Skip to contentSkip to conversation

EFI: Make installer EFI aware

PATCH Superseded Darren Hart 3 participants 7 messages Jul 17, 2012 – Jul 19, 2012

v2 of 3 Superseded Latest is v3 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

v2 cover EFI: Make installer EFI aware

V2: Add missing initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb file.

The following changes since commit 2bd0aaf98c5d586638d82f5f22c1c24122a889a3:

toolchain-scripts: Sync the SDK/ADT values to the build system (2012-07-17 18:02:10 +0100)

are available in the git repository at:
git://git.yoctoproject.org/user-contrib/dvhart/oe-core installer
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/user-contrib/dvhart/oe-core/log/?h=installer

Darren Hart (1):
EFI: Make installer EFI aware

 meta/classes/grub-efi.bbclass                      |    2 +
 .../images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb         |    2 +-
 .../initrdscripts/files/init-install-efi.sh        |  188 ++++++++++++++++++++
 meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/files/init-live.sh |    6 +-
 .../initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb              |   22 +++
 5 files changed, 216 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/files/init-install-efi.sh
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb
Signature · 1 line
1.7.5.4
#1 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/1 EFI: Make installer EFI aware

[YOCTO #1919]

Create a basic EFI installer script modeled after the existing installer and add it to a new initramfs-live-install-efi recipe. Update the init-live.sh script to distinguish between LABEL=install and LABEL=install-efi and select the appropriate script. Add the efi installer to core-image-minimal-initramfs.

Update grub-efi.bbclass to use "LABEL=install-efi" when it detects a label of "install". This is clearly not ideal, but a proper fix would involve decoupling the LABELS assignment from the image-live.bbclass usage of SYSLINUX_LABELS. We should be able to address that in a follow-on clean-up series.

---
 meta/classes/grub-efi.bbclass                      |    2 +
 .../images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb         |    2 +-
 .../initrdscripts/files/init-install-efi.sh        |  188 ++++++++++++++++++++
 meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/files/init-live.sh |    6 +-
 .../initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb              |   22 +++
 5 files changed, 216 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/files/init-install-efi.sh
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb
meta/classes/grub-efi.bbclass +2 -0
index 1efb43b..147accc 100644
@@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ python build_grub_cfg() {
         bb.data.update_data(localdata)
 
         cfgfile.write('\nmenuentry \'%s\'{\n' % (label))
+        if label == "install":
+            label = "install-efi"
         cfgfile.write('linux /vmlinuz LABEL=%s' % (label))
 
         append = localdata.getVar('APPEND', True)
meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb +1 -1
index 4aeb618..7f6826c 100644
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "Small image capable of booting a device. The kernel includes \
 the Minimal RAM-based Initial Root Filesystem (initramfs), which finds the \
 first “init” program more efficiently."
 
-IMAGE_INSTALL = "initramfs-live-boot initramfs-live-install busybox udev base-passwd"
+IMAGE_INSTALL = "initramfs-live-boot initramfs-live-install initramfs-live-install-efi busybox udev base-passwd"
 
 # Do not pollute the initrd image with rootfs features
 IMAGE_FEATURES = ""
meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/files/init-install-efi.sh new file +188 -0

188 lines not on this page · raw message

meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/files/init-live.sh +3 -3
index 737dae4..d02ed19 100644
@@ -110,11 +110,11 @@ case $label in
 	    fi
 	fi
 	;;
-    install)
+    install|install-efi)
 	if [ -f /media/$i/$ISOLINUX/$ROOT_IMAGE ] ; then
-	    ./install.sh $i/$ISOLINUX $ROOT_IMAGE $video_mode $vga_mode
+	    ./$label.sh $i/$ISOLINUX $ROOT_IMAGE $video_mode $vga_mode
 	else
-	    fatal "Could not find install script"
+	    fatal "Could not find $label script"
 	fi
 
