kobject: support namespace aware udev
Subsystems (3)
cover kobject: support namespace aware udev
Currently when a uevent occurs, the event is replicated and sent to every listener on the kernel netlink socket, ignoring network namespaces boundaries, forwarding events to every listener in every network namespace.
With the expanded use of containers, it would be useful to be able to regulate this flow of events to specific containers. By restricting the events to only the host network namespace, it allows for a userspace program to provide a system wide policy on which events are routed where.
A new kernel function (kobject_uevent_forward) was added which allows forwarding a given message to any uevent listeners in the network namespace of the specified pid and a generic netlink module was added to provide an interface to that kernel function. This allows a userspace program to be able to read the uevents via the libudev, and apply a policy (drop, forward, or modify), and sending those uevents to a specific network namespace, and by association to a specific container.
By allowing a controlled flow of uevents to a container, it is possible for the container to run udevd, processing the event as normal while allowing the host to maintain control over what events are sent.
Michael J. Coss (3):
lib/kobject_uevent.c: disable broadcast of uevents to other namespaces lib/kobject_uevent.c: add uevent forwarding function net/udevns: Netlink module to forward uevent to containers
include/linux/kobject.h | 3 ++ include/net/net_namespace.h | 3 ++ include/uapi/linux/Kbuild | 1 + include/uapi/linux/udevns.h | 19 ++++++++ kernel/ksysfs.c | 12 +++++ lib/kobject_uevent.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ net/Kconfig | 1 + net/Makefile | 1 + net/udevns/Kconfig | 9 ++++ net/udevns/Makefile | 5 ++ net/udevns/udevns.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ net/udevns/udevns.h | 19 ++++++++ 12 files changed, 279 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/udevns.h create mode 100644 net/udevns/Kconfig create mode 100644 net/udevns/Makefile create mode 100644 net/udevns/udevns.c create mode 100644 net/udevns/udevns.h
Signature · 1 line
2.4.6
PATCH 1/3 lib/kobject_uevent.c: disable broadcast of uevents to other namespaces
Restrict sending uevents to only those listeners operating in the same network namespace as the system init process. This is the first step toward allowing policy control of the forwarding of events to other namespaces in userspace.
--- lib/kobject_uevent.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
lib/kobject_uevent.c +4 -0
@@ -295,6 +295,10 @@ int kobject_uevent_env(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action,if (!netlink_has_listeners (uevent_sock,1 ))continue ; +/* forward event only to the host systems network namespaces */ +if (!net_eq (sock_net (uevent_sock), &init_net)) +continue ; +/* allocate message with the maximum possible size */ len =strlen (action_string) +strlen (devpath) +2 ; skb =alloc_skb (len + env->buflen,GFP_KERNEL );
Signature · 1 line
2.4.6
Re: [PATCH 1/3] lib/kobject_uevent.c: disable broadcast of uevents to other namespaces
Quoted 4 lines · Michael J. Coss
Restrict sending uevents to only those listeners operating in the same network namespace as the system init process. This is the first step toward allowing policy control of the forwarding of events to other namespaces in userspace.
This limitation whould be better if we only skipped network namespaces where you are sending spoofed uevents.
As it sits this has the possibility to break userspace.
Eric
Quoted 20 lines
Signed-off-by Michael J. Coss <[email protected]>--- lib/kobject_uevent.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)lib/kobject_uevent.c +4
-0@@ -295,6 +295,10 @@ int kobject_uevent_env(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action,if (!netlink_has_listeners (uevent_sock,1 ))continue ; +/* forward event only to the host systems network namespaces */ +if (!net_eq (sock_net (uevent_sock), &init_net)) +continue ; +/* allocate message with the maximum possible size */ len =strlen (action_string) +strlen (devpath) +2 ; skb =alloc_skb (len + env->buflen,GFP_KERNEL );
Re: [PATCH 1/3] lib/kobject_uevent.c: disable broadcast of uevents to other namespaces
Quoted 6 lines · Eric W. Biederman
Quoted 4 lines · Michael J. Coss
Restrict sending uevents to only those listeners operating in the same network namespace as the system init process. This is the first step toward allowing policy control of the forwarding of events to other namespaces in userspace.
Quoted 7 lines
This limitation whould be better if we only skipped network namespaces where you are sending spoofed uevents.
As it sits this has the possibility to break userspace.
Eric
While I don't necessarily see how this could cause an issue with userspace, I agree that it could be made to work that way and accomplish the same goal and be even more transparent. I would think that it would require some state in the network namespace that would be settable to say enable/disable host uevent broadcasts across this particular netlink socket.
---Michael J Coss
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 51c185b6fa89f0b8e9e7dcaffb3c21c975c84302.1441762578.git.michael.coss-cfy2TCaE7SFv+uJa97DSA9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
Re: [PATCH 1/3] lib/kobject_uevent.c: disable broadcast of uevents to other namespaces
Hi Michael,
While experimenting with your patches, I discovered a couple of issues:
1) One problem is that the test to disable broadcast has an undesired
side-effect: it silently drops kernel uevents designated to specific net namespace(s). For example, uevents related to the "net" subsystem are now gone.
More specifically, kobject_uevent_env() eventually calls netlink_broadcast_filtered() with "kobj_bcast_filter()" as the @filter argument; This filter is invoked by the netlink delivery code (for each target socket): if the respective kobject has a valid "struct kobj_ns_type_operations ops" then it will use the ops->netlink_ns() as the target network namespace, and only post to sockets that belong to that target network namespace.
To remedy this, I suggest to move the test into "kobj_bcast_filter()", by replacing the final "return 0;" with "return !net_eq(sock_net(dsk), &init_net);".
2) Another problem is that when a task writes to the special file "uevent" in /sys/..., e.g. "/sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-0/uevent", it should ideally expect to see the resulting uevent in the network namespace to which it belongs, and only there. With broadcast disabled it will instead reach only the init network namespace (while before the patch it would reach all network namespaces).
This could be fixed by having the userspace daemon that listens in the init network namespace forward such uevents to the "origin" network namespace (i.e. where the task belongs). However, I couldn't figure out a way for userspace to tell whether a particular uevent was "task made" via the respective "uevent" file and if so, in which network namespace - or by which task/pid - it was done.
So I can't think of another solution but to do it in the kernel: handle writes to "uevent" in a way that only posts them in the network namespace of the writer task.
Do you see a better option?
Thanks,
Oren.
Quoted 35 lines · Michael J. Coss
Restrict sending uevents to only those listeners operating in the same network namespace as the system init process. This is the first step toward allowing policy control of the forwarding of events to other namespaces in userspace.
Signed-off-by Michael J. Coss <[email protected]>--- lib/kobject_uevent.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)lib/kobject_uevent.c +1
-0@@ -295,6 +295,10 @@ int kobject_uevent_env(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action, if (!netlink_has_listeners(uevent_sock, 1)) continue; +/* forward event only to the host systems network namespaces */
lib/kobject_uevent.c +3
-1+if (!net_eq (sock_net (uevent_sock), &init_net)) +continue ; +/* allocate message with the maximum possible size */ len =strlen (action_string) +strlen (devpath) +2 ; skb =alloc_skb (len + env->buflen,GFP_KERNEL ); --2.4.6
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
PATCH 2/3 lib/kobject_uevent.c: add uevent forwarding function
In reply to Michael J. CossAdds capability to allow userspace programs to forward a given event to a specific network namespace as determined by the provided pid. In addition, support for a per-namespace kobject_sequence counter was added. Sysfs was modified to return the correct event counter based on the current network namespace.
--- include/linux/kobject.h | 3 ++ include/net/net_namespace.h | 3 ++ kernel/ksysfs.c | 12 ++++++ lib/kobject_uevent.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 108 insertions(+)
include/linux/kobject.h +3 -0
@@ -215,6 +215,9 @@ extern struct kobject *firmware_kobj;int kobject_uevent (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action);int kobject_uevent_env (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action,char *envp[]); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid); +#endif __printf(2, 3)int add_uevent_var (struct kobj_uevent_env *env,const char *format, ...);
include/net/net_namespace.h +3 -0
@@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ struct net {#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_MPLS )struct netns_mpls mpls;#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +u64 kevent_seqnum; +#endif struct sock *diag_nlsk;atomic_t fnhe_genid; };
kernel/ksysfs.c +12 -0
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@#include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/rcupdate.h> /* rcu_expedited */ +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +#include <net/net_namespace.h> +#endif #define KERNEL_ATTR_RO (_name) \ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = __ATTR_RO(_name)
@@ -33,6 +36,15 @@ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = \static ssize_t uevent_seqnum_show (struct kobject *kobj,struct kobj_attribute *attr,char *buf) { +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +pid_t p =task_pid_vnr (current); +struct net *n =get_net_ns_by_pid (p); + +if (n !=ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) { +if (!net_eq (n, &init_net)) +return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , n->kevent_seqnum); + } +#endif return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , (unsigned long long )uevent_seqnum); }KERNEL_ATTR_RO (uevent_seqnum);
lib/kobject_uevent.c +90 -0
96 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.4.6
Greg KH
maintainerRe: [PATCH 2/3] lib/kobject_uevent.c: add uevent forwarding function
Quoted 47 lines · Michael J. Coss
Adds capability to allow userspace programs to forward a given event to a specific network namespace as determined by the provided pid. In addition, support for a per-namespace
kobject_sequencecounter was added. Sysfs was modified to return the correct event counter based on the current network namespace.Signed-off-by Michael J. Coss <[email protected]>--- include/linux/kobject.h | 3 ++ include/net/net_namespace.h | 3 ++ kernel/ksysfs.c | 12 ++++++ lib/kobject_uevent.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 108 insertions(+)include/linux/kobject.h +3
-0@@ -215,6 +215,9 @@ extern struct kobject *firmware_kobj;int kobject_uevent (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action);int kobject_uevent_env (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action,char *envp[]); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid); +#endif __printf(2, 3)int add_uevent_var (struct kobj_uevent_env *env,const char *format, ...);include/net/net_namespace.h +3
-0@@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ struct net {#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_MPLS )struct netns_mpls mpls;#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +u64 kevent_seqnum; +#endif struct sock *diag_nlsk;atomic_t fnhe_genid; };kernel/ksysfs.c +0
-0
kernel/ksysfs.c line 26
Quoted 6 lines
kernel/ksysfs.c +3
-0@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@#include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/rcupdate.h> /* rcu_expedited */ +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +#include <net/net_namespace.h> +#endif
#if isn't needed here, right?
