Optimise 64-bit IOVA allocations
Subsystems (6)
Robin Murphy
maintainerv2 cover Optimise 64-bit IOVA allocations
Hi all,
In the wake of the ARM SMMU optimisation efforts, it seems that certain workloads (e.g. storage I/O with large scatterlists) probably remain quite heavily influenced by IOVA allocation performance. Separately, Ard also reported massive performance drops for a graphical desktop on AMD Seattle when enabling SMMUs via IORT, which we traced to dma_32bit_pfn in the DMA ops domain getting initialised differently for ACPI vs. DT, and exposing the overhead of the rbtree slow path. Whilst we could go around trying to close up all the little gaps that lead to hitting the slowest case, it seems a much better idea to simply make said slowest case a lot less slow.
I had a go at rebasing Leizhen's last IOVA series[1], but ended up finding the changes rather too hard to follow, so I've taken the liberty here of picking the whole thing up and reimplementing the main part in a rather less invasive manner.
Robin.
Changes from v1:
- Fix overflow with 32-bit dma_addr_t
- Add tested-bys
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org/msg17753.html
Robin Murphy (1):
iommu/iova: Extend rbtree node caching
Zhen Lei (3):
iommu/iova: Optimise rbtree searching
iommu/iova: Optimise the padding calculation
iommu/iova: Make dma_32bit_pfn implicit
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c | 3 +- drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c | 3 +- drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 7 +-- drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 18 +------ drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 11 ++-- drivers/iommu/iova.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++----------------------- drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_rma.c | 3 +- include/linux/iova.h | 8 +-- 8 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.12.2.dirty
Robin Murphy
maintainerPATCH v2 1/4 iommu/iova: Optimise rbtree searching
From: Zhen Lei <[email protected]>
Checking the IOVA bounds separately before deciding which direction to continue the search (if necessary) results in redundantly comparing both pfns twice each. GCC can already determine that the final comparison op is redundant and optimise it down to 3 in total, but we can go one further with a little tweak of the ordering (which makes the intent of the code that much cleaner as a bonus).
---
v2: No change
drivers/iommu/iova.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/iova.c +3 -6
@@ -289,15 +289,12 @@ private_find_iova(struct iova_domain *iovad, unsigned long pfn)while (node) { struct iova *iova = rb_entry(node, struct iova, node); -/* If pfn falls within iova's range, return iova */ -if ((pfn >= iova->pfn_lo) && (pfn <= iova->pfn_hi)) { -return iova; - } -if (pfn < iova->pfn_lo) node = node->rb_left; -else if (pfn > iova->pfn_lo) +else if (pfn > iova->pfn_hi) node = node->rb_right; +else +return iova;/* pfn falls within iova's range */ }return NULL ;
Signature · 1 line
2.12.2.dirty
Robin Murphy
maintainerPATCH v2 2/4 iommu/iova: Optimise the padding calculation
In reply to Robin MurphyFrom: Zhen Lei <[email protected]>
The mask for calculating the padding size doesn't change, so there's no need to recalculate it every loop iteration. Furthermore, Once we've done that, it becomes clear that we don't actually need to calculate a padding size at all - by flipping the arithmetic around, we can just combine the upper limit, size, and mask directly to check against the lower limit.
For an arm64 build, this alone knocks 16% off the size of the entire alloc_iova() function!
---
v2: No change
drivers/iommu/iova.c | 40 ++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/iova.c +14 -26
@@ -129,16 +129,6 @@ iova_insert_rbtree(struct rb_root *root, struct iova *iova,rb_insert_color (&iova->node, root); } -/* -* Computes the padding size required, to make the start address -* naturally aligned on the power-of-two order of its size -*/ -static unsigned int -iova_get_pad_size (unsigned int size,unsigned int limit_pfn) -{ -return (limit_pfn - size) & (__roundup_pow_of_two (size) -1 ); -} -static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range (struct iova_domain *iovad,unsigned long size,unsigned long limit_pfn,struct iova *new,bool size_aligned)
@@ -146,7 +136,10 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,struct rb_node *prev, *curr =NULL ;unsigned long flags;unsigned long saved_pfn; -unsigned int pad_size =0 ; +unsigned long align_mask = ~0UL ; + +if (size_aligned) + align_mask <<=__fls (size);/* Walk the tree backwards */ spin_lock_irqsave (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags);
@@ -156,31 +149,26 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,while (curr) { struct iova *curr_iova = rb_entry(curr, struct iova, node); -if (limit_pfn <= curr_iova->pfn_lo) { +if (limit_pfn <= curr_iova->pfn_lo) goto move_left; - }else if (limit_pfn > curr_iova->pfn_hi) { -if (size_aligned) - pad_size =iova_get_pad_size (size, limit_pfn); -if ((curr_iova->pfn_hi + size + pad_size) < limit_pfn) -break ;/* found a free slot */ - } + +if (((limit_pfn - size) & align_mask) > curr_iova->pfn_hi) +break ;/* found a free slot */ + limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo; move_left: prev = curr; curr =rb_prev (curr); } -if (!curr) { -if (size_aligned) - pad_size =iova_get_pad_size (size, limit_pfn); -if ((iovad->start_pfn + size + pad_size) > limit_pfn) { -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags); -return -ENOMEM ; - } +if (limit_pfn < size || + (!curr && ((limit_pfn - size) & align_mask) < iovad->start_pfn)) { +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags); +return -ENOMEM ; }/* pfn_lo will point to size aligned address if size_aligned is set */ - new->pfn_lo = limit_pfn - (size + pad_size); + new->pfn_lo = (limit_pfn - size) & align_mask; new->pfn_hi = new->pfn_lo + size -1 ;/* If we have 'prev', it's a valid place to start the insertion. */
Signature · 1 line
2.12.2.dirty
Robin Murphy
maintainerPATCH v2 3/4 iommu/iova: Extend rbtree node caching
In reply to Robin MurphyThe cached node mechanism provides a significant performance benefit for allocations using a 32-bit DMA mask, but in the case of non-PCI devices or where the 32-bit space is full, the loss of this benefit can be significant - on large systems there can be many thousands of entries in the tree, such that traversing to the end then walking all the way down to find free space every time becomes increasingly awful.
Maintain a similar cached node for the whole IOVA space as a superset of the 32-bit space so that performance can remain much more consistent.
Inspired by work by Zhen Lei <[email protected]>.
---
v2: No change
drivers/iommu/iova.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- include/linux/iova.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/iova.c +28 -31
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ init_iova_domain(struct iova_domain *iovad, unsigned long granule,spin_lock_init (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock); iovad->rbroot =RB_ROOT ; + iovad->cached_node =NULL ; iovad->cached32_node =NULL ; iovad->granule = granule; iovad->start_pfn = start_pfn;
@@ -57,48 +58,46 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_iova_domain);static struct rb_node *__get_cached_rbnode (struct iova_domain *iovad,unsigned long *limit_pfn) { -if ((*limit_pfn > iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) || - (iovad->cached32_node ==NULL )) +struct rb_node *cached_node =NULL ; +struct iova *curr_iova; + +if (*limit_pfn <= iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + cached_node = iovad->cached32_node; +if (!cached_node) + cached_node = iovad->cached_node; +if (!cached_node)return rb_last (&iovad->rbroot); -else { -struct rb_node *prev_node =rb_prev (iovad->cached32_node); -struct iova *curr_iova = - rb_entry(iovad->cached32_node, struct iova, node); - *limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo; -return prev_node; - } + + curr_iova = rb_entry(cached_node, struct iova, node); + *limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo; + +return rb_prev (cached_node); }static void -__cached_rbnode_insert_update (struct iova_domain *iovad, -unsigned long limit_pfn,struct iova *new) +__cached_rbnode_insert_update (struct iova_domain *iovad,struct iova *new) { -if (limit_pfn != iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) -return ; - iovad->cached32_node = &new->node; +if (new->pfn_lo > iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + iovad->cached_node = &new->node; +else + iovad->cached32_node = &new->node; }static void __cached_rbnode_delete_update (struct iova_domain *iovad,struct iova *free) {struct iova *cached_iova; -struct rb_node *curr; +struct rb_node **curr =NULL ; -if (!iovad->cached32_node) -return ; - curr = iovad->cached32_node; - cached_iova = rb_entry(curr, struct iova, node); +if (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + curr = &iovad->cached32_node; +if (!curr) + curr = &iovad->cached_node; -if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) { -struct rb_node *node =rb_next (&free->node); - struct iova *iova = rb_entry(node, struct iova, node); + cached_iova = rb_entry(*curr, struct iova, node); -/* only cache if it's below 32bit pfn */ -if (node && iova->pfn_lo < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) - iovad->cached32_node = node; -else - iovad->cached32_node =NULL ; - } +if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) + *curr =rb_next (&free->node); }/* Insert the iova into domain rbtree by holding writer lock */
@@ -135,7 +134,6 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad, {struct rb_node *prev, *curr =NULL ;unsigned long flags; -unsigned long saved_pfn;unsigned long align_mask = ~0UL ;if (size_aligned)
@@ -143,7 +141,6 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,/* Walk the tree backwards */ spin_lock_irqsave (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags); - saved_pfn = limit_pfn; curr =__get_cached_rbnode (iovad, &limit_pfn); prev = curr;while (curr) {
@@ -173,7 +170,7 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,/* If we have 'prev', it's a valid place to start the insertion. */ iova_insert_rbtree (&iovad->rbroot, new, prev); -__cached_rbnode_insert_update (iovad, saved_pfn, new); +__cached_rbnode_insert_update (iovad, new);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags);
include/linux/iova.h +2 -1
@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ struct iova_rcache {struct iova_domain {spinlock_t iova_rbtree_lock;/* Lock to protect update of rbtree */ struct rb_root rbroot;/* iova domain rbtree root */ -struct rb_node *cached32_node;/* Save last alloced node */ +struct rb_node *cached_node;/* Save last alloced node */ +struct rb_node *cached32_node;/* Save last 32-bit alloced node */ unsigned long granule;/* pfn granularity for this domain */ unsigned long start_pfn;/* Lower limit for this domain */ unsigned long dma_32bit_pfn;
Signature · 1 line
2.12.2.dirty
Robin Murphy
maintainerPATCH v2 4/4 iommu/iova: Make dma_32bit_pfn implicit
In reply to Robin MurphyFrom: Zhen Lei <[email protected]>
Now that the cached node optimisation can apply to all allocations, the couple of users which were playing tricks with dma_32bit_pfn in order to benefit from it can stop doing so. Conversely, there is also no need for all the other users to explicitly calculate a 'real' 32-bit PFN, when init_iova_domain() can happily do that itself from the page granularity.
---
v2: Avoid iova_pfn() overflow with 32-bit dma_addr_t
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c | 3 +-- drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c | 3 +-- drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 7 ++----- drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 18 +----------------- drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 11 +++-------- drivers/iommu/iova.c | 4 ++-- drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_rma.c | 3 +-- include/linux/iova.h | 5 ++--- 8 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c +1 -2
@@ -150,8 +150,7 @@ static int tegra_drm_load(struct drm_device *drm, unsigned long flags) order =__ffs (tegra->domain->pgsize_bitmap);init_iova_domain (&tegra->carveout.domain,1UL << order, - carveout_start >> order, - carveout_end >> order); + carveout_start >> order); tegra->carveout.shift =iova_shift (&tegra->carveout.domain); tegra->carveout.limit = carveout_end >> tegra->carveout.shift;
drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c +1 -2
@@ -193,8 +193,7 @@ static int host1x_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) order =__ffs (host->domain->pgsize_bitmap);init_iova_domain (&host->iova,1UL << order, - geometry->aperture_start >> order, - geometry->aperture_end >> order); + geometry->aperture_start >> order); host->iova_end = geometry->aperture_end; }
drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c +2 -5
@@ -63,7 +63,6 @@/* IO virtual address start page frame number */ #define IOVA_START_PFN (1)#define IOVA_PFN (addr) ((addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT) -#define DMA_32BIT_PFN IOVA_PFN(DMA_BIT_MASK(32))/* Reserved IOVA ranges */ #define MSI_RANGE_START (0xfee00000)
@@ -2010,8 +2009,7 @@ static struct dma_ops_domain *dma_ops_domain_alloc(void)if (!dma_dom->domain.pt_root) goto free_dma_dom; -init_iova_domain (&dma_dom->iovad,PAGE_SIZE , -IOVA_START_PFN ,DMA_32BIT_PFN ); +init_iova_domain (&dma_dom->iovad,PAGE_SIZE ,IOVA_START_PFN );/* Initialize reserved ranges */ copy_reserved_iova (&reserved_iova_ranges, &dma_dom->iovad);
@@ -2912,8 +2910,7 @@ static int init_reserved_iova_ranges(void)struct pci_dev *pdev =NULL ;struct iova *val; -init_iova_domain (&reserved_iova_ranges,PAGE_SIZE , -IOVA_START_PFN ,DMA_32BIT_PFN ); +init_iova_domain (&reserved_iova_ranges,PAGE_SIZE ,IOVA_START_PFN );lockdep_set_class (&reserved_iova_ranges.iova_rbtree_lock, &reserved_rbtree_key);
drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c +1 -17
@@ -292,18 +292,7 @@ int iommu_dma_init_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain, dma_addr_t base,/* ...then finally give it a kicking to make sure it fits */ base_pfn = max_t(unsigned long, base_pfn, domain->geometry.aperture_start >> order); - end_pfn = min_t(unsigned long, end_pfn, - domain->geometry.aperture_end >> order); } -/* -* PCI devices may have larger DMA masks, but still prefer allocating -* within a 32-bit mask to avoid DAC addressing. Such limitations don't -* apply to the typical platform device, so for those we may as well -* leave the cache limit at the top of their range to save an rb_last() -* traversal on every allocation. -*/ -if (dev &&dev_is_pci (dev)) - end_pfn &=DMA_BIT_MASK (32 ) >> order;/* start_pfn is always nonzero for an already-initialised domain */ if (iovad->start_pfn) {
@@ -312,16 +301,11 @@ int iommu_dma_init_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain, dma_addr_t base,pr_warn ("Incompatible range for DMA domain\n" );return -EFAULT ; } -/* -* If we have devices with different DMA masks, move the free -* area cache limit down for the benefit of the smaller one. -*/ - iovad->dma_32bit_pfn =min (end_pfn +1 , iovad->dma_32bit_pfn);return 0 ; } -init_iova_domain (iovad,1UL << order, base_pfn, end_pfn); +init_iova_domain (iovad,1UL << order, base_pfn);if (!dev)return 0 ;
drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c +3 -8
@@ -82,8 +82,6 @@#define IOVA_START_PFN (1)#define IOVA_PFN (addr) ((addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT) -#define DMA_32BIT_PFN IOVA_PFN(DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) -#define DMA_64BIT_PFN IOVA_PFN(DMA_BIT_MASK(64))/* page table handling */ #define LEVEL_STRIDE (9)
@@ -1874,8 +1872,7 @@ static int dmar_init_reserved_ranges(void)struct iova *iova;int i; -init_iova_domain (&reserved_iova_list,VTD_PAGE_SIZE ,IOVA_START_PFN , -DMA_32BIT_PFN ); +init_iova_domain (&reserved_iova_list,VTD_PAGE_SIZE ,IOVA_START_PFN );lockdep_set_class (&reserved_iova_list.iova_rbtree_lock, &reserved_rbtree_key);
@@ -1933,8 +1930,7 @@ static int domain_init(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct intel_iommu *iommu,int adjust_width, agaw;unsigned long sagaw; -init_iova_domain (&domain->iovad,VTD_PAGE_SIZE ,IOVA_START_PFN , -DMA_32BIT_PFN ); +init_iova_domain (&domain->iovad,VTD_PAGE_SIZE ,IOVA_START_PFN );domain_reserve_special_ranges (domain);/* calculate AGAW */
@@ -4989,8 +4985,7 @@ static int md_domain_init(struct dmar_domain *domain, int guest_width) {int adjust_width; -init_iova_domain (&domain->iovad,VTD_PAGE_SIZE ,IOVA_START_PFN , -DMA_32BIT_PFN ); +init_iova_domain (&domain->iovad,VTD_PAGE_SIZE ,IOVA_START_PFN );domain_reserve_special_ranges (domain);/* calculate AGAW */
drivers/iommu/iova.c +2 -2
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static void free_iova_rcaches(struct iova_domain *iovad);void init_iova_domain (struct iova_domain *iovad,unsigned long granule, -unsigned long start_pfn,unsigned long pfn_32bit) +unsigned long start_pfn) {/* * IOVA granularity will normally be equal to the smallest
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ init_iova_domain(struct iova_domain *iovad, unsigned long granule, iovad->cached32_node =NULL ; iovad->granule = granule; iovad->start_pfn = start_pfn; - iovad->dma_32bit_pfn = pfn_32bit +1 ; + iovad->dma_32bit_pfn =1UL << (32 -iova_shift (iovad));init_iova_rcaches (iovad); }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (init_iova_domain);
drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_rma.c +1 -2
@@ -39,8 +39,7 @@ void scif_rma_ep_init(struct scif_endpt *ep)struct scif_endpt_rma_info *rma = &ep->rma_info;mutex_init (&rma->rma_lock); -init_iova_domain (&rma->iovad,PAGE_SIZE ,SCIF_IOVA_START_PFN , -SCIF_DMA_64BIT_PFN ); +init_iova_domain (&rma->iovad,PAGE_SIZE ,SCIF_IOVA_START_PFN );spin_lock_init (&rma->tc_lock);mutex_init (&rma->mmn_lock);INIT_LIST_HEAD (&rma->reg_list);
include/linux/iova.h +2 -3
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct iova *reserve_iova(struct iova_domain *iovad, unsigned long pfn_lo, unsigned long pfn_hi);void copy_reserved_iova (struct iova_domain *from,struct iova_domain *to);void init_iova_domain (struct iova_domain *iovad,unsigned long granule, -unsigned long start_pfn,unsigned long pfn_32bit); +unsigned long start_pfn);struct iova *find_iova (struct iova_domain *iovad,unsigned long pfn);void put_iova_domain (struct iova_domain *iovad); struct iova *split_and_remove_iova(struct iova_domain *iovad,
@@ -170,8 +170,7 @@ static inline void copy_reserved_iova(struct iova_domain *from,static inline void init_iova_domain (struct iova_domain *iovad,unsigned long granule, -unsigned long start_pfn, -unsigned long pfn_32bit) +unsigned long start_pfn) { }
Signature · 1 line
2.12.2.dirty
Joerg Roedel
maintainerHi Robin.
Quoted 11 lines · Robin Murphy
Hi all,
In the wake of the ARM SMMU optimisation efforts, it seems that certain workloads (e.g. storage I/O with large scatterlists) probably remain quite heavily influenced by IOVA allocation performance. Separately, Ard also reported massive performance drops for a graphical desktop on AMD Seattle when enabling SMMUs via IORT, which we traced to
dma_32bit_pfnin the DMA ops domain getting initialised differently for ACPI vs. DT, and exposing the overhead of the rbtree slow path. Whilst we could go around trying to close up all the little gaps that lead to hitting the slowest case, it seems a much better idea to simply make said slowest case a lot less slow.
Do you have some numbers here? How big was the impact before these patches and how is it with the patches?
Joerg
Quoted 15 lines · Joerg Roedel
Hi Robin.
Quoted 11 lines · Robin Murphy
Hi all,
In the wake of the ARM SMMU optimisation efforts, it seems that certain workloads (e.g. storage I/O with large scatterlists) probably remain quite heavily influenced by IOVA allocation performance. Separately, Ard also reported massive performance drops for a graphical desktop on AMD Seattle when enabling SMMUs via IORT, which we traced to
dma_32bit_pfnin the DMA ops domain getting initialised differently for ACPI vs. DT, and exposing the overhead of the rbtree slow path. Whilst we could go around trying to close up all the little gaps that lead to hitting the slowest case, it seems a much better idea to simply make said slowest case a lot less slow.
Quoted 2 lines
Do you have some numbers here? How big was the impact before these patches and how is it with the patches?
Here are some numbers:
(before)$ iperf -s
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 35898
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.0-10.2 sec 7.88 MBytes 6.48 Mbits/sec [ 5] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 35900 [ 5] 0.0-10.3 sec 7.88 MBytes 6.43 Mbits/sec [ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 35902 [ 4] 0.0-10.3 sec 7.88 MBytes 6.43 Mbits/sec
(after)$ iperf -s
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 36330
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.09 GBytes 933 Mbits/sec [ 5] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 36332 [ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 939 Mbits/sec [ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 36334 [ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 938 Mbits/sec
Quoted 7 lines
Joerg
.
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks! BestRegards
Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu/iova: Extend rbtree node caching
In reply to Robin MurphyHi Robin,
I am seeing a crash when performing very basic testing on this series with a Mellanox CX4 NIC. I dug into the crash a bit, and think this patch is the culprit, but this rcache business is still mostly witchcraft to me.
# ifconfig eth5 up
# ifconfig eth5 down
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000020
user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgd = ffff8007dbf47c00
[0000000000000020] *pgd=00000006efab0003, *pud=00000006efab0003, *pmd=00000007d8720003, *pte=0000000000000000
Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 47 PID: 5082 Comm: ifconfig Not tainted 4.13.0-rtp-enablement+ #3
task: ffff8007da1e5780 task.stack: ffff8007ddcb8000
PC is at __cached_rbnode_delete_update+0x2c/0x58
LR is at private_free_iova+0x2c/0x60
pc : [<ffff00000852c6e4>] lr : [<ffff00000852cdac>] pstate: 204001c5
sp : ffff8007ddcbba00
x29: ffff8007ddcbba00 x28: ffff8007c8350210
x27: ffff8007d1a80000 x26: ffff8007dcc20800
x25: 0000000000000140 x24: ffff8007c98f0008
x23: 00000000fffffe4e x22: 0000000000000140
x21: ffff8007c98f0008 x20: ffff8007c9adb240
x19: ffff8007c98f0018 x18: 0000000000000010
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
x15: 4000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000
x13: 00000000ffffffff x12: 0000000000000001
x11: dead000000000200 x10: 00000000ffffffff
x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffff8007c9adb1c0
x7 : 0000000040002000 x6 : 0000000000210d00
x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 000000000000c57e
x3 : 00000000ffffffcf x2 : 00000000ffffffcf
x1 : ffff8007c9adb240 x0 : 0000000000000000
[...]
[<ffff00000852c6e4>] __cached_rbnode_delete_update+0x2c/0x58
[<ffff00000852cdac>] private_free_iova+0x2c/0x60
[<ffff00000852cea4>] iova_magazine_free_pfns+0x4c/0xa0
[<ffff00000852d0a8>] free_iova_fast+0x1b0/0x230
[<ffff000008529d34>] iommu_dma_free_iova+0x5c/0x80
[<ffff000008529db4>] __iommu_dma_unmap+0x5c/0x98
[<ffff00000852aebc>] iommu_dma_unmap_resource+0x24/0x30
[<ffff00000852aed4>] iommu_dma_unmap_page+0xc/0x18
[<ffff000008093030>] __iommu_unmap_page+0x40/0x60
[<ffff0000087401bc>] mlx5e_page_release+0xbc/0x128
[<ffff000008740498>] mlx5e_dealloc_rx_wqe+0x30/0x40
[<ffff000008735ef0>] mlx5e_close_channel+0x70/0x1f8
[<ffff0000087370f4>] mlx5e_close_channels+0x2c/0x50
[<ffff0000087385dc>] mlx5e_close_locked+0x54/0x68
[<ffff000008738620>] mlx5e_close+0x30/0x58
[...]** Disassembly for __cached_rbnode_delete_update() near the fault **
92|if (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn)
FFFF00000852C6C4| ldr x3,[x1,#0x18] ; x3,[free,#24]
FFFF00000852C6C8| ldr x2,[x0,#0x30] ; x2,[iovad,#48]
FFFF00000852C6CC| cmp x3,x2
FFFF00000852C6D0| b.cs 0xFFFF00000852C708
| curr = &iovad->cached32_node;
94|if (!curr)
FFFF00000852C6D4| adds x19,x0,#0x18 ; x19,iovad,#24
FFFF00000852C6D8| b.eq 0xFFFF00000852C708
|
|cached_iova = rb_entry(*curr, struct iova, node);
|
99|if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo)
FFFF00000852C6DC| ldr x0,[x19] ; xiovad,[curr]
FFFF00000852C6E0| ldr x2,[x1,#0x20] ; x2,[free,#32]
FFFF00000852C6E4| ldr x0,[x0,#0x20] ; x0,[x0,#32]Apparently cached_iova was NULL so the pfn_lo access faulted.
FFFF00000852C6E8| cmp x2,x0
FFFF00000852C6EC| b.cc 0xFFFF00000852C6FC
FFFF00000852C6F0| mov x0,x1 ; x0,free
100| *curr = rb_next(&free->node);After instrumenting the code a bit, this seems to be the culprit. In the previous call, free->pfn_lo was 0xFFFF_FFFF which is actually the dma_limit for the domain so rb_next() returns NULL.
Let me know if you have any questions or would like additional tests run. I also applied your "DMA domain debug info" patches and dumped the contents of the domain at each of the steps above in case that would be useful. If nothing else, they reinforce how thirsty the CX4 NIC is especially when using 64k pages and many CPUs.
-Nate
Quoted 150 lines · Robin Murphy
The cached node mechanism provides a significant performance benefit for allocations using a 32-bit DMA mask, but in the case of non-PCI devices or where the 32-bit space is full, the loss of this benefit can be significant - on large systems there can be many thousands of entries in the tree, such that traversing to the end then walking all the way down to find free space every time becomes increasingly awful.
Maintain a similar cached node for the whole IOVA space as a superset of the 32-bit space so that performance can remain much more consistent.
Inspired by work by Zhen Lei <[email protected]>.
Tested-by Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>Tested-by Zhen Lei <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Robin Murphy <[email protected]>---
v2: No change
drivers/iommu/iova.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- include/linux/iova.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)drivers/iommu/iova.c +28
-31@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ init_iova_domain(struct iova_domain *iovad, unsigned long granule,spin_lock_init (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock); iovad->rbroot =RB_ROOT ; + iovad->cached_node =NULL ; iovad->cached32_node =NULL ; iovad->granule = granule; iovad->start_pfn = start_pfn;@@ -57,48 +58,46 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_iova_domain);static struct rb_node *__get_cached_rbnode (struct iova_domain *iovad,unsigned long *limit_pfn) { -if ((*limit_pfn > iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) || - (iovad->cached32_node ==NULL )) +struct rb_node *cached_node =NULL ; +struct iova *curr_iova; + +if (*limit_pfn <= iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + cached_node = iovad->cached32_node; +if (!cached_node) + cached_node = iovad->cached_node; +if (!cached_node)return rb_last (&iovad->rbroot); -else { -struct rb_node *prev_node =rb_prev (iovad->cached32_node); -struct iova *curr_iova = - rb_entry(iovad->cached32_node, struct iova, node); - *limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo; -return prev_node; - } + + curr_iova = rb_entry(cached_node, struct iova, node); + *limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo; + +return rb_prev (cached_node); }static void -__cached_rbnode_insert_update (struct iova_domain *iovad, -unsigned long limit_pfn,struct iova *new) +__cached_rbnode_insert_update (struct iova_domain *iovad,struct iova *new) { -if (limit_pfn != iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) -return ; - iovad->cached32_node = &new->node; +if (new->pfn_lo > iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + iovad->cached_node = &new->node; +else + iovad->cached32_node = &new->node; }static void __cached_rbnode_delete_update (struct iova_domain *iovad,struct iova *free) {struct iova *cached_iova; -struct rb_node *curr; +struct rb_node **curr =NULL ; -if (!iovad->cached32_node) -return ; - curr = iovad->cached32_node; - cached_iova = rb_entry(curr, struct iova, node); +if (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + curr = &iovad->cached32_node; +if (!curr) + curr = &iovad->cached_node; -if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) { -struct rb_node *node =rb_next (&free->node); - struct iova *iova = rb_entry(node, struct iova, node); + cached_iova = rb_entry(*curr, struct iova, node); -/* only cache if it's below 32bit pfn */ -if (node && iova->pfn_lo < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) - iovad->cached32_node = node; -else - iovad->cached32_node =NULL ; - } +if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) + *curr =rb_next (&free->node); }/* Insert the iova into domain rbtree by holding writer lock */ @@ -135,7 +134,6 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad, {struct rb_node *prev, *curr =NULL ;unsigned long flags; -unsigned long saved_pfn;unsigned long align_mask = ~0UL ;if (size_aligned)@@ -143,7 +141,6 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,/* Walk the tree backwards */ spin_lock_irqsave (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags); - saved_pfn = limit_pfn; curr =__get_cached_rbnode (iovad, &limit_pfn); prev = curr;while (curr) {@@ -173,7 +170,7 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,/* If we have 'prev', it's a valid place to start the insertion. */ iova_insert_rbtree (&iovad->rbroot, new, prev); -__cached_rbnode_insert_update (iovad, saved_pfn, new); +__cached_rbnode_insert_update (iovad, new);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags);include/linux/iova.h +2
-1@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ struct iova_rcache {struct iova_domain {spinlock_t iova_rbtree_lock;/* Lock to protect update of rbtree */ struct rb_root rbroot;/* iova domain rbtree root */ -struct rb_node *cached32_node;/* Save last alloced node */ +struct rb_node *cached_node;/* Save last alloced node */ +struct rb_node *cached32_node;/* Save last 32-bit alloced node */ unsigned long granule;/* pfn granularity for this domain */ unsigned long start_pfn;/* Lower limit for this domain */ unsigned long dma_32bit_pfn;
Signature · 2 lines
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Robin Murphy
maintainerRe: [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu/iova: Extend rbtree node caching
Hi Nate,
Quoted 81 lines · Nate Watterson
Hi Robin,
