New: PATA scan: ACPI Exception AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT... is beyond end of object
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]/
Quoted 41 lines · On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 13:35:00 -0800 (PST) [email protected] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9320
Summary: PATA scan: ACPI Exception
AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT... is
beyond end of object
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: Linux version 2.6.24-rc2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: Other
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [email protected]Most recent kernel where this bug did not occur:
I rebuild daily, if rebuild script does not fail. The last errorless boot
was on october 29. The first boot after this was october 31Distribution: slack
Hardware Environment:VIA C7, CN700 IDE interface: VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C Diskless PXE boot
Software Environment:
Problem Description:dmesg:
ata3: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd0x1f0ctl0x3f6bmdma0xf900irq 14
ata4: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd0x170ctl0x376bmdma0xf908irq 15 ACPI Exception (exoparg2-0442):AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Index (0FFFFFFFF) is beyond end of object [20070126]
ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.PATA.GTM_] (Nodec1c0b420),AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.PATA.CHN0._GTM] (Nodec1c0b228),AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
Quoted 9 lines
ata3: ACPI get timing mode failed (AE
0x300d)
ACPI Exception (exoparg2-0442):AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Index (0FFFFFFFF) is beyond end of object [20070126]
ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.PATA.GTM_] (Nodec1c0b420),AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.PATA.CHN1._GTM] (Nodec1c0b330),AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
ata4: ACPI get timing mode failed (AE0x300d)
Seems to be another post-2.6.23 regression. Is it an acpi thing or an ata thing, of just something which the new acpi+ata stuff exposed??
Quoted 2 lines · Andrew Morton
Seems to be another post-2.6.23 regression. Is it an acpi thing or an ata thing, of just something which the new acpi+ata stuff exposed??
I suspect that this is just because acpi is enabled by default on ata now. Is it actually causing any problems?
Signature · 1 line
Matthew Garrett | [email protected]