Quoted 59 lines
kernel/ksysfs.c +9
-0#define KERNEL_ATTR_RO (_name) \ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = __ATTR_RO(_name)@@ -33,6 +36,15 @@ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = \static ssize_t uevent_seqnum_show (struct kobject *kobj,struct kobj_attribute *attr,char *buf) { +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +pid_t p =task_pid_vnr (current); +struct net *n =get_net_ns_by_pid (p); + +if (n !=ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) { +if (!net_eq (n, &init_net)) +return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , n->kevent_seqnum); + } +#endif return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , (unsigned long long )uevent_seqnum); }KERNEL_ATTR_RO (uevent_seqnum);lib/kobject_uevent.c +32
-0@@ -379,6 +379,96 @@ int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (kobject_uevent); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +/** +* kobject_uevent_forward - forward event to specified network namespace +* +* @buf: event buffer +* @len: event length +* @pid: pid of network namespace +* +* Returns 0 if kobject_uevent_forward() is completed with success or the +* corresponding error when it fails. +*/ +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid) +{ +int retval =0 ; +#if defined(CONFIG_NET ) +struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; +struct net *pns; +char *p; +u64 num; + +/* grab the network namespace of the provided pid */ + pns =get_net_ns_by_pid (pid); +if (pns ==ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) +return -ESRCH ; + +/* find sequence number in buffer */ + p = buf; + num =0 ; +while (p < (buf + len)) { +if (strncmp (p,"SEQNUM=" ,7 ) ==0 ) { +int r; +
lib/kobject_uevent.c int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) · line 423
Quoted 10 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +10
-0+ p +=7 ; + r =kstrtoull (p,10 , &num); +if (r) { +put_net (pns); +return r; + } +break ; + } + p += (strlen (p) +1 ); + }
Ok, that's crazy, replacing an existing sequence number with a sequence number of the namespace? An interesting hack, yes, but something we want to maintain for the next 20+ years, no. Surely there's a better way to do this?
But again, I'm not sold on this whole idea anyway.
greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 2/3] lib/kobject_uevent.c: add uevent forwarding function
Quoted 130 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 47 lines · Michael J. Coss
Adds capability to allow userspace programs to forward a given event to a specific network namespace as determined by the provided pid. In addition, support for a per-namespace
kobject_sequencecounter was added. Sysfs was modified to return the correct event counter based on the current network namespace.Signed-off-by Michael J. Coss <[email protected]>--- include/linux/kobject.h | 3 ++ include/net/net_namespace.h | 3 ++ kernel/ksysfs.c | 12 ++++++ lib/kobject_uevent.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 108 insertions(+)include/linux/kobject.h +3
-0@@ -215,6 +215,9 @@ extern struct kobject *firmware_kobj;int kobject_uevent (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action);int kobject_uevent_env (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action,char *envp[]); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid); +#endif __printf(2, 3)int add_uevent_var (struct kobj_uevent_env *env,const char *format, ...);include/net/net_namespace.h +3
-0@@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ struct net {#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_MPLS )struct netns_mpls mpls;#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +u64 kevent_seqnum; +#endif struct sock *diag_nlsk;atomic_t fnhe_genid; };kernel/ksysfs.c +0
-0kernel/ksysfs.c line 26
Quoted 6 lines
kernel/ksysfs.c +3
-0@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@#include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/rcupdate.h> /* rcu_expedited */ +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +#include <net/net_namespace.h> +#endif #if isn't needed here, right?
Quoted 59 lines
kernel/ksysfs.c +9
-0#define KERNEL_ATTR_RO (_name) \ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = __ATTR_RO(_name)@@ -33,6 +36,15 @@ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = \static ssize_t uevent_seqnum_show (struct kobject *kobj,struct kobj_attribute *attr,char *buf) { +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +pid_t p =task_pid_vnr (current); +struct net *n =get_net_ns_by_pid (p); + +if (n !=ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) { +if (!net_eq (n, &init_net)) +return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , n->kevent_seqnum); + } +#endif return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , (unsigned long long )uevent_seqnum); }KERNEL_ATTR_RO (uevent_seqnum);lib/kobject_uevent.c +32
-0@@ -379,6 +379,96 @@ int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (kobject_uevent); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +/** +* kobject_uevent_forward - forward event to specified network namespace +* +* @buf: event buffer +* @len: event length +* @pid: pid of network namespace +* +* Returns 0 if kobject_uevent_forward() is completed with success or the +* corresponding error when it fails. +*/ +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid) +{ +int retval =0 ; +#if defined(CONFIG_NET ) +struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; +struct net *pns; +char *p; +u64 num; + +/* grab the network namespace of the provided pid */ + pns =get_net_ns_by_pid (pid); +if (pns ==ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) +return -ESRCH ; + +/* find sequence number in buffer */ + p = buf; + num =0 ; +while (p < (buf + len)) { +if (strncmp (p,"SEQNUM=" ,7 ) ==0 ) { +int r; +lib/kobject_uevent.c int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) · line 423
Quoted 10 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +10
-0+ p +=7 ; + r =kstrtoull (p,10 , &num); +if (r) { +put_net (pns); +return r; + } +break ; + } + p += (strlen (p) +1 ); + }Ok, that's crazy, replacing an existing sequence number with a sequence number of the namespace? An interesting hack, yes, but something we want to maintain for the next 20+ years, no. Surely there's a better way to do this?
Quoted 4 lines
But again, I'm not sold on this whole idea anyway.
greg k-h
Re: the #if
The #if is only needed because the new udevns code references a structure defined in that header. Obviously it could be included without consequences but I #if it to show it was part of the forwarding code.
Re: sequence #
I wanted it as transparent as possible, without this the udevd running inside the container has issues with the values of the sequence numbers seen, by making it tied to the namespace, udevd could run unchanged. Our goal was to minimize the changes to a linux distro and still be able to run a full desktop inside a container. But even in absence of our use case, the first question is should uevents be broadcasts to every network namespace? I don't think that broadcasting is the correct action. And follow on questions are what if anything should be done with regards to uevents and containers.
Signature · 1 line
---Michael J Coss
Greg KH
maintainerRe: [PATCH 2/3] lib/kobject_uevent.c: add uevent forwarding function
Quoted 133 lines · Michael J Coss
Quoted 132 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 47 lines · Michael J. Coss
Adds capability to allow userspace programs to forward a given event to a specific network namespace as determined by the provided pid. In addition, support for a per-namespace
kobject_sequencecounter was added. Sysfs was modified to return the correct event counter based on the current network namespace.Signed-off-by Michael J. Coss <[email protected]>--- include/linux/kobject.h | 3 ++ include/net/net_namespace.h | 3 ++ kernel/ksysfs.c | 12 ++++++ lib/kobject_uevent.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 108 insertions(+)include/linux/kobject.h +3
-0@@ -215,6 +215,9 @@ extern struct kobject *firmware_kobj;int kobject_uevent (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action);int kobject_uevent_env (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action,char *envp[]); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid); +#endif __printf(2, 3)int add_uevent_var (struct kobj_uevent_env *env,const char *format, ...);include/net/net_namespace.h +3
-0@@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ struct net {#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_MPLS )struct netns_mpls mpls;#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +u64 kevent_seqnum; +#endif struct sock *diag_nlsk;atomic_t fnhe_genid; };kernel/ksysfs.c +0
-0kernel/ksysfs.c line 26
Quoted 6 lines
kernel/ksysfs.c +3
-0@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@#include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/rcupdate.h> /* rcu_expedited */ +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +#include <net/net_namespace.h> +#endif #if isn't needed here, right?
Quoted 59 lines
kernel/ksysfs.c +9
-0#define KERNEL_ATTR_RO (_name) \ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = __ATTR_RO(_name)@@ -33,6 +36,15 @@ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = \static ssize_t uevent_seqnum_show (struct kobject *kobj,struct kobj_attribute *attr,char *buf) { +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +pid_t p =task_pid_vnr (current); +struct net *n =get_net_ns_by_pid (p); + +if (n !=ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) { +if (!net_eq (n, &init_net)) +return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , n->kevent_seqnum); + } +#endif return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , (unsigned long long )uevent_seqnum); }KERNEL_ATTR_RO (uevent_seqnum);lib/kobject_uevent.c +32
-0@@ -379,6 +379,96 @@ int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (kobject_uevent); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +/** +* kobject_uevent_forward - forward event to specified network namespace +* +* @buf: event buffer +* @len: event length +* @pid: pid of network namespace +* +* Returns 0 if kobject_uevent_forward() is completed with success or the +* corresponding error when it fails. +*/ +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid) +{ +int retval =0 ; +#if defined(CONFIG_NET ) +struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; +struct net *pns; +char *p; +u64 num; + +/* grab the network namespace of the provided pid */ + pns =get_net_ns_by_pid (pid); +if (pns ==ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) +return -ESRCH ; + +/* find sequence number in buffer */ + p = buf; + num =0 ; +while (p < (buf + len)) { +if (strncmp (p,"SEQNUM=" ,7 ) ==0 ) { +int r; +lib/kobject_uevent.c int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) · line 423
Quoted 10 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +10
-0+ p +=7 ; + r =kstrtoull (p,10 , &num); +if (r) { +put_net (pns); +return r; + } +break ; + } + p += (strlen (p) +1 ); + }Ok, that's crazy, replacing an existing sequence number with a sequence number of the namespace? An interesting hack, yes, but something we want to maintain for the next 20+ years, no. Surely there's a better way to do this?
But again, I'm not sold on this whole idea anyway.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
greg k-h
Re: the #if
The #if is only needed because the new udevns code references a structure defined in that header. Obviously it could be included without consequences but I #if it to show it was part of the forwarding code.
That's not an issue, we don't put #ifdefs in .c code if at all possible, you will note that you added a bunch of them :(
Quoted 4 lines
Re: sequence #
I wanted it as transparent as possible, without this the udevd running inside the container has issues with the values of the sequence numbers seen, by making it tied to the namespace, udevd could run unchanged.
Oh I know why you did it, I just don't like it :)
Quoted 6 lines
Our goal was to minimize the changes to a linux distro and still be able to run a full desktop inside a container. But even in absence of our use case, the first question is should uevents be broadcasts to every network namespace? I don't think that broadcasting is the correct action. And follow on questions are what if anything should be done with regards to uevents and containers.
