PCI: dwc: MSI-X feature
Subsystems (3)
v5 cover PCI: dwc: MSI-X feature
Replaces the use of IRQ domain hierarchy by the IRQ chained used by pcie-designware and each SoC specific driver in order to allow new and complex features like MSI-X.
Adds Synopsys Root Complex support for MSI-X feature.
Expands the maximum number of IRQs from 32 to 256 distributed by a maximum of 8 controller registers.
The patch set was made against the Bjorn's next branch.
Gustavo Pimentel (9):
PCI: dwc: Add IRQ chained API support
PCI: dwc: exynos: Switch to use the IRQ chained API
PCI: dwc: imx6: Switch to use the IRQ chained API
PCI: dwc: artpec6: Switch to use the IRQ chained API
PCI: dwc: designware: Switch to use the IRQ chained API
PCI: dwc: qcom: Switch to use the IRQ chained API
PCI: dwc: keystone: Switch to use the IRQ chained API
PCI: dwc: Remove IRQ domain hierarchy API support
PCI: dwc: Expand maximum number of IRQs from 32 to 256
drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c | 18 -- drivers/pci/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 18 -- drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone-dw.c | 91 +------- drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.c | 1 + drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.h | 4 +- drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 3 +- drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c | 18 -- drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 402 +++++++++++++++++++-------------- drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c | 16 -- drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 30 ++- drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 16 -- 11 files changed, 260 insertions(+), 357 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
PATCH v5 1/9 PCI: dwc: Add IRQ chained API support
Adds a IRQ chained API to pcie-designware, that aims to replace the current IRQ domain hierarchy API implemented.
Although the IRQ domain hierarchy API is still available, pcie-designware will use now the IRQ chained API.
---
Change v1->v2:
- num_vectors is now not configurable by the Device Tree. Now it is 32 by default and can be overridden by any specific SoC driver. Change v2->v3:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
Change v3->v4:
- Moved Kishon's fixes (PCI end point error and a dra7xx warning) from v3-0007 patch file to here.
- Undo the change of the function signature to be more coherent with the host mode specific functions (Thanks Kishon).
- Refactor the added functions in order to used host_data so that getting pp again back from pci could be avoided. (Thanks Kishon)
- Changed summary line to match the drivers/PCI convention and changelog to maintain the consistency (thanks Bjorn).
Change v4->v5:
- Implemented Kishon MSI multiple messages fix (thanks Kishon).
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 18 ++ 2 files changed, 286 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c +268 -28
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@* published by the Free Software Foundation. */ +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> #include <linux/irqdomain.h> #include <linux/of_address.h> #include <linux/of_pci.h>
@@ -53,6 +54,36 @@ static struct irq_chip dw_msi_irq_chip = { .irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq, }; +static void dw_msi_ack_irq (struct irq_data *d) +{ +irq_chip_ack_parent (d); +} + +static void dw_msi_mask_irq (struct irq_data *d) +{ +pci_msi_mask_irq (d); +irq_chip_mask_parent (d); +} + +static void dw_msi_unmask_irq (struct irq_data *d) +{ +pci_msi_unmask_irq (d); +irq_chip_unmask_parent (d); +} + +static struct irq_chip dw_pcie_msi_irq_chip = { + .name ="PCI-MSI" , + .irq_ack = dw_msi_ack_irq, + .irq_mask = dw_msi_mask_irq, + .irq_unmask = dw_msi_unmask_irq, +}; + +static struct msi_domain_info dw_pcie_msi_domain_info = { + .flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS |MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS | +MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX |MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI ), + .chip = &dw_pcie_msi_irq_chip, +}; +/* MSI int handler */ irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq (struct pcie_port *pp) {