I am seeing a crash when performing very basic testing on this series with a Mellanox CX4 NIC. I dug into the crash a bit, and think this patch is the culprit, but this rcache business is still mostly witchcraft to me.# ifconfig eth5 up # ifconfig eth5 down Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000020 user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgd = ffff8007dbf47c00 [0000000000000020] *pgd=00000006efab0003, *pud=00000006efab0003, *pmd=00000007d8720003, *pte=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 47 PID: 5082 Comm: ifconfig Not tainted 4.13.0-rtp-enablement+ #3 task: ffff8007da1e5780 task.stack: ffff8007ddcb8000 PC is at __cached_rbnode_delete_update+0x2c/0x58 LR is at private_free_iova+0x2c/0x60 pc : [<ffff00000852c6e4>] lr : [<ffff00000852cdac>] pstate: 204001c5 sp : ffff8007ddcbba00 x29: ffff8007ddcbba00 x28: ffff8007c8350210 x27: ffff8007d1a80000 x26: ffff8007dcc20800 x25: 0000000000000140 x24: ffff8007c98f0008 x23: 00000000fffffe4e x22: 0000000000000140 x21: ffff8007c98f0008 x20: ffff8007c9adb240 x19: ffff8007c98f0018 x18: 0000000000000010 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 4000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 00000000ffffffff x12: 0000000000000001 x11: dead000000000200 x10: 00000000ffffffff x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffff8007c9adb1c0 x7 : 0000000040002000 x6 : 0000000000210d00 x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 000000000000c57e x3 : 00000000ffffffcf x2 : 00000000ffffffcf x1 : ffff8007c9adb240 x0 : 0000000000000000 [...] [<ffff00000852c6e4>] __cached_rbnode_delete_update+0x2c/0x58 [<ffff00000852cdac>] private_free_iova+0x2c/0x60 [<ffff00000852cea4>] iova_magazine_free_pfns+0x4c/0xa0 [<ffff00000852d0a8>] free_iova_fast+0x1b0/0x230 [<ffff000008529d34>] iommu_dma_free_iova+0x5c/0x80 [<ffff000008529db4>] __iommu_dma_unmap+0x5c/0x98 [<ffff00000852aebc>] iommu_dma_unmap_resource+0x24/0x30 [<ffff00000852aed4>] iommu_dma_unmap_page+0xc/0x18 [<ffff000008093030>] __iommu_unmap_page+0x40/0x60 [<ffff0000087401bc>] mlx5e_page_release+0xbc/0x128 [<ffff000008740498>] mlx5e_dealloc_rx_wqe+0x30/0x40 [<ffff000008735ef0>] mlx5e_close_channel+0x70/0x1f8 [<ffff0000087370f4>] mlx5e_close_channels+0x2c/0x50 [<ffff0000087385dc>] mlx5e_close_locked+0x54/0x68 [<ffff000008738620>] mlx5e_close+0x30/0x58 [...]** Disassembly for
__cached_rbnode_delete_update()near the fault **92|if (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) FFFF00000852C6C4| ldr x3,[x1,#0x18] ; x3,[free,#24] FFFF00000852C6C8| ldr x2,[x0,#0x30] ; x2,[iovad,#48] FFFF00000852C6CC| cmp x3,x2 FFFF00000852C6D0| b.cs 0xFFFF00000852C708 | curr = &iovad->cached32_node; 94|if (!curr) FFFF00000852C6D4| adds x19,x0,#0x18 ; x19,iovad,#24 FFFF00000852C6D8| b.eq 0xFFFF00000852C708 | |cached_iova = rb_entry(*curr, struct iova, node); | 99|if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) FFFF00000852C6DC| ldr x0,[x19] ; xiovad,[curr] FFFF00000852C6E0| ldr x2,[x1,#0x20] ; x2,[free,#32] FFFF00000852C6E4| ldr x0,[x0,#0x20] ; x0,[x0,#32]Apparently
cached_iovawas NULL so thepfn_loaccess faulted.FFFF00000852C6E8| cmp x2,x0 FFFF00000852C6EC| b.cc 0xFFFF00000852C6FC FFFF00000852C6F0| mov x0,x1 ; x0,free 100| *curr = rb_next(&free->node);After instrumenting the code a bit, this seems to be the culprit. In the previous call,
free->pfn_lowas 0xFFFF_FFFF which is actually thedma_limitfor the domain sorb_next()returns NULL.
Quoted 5 lines
Let me know if you have any questions or would like additional tests run. I also applied your "DMA domain debug info" patches and dumped the contents of the domain at each of the steps above in case that would be useful. If nothing else, they reinforce how thirsty the CX4 NIC is especially when using 64k pages and many CPUs.
Thanks for the report - I somehow managed to reason myself out of keeping the "no cached node" check in __cached_rbnode_delete_update() on the assumption that it must always be set by a previous allocation. However, there is indeed just one case case for which that fails: when you free any IOVA immediately after freeing the very topmost one. Which is something that freeing an entire magazine's worth of IOVAs back to the tree all at once has a very real chance of doing...
The obvious straightforward fix is inline below, but I'm now starting to understand the appeal of reserving a sentinel node to ensure the tree can never be empty, so I might have a quick go at that to see if it results in nicer code overall.
Robin.
Quoted 90 lines
-Nate
Quoted 86 lines · Robin Murphy
The cached node mechanism provides a significant performance benefit for allocations using a 32-bit DMA mask, but in the case of non-PCI devices or where the 32-bit space is full, the loss of this benefit can be significant - on large systems there can be many thousands of entries in the tree, such that traversing to the end then walking all the way down to find free space every time becomes increasingly awful.
Maintain a similar cached node for the whole IOVA space as a superset of the 32-bit space so that performance can remain much more consistent.
Inspired by work by Zhen Lei <[email protected]>.
Tested-by Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>Tested-by Zhen Lei <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Robin Murphy <[email protected]>---
v2: No change
drivers/iommu/iova.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- include/linux/iova.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)drivers/iommu/iova.c +20
-15@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ init_iova_domain(struct iova_domain *iovad, unsignedlong granule, spin_lock_init(&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock); iovad->rbroot =RB_ROOT ; + iovad->cached_node =NULL ; iovad->cached32_node =NULL ; iovad->granule = granule; iovad->start_pfn = start_pfn;@@ -57,48 +58,46 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_iova_domain);static struct rb_node *__get_cached_rbnode (struct iova_domain *iovad,unsigned long *limit_pfn) { -if ((*limit_pfn > iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) || - (iovad->cached32_node ==NULL )) +struct rb_node *cached_node =NULL ; +struct iova *curr_iova; + +if (*limit_pfn <= iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + cached_node = iovad->cached32_node; +if (!cached_node) + cached_node = iovad->cached_node; +if (!cached_node)return rb_last (&iovad->rbroot); -else { -struct rb_node *prev_node =rb_prev (iovad->cached32_node); -struct iova *curr_iova = - rb_entry(iovad->cached32_node, struct iova, node); - *limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo; -return prev_node; - } + + curr_iova = rb_entry(cached_node, struct iova, node); + *limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo; + +return rb_prev (cached_node); }static void -__cached_rbnode_insert_update (struct iova_domain *iovad, -unsigned long limit_pfn,struct iova *new) +__cached_rbnode_insert_update (struct iova_domain *iovad,struct iova *new) { -if (limit_pfn != iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) -return ; - iovad->cached32_node = &new->node; +if (new->pfn_lo > iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + iovad->cached_node = &new->node; +else + iovad->cached32_node = &new->node; }static void __cached_rbnode_delete_update (struct iova_domain *iovad,struct iova *free) {struct iova *cached_iova; -struct rb_node *curr; +struct rb_node **curr =NULL ;
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/iommu/iova.c EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_iova_domain); · line 95
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/iommu/iova.c +4
-3- if (!iovad->cached32_node) - return; - curr = iovad->cached32_node; - cached_iova = rb_entry(curr, struct iova, node); +if (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + curr = &iovad->cached32_node; +if (!curr) + curr = &iovad->cached_node;
+ if (!*curr)
+ return;
Quoted 56 lines
Quoted 55 lines
drivers/iommu/iova.c +3
-9- if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) { -struct rb_node *node =rb_next (&free->node); - struct iova *iova = rb_entry(node, struct iova, node); + cached_iova = rb_entry(*curr, struct iova, node); -/* only cache if it's below 32bit pfn */ - if (node && iova->pfn_lo < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) - iovad->cached32_node = node; - else - iovad->cached32_node = NULL; - } + if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) + *curr =rb_next (&free->node); }/* Insert the iova into domain rbtree by holding writer lock */ @@ -135,7 +134,6 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad, {struct rb_node *prev, *curr =NULL ;unsigned long flags; -unsigned long saved_pfn;unsigned long align_mask = ~0UL ;if (size_aligned)@@ -143,7 +141,6 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,/* Walk the tree backwards */ spin_lock_irqsave (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags); - saved_pfn = limit_pfn; curr =__get_cached_rbnode (iovad, &limit_pfn); prev = curr;while (curr) {@@ -173,7 +170,7 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,/* If we have 'prev', it's a valid place to start the insertion. */
iova_insert_rbtree(&iovad->rbroot, new, prev);drivers/iommu/iova.c +1
-1-__cached_rbnode_insert_update (iovad, saved_pfn, new); +__cached_rbnode_insert_update (iovad, new);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags); diff --git a/include/linux/iova.h b/include/linux/iova.hindex
e0a892ae45c0..0bb8df43b393100644include/linux/iova.h +0
-0@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ struct iova_rcache {struct iova_domain {spinlock_t iova_rbtree_lock;/* Lock to protect update of rbtree */
structrb_rootrbroot; /* iova domain rbtree root */include/linux/iova.h +2
-1-struct rb_node *cached32_node;/* Save last alloced node */ +struct rb_node *cached_node;/* Save last alloced node */ +struct rb_node *cached32_node;/* Save last 32-bit alloced node */
unsigned long granule; /* pfn granularity for this domain */ unsigned long start_pfn; /* Lower limit for this domain */ unsigned long dma_32bit_pfn;
Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu/iova: Extend rbtree node caching
Hi Robin,
Quoted 98 lines · Robin Murphy
Hi Nate,
Quoted 81 lines · Nate Watterson
Hi Robin,