 	# If we're getting here, we failed...
meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb new file +22 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6696d94
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+DESCRIPTION = "A live image init script for grub-efi"
+LICENSE = "MIT"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${COREBASE}/meta/COPYING.MIT;md5=3da9cfbcb788c80a0384361b4de20420"
+SRC_URI = "file://init-install-efi.sh"
+
+PR = "r7"
+
+RDEPENDS_${PN} = "parted e2fsprogs-mke2fs dosfstools"
+
+do_install() {
+        install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/init-install-efi.sh ${D}/install-efi.sh
+}
+
+# While this package maybe an allarch due to it being a
+# simple script, reality is that it is Host specific based
+# on the COMPATIBLE_HOST below, which needs to take precedence
+#inherit allarch
+INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1"
+
+FILES_${PN} = " /install-efi.sh "
+
+COMPATIBLE_HOST = "(i.86|x86_64).*-linux"
Signature · 1 line
1.7.5.4
#2 lore raw
Quoted 43 lines · Darren Hart

[YOCTO #1919]

Create a basic EFI installer script modeled after the existing installer and add it to a new initramfs-live-install-efi recipe. Update the init-live.sh script to distinguish between LABEL=install and LABEL=install-efi and select the appropriate script. Add the efi installer to core-image-minimal-initramfs.

Update grub-efi.bbclass to use "LABEL=install-efi" when it detects a label of "install". This is clearly not ideal, but a proper fix would involve decoupling the LABELS assignment from the image-live.bbclass usage of SYSLINUX_LABELS. We should be able to address that in a follow-on clean-up series.

---
  meta/classes/grub-efi.bbclass                      |    2 +
  .../images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb         |    2 +-
  .../initrdscripts/files/init-install-efi.sh        |  188 ++++++++++++++++++++
  meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/files/init-live.sh |    6 +-
  .../initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb              |   22 +++
  5 files changed, 216 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/files/init-install-efi.sh create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb

meta/classes/grub-efi.bbclass +2 -0
index 1efb43b..147accc 100644
@@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ python build_grub_cfg() {
          bb.data.update_data(localdata)
 
          cfgfile.write('\nmenuentry \'%s\'{\n' % (label))
+        if label == "install":
+            label = "install-efi"
          cfgfile.write('linux /vmlinuz LABEL=%s' % (label))
 
          append = localdata.getVar('APPEND', True)
meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb +0 -0
index 4aeb618..7f6826c 100644

meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb DESCRIPTION = "Small image capable of booting a device. The kernel includes \ · line 9

Quoted 8 lines
meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb +1 -1
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "Small image capable of booting a device. The kernel includes \
  the Minimal RAM-based Initial Root Filesystem (initramfs), which finds the \
  first “init” program more efficiently."
 
-IMAGE_INSTALL = "initramfs-live-boot initramfs-live-install busybox udev base-passwd"
+IMAGE_INSTALL = "initramfs-live-boot initramfs-live-install initramfs-live-install-efi busybox udev base-passwd"
 
  # Do not pollute the initrd image with rootfs features
  IMAGE_FEATURES = ""

Does this now need a PR bump also?

