❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.12.0-rc2 (arm-next)
Hello,
We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
Commit: 30b2675761b8 - arm64: mm: remove unused __cpu_uses_extended_idmap[_level()]
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
Merge: OK
Compile: OK
Tests: FAILED
All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
One or more kernel tests failed:
aarch64:
❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
We hope that these logs can help you find the problem quickly. For the full detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of this message.
Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.
,-. ,-.
( C ) ( K ) Continuous
`-',-.`-' Kernel
( I ) Integration
`-'______________________________________________________________________________
Compile testing
---------------
We compiled the kernel for 1 architecture:
aarch64:
make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:
aarch64:
Host 1:
✅ Boot test
✅ ACPI table test
✅ ACPI enabled test
✅ LTP
✅ Loopdev Sanity
✅ Memory: fork_mem
✅ Memory function: memfd_create
✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility) ✅ Networking bridge: sanity
✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
✅ Networking socket: fuzz
✅ Networking: igmp conformance test
✅ Networking route: pmtu
✅ Networking route_func - local
✅ Networking route_func - forward
✅ Networking TCP: keepalive test
✅ Networking UDP: socket
✅ Networking cki netfilter test
❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test ✅ Networking tunnel: gre basic
✅ L2TP basic test
✅ Networking tunnel: vxlan basic
✅ Networking ipsec: basic netns - transport ✅ Networking ipsec: basic netns - tunnel ✅ Libkcapi AF_ALG test
✅ pciutils: update pci ids test
✅ ALSA PCM loopback test
✅ ALSA Control (mixer) Userspace Element test ✅ storage: SCSI VPD
✅ trace: ftrace/tracer
🚧 ✅ i2c: i2cdetect sanity
🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
🚧 ✅ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
🚧 ✅ Firmware test suite
🚧 ✅ jvm - jcstress tests
🚧 ✅ Memory function: kaslr
🚧 ✅ audit: audit testsuite test
Host 2:
✅ Boot test
✅ selinux-policy: serge-testsuite
✅ storage: software RAID testing
🚧 ✅ xfstests - ext4
🚧 ✅ xfstests - xfs
🚧 ✅ xfstests - btrfs
🚧 ✅ IPMI driver test
🚧 ✅ IPMItool loop stress test
🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
🚧 ✅ Storage block - filesystem fio test
🚧 ✅ Storage block - queue scheduler test
🚧 ✅ Storage nvme - tcp
🚧 ✅ Storage: lvm device-mapper test
🚧 ✅ Storage: swraid mdadm raid_module test
🚧 ✅ stress: stress-ng
Test sources: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-tests
💚 Pull requests are welcome for new tests or improvements to existing tests!
Aborted tests
-------------
Tests that didn't complete running successfully are marked with ⚡⚡⚡. If this was caused by an infrastructure issue, we try to mark that explicitly in the report.
Waived tests
------------
If the test run included waived tests, they are marked with 🚧. Such tests are executed but their results are not taken into account. Tests are waived when their results are not reliable enough, e.g. when they're just introduced or are being fixed.
Testing timeout
---------------
We aim to provide a report within reasonable timeframe. Tests that haven't finished running yet are marked with ⏱.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Hi all,
Quoted 20 lines · CKI Project
We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
Commit:30b2675761b8- arm64: mm: remove unused __cpu_uses_extended_idmap[_level()]The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
Merge: OK
Compile: OK
Tests: FAILEDAll kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
One or more kernel tests failed:
aarch64:
❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
[...]
Quoted 7 lines
Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:aarch64:
Host 1:
❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
Hmm, looks like this one actually passed:
or am I looking in the wrong place?
Thanks,
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
----- Original Message -----
Quoted 44 lines
From: "Will Deacon" <[email protected]>
To: "CKI Project" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Jianlin Shi" <[email protected]>, "catalin marinas" <[email protected]>, "Jianwen Ji" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Hangbin Liu" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 10:43:47 AM
Subject: Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.12.0-rc2 (arm-next)Hi all,
Quoted 23 lines · CKI Project
We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git Commit: 30b2675761b8 - arm64: mm: remove unused __cpu_uses_extended_idmap[_level()]The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
Merge: OK
Compile: OK
Tests: FAILEDAll kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
One or more kernel tests failed:
aarch64:
❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test[...]
Quoted 7 lines
Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:aarch64:
Host 1:
❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
Quoted 6 lines
Hmm, looks like this one actually passed:
or am I looking in the wrong place?
Hi,
the test actually didn't finish but aborted. It's also a bit visible in the logs you linked as they are cut off after the basic_nic test started.
I checked the console log and this looks like the issue we just reported to upstream:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212227
as the test is killed (test timeout) after spamming the console log for an hour with a message about unregister_netdevice. So it's a bug, just not arm-tree specific.
@Jianwen, please correct me if there's a different problem with the test run that I didn't recognize.
Thanks,
Veronika
Quoted 6 lines
Thanks,
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel?5.12.0-rc2 (arm-next)
Quoted 20 lines · Veronika Kabatova
----- Original Message -----
Quoted 19 lines
From: "Will Deacon" <[email protected]>
To: "CKI Project" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Jianlin Shi" <[email protected]>, "catalin marinas" <[email protected]>, "Jianwen Ji" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Hangbin Liu" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 10:43:47 AM
Subject: Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.12.0-rc2 (arm-next)Quoted 7 lines · CKI Project
Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:aarch64:
Host 1:
❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic testHmm, looks like this one actually passed:
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
or am I looking in the wrong place?
Hi,
the test actually didn't finish but aborted. It's also a bit visible in the logs you linked as they are cut off after the
basic_nictest started.
Ah yes, I missed that it was truncated. Thanks.
Quoted 8 lines
I checked the console log and this looks like the issue we just reported to upstream:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212227
as the test is killed (test timeout) after spamming the console log for an hour with a message about
unregister_netdevice. So it's a bug, just not arm-tree specific.
Cheers. I don't have anything queued that I would expect to break only a networing test (more like the machine wouldn't boot if we broke something) so I'll go ahead with my pull request as planned.
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel?5.12.0-rc2 (arm-next)
In reply to Veronika KabatovaQuoted 17 lines · Veronika Kabatova
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:aarch64:
Host 1:
❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic testQuoted 6 lines
Hmm, looks like this one actually passed:
or am I looking in the wrong place?
Hi,
Quoted 7 lines
the test actually didn't finish but aborted. It's also a bit visible in the logs you linked as they are cut off after the
basic_nictest started.I checked the console log and this looks like the issue we just reported to upstream:
cc lxin@ who is familiar with sctp and dev usage count issue.
Thanks
Hangbin
Quoted 5 lines
as the test is killed (test timeout) after spamming the console log for an hour with a message about
unregister_netdevice. So it's a bug, just not arm-tree specific.
Quoted 15 lines
@Jianwen, please correct me if there's a different problem with the test run that I didn't recognize.
Thanks,
VeronikaQuoted 6 lines
Thanks,
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel