irqstack changes for Josh
Subsystems (2)
Andy Lutomirski
maintainercover irqstack changes for Josh
Patch 1 consolidates code and patch 2 fixes a glitch that Josh noticed. These could go straight to -tip, but it may make more sense for Josh to add them to his undwarf series.
P.S. Should undwarf be called balrog instead? It seems that Josh has been delving very deeply indeed lately.
Andy Lutomirski (2):
x86/entry/64: Refactor IRQ stacks and make them NMI-safe x86/entry/64: Initialize the top of the IRQ stack before switching
stacks
arch/x86/Kconfig.debug | 2 - arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 3 ++ 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.9.4
Andy Lutomirski
maintainerPATCH 2/2 x86/entry/64: Initialize the top of the IRQ stack before switching stacks
The OOPS unwinder wants the word at the top of the IRQ stack to point back to the previous stack at all times when the IRQ stack is in use. There's currently a one-instruction window in ENTER_IRQ_STACK during which this isn't the case. Fix it by writing the old RSP to the top of the IRQ stack before jumping.
This currently writes the pointer to the stack twice, which is a bit ugly. We could get rid of this by replacing irq_stack_ptr with irq_stack_ptr_minus_eight (better name welcome). OTOH, there may be all kinds of odd microarchitectural considerations in play that affect performance by a few cycles here.
--- arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S +23 -1
@@ -468,6 +468,7 @@ END(irq_entries_start) DEBUG_ENTRY_ASSERT_IRQS_OFF movq %rsp, \old_rsp incl PER_CPU_VAR(irq_count) + jnz .Lirq_stack_push_old_rsp_\@ /* * Right now, if we just incremented irq_count to zero, we've
@@ -477,9 +478,30 @@ END(irq_entries_start) * it must be *extremely* careful to limit its stack usage. This * could include kprobes and a hypothetical future IST-less #DB * handler. + * + * The OOPS unwinder relies on the word at the top of the IRQ + * stack linking back to the previous RSP for the entire time we're + * on the IRQ stack. For this to work reliably, we need to write + * it before we actually move ourselves to the IRQ stack. + */ + + movq \old_rsp, PER_CPU_VAR(irq_stack_union + IRQ_STACK_SIZE - 8) + movq PER_CPU_VAR(irq_stack_ptr), %rsp + +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY + /* + * If the first movq above becomes wrong due to IRQ stack layout + * changes, the only way we'll notice is if we try to unwind right + * here. Assert that we set up the stack right to catch this type + * of bug quickly. */ + cmpq -8(%rsp), \old_rsp + je .Lirq_stack_okay\@ + ud2 + .Lirq_stack_okay\@: +#endif - cmovzq PER_CPU_VAR(irq_stack_ptr), %rsp +.Lirq_stack_push_old_rsp_\@: pushq \old_rsp .endm
Signature · 1 line
2.9.4
Andy Lutomirski
maintainerPATCH 1/2 x86/entry/64: Refactor IRQ stacks and make them NMI-safe
In reply to Andy LutomirskiThis will allow IRQ stacks to nest inside NMIs or similar entries that can happen during IRQ stack setup or teardown.
The new macros won't work correctly if they're invoked with IRQs on. Add a check under CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY to detect that.
--- arch/x86/Kconfig.debug | 2 -- arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 3 ++ 3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
arch/x86/Kconfig.debug +0 -2
@@ -305,8 +305,6 @@ config DEBUG_ENTRY Some of these sanity checks may slow down kernel entries and exits or otherwise impact performance. - This is currently used to help test NMI code. - If unsure, say N. config DEBUG_NMI_SELFTEST
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S +61 -24
119 lines not on this page · raw message
arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c +3 -0
@@ -279,6 +279,9 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct *next_p)struct tss_struct *tss = &per_cpu (cpu_tss, cpu);unsigned prev_fsindex, prev_gsindex; +WARN_ON_ONCE (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY ) && +this_cpu_read (irq_count) !=-1 ); +switch_fpu_prepare (prev_fpu, cpu);/* We must save %fs and %gs before load_TLS() because
Signature · 1 line
2.9.4
Quoted 6 lines · Andy Lutomirski
Patch 1 consolidates code and patch 2 fixes a glitch that Josh noticed. These could go straight to -tip, but it may make more sense for Josh to add them to his undwarf series.
P.S. Should undwarf be called balrog instead? It seems that Josh has been delving very deeply indeed lately.
Who cares about that entry code stuff. I like the Balrog idea. The top contenders in my mind are:
- Balrog unwinder
- Orc unwinder
- Undwarf unwinder
Signature · 1 line
Josh