I don't think you should be running udevd within a container, as a device is never bound to a namespace (network devices are the only exception), it's a false thing to think that a uevent is only for a single namespace as well. I understand your wish to change only the kernel to get unmodified userspace to run, but I suggest modifying your userspace instead :)
sorry,
greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 2/3] lib/kobject_uevent.c: add uevent forwarding function
Quoted 160 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 133 lines · Michael J Coss
Quoted 132 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 47 lines · Michael J. Coss
Adds capability to allow userspace programs to forward a given event to a specific network namespace as determined by the provided pid. In addition, support for a per-namespace
kobject_sequencecounter was added. Sysfs was modified to return the correct event counter based on the current network namespace.Signed-off-by Michael J. Coss <[email protected]>--- include/linux/kobject.h | 3 ++ include/net/net_namespace.h | 3 ++ kernel/ksysfs.c | 12 ++++++ lib/kobject_uevent.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 108 insertions(+)include/linux/kobject.h +3
-0@@ -215,6 +215,9 @@ extern struct kobject *firmware_kobj;int kobject_uevent (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action);int kobject_uevent_env (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action,char *envp[]); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid); +#endif __printf(2, 3)int add_uevent_var (struct kobj_uevent_env *env,const char *format, ...);include/net/net_namespace.h +3
-0@@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ struct net {#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_MPLS )struct netns_mpls mpls;#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +u64 kevent_seqnum; +#endif struct sock *diag_nlsk;atomic_t fnhe_genid; };kernel/ksysfs.c +0
-0kernel/ksysfs.c line 26
Quoted 6 lines
kernel/ksysfs.c +3
-0@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@#include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/rcupdate.h> /* rcu_expedited */ +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +#include <net/net_namespace.h> +#endif #if isn't needed here, right?
Quoted 59 lines
kernel/ksysfs.c +9
-0#define KERNEL_ATTR_RO (_name) \ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = __ATTR_RO(_name)@@ -33,6 +36,15 @@ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = \static ssize_t uevent_seqnum_show (struct kobject *kobj,struct kobj_attribute *attr,char *buf) { +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +pid_t p =task_pid_vnr (current); +struct net *n =get_net_ns_by_pid (p); + +if (n !=ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) { +if (!net_eq (n, &init_net)) +return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , n->kevent_seqnum); + } +#endif return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , (unsigned long long )uevent_seqnum); }KERNEL_ATTR_RO (uevent_seqnum);lib/kobject_uevent.c +32
-0@@ -379,6 +379,96 @@ int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (kobject_uevent); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +/** +* kobject_uevent_forward - forward event to specified network namespace +* +* @buf: event buffer +* @len: event length +* @pid: pid of network namespace +* +* Returns 0 if kobject_uevent_forward() is completed with success or the +* corresponding error when it fails. +*/ +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid) +{ +int retval =0 ; +#if defined(CONFIG_NET ) +struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; +struct net *pns; +char *p; +u64 num; + +/* grab the network namespace of the provided pid */ + pns =get_net_ns_by_pid (pid); +if (pns ==ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) +return -ESRCH ; + +/* find sequence number in buffer */ + p = buf; + num =0 ; +while (p < (buf + len)) { +if (strncmp (p,"SEQNUM=" ,7 ) ==0 ) { +int r; +lib/kobject_uevent.c int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) · line 423
Quoted 10 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +10
-0+ p +=7 ; + r =kstrtoull (p,10 , &num); +if (r) { +put_net (pns); +return r; + } +break ; + } + p += (strlen (p) +1 ); + }Ok, that's crazy, replacing an existing sequence number with a sequence number of the namespace? An interesting hack, yes, but something we want to maintain for the next 20+ years, no. Surely there's a better way to do this?
But again, I'm not sold on this whole idea anyway.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
greg k-h
Re: the #if
The #if is only needed because the new udevns code references a structure defined in that header. Obviously it could be included without consequences but I #if it to show it was part of the forwarding code.That's not an issue, we don't put #ifdefs in .c code if at all possible, you will note that you added a bunch of them :(
Quoted 4 lines
Re: sequence #
I wanted it as transparent as possible, without this the udevd running inside the container has issues with the values of the sequence numbers seen, by making it tied to the namespace, udevd could run unchanged.Oh I know why you did it, I just don't like it :)
Quoted 6 lines
Our goal was to minimize the changes to a linux distro and still be able to run a full desktop inside a container. But even in absence of our use case, the first question is should uevents be broadcasts to every network namespace? I don't think that broadcasting is the correct action. And follow on questions are what if anything should be done with regards to uevents and containers.
Quoted 6 lines
I don't think you should be running udevd within a container, as a device is never bound to a namespace (network devices are the only exception), it's a false thing to think that a uevent is only for a single namespace as well. I understand your wish to change only the kernel to get unmodified userspace to run, but I suggest modifying your userspace instead :)
Greg,
I fully agree with you that running unmodified distro inside a container is not a justified
cause for kernel changes.
However, I would like to highlight the point that udev is not the only consumer of uevents,
so changing userspace, as you rightfully suggested, may not be as simple as you imagine.
For example, in our Android use case, we have no intention of running unmodified Android
inside container and modifying Android's ueventd is not an issue for us. Android userspace uses uevents extensively. For example, vold uses uevents to be notified of SDCARD insert event and that is just one example.
We can get around vold and maybe we can get around every other open source Android tool
that make use of uevents, but phone vendors tend to use uevents to communicate messages between their drivers and proprietary software and this is were we must have
a way to filter those uevents in the kernel.
You argue that "device is never bound to a namespace" (and that it never will be)
and I don't disagree with that.
However, as Eric said, the "broadcast everything" logic does not make much sense.
In a way, the broadcast logic is opposite to your suggestion to modify userspace.
In almost every existing implementation of containers, only the root namespace owns responsibility for booting the machine and configuring devices, so if all containers were running modified userspace, there would have been no need to broadcast uevents to all namespaces.
At the very least, you should be able to consent with the idea of having the broadcast
policy decided by userspace. Legacy distros can keep broadcast on by default to not break unmodified userspace programs.
Modern distros, that were modified to run inside containers, be them systemd driven or other,
can turn broadcast off and let the daemons running in root ns be in charge.
Many of us would like the feature that this patch set is set to achieve. Can you please provide constructive feedback to Michael's work, pointing at the parts you think can go into kernel this way or another and the parts
for which you see a valid userspace alternative.
Thanks,
Amir.
Quoted 8 lines
sorry,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
Greg KH
maintainerRe: [PATCH 2/3] lib/kobject_uevent.c: add uevent forwarding function
Quoted 3 lines · Amir Goldstein
I fully agree with you that running unmodified distro inside a container is not a justified
cause for kernel changes.
Great, end of discussion :)
Quoted 3 lines
However, I would like to highlight the point that udev is not the only consumer of uevents, so changing userspace, as you rightfully suggested, may not be as simple as you imagine.
But you have control over who consumes uevents, so if you really want to create such a "only send some uevents to some containers" you can do so from the "host" container today. Exactly like udev does this today if you look at how udevd works, udevd uses the kernel as the filter to only wake up processes that have subscribed to specific events. It's as if no one actually looks at how this works :(
Quoted 11 lines
For example, in our Android use case, we have no intention of running unmodified Android
inside container and modifying Android's ueventd is not an issue for us. Android userspace uses uevents extensively. For example, vold uses uevents to be notified of SDCARD insert event and that is just one example.
We can get around vold and maybe we can get around every other open source Android tool
that make use of uevents, but phone vendors tend to use uevents to communicate messages between their drivers and proprietary software and this is were we must have
a way to filter those uevents in the kernel.
If you are going to modify Android, just use udevd and filter things that way, you can do it today. Or just modify the tools that Android uses for listening to uevents.
Quoted 2 lines
You argue that "device is never bound to a namespace" (and that it never will be) and I don't disagree with that.
Great, end of discussion :)
Quoted 2 lines
However, as Eric said, the "broadcast everything" logic does not make much sense.
Only one thing is listening to these events, put your filter there (again, just like udevd does today...)
Quoted 2 lines
In a way, the broadcast logic is opposite to your suggestion to modify userspace.
Nope, see above.
Quoted 4 lines
In almost every existing implementation of containers, only the root namespace owns responsibility for booting the machine and configuring devices, so if all containers were running modified userspace, there would have been no need to broadcast uevents to all namespaces.
Wonderful, as you said you were going to modify the container applications, this isn't an issue :)
Quoted 2 lines
At the very least, you should be able to consent with the idea of having the broadcast policy decided by userspace.
But it already is, userspace can decide what it wants to do with every event today. Again, to sound like a broken record, just like udevd does.
greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 2/3] lib/kobject_uevent.c: add uevent forwarding function
In reply to Michael J. CossQuoted 5 lines · Michael J. Coss
Adds capability to allow userspace programs to forward a given event to a specific network namespace as determined by the provided pid. In addition, support for a per-namespace
kobject_sequencecounter was added. Sysfs was modified to return the correct event counter based on the current network namespace.
So this patch is buggy.
Quoted 53 lines
Signed-off-by Michael J. Coss <[email protected]>--- include/linux/kobject.h | 3 ++ include/net/net_namespace.h | 3 ++ kernel/ksysfs.c | 12 ++++++ lib/kobject_uevent.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 108 insertions(+)include/linux/kobject.h +3
-0@@ -215,6 +215,9 @@ extern struct kobject *firmware_kobj;int kobject_uevent (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action);int kobject_uevent_env (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action,char *envp[]); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid); +#endif __printf(2, 3)int add_uevent_var (struct kobj_uevent_env *env,const char *format, ...);include/net/net_namespace.h +3
-0@@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ struct net {#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_MPLS )struct netns_mpls mpls;#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +u64 kevent_seqnum; +#endif struct sock *diag_nlsk;atomic_t fnhe_genid; };kernel/ksysfs.c +3
-0@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@#include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/rcupdate.h> /* rcu_expedited */ +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +#include <net/net_namespace.h> +#endif #define KERNEL_ATTR_RO (_name) \ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = __ATTR_RO(_name)@@ -33,6 +36,15 @@ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = \static ssize_t uevent_seqnum_show (struct kobject *kobj,struct kobj_attribute *attr,char *buf)
kernel/ksysfs.c static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = \ · line 47
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/ksysfs.c +9
-0{ +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +pid_t p =task_pid_vnr (current); +struct net *n =get_net_ns_by_pid (p); + +if (n !=ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) { +if (!net_eq (n, &init_net)) +return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , n->kevent_seqnum); + } +#endif
The test here is completely wrong.
a) Each sysfs instance already has a network namespace attached to it's superblock so using the pid of the caller is wrong.
b) You return kevent_seqnum even in network namespaces where you are not sending uevents from userspace which is concerning.
c) Is this all we need to do to sysfs? Otherwise it may be best to simply fake this file, and remove the need to play games with the sequence number in kobject_uevent_forward.