Quoted 219 lines
meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/files/init-install-efi.sh new file +188 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c762f4b
@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
+#!/bin/sh -e
+#
+# Copyright (c) 2012, Intel Corporation.
+# All rights reserved.
+#
+# install.sh [device_name] [rootfs_name] [video_mode] [vga_mode]
+#
+
+PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin
+
+# We need 20 Mb for the boot partition
+boot_size=20
+
+# 5% for the swap
+swap_ratio=5
+
+found="no"
+
+echo "Searching for a hard drive..."
+for device in 'hda' 'hdb' 'sda' 'sdb' 'mmcblk0' 'mmcblk1'
+do
+    if [ -e /sys/block/${device}/removable ]; then
+        if [ "$(cat /sys/block/${device}/removable)" = "0" ]; then
+            found="yes"
+
+            while true; do
+                # Try sleeping here to avoid getting kernel messages
+                # obscuring/confusing user
+                sleep 5
+                echo "Found drive at /dev/${device}. Do you want to install this image there ? [y/n]"
+                read answer
+                if [ "$answer" = "y" ] ; then
+                    break
+                fi
+
+                if [ "$answer" = "n" ] ; then
+                    found=no
+                    break
+                fi
+
+                echo "Please answer y or n"
+            done
+        fi
+    fi
+
+    if [ "$found" = "yes" ]; then
+        break;
+    fi
+
+done
+
+if [ "$found" = "no" ]; then
+    exit 1
+fi
+
+echo "Installing image on /dev/${device}"
+
+#
+# The udev automounter can cause pain here, kill it
+#
+rm -f /etc/udev/scripts/mount*
+
+#
+# Unmount anything the automounter had mounted
+#
+umount /dev/${device}* 2> /dev/null || /bin/true
+
+# We always build with devtmpfs, this is not necessary
+#if [ ! -b /dev/sda ] ; then
+#    mknod /dev/sda b 8 0
+#fi
+#
+#if [ ! -b /dev/sdb ] ; then
+#    mknod /dev/sdb b 8 16
+#fi
+#
+#if [ ! -b /dev/loop0 ] ; then
+#    mknod /dev/loop0 b 7 0
+#fi
+
+mkdir -p /tmp
+cat /proc/mounts > /etc/mtab
+
+disk_size=$(parted /dev/${device} unit mb print | grep Disk | cut -d" " -f 3 | sed -e "s/MB//")
+
+swap_size=$((disk_size*swap_ratio/100))
+rootfs_size=$((disk_size-boot_size-swap_size))
+
+rootfs_start=$((boot_size))
+rootfs_end=$((rootfs_start+rootfs_size))
+swap_start=$((rootfs_end))
+
+# MMC devices are special in a couple of ways
+# 1) they use a partition prefix character 'p'
+# 2) they are detected asynchronously (need rootwait)
+rootwait=""
+part_prefix=""
+if [ ! "${device#mmcblk}" = "${device}" ]; then
+    part_prefix="p"
+    rootwait="rootwait"
+fi
+bootfs=/dev/${device}${part_prefix}1
+rootfs=/dev/${device}${part_prefix}2
+swap=/dev/${device}${part_prefix}3
+
+echo "*****************"
+echo "Boot partition size:   $boot_size MB ($bootfs)"
+echo "Rootfs partition size: $rootfs_size MB ($rootfs)"
+echo "Swap partition size:   $swap_size MB ($swap)"
+echo "*****************"
+echo "Deleting partition table on /dev/${device} ..."
+dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/${device} bs=512 count=2
+
+echo "Creating new partition table on /dev/${device} ..."
+parted /dev/${device} mklabel gpt
+
+echo "Creating boot partition on $bootfs"
+parted /dev/${device} mkpart primary 0% $boot_size
+
+echo "Creating rootfs partition on $rootfs"
+parted /dev/${device} mkpart primary $rootfs_start $rootfs_end
+
+echo "Creating swap partition on $swap"
+parted /dev/${device} mkpart primary $swap_start 100%
+
+parted /dev/${device} print
+
+echo "Formatting $bootfs to vfat..."
+mkfs.vfat $bootfs
+
+echo "Formatting $rootfs to ext3..."
+mkfs.ext3 $rootfs
+
+echo "Formatting swap partition...($swap)"
+mkswap $swap
+
+mkdir /ssd
+mkdir /rootmnt
+mkdir /bootmnt
+
+mount $rootfs /ssd
+mount -o rw,loop,noatime,nodiratime /media/$1/$2 /rootmnt
+
+echo "Copying rootfs files..."
+cp -a /rootmnt/* /ssd
+
+if [ -d /ssd/etc/ ] ; then
+    echo "$swap                swap             swap       defaults              0  0" >> /ssd/etc/fstab
+
+    # We dont want udev to mount our root device while we're booting...
+    if [ -d /ssd/etc/udev/ ] ; then
+        echo "/dev/${device}" >> /ssd/etc/udev/mount.blacklist
+    fi
+fi
+
+umount /ssd
+umount /rootmnt
+
+echo "Preparing boot partition..."
+mount $bootfs /ssd
+
+EFIDIR="/ssd/EFI/BOOT"
+mkdir -p $EFIDIR
+GRUBCFG="$EFIDIR/grub.cfg"
+
+cp /media/$1/vmlinuz /ssd
+# Copy the efi loader and config (booti*.efi and grub.cfg)
+cp /media/$1/EFI/BOOT/* $EFIDIR
+
+# Update grub config for the installed image
+# Delete the install entry
+sed -i "/menuentry 'install'/,/^}/d" $GRUBCFG
+# Delete the initrd lines
+sed -i "/initrd /d" $GRUBCFG
+# Delete any LABEL= strings
+sed -i "s/ LABEL=[^ ]*/ /" $GRUBCFG
+# Replace the ramdisk root with the install device and include other options
+sed -i "s@ root=[^ ]*@ root=$rootfs rw $rootwait quiet@" $GRUBCFG
+
+umount /ssd
+sync
+
+echo "Remove your installation media, and press ENTER"
+
+read enter
+
+echo "Rebooting..."
+reboot -f
meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/files/init-live.sh +3 -3
index 737dae4..d02ed19 100644
@@ -110,11 +110,11 @@ case $label in
  	    fi
  	fi
  	;;
-    install)
+    install|install-efi)
  	if [ -f /media/$i/$ISOLINUX/$ROOT_IMAGE ] ; then
-	    ./install.sh $i/$ISOLINUX $ROOT_IMAGE $video_mode $vga_mode
+	    ./$label.sh $i/$ISOLINUX $ROOT_IMAGE $video_mode $vga_mode
  	else
-	    fatal "Could not find install script"
+	    fatal "Could not find $label script"
  	fi
 
