block/loop: handle discard/zeroout error
cover block/loop: handle discard/zeroout error
Fix some problems when setting up loop device with a block device as back file and create/mount ext4 in the loop device.
BTW: blkdev_issue_zeroout retries if we immediately find the device doesn't support zeroout, but it doesn't retry if submit_bio_wait returns -EOPNOTSUPP. Is this correct behavior?
Thanks,
Shaohua
Shaohua Li (3):
block/loop: don't hijack error number
block/loop: use FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE for REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES block/loop: suppress discard IO error message
drivers/block/loop.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.9.5
PATCH 1/3 block/loop: don't hijack error number
If the bio returns -EOPNOTSUPP, we shouldn't hijack it and return -EIO
--- drivers/block/loop.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/block/loop.c +2 -2
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static void lo_complete_rq(struct request *rq)zero_fill_bio (bio); } -blk_mq_end_request (rq, cmd->ret <0 ?BLK_STS_IOERR :BLK_STS_OK ); +blk_mq_end_request (rq,errno_to_blk_status (cmd->ret)); }static void lo_rw_aio_complete (struct kiocb *iocb,long ret,long ret2)
@@ -1725,7 +1725,7 @@ static void loop_handle_cmd(struct loop_cmd *cmd) failed:/* complete non-aio request */ if (!cmd->use_aio || ret) { - cmd->ret = ret ? -EIO :0 ; + cmd->ret = ret;blk_mq_complete_request (cmd->rq); } }
Signature · 1 line
2.9.5
PATCH 2/3 block/loop: use FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE for REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES
In reply to Shaohua LiREQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES really means zero the data. And the in blkdev_fallocate, FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE will retry but FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE not, even loop request doesn't have BLKDEV_ZERO_NOFALLBACK set.
--- drivers/block/loop.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
drivers/block/loop.c +3 -0
@@ -430,6 +430,9 @@ static int lo_discard(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq, loff_t pos)int mode =FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE |FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE ;int ret; +if (req_op (rq) ==REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES ) + mode =FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE |FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE ; +if ((!file->f_op->fallocate) || lo->lo_encrypt_key_size) { ret = -EOPNOTSUPP ; goto out;
Signature · 1 line
2.9.5
PATCH 3/3 block/loop: suppress discard IO error message
In reply to Shaohua LiWe don't know if fallocate really supports FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE till fallocate is called. If it doesn't support, loop will return -EOPNOTSUPP and we seee a lot of error message printed by blk_update_request. Failure for discard IO isn't a problem, so we just return 0 in loop which will suppress the IO error message
--- drivers/block/loop.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
drivers/block/loop.c +3 -0
@@ -441,6 +441,9 @@ static int lo_discard(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq, loff_t pos) ret = file->f_op->fallocate (file, mode, pos,blk_rq_bytes (rq));if (unlikely (ret && ret != -EINVAL && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP )) ret = -EIO ; + +if (req_op (rq) ==REQ_OP_DISCARD && ret == -EOPNOTSUPP ) + ret =0 ; out:return ret; }
Signature · 1 line
2.9.5