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/ksysfs.c +0
-0return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , (unsigned long long )uevent_seqnum); }KERNEL_ATTR_RO (uevent_seqnum);lib/kobject_uevent.c +0
-0
lib/kobject_uevent.c int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) · line 388
Quoted 10 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +7
-0@@ -379,6 +379,96 @@ int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (kobject_uevent); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +/** +* kobject_uevent_forward - forward event to specified network namespace +* +* @buf: event buffer +* @len: event length +* @pid: pid of network namespace
This function should just take a network namespace all of the weird bits should be left to the user/kernel interface.
The pid should be translated into a network namespace at the edge of user space. Not down here in a helper function.
Quoted 24 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +24
-0+* Returns 0 if kobject_uevent_forward() is completed with success or the +* corresponding error when it fails. +*/ +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid) +{ +int retval =0 ; +#if defined(CONFIG_NET ) +struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; +struct net *pns; +char *p; +u64 num; + +/* grab the network namespace of the provided pid */ + pns =get_net_ns_by_pid (pid); +if (pns ==ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) +return -ESRCH ; + +/* find sequence number in buffer */ + p = buf; + num =0 ; +while (p < (buf + len)) { +if (strncmp (p,"SEQNUM=" ,7 ) ==0 ) { +int r; +
lib/kobject_uevent.c int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) · line 423
Quoted 10 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +10
-0+ p +=7 ; + r =kstrtoull (p,10 , &num); +if (r) { +put_net (pns); +return r; + } +break ; + } + p += (strlen (p) +1 ); + }
Do we really need to parse the sequence number out of the packet? I suspect it would be easier to simply have a sequence number that increments every time a message passes through.
Quoted 12 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +12
-0+ +/* if we didn't see a valid seqnum, or none was present, return error */ +if (num ==0 ) { +put_net (pns); +return -EINVAL ; + } +/* update per namespace sequence number as needed */ +if (pns->kevent_seqnum < num) + pns->kevent_seqnum = num; + +list_for_each_entry (ue_sk, &uevent_sock_list, list) { +struct sock *uevent_sock = ue_sk->sk;
lib/kobject_uevent.c int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) · line 445
Quoted 10 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +10
-0+struct sk_buff *skb; + +if (!netlink_has_listeners (uevent_sock,1 )) +continue ; +/* +* only send to sockets share the same network namespace +* as the passed pid +*/ +if (!net_eq (sock_net (uevent_sock), pns)) +continue ;
This look is terribly inefficient. You could just go directly to the network namespace uevent_sock that you want from your network namespace.
I wonder if we could arrange things so that the same skb you pass in is the skb that gets broadcast out. That would simplify a lot of things.
Quoted 28 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +25
-0+/* allocate message with the maximum possible size */ + skb =alloc_skb (len,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (skb) { +char *p; + + p =skb_put (skb, len); +memcpy (p, buf, len); +NETLINK_CB (skb).dst_group =1 ; + retval =netlink_broadcast (uevent_sock, skb,0 ,1 , +GFP_KERNEL ); + +/* ENOBUFS should be handled in userspace */ +if (retval == -ENOBUFS || retval == -ESRCH ) + retval =0 ; + }else { + retval = -ENOMEM ; + } + } +put_net (pns); +#endif +return retval; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (kobject_uevent_forward); +#endif +/** * add_uevent_var - add key value string to the environment buffer * @env: environment buffer structure
Re: [COMMERCIAL] Re: [PATCH 2/3] lib/kobject_uevent.c: add uevent forwarding function
Quoted 76 lines · Eric W. Biederman
Quoted 5 lines · Michael J. Coss
Adds capability to allow userspace programs to forward a given event to a specific network namespace as determined by the provided pid. In addition, support for a per-namespace
kobject_sequencecounter was added. Sysfs was modified to return the correct event counter based on the current network namespace.So this patch is buggy.
Quoted 53 lines
Signed-off-by Michael J. Coss <[email protected]>--- include/linux/kobject.h | 3 ++ include/net/net_namespace.h | 3 ++ kernel/ksysfs.c | 12 ++++++ lib/kobject_uevent.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 108 insertions(+)include/linux/kobject.h +3
-0@@ -215,6 +215,9 @@ extern struct kobject *firmware_kobj;int kobject_uevent (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action);int kobject_uevent_env (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action,char *envp[]); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid); +#endif __printf(2, 3)int add_uevent_var (struct kobj_uevent_env *env,const char *format, ...);include/net/net_namespace.h +3
-0@@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ struct net {#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_MPLS )struct netns_mpls mpls;#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +u64 kevent_seqnum; +#endif struct sock *diag_nlsk;atomic_t fnhe_genid; };kernel/ksysfs.c +3
-0@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@#include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/rcupdate.h> /* rcu_expedited */ +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +#include <net/net_namespace.h> +#endif #define KERNEL_ATTR_RO (_name) \ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = __ATTR_RO(_name)@@ -33,6 +36,15 @@ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = \static ssize_t uevent_seqnum_show (struct kobject *kobj,struct kobj_attribute *attr,char *buf)kernel/ksysfs.c static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = \ · line 47
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/ksysfs.c +9
-0{ +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +pid_t p =task_pid_vnr (current); +struct net *n =get_net_ns_by_pid (p); + +if (n !=ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) { +if (!net_eq (n, &init_net)) +return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , n->kevent_seqnum); + } +#endif The test here is completely wrong.
a) Each sysfs instance already has a network namespace attached to it's superblock so using the pid of the caller is wrong.
Quoted 6 lines
b) You return
kevent_seqnumeven in network namespaces where you are not sending uevents from userspace which is concerning.c) Is this all we need to do to sysfs? Otherwise it may be best to simply fake this file, and remove the need to play games with the sequence number in
kobject_uevent_forward.
I will take a look at the sysfs network namespace, I was unaware that there was an existing namespace attached. If the broadcasting is disabled, then no events are ever sent to a non-host namespace except as a function of a user space daemon. And as such the kevent_seqnum will be 0 and rightfully so. If broadcasts are selectively disabled then we clearly need to look this in that light. The sequence number is a single value generated as uevents occur, it's not clear to me how to get a user space application to fake this out, as the generated number is inserted into the uevent message.
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/ksysfs.c +0
-0return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , (unsigned long long )uevent_seqnum); }KERNEL_ATTR_RO (uevent_seqnum);lib/kobject_uevent.c +0
-0lib/kobject_uevent.c int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) · line 388
Quoted 10 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +7
-0@@ -379,6 +379,96 @@ int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (kobject_uevent); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +/** +* kobject_uevent_forward - forward event to specified network namespace +* +* @buf: event buffer +* @len: event length +* @pid: pid of network namespace This function should just take a network namespace all of the weird bits should be left to the user/kernel interface.
Quoted 2 lines
The pid should be translated into a network namespace at the edge of user space. Not down here in a helper function.
Agreed. It could just pass the pointer to the namespace, as part of the message processing in the module.
Quoted 29 lines
Quoted 29 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +29
-0+* Returns 0 if kobject_uevent_forward() is completed with success or the +* corresponding error when it fails. +*/ +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid) +{ +int retval =0 ; +#if defined(CONFIG_NET ) +struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; +struct net *pns; +char *p; +u64 num; + +/* grab the network namespace of the provided pid */ + pns =get_net_ns_by_pid (pid); +if (pns ==ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) +return -ESRCH ; + +/* find sequence number in buffer */ + p = buf; + num =0 ; +while (p < (buf + len)) { +if (strncmp (p,"SEQNUM=" ,7 ) ==0 ) { +int r; + + p +=7 ; + r =kstrtoull (p,10 , &num); +if (r) { +put_net (pns); +return r;
Quoted 8 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) · line 423
Quoted 5 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +5
-0+ } +break ; + } + p += (strlen (p) +1 ); + }Do we really need to parse the sequence number out of the packet? I suspect it would be easier to simply have a sequence number that increments every time a message passes through.
The original uevent message don't have a sequence number, one is generated and inserted into the uevent message before it is sent to userspace. As the messages are being pushed back out kernel->user space->kernel, I just wanted to track the highest sequence number seen in this particular namespace.
Quoted 53 lines
Quoted 12 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +12
-0+ +/* if we didn't see a valid seqnum, or none was present, return error */ +if (num ==0 ) { +put_net (pns); +return -EINVAL ; + } +/* update per namespace sequence number as needed */ +if (pns->kevent_seqnum < num) + pns->kevent_seqnum = num; + +list_for_each_entry (ue_sk, &uevent_sock_list, list) { +struct sock *uevent_sock = ue_sk->sk;lib/kobject_uevent.c int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) · line 445
Quoted 10 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +10
-0+struct sk_buff *skb; + +if (!netlink_has_listeners (uevent_sock,1 )) +continue ; +/* +* only send to sockets share the same network namespace +* as the passed pid +*/ +if (!net_eq (sock_net (uevent_sock), pns)) +continue ;This look is terribly inefficient. You could just go directly to the network namespace
uevent_sockthat you want from your network namespace.I wonder if we could arrange things so that the same skb you pass in is the skb that gets broadcast out. That would simplify a lot of things.
Quoted 25 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +25
-0+/* allocate message with the maximum possible size */ + skb =alloc_skb (len,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (skb) { +char *p; + + p =skb_put (skb, len); +memcpy (p, buf, len); +NETLINK_CB (skb).dst_group =1 ; + retval =netlink_broadcast (uevent_sock, skb,0 ,1 , +GFP_KERNEL ); + +/* ENOBUFS should be handled in userspace */ +if (retval == -ENOBUFS || retval == -ESRCH ) + retval =0 ; + }else { + retval = -ENOMEM ; + } + } +put_net (pns); +#endif +return retval; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (kobject_uevent_forward); +#endif +
Quoted 9 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) · line 474
Quoted 3 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +0
-0/** * add_uevent_var - add key value string to the environment buffer * @env: environment buffer structure --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Thanks.
Signature · 1 line
---Michael J Coss
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 3456750fe7a5a5eb709e315618facf5704cc1885.1441762578.git.michael.coss-cfy2TCaE7SFv+uJa97DSA9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
Re: [PATCH 2/3] lib/kobject_uevent.c: add uevent forwarding function
Quoted 153 lines · Michael J. Coss
Adds capability to allow userspace programs to forward a given event to a specific network namespace as determined by the provided pid. In addition, support for a per-namespace
kobject_sequencecounter was added. Sysfs was modified to return the correct event counter based on the current network namespace.Signed-off-by Michael J. Coss <[email protected]>--- include/linux/kobject.h | 3 ++ include/net/net_namespace.h | 3 ++ kernel/ksysfs.c | 12 ++++++ lib/kobject_uevent.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 108 insertions(+)include/linux/kobject.h +3
-0@@ -215,6 +215,9 @@ extern struct kobject *firmware_kobj;int kobject_uevent (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action);int kobject_uevent_env (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action,char *envp[]); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid); +#endif __printf(2, 3)int add_uevent_var (struct kobj_uevent_env *env,const char *format, ...);include/net/net_namespace.h +3
-0@@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ struct net {#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_MPLS )struct netns_mpls mpls;#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +u64 kevent_seqnum; +#endif struct sock *diag_nlsk;atomic_t fnhe_genid; };kernel/ksysfs.c +12
-0@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@#include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/rcupdate.h> /* rcu_expedited */ +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +#include <net/net_namespace.h> +#endif #define KERNEL_ATTR_RO (_name) \ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = __ATTR_RO(_name)@@ -33,6 +36,15 @@ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = \static ssize_t uevent_seqnum_show (struct kobject *kobj,struct kobj_attribute *attr,char *buf) { +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +pid_t p =task_pid_vnr (current); +struct net *n =get_net_ns_by_pid (p); + +if (n !=ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) { +if (!net_eq (n, &init_net)) +return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , n->kevent_seqnum); + } +#endif return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , (unsigned long long )uevent_seqnum); }KERNEL_ATTR_RO (uevent_seqnum);lib/kobject_uevent.c +44
-0@@ -379,6 +379,96 @@ int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (kobject_uevent); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +/** +* kobject_uevent_forward - forward event to specified network namespace +* +* @buf: event buffer +* @len: event length +* @pid: pid of network namespace +* +* Returns 0 if kobject_uevent_forward() is completed with success or the +* corresponding error when it fails. +*/ +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid) +{ +int retval =0 ; +#if defined(CONFIG_NET ) +struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; +struct net *pns; +char *p; +u64 num; + +/* grab the network namespace of the provided pid */ + pns =get_net_ns_by_pid (pid); +if (pns ==ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) +return -ESRCH ; + +/* find sequence number in buffer */ + p = buf; + num =0 ; +while (p < (buf + len)) { +if (strncmp (p,"SEQNUM=" ,7 ) ==0 ) { +int r; + + p +=7 ; + r =kstrtoull (p,10 , &num); +if (r) { +put_net (pns); +return r; + } +break ; + } + p += (strlen (p) +1 ); + } + +/* if we didn't see a valid seqnum, or none was present, return error */
lib/kobject_uevent.c +25
-0+if (num ==0 ) { +put_net (pns); +return -EINVAL ; + } +/* update per namespace sequence number as needed */ +if (pns->kevent_seqnum < num) + pns->kevent_seqnum = num; + +list_for_each_entry (ue_sk, &uevent_sock_list, list) { +struct sock *uevent_sock = ue_sk->sk; +struct sk_buff *skb; + +if (!netlink_has_listeners (uevent_sock,1 )) +continue ; +/* +* only send to sockets share the same network namespace +* as the passed pid +*/ +if (!net_eq (sock_net (uevent_sock), pns)) +continue ; + +/* allocate message with the maximum possible size */ + skb =alloc_skb (len,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (skb) { +char *p;
lib/kobject_uevent.c int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) · line 460
Quoted 10 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +10
-0+ + p =skb_put (skb, len); +memcpy (p, buf, len); +NETLINK_CB (skb).dst_group =1 ; + retval =netlink_broadcast (uevent_sock, skb,0 ,1 , +GFP_KERNEL ); + +/* ENOBUFS should be handled in userspace */ +if (retval == -ENOBUFS || retval == -ESRCH ) + retval =0 ;
This may mask an error from an earlier send (to a distinct listener socket). Instead, we should retain and report either the first error seen or some error seen.
lib/kobject_uevent.c int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) · line 467
Quoted 8 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +7
-0+ } else { + retval = -ENOMEM ; + } + } +put_net (pns); +#endif +return retval;
+}
Quoted 14 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +3
-1+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (kobject_uevent_forward); +#endif +/** * add_uevent_var - add key value string to the environment buffer * @env: environment buffer structure -- 2.4.6
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): CAA4jN2br76atf9UuOhJVcoQPZ6GMN91Mk1GsoXcVFC-eFvFafA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org
Re: [PATCH 2/3] lib/kobject_uevent.c: add uevent forwarding function
Quoted 164 lines · Oren Laadan
Quoted 159 lines · Michael J. Coss
Adds capability to allow userspace programs to forward a given event to a specific network namespace as determined by the provided pid. In addition, support for a per-namespace
kobject_sequencecounter was added. Sysfs was modified to return the correct event counter based on the current network namespace.Signed-off-by Michael J. Coss <[email protected]>--- include/linux/kobject.h | 3 ++ include/net/net_namespace.h | 3 ++ kernel/ksysfs.c | 12 ++++++ lib/kobject_uevent.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 108 insertions(+)include/linux/kobject.h +3
-0@@ -215,6 +215,9 @@ extern struct kobject *firmware_kobj;int kobject_uevent (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action);int kobject_uevent_env (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action,char *envp[]); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid); +#endif __printf(2, 3)int add_uevent_var (struct kobj_uevent_env *env,const char *format, ...);include/net/net_namespace.h +3
-0@@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ struct net {#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_MPLS )struct netns_mpls mpls;#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +u64 kevent_seqnum; +#endif struct sock *diag_nlsk;atomic_t fnhe_genid; };kernel/ksysfs.c +12
-0@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@#include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/rcupdate.h> /* rcu_expedited */ +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +#include <net/net_namespace.h> +#endif #define KERNEL_ATTR_RO (_name) \ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = __ATTR_RO(_name)@@ -33,6 +36,15 @@ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = \static ssize_t uevent_seqnum_show (struct kobject *kobj,struct kobj_attribute *attr,char *buf) { +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +pid_t p =task_pid_vnr (current); +struct net *n =get_net_ns_by_pid (p); + +if (n !=ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) { +if (!net_eq (n, &init_net)) +return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , n->kevent_seqnum); + } +#endif return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , (unsigned long long )uevent_seqnum); }KERNEL_ATTR_RO (uevent_seqnum);lib/kobject_uevent.c +44
-0@@ -379,6 +379,96 @@ int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (kobject_uevent); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +/** +* kobject_uevent_forward - forward event to specified network namespace +* +* @buf: event buffer +* @len: event length +* @pid: pid of network namespace +* +* Returns 0 if kobject_uevent_forward() is completed with success or the +* corresponding error when it fails. +*/ +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid) +{ +int retval =0 ; +#if defined(CONFIG_NET ) +struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; +struct net *pns; +char *p; +u64 num; + +/* grab the network namespace of the provided pid */ + pns =get_net_ns_by_pid (pid); +if (pns ==ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) +return -ESRCH ; + +/* find sequence number in buffer */ + p = buf; + num =0 ; +while (p < (buf + len)) { +if (strncmp (p,"SEQNUM=" ,7 ) ==0 ) { +int r; + + p +=7 ; + r =kstrtoull (p,10 , &num); +if (r) { +put_net (pns); +return r; + } +break ; + } + p += (strlen (p) +1 ); + } + +/* if we didn't see a valid seqnum, or none was present, return error */
lib/kobject_uevent.c +32
-0+if (num ==0 ) { +put_net (pns); +return -EINVAL ; + } +/* update per namespace sequence number as needed */ +if (pns->kevent_seqnum < num) + pns->kevent_seqnum = num; + +list_for_each_entry (ue_sk, &uevent_sock_list, list) { +struct sock *uevent_sock = ue_sk->sk; +struct sk_buff *skb; + +if (!netlink_has_listeners (uevent_sock,1 )) +continue ; +/* +* only send to sockets share the same network namespace +* as the passed pid +*/ +if (!net_eq (sock_net (uevent_sock), pns)) +continue ; + +/* allocate message with the maximum possible size */ + skb =alloc_skb (len,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (skb) { +char *p; + + p =skb_put (skb, len); +memcpy (p, buf, len); +NETLINK_CB (skb).dst_group =1 ; + retval =netlink_broadcast (uevent_sock, skb,0 ,1 , +GFP_KERNEL ); +
Quoted 10 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c int kobject_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action) · line 460
Quoted 4 lines
lib/kobject_uevent.c +3
-0+/* ENOBUFS should be handled in userspace */ +if (retval == -ENOBUFS || retval == -ESRCH ) + retval =0 ;This may mask an error from an earlier send (to a distinct listener socket). Instead, we should retain and report either the first error seen or some error seen.
Ok, scratch that:
I see the model function kobject_uevent_env() does the same thing; and returning a meaningful error on a broadcast is questionable anyway...
Oren.
PATCH 3/3 net/udevns: Netlink module to forward uevent to containers
In reply to Michael J. CossNew generic netlink module to provide an interface with the new forwarding interface for uevent. The driver allows a user to direct a uevent as read from the kernel to a specific network namespace by providing the uevent message, and a target process id. The uapi header file provides the message format.