I am seeing a crash when performing very basic testing on this series with a Mellanox CX4 NIC. I dug into the crash a bit, and think this patch is the culprit, but this rcache business is still mostly witchcraft to me.# ifconfig eth5 up # ifconfig eth5 down Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000020 user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgd = ffff8007dbf47c00 [0000000000000020] *pgd=00000006efab0003, *pud=00000006efab0003, *pmd=00000007d8720003, *pte=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 47 PID: 5082 Comm: ifconfig Not tainted 4.13.0-rtp-enablement+ #3 task: ffff8007da1e5780 task.stack: ffff8007ddcb8000 PC is at __cached_rbnode_delete_update+0x2c/0x58 LR is at private_free_iova+0x2c/0x60 pc : [<ffff00000852c6e4>] lr : [<ffff00000852cdac>] pstate: 204001c5 sp : ffff8007ddcbba00 x29: ffff8007ddcbba00 x28: ffff8007c8350210 x27: ffff8007d1a80000 x26: ffff8007dcc20800 x25: 0000000000000140 x24: ffff8007c98f0008 x23: 00000000fffffe4e x22: 0000000000000140 x21: ffff8007c98f0008 x20: ffff8007c9adb240 x19: ffff8007c98f0018 x18: 0000000000000010 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 4000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 00000000ffffffff x12: 0000000000000001 x11: dead000000000200 x10: 00000000ffffffff x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffff8007c9adb1c0 x7 : 0000000040002000 x6 : 0000000000210d00 x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 000000000000c57e x3 : 00000000ffffffcf x2 : 00000000ffffffcf x1 : ffff8007c9adb240 x0 : 0000000000000000 [...] [<ffff00000852c6e4>] __cached_rbnode_delete_update+0x2c/0x58 [<ffff00000852cdac>] private_free_iova+0x2c/0x60 [<ffff00000852cea4>] iova_magazine_free_pfns+0x4c/0xa0 [<ffff00000852d0a8>] free_iova_fast+0x1b0/0x230 [<ffff000008529d34>] iommu_dma_free_iova+0x5c/0x80 [<ffff000008529db4>] __iommu_dma_unmap+0x5c/0x98 [<ffff00000852aebc>] iommu_dma_unmap_resource+0x24/0x30 [<ffff00000852aed4>] iommu_dma_unmap_page+0xc/0x18 [<ffff000008093030>] __iommu_unmap_page+0x40/0x60 [<ffff0000087401bc>] mlx5e_page_release+0xbc/0x128 [<ffff000008740498>] mlx5e_dealloc_rx_wqe+0x30/0x40 [<ffff000008735ef0>] mlx5e_close_channel+0x70/0x1f8 [<ffff0000087370f4>] mlx5e_close_channels+0x2c/0x50 [<ffff0000087385dc>] mlx5e_close_locked+0x54/0x68 [<ffff000008738620>] mlx5e_close+0x30/0x58 [...]** Disassembly for
__cached_rbnode_delete_update()near the fault **92|if (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) FFFF00000852C6C4| ldr x3,[x1,#0x18] ; x3,[free,#24] FFFF00000852C6C8| ldr x2,[x0,#0x30] ; x2,[iovad,#48] FFFF00000852C6CC| cmp x3,x2 FFFF00000852C6D0| b.cs 0xFFFF00000852C708 | curr = &iovad->cached32_node; 94|if (!curr) FFFF00000852C6D4| adds x19,x0,#0x18 ; x19,iovad,#24 FFFF00000852C6D8| b.eq 0xFFFF00000852C708 | |cached_iova = rb_entry(*curr, struct iova, node); | 99|if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) FFFF00000852C6DC| ldr x0,[x19] ; xiovad,[curr] FFFF00000852C6E0| ldr x2,[x1,#0x20] ; x2,[free,#32] FFFF00000852C6E4| ldr x0,[x0,#0x20] ; x0,[x0,#32]Apparently
cached_iovawas NULL so thepfn_loaccess faulted.FFFF00000852C6E8| cmp x2,x0 FFFF00000852C6EC| b.cc 0xFFFF00000852C6FC FFFF00000852C6F0| mov x0,x1 ; x0,free 100| *curr = rb_next(&free->node);After instrumenting the code a bit, this seems to be the culprit. In the previous call,
free->pfn_lowas 0xFFFF_FFFF which is actually thedma_limitfor the domain sorb_next()returns NULL.Quoted 5 lines
Let me know if you have any questions or would like additional tests run. I also applied your "DMA domain debug info" patches and dumped the contents of the domain at each of the steps above in case that would be useful. If nothing else, they reinforce how thirsty the CX4 NIC is especially when using 64k pages and many CPUs.
Thanks for the report - I somehow managed to reason myself out of keeping the "no cached node" check in
__cached_rbnode_delete_update()on the assumption that it must always be set by a previous allocation. However, there is indeed just one case case for which that fails: when you free any IOVA immediately after freeing the very topmost one. Which is something that freeing an entire magazine's worth of IOVAs back to the tree all at once has a very real chance of doing...
Quoted 4 lines
The obvious straightforward fix is inline below, but I'm now starting to understand the appeal of reserving a sentinel node to ensure the tree can never be empty, so I might have a quick go at that to see if it results in nicer code overall.
After applying your fix, the crash no longer occurs, but the performance of this use case is only marginally less awful than it was before. I'll start a new thread to discuss the causes and potential solutions.
Nate
Quoted 162 lines
Robin.
Quoted 98 lines
-Nate
Quoted 94 lines · Robin Murphy
The cached node mechanism provides a significant performance benefit for allocations using a 32-bit DMA mask, but in the case of non-PCI devices or where the 32-bit space is full, the loss of this benefit can be significant - on large systems there can be many thousands of entries in the tree, such that traversing to the end then walking all the way down to find free space every time becomes increasingly awful.
Maintain a similar cached node for the whole IOVA space as a superset of the 32-bit space so that performance can remain much more consistent.
Inspired by work by Zhen Lei <[email protected]>.
Tested-by Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>Tested-by Zhen Lei <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Robin Murphy <[email protected]>---
v2: No change
drivers/iommu/iova.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- include/linux/iova.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)drivers/iommu/iova.c +24
-18@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ init_iova_domain(struct iova_domain *iovad, unsignedlong granule, spin_lock_init(&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock); iovad->rbroot =RB_ROOT ; + iovad->cached_node =NULL ; iovad->cached32_node =NULL ; iovad->granule = granule; iovad->start_pfn = start_pfn;@@ -57,48 +58,46 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_iova_domain);static struct rb_node *__get_cached_rbnode (struct iova_domain *iovad,unsigned long *limit_pfn) { -if ((*limit_pfn > iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) || - (iovad->cached32_node ==NULL )) +struct rb_node *cached_node =NULL ; +struct iova *curr_iova; + +if (*limit_pfn <= iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + cached_node = iovad->cached32_node; +if (!cached_node) + cached_node = iovad->cached_node; +if (!cached_node)return rb_last (&iovad->rbroot); -else { -struct rb_node *prev_node =rb_prev (iovad->cached32_node); -struct iova *curr_iova = - rb_entry(iovad->cached32_node, struct iova, node); - *limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo; -return prev_node; - } + + curr_iova = rb_entry(cached_node, struct iova, node); + *limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo; + +return rb_prev (cached_node); }static void -__cached_rbnode_insert_update (struct iova_domain *iovad, -unsigned long limit_pfn,struct iova *new) +__cached_rbnode_insert_update (struct iova_domain *iovad,struct iova *new) { -if (limit_pfn != iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) -return ; - iovad->cached32_node = &new->node; +if (new->pfn_lo > iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + iovad->cached_node = &new->node; +else + iovad->cached32_node = &new->node; }static void __cached_rbnode_delete_update (struct iova_domain *iovad,struct iova *free) {struct iova *cached_iova; -struct rb_node *curr; +struct rb_node **curr =NULL ; - if (!iovad->cached32_node) - return; - curr = iovad->cached32_node; - cached_iova = rb_entry(curr, struct iova, node); +if (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + curr = &iovad->cached32_node; +if (!curr) + curr = &iovad->cached_node;(quoted diff) +2
-0+ if (!*curr) + return;Quoted 57 lines
Quoted 56 lines
drivers/iommu/iova.c +3
-9- if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) { -struct rb_node *node =rb_next (&free->node); - struct iova *iova = rb_entry(node, struct iova, node); + cached_iova = rb_entry(*curr, struct iova, node); -/* only cache if it's below 32bit pfn */ - if (node && iova->pfn_lo < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) - iovad->cached32_node = node; - else - iovad->cached32_node = NULL; - } + if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) + *curr =rb_next (&free->node); }/* Insert the iova into domain rbtree by holding writer lock */ @@ -135,7 +134,6 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad, {struct rb_node *prev, *curr =NULL ;unsigned long flags; -unsigned long saved_pfn;unsigned long align_mask = ~0UL ;if (size_aligned)@@ -143,7 +141,6 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,/* Walk the tree backwards */ spin_lock_irqsave (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags); - saved_pfn = limit_pfn; curr =__get_cached_rbnode (iovad, &limit_pfn); prev = curr;while (curr) {@@ -173,7 +170,7 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,/* If we have 'prev', it's a valid place to start the insertion. */
iova_insert_rbtree(&iovad->rbroot, new, prev);drivers/iommu/iova.c +1
-1-__cached_rbnode_insert_update (iovad, saved_pfn, new); +__cached_rbnode_insert_update (iovad, new);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags); diff --git a/include/linux/iova.h b/include/linux/iova.hindex
e0a892ae45c0..0bb8df43b393100644include/linux/iova.h +0
-0@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ struct iova_rcache {struct iova_domain {spinlock_t iova_rbtree_lock;/* Lock to protect update of rbtree */
structrb_rootrbroot; /* iova domain rbtree root */include/linux/iova.h +2
-1-struct rb_node *cached32_node;/* Save last alloced node */ +struct rb_node *cached_node;/* Save last alloced node */ +struct rb_node *cached32_node;/* Save last 32-bit alloced node */
unsigned long granule; /* pfn granularity for this domain */ unsigned long start_pfn; /* Lower limit for this domain */ unsigned long dma_32bit_pfn;
Signature · 2 lines
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Quoted 42 lines · Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Quoted 15 lines · Joerg Roedel
Hi Robin.