@@ -81,6 +112,196 @@ irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp)return ret; } +/* Chained MSI interrupt service routine */ +static void dw_chained_msi_isr (struct irq_desc *desc) +{ +struct irq_chip *chip =irq_desc_get_chip (desc); +struct pcie_port *pp; + +chained_irq_enter (chip, desc); + + pp =irq_desc_get_handler_data (desc); +dw_handle_msi_irq (pp); + +chained_irq_exit (chip, desc); +} + +static void dw_pci_setup_msi_msg (struct irq_data *data,struct msi_msg *msg) +{ +struct pcie_port *pp =irq_data_get_irq_chip_data (data); +struct dw_pcie *pci =to_dw_pcie_from_pp (pp); +u64 msi_target; + +if (pp->ops->get_msi_addr) + msi_target = pp->ops->get_msi_addr (pp); +else + msi_target =virt_to_phys ((void *)pp->msi_data); + + msg->address_lo =lower_32_bits (msi_target); + msg->address_hi =upper_32_bits (msi_target); + +if (pp->ops->get_msi_data) + msg->data = pp->ops->get_msi_data (pp, data->hwirq); +else + msg->data = data->hwirq; + +dev_dbg (pci->dev,"msi#%d address_hi %#x address_lo %#x\n" , + (int )data->hwirq, msg->address_hi, msg->address_lo); +} + +static int dw_pci_msi_set_affinity (struct irq_data *irq_data, +const struct cpumask *mask,bool force) +{ +return -EINVAL ; +} + +static void dw_pci_bottom_mask (struct irq_data *data) +{ +struct pcie_port *pp =irq_data_get_irq_chip_data (data); +unsigned int res, bit, ctrl; +unsigned long flags; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&pp->lock, flags); + +if (pp->ops->msi_clear_irq) + pp->ops->msi_clear_irq (pp, data->hwirq); +else { + ctrl = data->hwirq /32 ; + res = ctrl *12 ; + bit = data->hwirq %32 ; + + pp->irq_status[ctrl] &= ~(1 << bit); +dw_pcie_wr_own_conf (pp,PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res,4 , + pp->irq_status[ctrl]); + } + +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pp->lock, flags); +} + +static void dw_pci_bottom_unmask (struct irq_data *data) +{ +struct pcie_port *pp =irq_data_get_irq_chip_data (data); +unsigned int res, bit, ctrl; +unsigned long flags; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&pp->lock, flags); + +if (pp->ops->msi_set_irq) + pp->ops->msi_set_irq (pp, data->hwirq); +else { + ctrl = data->hwirq /32 ; + res = ctrl *12 ; + bit = data->hwirq %32 ; + + pp->irq_status[ctrl] |=1 << bit; +dw_pcie_wr_own_conf (pp,PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res,4 , + pp->irq_status[ctrl]); + } + +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pp->lock, flags); +} + +static void dw_pci_bottom_ack (struct irq_data *d) +{ +struct msi_desc *msi =irq_data_get_msi_desc (d); +struct pcie_port *pp; + + pp = (struct pcie_port *)msi_desc_to_pci_sysdata (msi); + +if (pp->ops->msi_irq_ack) + pp->ops->msi_irq_ack (d->hwirq, pp); +} + +static struct irq_chip dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip = { + .name ="DWPCI-MSI" , + .irq_ack = dw_pci_bottom_ack, + .irq_compose_msi_msg = dw_pci_setup_msi_msg, + .irq_set_affinity = dw_pci_msi_set_affinity, + .irq_mask = dw_pci_bottom_mask, + .irq_unmask = dw_pci_bottom_unmask, +}; + +static int dw_pcie_irq_domain_alloc (struct irq_domain *domain, +unsigned int virq,unsigned int nr_irqs, +void *args) +{ +struct pcie_port *pp = domain->host_data; +unsigned long flags; +unsigned long bit; +u32 i; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&pp->lock, flags); + + bit =bitmap_find_free_region (pp->msi_irq_in_use, pp->num_vectors, +order_base_2 (nr_irqs)); + +if (bit <0 ) { +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pp->lock, flags); +return -ENOSPC ; + } + +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pp->lock, flags); + +for (i =0 ; i < nr_irqs; i++) +irq_domain_set_info (domain, virq + i, bit + i, + &dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip, + pp, handle_level_irq, +NULL ,NULL ); + +return 0 ; +} + +static void dw_pcie_irq_domain_free (struct irq_domain *domain, +unsigned int virq,unsigned int nr_irqs) +{ +struct irq_data *data =irq_domain_get_irq_data (domain, virq); +struct pcie_port *pp =irq_data_get_irq_chip_data (data); +unsigned long flags; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&pp->lock, flags); +bitmap_release_region (pp->msi_irq_in_use, data->hwirq, +order_base_2 (nr_irqs)); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pp->lock, flags); +} + +static const struct irq_domain_ops dw_pcie_msi_domain_ops = { + .alloc = dw_pcie_irq_domain_alloc, + .free = dw_pcie_irq_domain_free, +}; + +int dw_pcie_allocate_domains (struct pcie_port *pp) +{ +struct dw_pcie *pci =to_dw_pcie_from_pp (pp); +struct fwnode_handle *fwnode =of_node_to_fwnode (pci->dev->of_node); + + pp->irq_domain =irq_domain_create_linear (fwnode, pp->num_vectors, + &dw_pcie_msi_domain_ops, pp); +if (!pp->irq_domain) { +dev_err (pci->dev,"failed to create IRQ domain\n" ); +return -ENOMEM ; + } + + pp->msi_domain =pci_msi_create_irq_domain (fwnode, + &dw_pcie_msi_domain_info, + pp->irq_domain); +if (!pp->msi_domain) { +dev_err (pci->dev,"failed to create MSI domain\n" ); +irq_domain_remove (pp->irq_domain); +return -ENOMEM ; + } + +return 0 ; +} + +void dw_pcie_free_msi (struct pcie_port *pp) +{ +irq_set_chained_handler (pp->msi_irq,NULL ); +irq_set_handler_data (pp->msi_irq,NULL ); + +irq_domain_remove (pp->msi_domain); +irq_domain_remove (pp->irq_domain); +} +void dw_pcie_msi_init (struct pcie_port *pp) {struct dw_pcie *pci =to_dw_pcie_from_pp (pp);
@@ -99,20 +320,21 @@ void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp)/* program the msi_data */ dw_pcie_wr_own_conf (pp,PCIE_MSI_ADDR_LO ,4 , - (u32)(msi_target &0xffffffff )); +lower_32_bits (msi_target));dw_pcie_wr_own_conf (pp,PCIE_MSI_ADDR_HI ,4 , - (u32)(msi_target >>32 &0xffffffff )); +upper_32_bits (msi_target)); }static void dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq (struct pcie_port *pp,int irq) { -unsigned int res, bit, val; +unsigned int res, bit, ctrl; - res = (irq /32 ) *12 ; + ctrl = irq /32 ; + res = ctrl *12 ; bit = irq %32 ; -dw_pcie_rd_own_conf (pp,PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res,4 , &val); - val &= ~(1 << bit); -dw_pcie_wr_own_conf (pp,PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res,4 , val); + pp->irq_status[ctrl] &= ~(1 << bit); +dw_pcie_wr_own_conf (pp,PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res,4 , + pp->irq_status[ctrl]); } static void clear_irq_range(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq_base,
@@ -134,13 +356,14 @@ static void clear_irq_range(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq_base,static void dw_pcie_msi_set_irq (struct pcie_port *pp,int irq) { -unsigned int res, bit, val; +unsigned int res, bit, ctrl; - res = (irq /32 ) *12 ; + ctrl = irq /32 ; + res = ctrl *12 ; bit = irq %32 ; -dw_pcie_rd_own_conf (pp,PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res,4 , &val); - val |=1 << bit; -dw_pcie_wr_own_conf (pp,PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res,4 , val); + pp->irq_status[ctrl] |=1 << bit; +dw_pcie_wr_own_conf (pp,PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res,4 , + pp->irq_status[ctrl]); }static int assign_irq (int no_irqs,struct msi_desc *desc,int *pos)
@@ -288,11 +511,13 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)struct device *dev = pci->dev;struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;struct platform_device *pdev =to_platform_device (dev); +struct resource_entry *win, *tmp;struct pci_bus *bus, *child;struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;struct resource *cfg_res; -int i, ret; -struct resource_entry *win, *tmp; +int ret; + +spin_lock_init (&pci->pp.lock); cfg_res =platform_get_resource_byname (pdev,IORESOURCE_MEM ,"config" );if (cfg_res) {