--- include/uapi/linux/Kbuild | 1 + include/uapi/linux/udevns.h | 19 ++++++++ net/Kconfig | 1 + net/Makefile | 1 + net/udevns/Kconfig | 9 ++++ net/udevns/Makefile | 5 ++ net/udevns/udevns.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ net/udevns/udevns.h | 19 ++++++++ 8 files changed, 167 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/udevns.h create mode 100644 net/udevns/Kconfig create mode 100644 net/udevns/Makefile create mode 100644 net/udevns/udevns.c create mode 100644 net/udevns/udevns.h
include/uapi/linux/Kbuild +1 -0
@@ -404,6 +404,7 @@ header-y += toshiba.h header-y += tty_flags.h header-y += tty.h header-y += types.h +header-y += udevns.h header-y += udf_fs_i.h header-y += udp.h header-y += uhid.h
include/uapi/linux/udevns.h new file +19 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +#ifndef _UDEVNS_H_ +#define _UDEVNS_H_ + +enum udevns_msg_types { +UDEVNS_FORWARD_MSG =0x1 , +UDEVNS_CMD_MAX , +}; + +enum udevns_attr { +UDEVNS_UNSPEC , +UDEVNS_PID , +UDEVNS_MSG , + __UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX, +}; + +#define UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX (__UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX - 1) +#define UDEVNS_VERSION 0x1 + +#endif
net/Kconfig +1 -0
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ source "net/packet/Kconfig" source "net/unix/Kconfig" source "net/xfrm/Kconfig" source "net/iucv/Kconfig" +source "net/udevns/Kconfig" config INET bool "TCP/IP networking"
net/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -74,3 +74,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HSR) += hsr/ ifneq ($(CONFIG_NET_SWITCHDEV),) obj-y += switchdev/ endif +obj-$(CONFIG_UDEVNS) += udevns/
net/udevns/Kconfig new file +9 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +config UDEVNS + tristate "UDEV namespace bridge" + depends on SYSFS + default n + help + This option enables support for explicit forwarding of UDEV events to + other network namespaces + + If unsure, say N.
net/udevns/Makefile new file +5 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +# +# Makefile for the uevent namespace aware forwarder +# +# +obj-$(CONFIG_UDEVNS) += udevns.o
net/udevns/udevns.c new file +112 -0
112 lines not on this page · raw message
net/udevns/udevns.h new file +19 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +#ifndef _UDEVNS_H_ +#define _UDEVNS_H_ + +enum udevns_msg_types { +UDEVNS_FORWARD_MSG =0x1 , +UDEVNS_CMD_MAX , +}; + +enum udevns_attr { +UDEVNS_UNSPEC , +UDEVNS_PID , +UDEVNS_MSG , + __UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX, +}; + +#define UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX (__UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX - 1) +#define UDEVNS_VERSION 0x1 + +#endif
Signature · 1 line
2.4.6
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net/udevns: Netlink module to forward uevent to containers
Quoted 5 lines · Michael J. Coss
New generic netlink module to provide an interface with the new forwarding interface for uevent. The driver allows a user to direct a uevent as read from the kernel to a specific network namespace by providing the uevent message, and a target process id. The uapi header file provides the message format.
If we can't just pass the message thourgh I don't expect genetlink is a particularly good interface for this.
It would be nice if we could open some appropriate thing and the act of getting a file descriptor ould suppress all of the uevent broadcast messages in that network namespace.
Further GENL_ADMIN_PERM is an unfortunate choice for a permission check. I don't see it as exploitable but I am not certain CAP_SYS_ADMIN is the
best capability to check. Beyond that we probably want to arrange
things so that we can use ns_capable so we can allow containers to hand off their devices to child containers.
Implementations that do not allow for containers to nest bother me.
Quoted 244 lines
Signed-off-by Michael J. Coss <[email protected]>--- include/uapi/linux/Kbuild | 1 + include/uapi/linux/udevns.h | 19 ++++++++ net/Kconfig | 1 + net/Makefile | 1 + net/udevns/Kconfig | 9 ++++ net/udevns/Makefile | 5 ++ net/udevns/udevns.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ net/udevns/udevns.h | 19 ++++++++ 8 files changed, 167 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/udevns.h create mode 100644 net/udevns/Kconfig create mode 100644 net/udevns/Makefile create mode 100644 net/udevns/udevns.c create mode 100644 net/udevns/udevns.hinclude/uapi/linux/Kbuild +1
-0@@ -404,6 +404,7 @@ header-y += toshiba.h header-y += tty_flags.h header-y += tty.h header-y += types.h +header-y += udevns.h header-y += udf_fs_i.h header-y += udp.h header-y += uhid.hinclude/uapi/linux/udevns.h new file +19
-0@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +#ifndef _UDEVNS_H_ +#define _UDEVNS_H_ + +enum udevns_msg_types { +UDEVNS_FORWARD_MSG =0x1 , +UDEVNS_CMD_MAX , +}; + +enum udevns_attr { +UDEVNS_UNSPEC , +UDEVNS_PID , +UDEVNS_MSG , + __UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX, +}; + +#define UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX (__UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX - 1) +#define UDEVNS_VERSION 0x1 + +#endif net/Kconfig +1
-0@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ source "net/packet/Kconfig" source "net/unix/Kconfig" source "net/xfrm/Kconfig" source "net/iucv/Kconfig" +source "net/udevns/Kconfig" config INET bool "TCP/IP networking"net/Makefile +1
-0@@ -74,3 +74,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HSR) += hsr/ ifneq ($(CONFIG_NET_SWITCHDEV),) obj-y += switchdev/ endif +obj-$(CONFIG_UDEVNS) += udevns/net/udevns/Kconfig new file +9
-0@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +config UDEVNS + tristate "UDEV namespace bridge" + depends on SYSFS + default n + help + This option enables support for explicit forwarding of UDEV events to + other network namespaces + + If unsure, say N.net/udevns/Makefile new file +5
-0@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +# +# Makefile for the uevent namespace aware forwarder +# +# +obj-$(CONFIG_UDEVNS) += udevns.onet/udevns/udevns.c new file +112
-0@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/moduleparam.h> +#include <net/sock.h> +#include <net/genetlink.h> +#include <linux/netlink.h> +#include <linux/skbuff.h> +#include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/list.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/uaccess.h> +#include <linux/kobject.h> +#include <linux/sysfs.h> + +#include "udevns.h" + +#define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Michael J Coss <[email protected]>" +#define DRIVER_DESC "new udev namespace bridge" +#define DEVICE_NAME "udevns" + +#ifdef MODULE +#define UDEVNS_NAME (THIS_MODULE->name) +#else +#define UDEVNS_NAME "udevns" +#endif + +#define UDEVNS_INFO(fmt, args...) \ + pr_info("[%s] " fmt, UDEVNS_NAME, ## args) + +#define UDEVNS_ERROR(fmt, args...) \ + pr_err("[ERROR:%s:%s] " fmt, UDEVNS_NAME, __func__, ## args) + +#define UDEVNS_WARNING(fmt, args...) \ + pr_warn("[WARNING:%s:%s] " fmt, UDEVNS_NAME, __func__, ## args) + +static struct genl_family udevns_genl_family = { + .id =GENL_ID_GENERATE , + .name =DEVICE_NAME , + .hdrsize =0 , + .version =UDEVNS_VERSION , + .maxattr =UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX , +}; + +static const struct nla_policy udevns_fmsgpolicy[UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX +1 ] = { + [UDEVNS_PID ] = { .type =NLA_U32 }, + [UDEVNS_MSG ] = { .type =NLA_STRING , .len =UEVENT_BUFFER_SIZE }, +}; + +static int udevns_forwardmsg (struct sk_buff *skb,struct genl_info *info) +{ +pid_t pid; +char *msg; +int msglen; +int err; + +if (!info->attrs[UDEVNS_PID ]) { +UDEVNS_WARNING ("missing PID from UDEVNS_FORWARD_MSG.\n" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + +if (!info->attrs[UDEVNS_MSG ]) { +UDEVNS_WARNING ("missing uevent from UDEVNS_FORWARD_MSG.\n" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + + pid =nla_get_u32 (info->attrs[UDEVNS_PID ]); + msg =nla_data (info->attrs[UDEVNS_MSG ]); + msglen =nla_len (info->attrs[UDEVNS_MSG ]); + +if (msglen <0 ) { +UDEVNS_ERROR ("Malformed uevent from UDEVNS_FORWARD_MSG.\n" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + + err =kobject_uevent_forward (msg, msglen, pid); +return err; +} + +static struct genl_ops udevns_genl_ops[] = { + { + .cmd =UDEVNS_FORWARD_MSG , + .flags =GENL_ADMIN_PERM , + .doit = udevns_forwardmsg, + .policy = udevns_fmsgpolicy, + }, +}; + +static int __init udevns_init (void ) +{ +int rc; + +UDEVNS_INFO ("Starting udevns module\n" ); + rc =genl_register_family_with_ops (&udevns_genl_family, + udevns_genl_ops); +if (rc) { +UDEVNS_ERROR ("Failed to register netlink interface\n" ); +return rc; + } +return 0 ; +} + +static void __exit udevns_exit(void) +{ +UDEVNS_INFO ("Exiting udevns module\n" ); +genl_unregister_family (&udevns_genl_family); +} + +module_init (udevns_init); +module_exit (udevns_exit); + +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL" ); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION (DRIVER_DESC ); +MODULE_AUTHOR (DRIVER_AUTHOR );net/udevns/udevns.h new file +19
-0@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +#ifndef _UDEVNS_H_ +#define _UDEVNS_H_ + +enum udevns_msg_types { +UDEVNS_FORWARD_MSG =0x1 , +UDEVNS_CMD_MAX , +}; + +enum udevns_attr { +UDEVNS_UNSPEC , +UDEVNS_PID , +UDEVNS_MSG , + __UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX, +}; + +#define UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX (__UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX - 1) +#define UDEVNS_VERSION 0x1 + +#endif
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net/udevns: Netlink module to forward uevent to containers
Quoted 14 lines · Eric W. Biederman
Quoted 5 lines · Michael J. Coss
New generic netlink module to provide an interface with the new forwarding interface for uevent. The driver allows a user to direct a uevent as read from the kernel to a specific network namespace by providing the uevent message, and a target process id. The uapi header file provides the message format.
If we can't just pass the message thourgh I don't expect genetlink is a particularly good interface for this.
It would be nice if we could open some appropriate thing and the act of getting a file descriptor ould suppress all of the uevent broadcast messages in that network namespace.
Quoted 9 lines
Further
GENL_ADMIN_PERMis an unfortunate choice for a permission check. I don't see it as exploitable but I am not certainCAP_SYS_ADMINis the
best capability to check. Beyond that we probably want to arrange
things so that we can usens_capableso we can allow containers to hand off their devices to child containers.Implementations that do not allow for containers to nest bother me.
I've done several different approaches with this. I really just wanted an interface to the kernel function to provide forwarding. The first choice was just a pseudo device that you wrote uevent messages to and that message was forwarded. This is yet another take on that. I'm not sure whether one is better or worse than the other.
Thanks for the feedback.
Signature · 1 line
---Michael J Coss
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 8 lines · Michael J. Coss
Currently when a uevent occurs, the event is replicated and sent to every listener on the kernel netlink socket, ignoring network namespaces boundaries, forwarding events to every listener in every network namespace.