Quoted 11 lines · Robin Murphy
Hi all,
In the wake of the ARM SMMU optimisation efforts, it seems that certain workloads (e.g. storage I/O with large scatterlists) probably remain quite heavily influenced by IOVA allocation performance. Separately, Ard also reported massive performance drops for a graphical desktop on AMD Seattle when enabling SMMUs via IORT, which we traced to
dma_32bit_pfnin the DMA ops domain getting initialised differently for ACPI vs. DT, and exposing the overhead of the rbtree slow path. Whilst we could go around trying to close up all the little gaps that lead to hitting the slowest case, it seems a much better idea to simply make said slowest case a lot less slow.Quoted 2 lines
Do you have some numbers here? How big was the impact before these patches and how is it with the patches?
Here are some numbers:
(before)$ iperf -s
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 35898[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.0-10.2 sec 7.88 MBytes 6.48 Mbits/sec [ 5] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 35900 [ 5] 0.0-10.3 sec 7.88 MBytes 6.43 Mbits/sec [ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 35902 [ 4] 0.0-10.3 sec 7.88 MBytes 6.43 Mbits/sec(after)$ iperf -s
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 36330
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
Quoted 6 lines
[ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.09 GBytes 933 Mbits/sec [ 5] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 36332 [ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 939 Mbits/sec [ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 36334 [ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 938 Mbits/sec
Is this testing done on Host or on Guest/VM?
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Joerg
.
--
Thanks!
BestRegards
Quoted 4 lines
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
thanks
Ganapat
Quoted 51 lines · Ganapatrao Kulkarni
Quoted 42 lines · Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Quoted 15 lines · Joerg Roedel
Hi Robin.
Quoted 11 lines · Robin Murphy
Hi all,
In the wake of the ARM SMMU optimisation efforts, it seems that certain workloads (e.g. storage I/O with large scatterlists) probably remain quite heavily influenced by IOVA allocation performance. Separately, Ard also reported massive performance drops for a graphical desktop on AMD Seattle when enabling SMMUs via IORT, which we traced to
dma_32bit_pfnin the DMA ops domain getting initialised differently for ACPI vs. DT, and exposing the overhead of the rbtree slow path. Whilst we could go around trying to close up all the little gaps that lead to hitting the slowest case, it seems a much better idea to simply make said slowest case a lot less slow.Quoted 2 lines
Do you have some numbers here? How big was the impact before these patches and how is it with the patches?
Here are some numbers:
(before)$ iperf -s
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 35898[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.0-10.2 sec 7.88 MBytes 6.48 Mbits/sec [ 5] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 35900 [ 5] 0.0-10.3 sec 7.88 MBytes 6.43 Mbits/sec [ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 35902 [ 4] 0.0-10.3 sec 7.88 MBytes 6.43 Mbits/sec(after)$ iperf -s
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 36330
[ ID] Interval Transfer BandwidthQuoted 6 lines
[ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.09 GBytes 933 Mbits/sec [ 5] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 36332 [ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 939 Mbits/sec [ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 36334 [ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 938 Mbits/sec
Quoted 1 line
Is this testing done on Host or on Guest/VM?
Host
Quoted 24 lines
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Joerg
.
--
Thanks!
BestRegardsQuoted 4 lines
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernelthanks
Ganapat.
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks! BestRegards
Quoted 54 lines · Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Quoted 51 lines · Ganapatrao Kulkarni
Quoted 48 lines · Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Quoted 15 lines · Joerg Roedel
Hi Robin.
Quoted 11 lines · Robin Murphy
Hi all,
In the wake of the ARM SMMU optimisation efforts, it seems that certain workloads (e.g. storage I/O with large scatterlists) probably remain quite heavily influenced by IOVA allocation performance. Separately, Ard also reported massive performance drops for a graphical desktop on AMD Seattle when enabling SMMUs via IORT, which we traced to
dma_32bit_pfnin the DMA ops domain getting initialised differently for ACPI vs. DT, and exposing the overhead of the rbtree slow path. Whilst we could go around trying to close up all the little gaps that lead to hitting the slowest case, it seems a much better idea to simply make said slowest case a lot less slow.Quoted 2 lines
Do you have some numbers here? How big was the impact before these patches and how is it with the patches?
Here are some numbers:
(before)$ iperf -s
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 35898[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.0-10.2 sec 7.88 MBytes 6.48 Mbits/sec [ 5] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 35900 [ 5] 0.0-10.3 sec 7.88 MBytes 6.43 Mbits/sec [ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 35902 [ 4] 0.0-10.3 sec 7.88 MBytes 6.43 Mbits/sec(after)$ iperf -s
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 36330
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth[ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.09 GBytes 933 Mbits/sec [ 5] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 36332 [ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 939 Mbits/sec [ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 36334 [ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 938 Mbits/sec
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line
Is this testing done on Host or on Guest/VM?
Host
As per your log, iperf throughput is improved to 938 Mbits/sec from 6.43 Mbits/sec.
IMO, this seems to be unrealistic, some thing wrong with the testing?
Quoted 23 lines
Quoted 23 lines
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Joerg
.
--
Thanks!
BestRegardsQuoted 4 lines
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernelthanks
Ganapat
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
.
--
Thanks!
BestRegards
thanks
Ganapat
Quoted 56 lines · Ganapatrao Kulkarni
Quoted 54 lines · Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Quoted 51 lines · Ganapatrao Kulkarni
Quoted 48 lines · Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Quoted 15 lines · Joerg Roedel
Hi Robin.
Quoted 11 lines · Robin Murphy
Hi all,
In the wake of the ARM SMMU optimisation efforts, it seems that certain workloads (e.g. storage I/O with large scatterlists) probably remain quite heavily influenced by IOVA allocation performance. Separately, Ard also reported massive performance drops for a graphical desktop on AMD Seattle when enabling SMMUs via IORT, which we traced to
dma_32bit_pfnin the DMA ops domain getting initialised differently for ACPI vs. DT, and exposing the overhead of the rbtree slow path. Whilst we could go around trying to close up all the little gaps that lead to hitting the slowest case, it seems a much better idea to simply make said slowest case a lot less slow.Quoted 2 lines
Do you have some numbers here? How big was the impact before these patches and how is it with the patches?
Here are some numbers:
(before)$ iperf -s
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 35898[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.0-10.2 sec 7.88 MBytes 6.48 Mbits/sec [ 5] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 35900 [ 5] 0.0-10.3 sec 7.88 MBytes 6.43 Mbits/sec [ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 35902 [ 4] 0.0-10.3 sec 7.88 MBytes 6.43 Mbits/sec(after)$ iperf -s
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 36330
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth[ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.09 GBytes 933 Mbits/sec [ 5] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 36332 [ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 939 Mbits/sec [ 4] local 192.168.1.106 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.198 port 36334 [ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 938 Mbits/sec
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line
Is this testing done on Host or on Guest/VM?
Host
As per your log, iperf throughput is improved to 938 Mbits/sec from 6.43 Mbits/sec.
IMO, this seems to be unrealistic, some thing wrong with the testing?
For 64bits non-pci devices, the iova allocation is always searched from the last rb-tree node.
When many iovas allocated and keep a long time, the search process should check many rb nodes
then find a suitable free space. As my tracking, the average times exceeds 10K.
[free-space][free][used][...][used]
^ ^ ^
| | |-----rb_last
| |--------- maybe more than 10K allocated iova nodes
|------- for 32bits devices, cached32_node remember the lastest freed node, which can help us reduce check times
This patch series add a new member "cached_node" to service for 64bits devices, like cached32_node service for 32bits devices.
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 24 lines
Quoted 24 lines
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Joerg
.
--
Thanks!
BestRegardsQuoted 4 lines
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernelthanks
GanapatQuoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
.
--
Thanks!
BestRegardsthanks
Ganapat.