@@ -391,18 +616,33 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) pci->num_viewport =2 ;if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_PCI_MSI )) { -if (!pp->ops->msi_host_init) { - pp->irq_domain =irq_domain_add_linear (dev->of_node, -MAX_MSI_IRQS , &msi_domain_ops, - &dw_pcie_msi_chip); -if (!pp->irq_domain) { -dev_err (dev,"irq domain init failed\n" ); - ret = -ENXIO ; +/* +* If a specific SoC driver needs to change the +* default number of vectors, it needs to implement +* the set_num_vectors callback. +*/ +if (!pp->ops->set_num_vectors) { + pp->num_vectors =MSI_DEF_NUM_VECTORS ; + }else { + pp->ops->set_num_vectors (pp); + +if (pp->num_vectors >MAX_MSI_IRQS || + pp->num_vectors ==0 ) { +dev_err (dev, +"Invalid number of vectors\n" ); goto error; } + } -for (i =0 ; i <MAX_MSI_IRQS ; i++) -irq_create_mapping (pp->irq_domain, i); +if (!pp->ops->msi_host_init) { + ret =dw_pcie_allocate_domains (pp); +if (ret) + goto error; + +if (pp->msi_irq) +irq_set_chained_handler_and_data (pp->msi_irq, + dw_chained_msi_isr, + pp); }else { ret = pp->ops->msi_host_init (pp, &dw_pcie_msi_chip);if (ret <0 )
@@ -424,10 +664,6 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) bridge->ops = &dw_pcie_ops; bridge->map_irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci; bridge->swizzle_irq = pci_common_swizzle; -if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_PCI_MSI )) { - bridge->msi = &dw_pcie_msi_chip; - dw_pcie_msi_chip.dev = dev; - } ret =pci_scan_root_bus_bridge (bridge);if (ret)
@@ -596,11 +832,15 @@ static u8 dw_pcie_iatu_unroll_enabled(struct dw_pcie *pci)void dw_pcie_setup_rc (struct pcie_port *pp) { -u32 val; +u32 val, ctrl;struct dw_pcie *pci =to_dw_pcie_from_pp (pp);dw_pcie_setup (pci); +/* Initialize IRQ Status array */ +for (ctrl =0 ; ctrl <MAX_MSI_CTRLS ; ctrl++) +dw_pcie_rd_own_conf (pp,PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + (ctrl *12 ),4 , + &pp->irq_status[ctrl]);/* setup RC BARs */ dw_pcie_writel_dbi (pci,PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0 ,0x00000004 );dw_pcie_writel_dbi (pci,PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1 ,0x00000000 );
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h +18 -0
@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@*/ #define MAX_MSI_IRQS 32#define MAX_MSI_CTRLS (MAX_MSI_IRQS / 32) +#define MSI_DEF_NUM_VECTORS 32/* Maximum number of inbound/outbound iATUs */ #define MAX_IATU_IN 256
@@ -152,7 +153,9 @@ struct dw_pcie_host_ops {phys_addr_t (*get_msi_addr)(struct pcie_port *pp);u32 (*get_msi_data)(struct pcie_port *pp,int pos);void (*scan_bus)(struct pcie_port *pp); +void (*set_num_vectors)(struct pcie_port *pp);int (*msi_host_init)(struct pcie_port *pp,struct msi_controller *chip); +void (*msi_irq_ack)(int irq,struct pcie_port *pp); };struct pcie_port {
@@ -177,7 +180,11 @@ struct pcie_port {const struct dw_pcie_host_ops *ops;int msi_irq;struct irq_domain *irq_domain; +struct irq_domain *msi_domain;dma_addr_t msi_data; +u32 num_vectors; +u32 irq_status[MAX_MSI_CTRLS ]; +spinlock_t lock;DECLARE_BITMAP (msi_irq_in_use,MAX_MSI_IRQS ); };
@@ -319,8 +326,10 @@ static inline void dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(struct dw_pcie *pci)#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE_DW_HOST irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq (struct pcie_port *pp);void dw_pcie_msi_init (struct pcie_port *pp); +void dw_pcie_free_msi (struct pcie_port *pp);void dw_pcie_setup_rc (struct pcie_port *pp);int dw_pcie_host_init (struct pcie_port *pp); +int dw_pcie_allocate_domains (struct pcie_port *pp);#else static inline irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq (struct pcie_port *pp) {
@@ -331,6 +340,10 @@ static inline void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp) { } +static inline void dw_pcie_free_msi (struct pcie_port *pp) +{ +} +static inline void dw_pcie_setup_rc (struct pcie_port *pp) { }
@@ -339,6 +352,11 @@ static inline int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) {return 0 ; } + +static inline int dw_pcie_allocate_domains (struct pcie_port *pp) +{ +return 0 ; +}#endif #ifdef CONFIG_PCIE_DW_EP
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] PCI: dwc: Add IRQ chained API support
Hello Gustavo
Quoted 31 lines · Gustavo Pimentel
Adds a IRQ chained API to pcie-designware, that aims to replace the current IRQ domain hierarchy API implemented.
