug 703] [SECURITY] Update openssl package to 0.9.8l
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=703
Peter Korsgaard <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED--- Comment #1 from Peter Korsgaard <[email protected]> 2009-11-15 23:00:35 UTC --- Thanks, committed. It would have been good to document why you need openssl-ditch.reject.patch though.
Signature · 3 lines
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.