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks! BestRegards
Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu/iova: Extend rbtree node caching
In reply to Nate WattersonQuoted 103 lines · Nate Watterson
Hi Robin,
Quoted 100 lines · Robin Murphy
Hi Nate,
Quoted 81 lines · Nate Watterson
Hi Robin,
I am seeing a crash when performing very basic testing on this series with a Mellanox CX4 NIC. I dug into the crash a bit, and think this patch is the culprit, but this rcache business is still mostly witchcraft to me.# ifconfig eth5 up # ifconfig eth5 down Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000020 user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgd = ffff8007dbf47c00 [0000000000000020] *pgd=00000006efab0003, *pud=00000006efab0003, *pmd=00000007d8720003, *pte=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 47 PID: 5082 Comm: ifconfig Not tainted 4.13.0-rtp-enablement+ #3 task: ffff8007da1e5780 task.stack: ffff8007ddcb8000 PC is at __cached_rbnode_delete_update+0x2c/0x58 LR is at private_free_iova+0x2c/0x60 pc : [<ffff00000852c6e4>] lr : [<ffff00000852cdac>] pstate: 204001c5 sp : ffff8007ddcbba00 x29: ffff8007ddcbba00 x28: ffff8007c8350210 x27: ffff8007d1a80000 x26: ffff8007dcc20800 x25: 0000000000000140 x24: ffff8007c98f0008 x23: 00000000fffffe4e x22: 0000000000000140 x21: ffff8007c98f0008 x20: ffff8007c9adb240 x19: ffff8007c98f0018 x18: 0000000000000010 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 4000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 00000000ffffffff x12: 0000000000000001 x11: dead000000000200 x10: 00000000ffffffff x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffff8007c9adb1c0 x7 : 0000000040002000 x6 : 0000000000210d00 x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 000000000000c57e x3 : 00000000ffffffcf x2 : 00000000ffffffcf x1 : ffff8007c9adb240 x0 : 0000000000000000 [...] [<ffff00000852c6e4>] __cached_rbnode_delete_update+0x2c/0x58 [<ffff00000852cdac>] private_free_iova+0x2c/0x60 [<ffff00000852cea4>] iova_magazine_free_pfns+0x4c/0xa0 [<ffff00000852d0a8>] free_iova_fast+0x1b0/0x230 [<ffff000008529d34>] iommu_dma_free_iova+0x5c/0x80 [<ffff000008529db4>] __iommu_dma_unmap+0x5c/0x98 [<ffff00000852aebc>] iommu_dma_unmap_resource+0x24/0x30 [<ffff00000852aed4>] iommu_dma_unmap_page+0xc/0x18 [<ffff000008093030>] __iommu_unmap_page+0x40/0x60 [<ffff0000087401bc>] mlx5e_page_release+0xbc/0x128 [<ffff000008740498>] mlx5e_dealloc_rx_wqe+0x30/0x40 [<ffff000008735ef0>] mlx5e_close_channel+0x70/0x1f8 [<ffff0000087370f4>] mlx5e_close_channels+0x2c/0x50 [<ffff0000087385dc>] mlx5e_close_locked+0x54/0x68 [<ffff000008738620>] mlx5e_close+0x30/0x58 [...]** Disassembly for
__cached_rbnode_delete_update()near the fault **92|if (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) FFFF00000852C6C4| ldr x3,[x1,#0x18] ; x3,[free,#24] FFFF00000852C6C8| ldr x2,[x0,#0x30] ; x2,[iovad,#48] FFFF00000852C6CC| cmp x3,x2 FFFF00000852C6D0| b.cs 0xFFFF00000852C708 | curr = &iovad->cached32_node; 94|if (!curr) FFFF00000852C6D4| adds x19,x0,#0x18 ; x19,iovad,#24 FFFF00000852C6D8| b.eq 0xFFFF00000852C708 | |cached_iova = rb_entry(*curr, struct iova, node); | 99|if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) FFFF00000852C6DC| ldr x0,[x19] ; xiovad,[curr] FFFF00000852C6E0| ldr x2,[x1,#0x20] ; x2,[free,#32] FFFF00000852C6E4| ldr x0,[x0,#0x20] ; x0,[x0,#32]Apparently
cached_iovawas NULL so thepfn_loaccess faulted.FFFF00000852C6E8| cmp x2,x0 FFFF00000852C6EC| b.cc 0xFFFF00000852C6FC FFFF00000852C6F0| mov x0,x1 ; x0,free 100| *curr = rb_next(&free->node);After instrumenting the code a bit, this seems to be the culprit. In the previous call,
free->pfn_lowas 0xFFFF_FFFF which is actually thedma_limitfor the domain sorb_next()returns NULL.Quoted 5 lines
Let me know if you have any questions or would like additional tests run. I also applied your "DMA domain debug info" patches and dumped the contents of the domain at each of the steps above in case that would be useful. If nothing else, they reinforce how thirsty the CX4 NIC is especially when using 64k pages and many CPUs.
Thanks for the report - I somehow managed to reason myself out of keeping the "no cached node" check in
__cached_rbnode_delete_update()on the assumption that it must always be set by a previous allocation. However, there is indeed just one case case for which that fails: when you free any IOVA immediately after freeing the very topmost one. Which is something that freeing an entire magazine's worth of IOVAs back to the tree all at once has a very real chance of doing...The obvious straightforward fix is inline below, but I'm now starting to understand the appeal of reserving a sentinel node to ensure the tree
Hi Robin,
Have you prepared v3? I think we'd better to use the sentinel nodes. Otherwise,
there maybe many special cases should be considered, which may make the code difficult to understand. The sentinel nodes make the dma32 and dma64 can be considered separately, and both parts are handled the same way as before.
Quoted 171 lines
Quoted 2 lines
can never be empty, so I might have a quick go at that to see if it results in nicer code overall.
After applying your fix, the crash no longer occurs, but the performance of this use case is only marginally less awful than it was before. I'll start a new thread to discuss the causes and potential solutions.
Nate
Quoted 162 lines
Robin.
Quoted 98 lines
-Nate
Quoted 94 lines · Robin Murphy
The cached node mechanism provides a significant performance benefit for allocations using a 32-bit DMA mask, but in the case of non-PCI devices or where the 32-bit space is full, the loss of this benefit can be significant - on large systems there can be many thousands of entries in the tree, such that traversing to the end then walking all the way down to find free space every time becomes increasingly awful.
Maintain a similar cached node for the whole IOVA space as a superset of the 32-bit space so that performance can remain much more consistent.
Inspired by work by Zhen Lei <[email protected]>.
Tested-by Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>Tested-by Zhen Lei <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Robin Murphy <[email protected]>---
v2: No change
drivers/iommu/iova.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- include/linux/iova.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)drivers/iommu/iova.c +24
-18@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ init_iova_domain(struct iova_domain *iovad, unsignedlong granule, spin_lock_init(&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock); iovad->rbroot =RB_ROOT ; + iovad->cached_node =NULL ; iovad->cached32_node =NULL ; iovad->granule = granule; iovad->start_pfn = start_pfn;@@ -57,48 +58,46 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_iova_domain);static struct rb_node *__get_cached_rbnode (struct iova_domain *iovad,unsigned long *limit_pfn) { -if ((*limit_pfn > iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) || - (iovad->cached32_node ==NULL )) +struct rb_node *cached_node =NULL ; +struct iova *curr_iova; + +if (*limit_pfn <= iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + cached_node = iovad->cached32_node; +if (!cached_node) + cached_node = iovad->cached_node; +if (!cached_node)return rb_last (&iovad->rbroot); -else { -struct rb_node *prev_node =rb_prev (iovad->cached32_node); -struct iova *curr_iova = - rb_entry(iovad->cached32_node, struct iova, node); - *limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo; -return prev_node; - } + + curr_iova = rb_entry(cached_node, struct iova, node); + *limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo; + +return rb_prev (cached_node); }static void -__cached_rbnode_insert_update (struct iova_domain *iovad, -unsigned long limit_pfn,struct iova *new) +__cached_rbnode_insert_update (struct iova_domain *iovad,struct iova *new) { -if (limit_pfn != iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) -return ; - iovad->cached32_node = &new->node; +if (new->pfn_lo > iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + iovad->cached_node = &new->node; +else + iovad->cached32_node = &new->node; }static void __cached_rbnode_delete_update (struct iova_domain *iovad,struct iova *free) {struct iova *cached_iova; -struct rb_node *curr; +struct rb_node **curr =NULL ; - if (!iovad->cached32_node) - return; - curr = iovad->cached32_node; - cached_iova = rb_entry(curr, struct iova, node); +if (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + curr = &iovad->cached32_node; +if (!curr) + curr = &iovad->cached_node;(quoted diff) +2
-0+ if (!*curr) + return;Quoted 57 lines
Quoted 56 lines
drivers/iommu/iova.c +3
-9- if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) { -struct rb_node *node =rb_next (&free->node); - struct iova *iova = rb_entry(node, struct iova, node); + cached_iova = rb_entry(*curr, struct iova, node); -/* only cache if it's below 32bit pfn */ - if (node && iova->pfn_lo < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) - iovad->cached32_node = node; - else - iovad->cached32_node = NULL; - } + if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) + *curr =rb_next (&free->node); }/* Insert the iova into domain rbtree by holding writer lock */ @@ -135,7 +134,6 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad, {struct rb_node *prev, *curr =NULL ;unsigned long flags; -unsigned long saved_pfn;unsigned long align_mask = ~0UL ;if (size_aligned)@@ -143,7 +141,6 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,/* Walk the tree backwards */ spin_lock_irqsave (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags); - saved_pfn = limit_pfn; curr =__get_cached_rbnode (iovad, &limit_pfn); prev = curr;while (curr) {@@ -173,7 +170,7 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,/* If we have 'prev', it's a valid place to start the insertion. */
iova_insert_rbtree(&iovad->rbroot, new, prev);drivers/iommu/iova.c +1
-1-__cached_rbnode_insert_update (iovad, saved_pfn, new); +__cached_rbnode_insert_update (iovad, new);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags); diff --git a/include/linux/iova.h b/include/linux/iova.hindex
e0a892ae45c0..0bb8df43b393100644include/linux/iova.h +0
-0@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ struct iova_rcache {struct iova_domain {spinlock_t iova_rbtree_lock;/* Lock to protect update of rbtree */
structrb_rootrbroot; /* iova domain rbtree root */include/linux/iova.h +2
-1-struct rb_node *cached32_node;/* Save last alloced node */ +struct rb_node *cached_node;/* Save last alloced node */ +struct rb_node *cached32_node;/* Save last 32-bit alloced node */
unsigned long granule; /* pfn granularity for this domain */ unsigned long start_pfn; /* Lower limit for this domain */ unsigned long dma_32bit_pfn;
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks! BestRegards
Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu/iova: Extend rbtree node caching
In reply to Robin MurphyQuoted 191 lines · Robin Murphy
Hi Nate,
Quoted 81 lines · Nate Watterson
Hi Robin,