  	# If we're getting here, we failed...
meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb new file +0 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6696d94

meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb line 7

Quoted 7 lines
meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb new file +7 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+DESCRIPTION = "A live image init script for grub-efi"
+LICENSE = "MIT"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${COREBASE}/meta/COPYING.MIT;md5=3da9cfbcb788c80a0384361b4de20420"
+SRC_URI = "file://init-install-efi.sh"
+
+PR = "r7"
+

Why PR = r7 for a new recipe, there should be no PR as it defaults to r0?

Sau!

Quoted 16 lines
meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb new file +15 -0
+RDEPENDS_${PN} = "parted e2fsprogs-mke2fs dosfstools"
+
+do_install() {
+        install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/init-install-efi.sh ${D}/install-efi.sh
+}
+
+# While this package maybe an allarch due to it being a
+# simple script, reality is that it is Host specific based
+# on the COMPATIBLE_HOST below, which needs to take precedence
+#inherit allarch
+INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1"
+
+FILES_${PN} = " /install-efi.sh "
+
+COMPATIBLE_HOST = "(i.86|x86_64).*-linux"
#3 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Saul Wold
Quoted 6 lines · Darren Hart
meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb +0 -0
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "Small image capable of booting a device. The kernel includes \
  the Minimal RAM-based Initial Root Filesystem (initramfs), which finds the \
  first “init” program more efficiently."
 
Quoted 7 lines

meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb DESCRIPTION = "Small image capable of booting a device. The kernel includes \ · line 9

Quoted 5 lines
meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb +1 -1
-IMAGE_INSTALL = "initramfs-live-boot initramfs-live-install busybox udev base-passwd"
+IMAGE_INSTALL = "initramfs-live-boot initramfs-live-install initramfs-live-install-efi busybox udev base-passwd"
 
  # Do not pollute the initrd image with rootfs features
  IMAGE_FEATURES = ""

Does this now need a PR bump also?

I didn't think so as this recipe is rebuilt for every image anyway. There is no PR in this recipe.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb new file +0 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6696d94
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
Quoted 8 lines

meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb line 7

Quoted 7 lines
meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb new file +7 -0
+DESCRIPTION = "A live image init script for grub-efi"
+LICENSE = "MIT"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${COREBASE}/meta/COPYING.MIT;md5=3da9cfbcb788c80a0384361b4de20420"
+SRC_URI = "file://init-install-efi.sh"
+
+PR = "r7"
+

Why PR = r7 for a new recipe, there should be no PR as it defaults to r0?

Good catch, just my forcing rebuilds during development, or perhaps a left-over copy from the initramfs-live-install_1.0.bb I based it on. Updated as r0 in the branch.

Thanks,

Signature · 3 lines
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
#4 lore raw
Quoted 36 lines · Darren Hart
Quoted 8 lines · Saul Wold
Quoted 6 lines · Darren Hart
meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb +0 -0
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "Small image capable of booting a device. The kernel includes \
  the Minimal RAM-based Initial Root Filesystem (initramfs), which finds the \
  first “init” program more efficiently."
 
Quoted 7 lines

meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb DESCRIPTION = "Small image capable of booting a device. The kernel includes \ · line 9

Quoted 5 lines
meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb +1 -1
-IMAGE_INSTALL = "initramfs-live-boot initramfs-live-install busybox udev base-passwd"
+IMAGE_INSTALL = "initramfs-live-boot initramfs-live-install initramfs-live-install-efi busybox udev base-passwd"
 
  # Do not pollute the initrd image with rootfs features
  IMAGE_FEATURES = ""

Does this now need a PR bump also?