Although the IRQ domain hierarchy API is still available, pcie-designware will use now the IRQ chained API.
Signed-off-by Gustavo Pimentel <[email protected]>---
Changev1->v2:
-num_vectorsis now not configurable by the Device Tree. Now it is 32 by default and can be overridden by any specific SoC driver. Changev2->v3:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
Changev3->v4:
- Moved Kishon's fixes (PCI end point error and a dra7xx warning) from v3-0007 patch file to here.
- Undo the change of the function signature to be more coherent with the host mode specific functions (Thanks Kishon).
- Refactor the added functions in order to usedhost_dataso that getting pp again back from pci could be avoided. (Thanks Kishon)
- Changed summary line to match thedrivers/PCIconvention and changelog to maintain the consistency (thanks Bjorn).
Changev4->v5:
- Implemented Kishon MSI multiple messages fix (thanks Kishon).drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 18 ++ 2 files changed, 286 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp) · line 138
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c +10
-0+static void dw_pci_setup_msi_msg (struct irq_data *data,struct msi_msg *msg) +{ +struct pcie_port *pp =irq_data_get_irq_chip_data (data); +struct dw_pcie *pci =to_dw_pcie_from_pp (pp); +u64 msi_target; + +if (pp->ops->get_msi_addr) + msi_target = pp->ops->get_msi_addr (pp); +else + msi_target =virt_to_phys ((void *)pp->msi_data);
The assignment in the else clause should be:
msi_target = (u64)pp->msi_data;
See my commit 111111a72e67 ("PCI: dwc: Use the DMA-API to get the MSI address").
Since this patch set was originally posted in June last year, you probably missed this when you recently rebased your patch set.
Since you introduce new functions and remove the old functions, I can see why you didn't get a merge conflict.
It might be worthwile to look at the commits made in the old functions since the original patch submission (June last year), to see if there has been any other fixes that needs to be applied in your new functions as well.
However, good news. With this small change Kishon's pci_epf_test passes on ARTPEC-6 :)
Will do some testing with a E1000E PCIe card to see if MSI-X also works, if it works, I will add a Tested-by tag.
Regards,
Niklas
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c +12
-0+ + msg->address_lo =lower_32_bits (msi_target); + msg->address_hi =upper_32_bits (msi_target); + +if (pp->ops->get_msi_data) + msg->data = pp->ops->get_msi_data (pp, data->hwirq); +else + msg->data = data->hwirq; + +dev_dbg (pci->dev,"msi#%d address_hi %#x address_lo %#x\n" , + (int )data->hwirq, msg->address_hi, msg->address_lo); +}
Niklas Cassel
Tested-byRe: [PATCH v5 1/9] PCI: dwc: Add IRQ chained API support
Quoted 46 lines · Niklas Cassel
Hello Gustavo
Quoted 31 lines · Gustavo Pimentel
Adds a IRQ chained API to pcie-designware, that aims to replace the current IRQ domain hierarchy API implemented.
Although the IRQ domain hierarchy API is still available, pcie-designware will use now the IRQ chained API.
Signed-off-by Gustavo Pimentel <[email protected]>---
Changev1->v2:
-num_vectorsis now not configurable by the Device Tree. Now it is 32 by default and can be overridden by any specific SoC driver. Changev2->v3:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
Changev3->v4:
- Moved Kishon's fixes (PCI end point error and a dra7xx warning) from v3-0007 patch file to here.
- Undo the change of the function signature to be more coherent with the host mode specific functions (Thanks Kishon).
- Refactor the added functions in order to usedhost_dataso that getting pp again back from pci could be avoided. (Thanks Kishon)
- Changed summary line to match thedrivers/PCIconvention and changelog to maintain the consistency (thanks Bjorn).