I am seeing a crash when performing very basic testing on this series with a Mellanox CX4 NIC. I dug into the crash a bit, and think this patch is the culprit, but this rcache business is still mostly witchcraft to me.# ifconfig eth5 up # ifconfig eth5 down Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000020 user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgd = ffff8007dbf47c00 [0000000000000020] *pgd=00000006efab0003, *pud=00000006efab0003, *pmd=00000007d8720003, *pte=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 47 PID: 5082 Comm: ifconfig Not tainted 4.13.0-rtp-enablement+ #3 task: ffff8007da1e5780 task.stack: ffff8007ddcb8000 PC is at __cached_rbnode_delete_update+0x2c/0x58 LR is at private_free_iova+0x2c/0x60 pc : [<ffff00000852c6e4>] lr : [<ffff00000852cdac>] pstate: 204001c5 sp : ffff8007ddcbba00 x29: ffff8007ddcbba00 x28: ffff8007c8350210 x27: ffff8007d1a80000 x26: ffff8007dcc20800 x25: 0000000000000140 x24: ffff8007c98f0008 x23: 00000000fffffe4e x22: 0000000000000140 x21: ffff8007c98f0008 x20: ffff8007c9adb240 x19: ffff8007c98f0018 x18: 0000000000000010 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 4000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 00000000ffffffff x12: 0000000000000001 x11: dead000000000200 x10: 00000000ffffffff x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffff8007c9adb1c0 x7 : 0000000040002000 x6 : 0000000000210d00 x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 000000000000c57e x3 : 00000000ffffffcf x2 : 00000000ffffffcf x1 : ffff8007c9adb240 x0 : 0000000000000000 [...] [<ffff00000852c6e4>] __cached_rbnode_delete_update+0x2c/0x58 [<ffff00000852cdac>] private_free_iova+0x2c/0x60 [<ffff00000852cea4>] iova_magazine_free_pfns+0x4c/0xa0 [<ffff00000852d0a8>] free_iova_fast+0x1b0/0x230 [<ffff000008529d34>] iommu_dma_free_iova+0x5c/0x80 [<ffff000008529db4>] __iommu_dma_unmap+0x5c/0x98 [<ffff00000852aebc>] iommu_dma_unmap_resource+0x24/0x30 [<ffff00000852aed4>] iommu_dma_unmap_page+0xc/0x18 [<ffff000008093030>] __iommu_unmap_page+0x40/0x60 [<ffff0000087401bc>] mlx5e_page_release+0xbc/0x128 [<ffff000008740498>] mlx5e_dealloc_rx_wqe+0x30/0x40 [<ffff000008735ef0>] mlx5e_close_channel+0x70/0x1f8 [<ffff0000087370f4>] mlx5e_close_channels+0x2c/0x50 [<ffff0000087385dc>] mlx5e_close_locked+0x54/0x68 [<ffff000008738620>] mlx5e_close+0x30/0x58 [...]** Disassembly for
__cached_rbnode_delete_update()near the fault **92|if (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) FFFF00000852C6C4| ldr x3,[x1,#0x18] ; x3,[free,#24] FFFF00000852C6C8| ldr x2,[x0,#0x30] ; x2,[iovad,#48] FFFF00000852C6CC| cmp x3,x2 FFFF00000852C6D0| b.cs 0xFFFF00000852C708 | curr = &iovad->cached32_node; 94|if (!curr) FFFF00000852C6D4| adds x19,x0,#0x18 ; x19,iovad,#24 FFFF00000852C6D8| b.eq 0xFFFF00000852C708 | |cached_iova = rb_entry(*curr, struct iova, node); | 99|if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) FFFF00000852C6DC| ldr x0,[x19] ; xiovad,[curr] FFFF00000852C6E0| ldr x2,[x1,#0x20] ; x2,[free,#32] FFFF00000852C6E4| ldr x0,[x0,#0x20] ; x0,[x0,#32]Apparently
cached_iovawas NULL so thepfn_loaccess faulted.FFFF00000852C6E8| cmp x2,x0 FFFF00000852C6EC| b.cc 0xFFFF00000852C6FC FFFF00000852C6F0| mov x0,x1 ; x0,free 100| *curr = rb_next(&free->node);After instrumenting the code a bit, this seems to be the culprit. In the previous call,
free->pfn_lowas 0xFFFF_FFFF which is actually thedma_limitfor the domain sorb_next()returns NULL.Quoted 5 lines
Let me know if you have any questions or would like additional tests run. I also applied your "DMA domain debug info" patches and dumped the contents of the domain at each of the steps above in case that would be useful. If nothing else, they reinforce how thirsty the CX4 NIC is especially when using 64k pages and many CPUs.
Thanks for the report - I somehow managed to reason myself out of keeping the "no cached node" check in
__cached_rbnode_delete_update()on the assumption that it must always be set by a previous allocation. However, there is indeed just one case case for which that fails: when you free any IOVA immediately after freeing the very topmost one. Which is something that freeing an entire magazine's worth of IOVAs back to the tree all at once has a very real chance of doing...The obvious straightforward fix is inline below, but I'm now starting to understand the appeal of reserving a sentinel node to ensure the tree can never be empty, so I might have a quick go at that to see if it results in nicer code overall.
Robin.
Quoted 86 lines
-Nate
Quoted 82 lines · Robin Murphy
The cached node mechanism provides a significant performance benefit for allocations using a 32-bit DMA mask, but in the case of non-PCI devices or where the 32-bit space is full, the loss of this benefit can be significant - on large systems there can be many thousands of entries in the tree, such that traversing to the end then walking all the way down to find free space every time becomes increasingly awful.
Maintain a similar cached node for the whole IOVA space as a superset of the 32-bit space so that performance can remain much more consistent.
Inspired by work by Zhen Lei <[email protected]>.
Tested-by Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>Tested-by Zhen Lei <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Robin Murphy <[email protected]>---
v2: No change
drivers/iommu/iova.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- include/linux/iova.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)drivers/iommu/iova.c +19
-14@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ init_iova_domain(struct iova_domain *iovad, unsignedlong granule, spin_lock_init(&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock); iovad->rbroot =RB_ROOT ; + iovad->cached_node =NULL ; iovad->cached32_node =NULL ; iovad->granule = granule; iovad->start_pfn = start_pfn;@@ -57,48 +58,46 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_iova_domain);static struct rb_node *__get_cached_rbnode (struct iova_domain *iovad,unsigned long *limit_pfn) { -if ((*limit_pfn > iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) || - (iovad->cached32_node ==NULL )) +struct rb_node *cached_node =NULL ; +struct iova *curr_iova; + +if (*limit_pfn <= iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + cached_node = iovad->cached32_node; +if (!cached_node) + cached_node = iovad->cached_node; +if (!cached_node)return rb_last (&iovad->rbroot); -else { -struct rb_node *prev_node =rb_prev (iovad->cached32_node); -struct iova *curr_iova = - rb_entry(iovad->cached32_node, struct iova, node); - *limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo; -return prev_node; - } + + curr_iova = rb_entry(cached_node, struct iova, node); + *limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo; + +return rb_prev (cached_node); }static void -__cached_rbnode_insert_update (struct iova_domain *iovad, -unsigned long limit_pfn,struct iova *new) +__cached_rbnode_insert_update (struct iova_domain *iovad,struct iova *new) { -if (limit_pfn != iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) -return ; - iovad->cached32_node = &new->node; +if (new->pfn_lo > iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + iovad->cached_node = &new->node; +else + iovad->cached32_node = &new->node; }static void __cached_rbnode_delete_update (struct iova_domain *iovad,struct iova *free)
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/iommu/iova.c EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_iova_domain); · line 90
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/iommu/iova.c +1
-4{struct iova *cached_iova; -struct rb_node *curr; +struct rb_node **curr =NULL ; - if (!iovad->cached32_node) - return; - curr = iovad->cached32_node; - cached_iova = rb_entry(curr, struct iova, node);
-----------------------------
Review
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/iommu/iova.c +4
-0+if (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + curr = &iovad->cached32_node; +if (!curr) + curr = &iovad->cached_node;(quoted diff) +2
-0+ if (!*curr) + return;
Is it necessary for us to try the following adjustment?
+ if (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn)
+ curr = &iovad->cached32_node;
+ else
+ curr = &iovad->cached_node;
+
+ if (!*curr) {
+ *curr = rb_next(&free->node);
+ return;
+ }
Quoted 61 lines
Quoted 48 lines
Quoted 48 lines
drivers/iommu/iova.c +3
-9- if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) { -struct rb_node *node =rb_next (&free->node); - struct iova *iova = rb_entry(node, struct iova, node); + cached_iova = rb_entry(*curr, struct iova, node); -/* only cache if it's below 32bit pfn */ - if (node && iova->pfn_lo < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) - iovad->cached32_node = node; - else - iovad->cached32_node = NULL; - } + if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) + *curr =rb_next (&free->node); }/* Insert the iova into domain rbtree by holding writer lock */ @@ -135,7 +134,6 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad, {struct rb_node *prev, *curr =NULL ;unsigned long flags; -unsigned long saved_pfn;unsigned long align_mask = ~0UL ;if (size_aligned)@@ -143,7 +141,6 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,/* Walk the tree backwards */ spin_lock_irqsave (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags); - saved_pfn = limit_pfn; curr =__get_cached_rbnode (iovad, &limit_pfn); prev = curr;while (curr) {@@ -173,7 +170,7 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,/* If we have 'prev', it's a valid place to start the insertion. */
iova_insert_rbtree(&iovad->rbroot, new, prev);drivers/iommu/iova.c +1
-1-__cached_rbnode_insert_update (iovad, saved_pfn, new); +__cached_rbnode_insert_update (iovad, new);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags); diff --git a/include/linux/iova.h b/include/linux/iova.hindex
e0a892ae45c0..0bb8df43b393100644include/linux/iova.h +0
-0@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ struct iova_rcache {struct iova_domain {spinlock_t iova_rbtree_lock;/* Lock to protect update of rbtree */
structrb_rootrbroot; /* iova domain rbtree root */Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 8 lines
include/linux/iova.h +2
-1-struct rb_node *cached32_node;/* Save last alloced node */ +struct rb_node *cached_node;/* Save last alloced node */ +struct rb_node *cached32_node;/* Save last 32-bit alloced node */
unsigned long granule; /* pfn granularity for this domain */ unsigned long start_pfn; /* Lower limit for this domain */ unsigned long dma_32bit_pfn;.
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks! BestRegards
Robin Murphy
maintainerRe: [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu/iova: Extend rbtree node caching
On 19/09/17 10:42, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
[...]
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/iommu/iova.c EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_iova_domain); · line 90
Quoted 11 lines
static void
__cached_rbnode_delete_update(structiova_domain*iovad, struct iova
*free){ struct iova *cached_iova;drivers/iommu/iova.c +1
-4-struct rb_node *curr; +struct rb_node **curr =NULL ; - if (!iovad->cached32_node) - return; - curr = iovad->cached32_node; - cached_iova = rb_entry(curr, struct iova, node);-----------------------------
Review
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/iommu/iova.c +4
-0+if (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + curr = &iovad->cached32_node; +if (!curr) + curr = &iovad->cached_node;(quoted diff) +2
-0+ if (!*curr) + return;Is it necessary for us to try the following adjustment?
Review
Quoted 9 lines
(quoted diff) +9
-0+ if (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) + curr = &iovad->cached32_node; + else + curr = &iovad->cached_node; + + if (!*curr) { + *curr = rb_next(&free->node); + return; + }
Yeah, I spotted that this looked a bit wonky after I posted it. It's already cleaned up in v3, which I'll be posting shortly after I write up some cover letters.
Thanks,
Robin.