I didn't think so as this recipe is rebuilt for every image anyway. There is no PR in this recipe.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb new file +0 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6696d94
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
Quoted 8 lines

meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb line 7

Quoted 7 lines
meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb new file +7 -0
+DESCRIPTION = "A live image init script for grub-efi"
+LICENSE = "MIT"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${COREBASE}/meta/COPYING.MIT;md5=3da9cfbcb788c80a0384361b4de20420"
+SRC_URI = "file://init-install-efi.sh"
+
+PR = "r7"
+

Why PR = r7 for a new recipe, there should be no PR as it defaults to r0?

Quoted 3 lines

Good catch, just my forcing rebuilds during development, or perhaps a left-over copy from the initramfs-live-install_1.0.bb I based it on. Updated as r0 in the branch.

Could I ask you to update this on top of Radu's fix please?

Cheers,

Richard

#5 lore raw
Quoted 37 lines · Richard Purdie
Quoted 36 lines · Darren Hart
Quoted 8 lines · Saul Wold
Quoted 6 lines · Darren Hart
meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb +0 -0
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "Small image capable of booting a device. The kernel includes \
  the Minimal RAM-based Initial Root Filesystem (initramfs), which finds the \
  first “init” program more efficiently."
 
Quoted 7 lines

meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb DESCRIPTION = "Small image capable of booting a device. The kernel includes \ · line 9

Quoted 5 lines
meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb +1 -1
-IMAGE_INSTALL = "initramfs-live-boot initramfs-live-install busybox udev base-passwd"
+IMAGE_INSTALL = "initramfs-live-boot initramfs-live-install initramfs-live-install-efi busybox udev base-passwd"
 
  # Do not pollute the initrd image with rootfs features
  IMAGE_FEATURES = ""

Does this now need a PR bump also?

I didn't think so as this recipe is rebuilt for every image anyway. There is no PR in this recipe.

Quoted 14 lines

meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb line 7

Quoted 13 lines
meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb new file +7 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6696d94
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+DESCRIPTION = "A live image init script for grub-efi"
+LICENSE = "MIT"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${COREBASE}/meta/COPYING.MIT;md5=3da9cfbcb788c80a0384361b4de20420"
+SRC_URI = "file://init-install-efi.sh"
+
+PR = "r7"
+

Why PR = r7 for a new recipe, there should be no PR as it defaults to r0?

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Good catch, just my forcing rebuilds during development, or perhaps a left-over copy from the initramfs-live-install_1.0.bb I based it on. Updated as r0 in the branch.

Could I ask you to update this on top of Radu's fix please?

Will do.

Signature · 3 lines
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
#6 lore raw
Quoted 39 lines · Darren Hart
Quoted 37 lines · Richard Purdie
Quoted 36 lines · Darren Hart
Quoted 8 lines · Saul Wold
Quoted 6 lines · Darren Hart
meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb +0 -0
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "Small image capable of booting a device. The kernel includes \
  the Minimal RAM-based Initial Root Filesystem (initramfs), which finds the \
  first “init” program more efficiently."
 
Quoted 7 lines

meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb DESCRIPTION = "Small image capable of booting a device. The kernel includes \ · line 9

Quoted 5 lines
meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb +1 -1
-IMAGE_INSTALL = "initramfs-live-boot initramfs-live-install busybox udev base-passwd"
+IMAGE_INSTALL = "initramfs-live-boot initramfs-live-install initramfs-live-install-efi busybox udev base-passwd"
 
  # Do not pollute the initrd image with rootfs features
  IMAGE_FEATURES = ""

Does this now need a PR bump also?

I didn't think so as this recipe is rebuilt for every image anyway. There is no PR in this recipe.

Quoted 14 lines

meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb line 7

Quoted 13 lines
meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb new file +7 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6696d94
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+DESCRIPTION = "A live image init script for grub-efi"
+LICENSE = "MIT"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${COREBASE}/meta/COPYING.MIT;md5=3da9cfbcb788c80a0384361b4de20420"
+SRC_URI = "file://init-install-efi.sh"
+
+PR = "r7"
+

Why PR = r7 for a new recipe, there should be no PR as it defaults to r0?

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Good catch, just my forcing rebuilds during development, or perhaps a left-over copy from the initramfs-live-install_1.0.bb I based it on. Updated as r0 in the branch.

Could I ask you to update this on top of Radu's fix please?

Will do.

Thanks, merged to master.

Richard