With the expanded use of containers, it would be useful to be able to regulate this flow of events to specific containers. By restricting the events to only the host network namespace, it allows for a userspace program to provide a system wide policy on which events are routed where.
Interesting, but why do you need a container to get a uevent at all? What uevents do a container care about?
thanks,
greg k-h
Quoted 9 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 8 lines · Michael J. Coss
Currently when a uevent occurs, the event is replicated and sent to every listener on the kernel netlink socket, ignoring network namespaces boundaries, forwarding events to every listener in every network namespace.
With the expanded use of containers, it would be useful to be able to regulate this flow of events to specific containers. By restricting the events to only the host network namespace, it allows for a userspace program to provide a system wide policy on which events are routed where.
Quoted 7 lines
Interesting, but why do you need a container to get a uevent at all? What uevents do a container care about?
thanks,
greg k-h
In our use case, we run a full desktop inside the container, including X. We run the Xserver in headless mode, and forward a uevent to the container to allow binding/unbinding of remote keyboard, mice, and
displays. So I want the add/del keyboard events, add/del mouse events,
and add/del display events. This is just one use case, I could image others. The bottom line is that the current behavior is to broadcast to everyone all uevents, and I don't see that as correct as it crosses the network namespace boundaries. It seems to me that you would want to provide controls as to where you want to forward those uevents, and that is not a policy that I believe should be in the kernel but rather in user space.
Signature · 1 line
---Michael J Coss
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 13 lines · Michael J Coss
Quoted 12 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 8 lines · Michael J. Coss
Currently when a uevent occurs, the event is replicated and sent to every listener on the kernel netlink socket, ignoring network namespaces boundaries, forwarding events to every listener in every network namespace.
With the expanded use of containers, it would be useful to be able to regulate this flow of events to specific containers. By restricting the events to only the host network namespace, it allows for a userspace program to provide a system wide policy on which events are routed where.
Interesting, but why do you need a container to get a uevent at all? What uevents do a container care about?
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
thanks,
greg k-h
In our use case, we run a full desktop inside the container, including X.
Ugh, I was worried you were going to say that :(
Quoted 10 lines
We run the Xserver in headless mode, and forward a uevent to the container to allow binding/unbinding of remote keyboard, mice, and
displays. So I want the add/del keyboard events, add/del mouse events,
and add/del display events. This is just one use case, I could image others. The bottom line is that the current behavior is to broadcast to everyone all uevents, and I don't see that as correct as it crosses the network namespace boundaries. It seems to me that you would want to provide controls as to where you want to forward those uevents, and that is not a policy that I believe should be in the kernel but rather in user space.
devices are not in namespaces, which is why we don't partition them off at all. And that's why I really don't want to add this type of filtering either. It's up to the "master" container/process/whatever to send uevents to child containers if it really wants to. If we were to ever have devices bound only to namespaces, then it would make sense to only send the uevents for those devices to that namespace.
But as that's never going to happen, I don't want to give people a false sense of "separation" here that isn't really there at all.
sorry,
greg k-h
Quoted 39 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 13 lines · Michael J Coss
Quoted 12 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 8 lines · Michael J. Coss
Currently when a uevent occurs, the event is replicated and sent to every listener on the kernel netlink socket, ignoring network namespaces boundaries, forwarding events to every listener in every network namespace.
With the expanded use of containers, it would be useful to be able to regulate this flow of events to specific containers. By restricting the events to only the host network namespace, it allows for a userspace program to provide a system wide policy on which events are routed where.
Interesting, but why do you need a container to get a uevent at all? What uevents do a container care about?
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
thanks,
greg k-h
In our use case, we run a full desktop inside the container, including X.
Ugh, I was worried you were going to say that :(
Quoted 10 lines
We run the Xserver in headless mode, and forward a uevent to the container to allow binding/unbinding of remote keyboard, mice, and
displays. So I want the add/del keyboard events, add/del mouse events,
and add/del display events. This is just one use case, I could image others. The bottom line is that the current behavior is to broadcast to everyone all uevents, and I don't see that as correct as it crosses the network namespace boundaries. It seems to me that you would want to provide controls as to where you want to forward those uevents, and that is not a policy that I believe should be in the kernel but rather in user space.devices are not in namespaces, which is why we don't partition them off at all. And that's why I really don't want to add this type of filtering either. It's up to the "master" container/process/whatever to send uevents to child containers if it really wants to. If we were to ever have devices bound only to namespaces, then it would make sense to only send the uevents for those devices to that namespace.
Quoted 7 lines
But as that's never going to happen, I don't want to give people a false sense of "separation" here that isn't really there at all.
sorry,
greg k-h
Agreed that devices are not in namespaces, but the events are, or at least could be. That master is the host, and to do that I want to forward events that the host receives to those individual containers. But since the kernel is broadcasting them, I can't have that policy on the host, and would have to filter on each container. Or I can do as you say and have the master forward events. I don't see this as putting the devices into a namespace, but rather managing devices from the outside and notifying the container of the event. Just like plugging in a monitor to the container.
Signature · 1 line
---Michael J Coss
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 43 lines · Michael J Coss
Quoted 42 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 13 lines · Michael J Coss
Quoted 12 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 8 lines · Michael J. Coss
Currently when a uevent occurs, the event is replicated and sent to every listener on the kernel netlink socket, ignoring network namespaces boundaries, forwarding events to every listener in every network namespace.
With the expanded use of containers, it would be useful to be able to regulate this flow of events to specific containers. By restricting the events to only the host network namespace, it allows for a userspace program to provide a system wide policy on which events are routed where.
Interesting, but why do you need a container to get a uevent at all? What uevents do a container care about?
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
thanks,
greg k-h
In our use case, we run a full desktop inside the container, including X.
Ugh, I was worried you were going to say that :(
Quoted 10 lines
We run the Xserver in headless mode, and forward a uevent to the container to allow binding/unbinding of remote keyboard, mice, and
displays. So I want the add/del keyboard events, add/del mouse events,
and add/del display events. This is just one use case, I could image others. The bottom line is that the current behavior is to broadcast to everyone all uevents, and I don't see that as correct as it crosses the network namespace boundaries. It seems to me that you would want to provide controls as to where you want to forward those uevents, and that is not a policy that I believe should be in the kernel but rather in user space.devices are not in namespaces, which is why we don't partition them off at all. And that's why I really don't want to add this type of filtering either. It's up to the "master" container/process/whatever to send uevents to child containers if it really wants to. If we were to ever have devices bound only to namespaces, then it would make sense to only send the uevents for those devices to that namespace.
But as that's never going to happen, I don't want to give people a false sense of "separation" here that isn't really there at all.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
sorry,
greg k-h
Agreed that devices are not in namespaces, but the events are, or at least could be.
No, there's no way to tell which event for which device goes to which namespace, as devices are not in a namespace.
Quoted 8 lines
That master is the host, and to do that I want to
forward events that the host receives to those individual containers. But since the kernel is broadcasting them, I can't have that policy on the host, and would have to filter on each container. Or I can do as you say and have the master forward events. I don't see this as putting the devices into a namespace, but rather managing devices from the outside and notifying the container of the event. Just like plugging in a monitor to the container.
But you can't "plug a monitor into a container". Nor can you "add a keyboard to a container". Or a tty device. Or anything else (except for network devices). Don't try to fake things out as that's not what is happening here. The kernel shouldn't be allowing things to be sent only to specific namespaces, as that's a lie, the devices are "global" and not in a namespace at all.
sorry,
greg k-h
Quoted 44 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 43 lines · Michael J Coss
Quoted 42 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 13 lines · Michael J Coss
Quoted 12 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 8 lines · Michael J. Coss
Currently when a uevent occurs, the event is replicated and sent to every listener on the kernel netlink socket, ignoring network namespaces boundaries, forwarding events to every listener in every network namespace.
With the expanded use of containers, it would be useful to be able to regulate this flow of events to specific containers. By restricting the events to only the host network namespace, it allows for a userspace program to provide a system wide policy on which events are routed where.
Interesting, but why do you need a container to get a uevent at all? What uevents do a container care about?
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
thanks,
greg k-h
In our use case, we run a full desktop inside the container, including X.
Ugh, I was worried you were going to say that :(
Quoted 10 lines
We run the Xserver in headless mode, and forward a uevent to the container to allow binding/unbinding of remote keyboard, mice, and
displays. So I want the add/del keyboard events, add/del mouse events,
and add/del display events. This is just one use case, I could image others. The bottom line is that the current behavior is to broadcast to everyone all uevents, and I don't see that as correct as it crosses the network namespace boundaries. It seems to me that you would want to provide controls as to where you want to forward those uevents, and that is not a policy that I believe should be in the kernel but rather in user space.devices are not in namespaces, which is why we don't partition them off at all. And that's why I really don't want to add this type of filtering either. It's up to the "master" container/process/whatever to send uevents to child containers if it really wants to. If we were to ever have devices bound only to namespaces, then it would make sense to only send the uevents for those devices to that namespace.
But as that's never going to happen, I don't want to give people a false sense of "separation" here that isn't really there at all.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
sorry,
greg k-h
Agreed that devices are not in namespaces, but the events are, or at least could be.
No, there's no way to tell which event for which device goes to which namespace, as devices are not in a namespace.
Why? The host certainly can have a policy for what devices go to which
container. And as such knows which events goes to which container. The container *is* a set on namespace, and control groups. So a user program reads the events on the master, looks in a database and forwards it to that container. The uevents represent the device add/del so it seems natural that it should be the mechanism by which that communication happens. I just want to see it controlled by a policy on the host.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
That master is the host, and to do that I want to
forward events that the host receives to those individual containers. But since the kernel is broadcasting them, I can't have that policy on the host, and would have to filter on each container. Or I can do as you say and have the master forward events. I don't see this as putting the devices into a namespace, but rather managing devices from the outside and notifying the container of the event. Just like plugging in a monitor to the container.
Quoted 6 lines
But you can't "plug a monitor into a container". Nor can you "add a keyboard to a container". Or a tty device. Or anything else (except for network devices). Don't try to fake things out as that's not what is happening here. The kernel shouldn't be allowing things to be sent only to specific namespaces, as that's a lie, the devices are "global" and not in a namespace at all.
Again why? Why are network devices *different*? They are a resources that is bound to the container, not to a namespace per se, but the container is a construct. A collection of namespaces, and cgroups. Again, I don't see why you can't add a keyboard to the container.
Quoted 9 lines
sorry,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Signature · 1 line
---Michael J Coss
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 47 lines · Michael J Coss
Quoted 46 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 45 lines · Michael J Coss
Quoted 44 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 13 lines · Michael J Coss
Quoted 12 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 8 lines · Michael J. Coss
Currently when a uevent occurs, the event is replicated and sent to every listener on the kernel netlink socket, ignoring network namespaces boundaries, forwarding events to every listener in every network namespace.
With the expanded use of containers, it would be useful to be able to regulate this flow of events to specific containers. By restricting the events to only the host network namespace, it allows for a userspace program to provide a system wide policy on which events are routed where.
Interesting, but why do you need a container to get a uevent at all? What uevents do a container care about?
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
thanks,
greg k-h
In our use case, we run a full desktop inside the container, including X.
Ugh, I was worried you were going to say that :(
Quoted 10 lines
We run the Xserver in headless mode, and forward a uevent to the container to allow binding/unbinding of remote keyboard, mice, and
displays. So I want the add/del keyboard events, add/del mouse events,
and add/del display events. This is just one use case, I could image others. The bottom line is that the current behavior is to broadcast to everyone all uevents, and I don't see that as correct as it crosses the network namespace boundaries. It seems to me that you would want to provide controls as to where you want to forward those uevents, and that is not a policy that I believe should be in the kernel but rather in user space.devices are not in namespaces, which is why we don't partition them off at all. And that's why I really don't want to add this type of filtering either. It's up to the "master" container/process/whatever to send uevents to child containers if it really wants to. If we were to ever have devices bound only to namespaces, then it would make sense to only send the uevents for those devices to that namespace.
But as that's never going to happen, I don't want to give people a false sense of "separation" here that isn't really there at all.
sorry,
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
greg k-h
Agreed that devices are not in namespaces, but the events are, or at least could be.
No, there's no way to tell which event for which device goes to which namespace, as devices are not in a namespace.
Why? The host certainly can have a policy for what devices go to which
container.
But that's a userspace thing, if at all, not a kernel thing.
Quoted 1 line
And as such knows which events goes to which container.
Userspace might know this, sure, so implement a version of udevd that does this all in userspace.
Quoted 1 line
The container *is* a set on namespace, and control groups.
But devices are not. They are global for the whole kernel.
Quoted 5 lines
So a user program reads the events on the master, looks in a database and forwards it to that container. The uevents represent the device add/del so it seems natural that it should be the mechanism by which that communication happens. I just want to see it controlled by a policy on the host.
Then do so all in userspace, don't try to force namespaces on devices in the kernel that do not have them at all. You are adding code that is "pretending" that devices really are in namespaces, which is not true at all.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
That master is the host, and to do that I want to
forward events that the host receives to those individual containers. But since the kernel is broadcasting them, I can't have that policy on the host, and would have to filter on each container. Or I can do as you say and have the master forward events. I don't see this as putting the devices into a namespace, but rather managing devices from the outside and notifying the container of the event. Just like plugging in a monitor to the container.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
But you can't "plug a monitor into a container". Nor can you "add a keyboard to a container". Or a tty device. Or anything else (except for network devices). Don't try to fake things out as that's not what is happening here. The kernel shouldn't be allowing things to be sent only to specific namespaces, as that's a lie, the devices are "global" and not in a namespace at all.
Again why? Why are network devices *different*?
They just are :)
Really, the layers behind a network device are set up for namespaces, and multiple processes accessing the same device, and lots of other things that no other device supports (hint, how do you access a network device from userspace, and why does that look totally different from how you access a disk or a tty device?)
If you want to do this type of work for all different device subsystems in the kernel, great, please do so, creating some way to "share" the hardware in virtual ways (hint, it's almost impossible to do, again network devices are special, that's just the way that Unix treats them...)
Quoted 4 lines
They are a resources that is bound to the container, not to a namespace per se, but the container is a construct. A collection of namespaces, and cgroups. Again, I don't see why you can't add a keyboard to the container.
Because a keyboard is not a device that can work that way. It can't be "shared". Yes, you can do multi-head systems, running with multiple keyboards and mice and bind them all do different users, and that works just fine, maybe you should look into that model for your container work. But note, you need to do this with each device type, and how would you handle /dev/mice? :)
Again, network devices are special, don't get hung up on trying to make all other devices in the system work like a network device.
greg k-h
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): cover.1441762578.git.michael.coss-cfy2TCaE7SFv+uJa97DSA9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
PATCH 1/3 lib/kobject_uevent.c: disable broadcast of uevents to other namespaces
Restrict sending uevents to only those listeners operating in the same network namespace as the system init process. This is the first step toward allowing policy control of the forwarding of events to other namespaces in userspace.
--- lib/kobject_uevent.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
lib/kobject_uevent.c +4 -0
@@ -295,6 +295,10 @@ int kobject_uevent_env(struct kobject *kobj, enum kobject_action action,if (!netlink_has_listeners (uevent_sock,1 ))continue ; +/* forward event only to the host systems network namespaces */ +if (!net_eq (sock_net (uevent_sock), &init_net)) +continue ; +/* allocate message with the maximum possible size */ len =strlen (action_string) +strlen (devpath) +2 ; skb =alloc_skb (len + env->buflen,GFP_KERNEL );
Signature · 1 line
2.4.6
PATCH 2/3 lib/kobject_uevent.c: add uevent forwarding function
In reply to a message not in the archiveAdds capability to allow userspace programs to forward a given event to a specific network namespace as determined by the provided pid. In addition, support for a per-namespace kobject_sequence counter was added. Sysfs was modified to return the correct event counter based on the current network namespace.
--- include/linux/kobject.h | 3 ++ include/net/net_namespace.h | 3 ++ kernel/ksysfs.c | 12 ++++++ lib/kobject_uevent.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 108 insertions(+)
include/linux/kobject.h +3 -0
@@ -215,6 +215,9 @@ extern struct kobject *firmware_kobj;int kobject_uevent (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action);int kobject_uevent_env (struct kobject *kobj,enum kobject_action action,char *envp[]); +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +int kobject_uevent_forward (char *buf,size_t len,pid_t pid); +#endif __printf(2, 3)int add_uevent_var (struct kobj_uevent_env *env,const char *format, ...);
include/net/net_namespace.h +3 -0
@@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ struct net {#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_MPLS )struct netns_mpls mpls;#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +u64 kevent_seqnum; +#endif struct sock *diag_nlsk;atomic_t fnhe_genid; };
kernel/ksysfs.c +12 -0
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@#include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/rcupdate.h> /* rcu_expedited */ +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +#include <net/net_namespace.h> +#endif #define KERNEL_ATTR_RO (_name) \ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = __ATTR_RO(_name)
@@ -33,6 +36,15 @@ static struct kobj_attribute _name##_attr = \static ssize_t uevent_seqnum_show (struct kobject *kobj,struct kobj_attribute *attr,char *buf) { +#if defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS ) || defined(CONFIG_UDEVNS_MODULE ) +pid_t p =task_pid_vnr (current); +struct net *n =get_net_ns_by_pid (p); + +if (n !=ERR_PTR (-ESRCH )) { +if (!net_eq (n, &init_net)) +return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , n->kevent_seqnum); + } +#endif return sprintf (buf,"%llu\n" , (unsigned long long )uevent_seqnum); }KERNEL_ATTR_RO (uevent_seqnum);
lib/kobject_uevent.c +90 -0
96 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.4.6
PATCH 3/3 net/udevns: Netlink module to forward uevent to containers
In reply to a message not in the archiveNew generic netlink module to provide an interface with the new forwarding interface for uevent. The driver allows a user to direct a uevent as read from the kernel to a specific network namespace by providing the uevent message, and a target process id. The uapi header file provides the message format.
--- include/uapi/linux/Kbuild | 1 + include/uapi/linux/udevns.h | 19 ++++++++ net/Kconfig | 1 + net/Makefile | 1 + net/udevns/Kconfig | 9 ++++ net/udevns/Makefile | 5 ++ net/udevns/udevns.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ net/udevns/udevns.h | 19 ++++++++ 8 files changed, 167 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/udevns.h create mode 100644 net/udevns/Kconfig create mode 100644 net/udevns/Makefile create mode 100644 net/udevns/udevns.c create mode 100644 net/udevns/udevns.h
include/uapi/linux/Kbuild +1 -0
@@ -404,6 +404,7 @@ header-y += toshiba.h header-y += tty_flags.h header-y += tty.h header-y += types.h +header-y += udevns.h header-y += udf_fs_i.h header-y += udp.h header-y += uhid.h
include/uapi/linux/udevns.h new file +19 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +#ifndef _UDEVNS_H_ +#define _UDEVNS_H_ + +enum udevns_msg_types { +UDEVNS_FORWARD_MSG =0x1 , +UDEVNS_CMD_MAX , +}; + +enum udevns_attr { +UDEVNS_UNSPEC , +UDEVNS_PID , +UDEVNS_MSG , + __UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX, +}; + +#define UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX (__UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX - 1) +#define UDEVNS_VERSION 0x1 + +#endif
net/Kconfig +1 -0
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ source "net/packet/Kconfig" source "net/unix/Kconfig" source "net/xfrm/Kconfig" source "net/iucv/Kconfig" +source "net/udevns/Kconfig" config INET bool "TCP/IP networking"
net/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -74,3 +74,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HSR) += hsr/ ifneq ($(CONFIG_NET_SWITCHDEV),) obj-y += switchdev/ endif +obj-$(CONFIG_UDEVNS) += udevns/
net/udevns/Kconfig new file +9 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +config UDEVNS + tristate "UDEV namespace bridge" + depends on SYSFS + default n + help + This option enables support for explicit forwarding of UDEV events to + other network namespaces + + If unsure, say N.
net/udevns/Makefile new file +5 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +# +# Makefile for the uevent namespace aware forwarder +# +# +obj-$(CONFIG_UDEVNS) += udevns.o
net/udevns/udevns.c new file +112 -0
112 lines not on this page · raw message
net/udevns/udevns.h new file +19 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +#ifndef _UDEVNS_H_ +#define _UDEVNS_H_ + +enum udevns_msg_types { +UDEVNS_FORWARD_MSG =0x1 , +UDEVNS_CMD_MAX , +}; + +enum udevns_attr { +UDEVNS_UNSPEC , +UDEVNS_PID , +UDEVNS_MSG , + __UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX, +}; + +#define UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX (__UDEVNS_ATTR_MAX - 1) +#define UDEVNS_VERSION 0x1 + +#endif
Signature · 1 line
2.4.6