Changev4->v5:
- Implemented Kishon MSI multiple messages fix (thanks Kishon).drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 18 ++ 2 files changed, 286 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp) · line 138
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c +10
-0+static void dw_pci_setup_msi_msg (struct irq_data *data,struct msi_msg *msg) +{ +struct pcie_port *pp =irq_data_get_irq_chip_data (data); +struct dw_pcie *pci =to_dw_pcie_from_pp (pp); +u64 msi_target; + +if (pp->ops->get_msi_addr) + msi_target = pp->ops->get_msi_addr (pp); +else + msi_target =virt_to_phys ((void *)pp->msi_data);The assignment in the else clause should be:
Quoted 2 lines
msi_target = (u64)pp->msi_data;
Kishon's pci_epf_test works, and also an Intel e1000e PCIe card with MSI-X (added some debug prints in the e1000e driver to verify that MSI-X is actually used). The intel e1000e network card appears to function properly with different ping sizes.
Nice!
With the one liner fix above:
PATCH v5 2/9 PCI: dwc: exynos: Switch to use the IRQ chained API
In reply to Gustavo PimentelChanges Exynos SoC specific driver to use the IRQ chained API available in pcie-designware.
---
Change v1->v2:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
Change v2->v3:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
Change v3->v4:
- Changed summary line to match the drivers/PCI convention and changelog to maintain the consistency (thanks Bjorn).
Change v4->v5:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c | 18 ------------------ 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c +0 -18
@@ -297,15 +297,6 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos_pcie_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)return IRQ_HANDLED ; } -static irqreturn_t exynos_pcie_msi_irq_handler (int irq,void *arg) -{ -struct exynos_pcie *ep = arg; -struct dw_pcie *pci = ep->pci; -struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp; - -return dw_handle_msi_irq (pp); -} -static void exynos_pcie_msi_init (struct exynos_pcie *ep) {struct dw_pcie *pci = ep->pci;
@@ -431,15 +422,6 @@ static int __init exynos_add_pcie_port(struct exynos_pcie *ep,dev_err (dev,"failed to get msi irq\n" );return pp->msi_irq; } - - ret =devm_request_irq (dev, pp->msi_irq, - exynos_pcie_msi_irq_handler, -IRQF_SHARED |IRQF_NO_THREAD , -"exynos-pcie" , ep); -if (ret) { -dev_err (dev,"failed to request msi irq\n" ); -return ret; - } } pp->root_bus_nr =-1 ;
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] PCI: dwc: exynos: Switch to use the IRQ chained API
Quoted 5 lines · Gustavo Pimentel
Changes Exynos SoC specific driver to use the IRQ chained API available in pcie-designware.
Signed-off-by Gustavo Pimentel <[email protected]>
It looks good.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
Quoted 56 lines
---
Changev1->v2:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version. Changev2->v3:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version. Changev3->v4:
- Changed summary line to match thedrivers/PCIconvention and changelog to
maintain the consistency (thanks Bjorn).
Changev4->v5:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c | 18 ------------------ 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c +0
-9@@ -297,15 +297,6 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos_pcie_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)return IRQ_HANDLED ; } -static irqreturn_t exynos_pcie_msi_irq_handler (int irq,void *arg) -{ -struct exynos_pcie *ep = arg; -struct dw_pcie *pci = ep->pci; -struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp; - -return dw_handle_msi_irq (pp); -} -static void exynos_pcie_msi_init (struct exynos_pcie *ep) {drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c +0
-9struct dw_pcie *pci = ep->pci;@@ -431,15 +422,6 @@ static int __init exynos_add_pcie_port(struct exynos_pcie *ep,dev_err (dev,"failed to get msi irq\n" );return pp->msi_irq; } - - ret =devm_request_irq (dev, pp->msi_irq, - exynos_pcie_msi_irq_handler, -IRQF_SHARED |IRQF_NO_THREAD , -"exynos-pcie" , ep); -if (ret) { -dev_err (dev,"failed to request msi irq\n" ); -return ret; - } }
pp->root_bus_nr= -1;
--
2.7.4
PATCH v5 3/9 PCI: dwc: imx6: Switch to use the IRQ chained API
In reply to Gustavo PimentelChanges iMX6 SoC specific driver to use the IRQ chained API available in pcie-designware.
---
Change v1->v2:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
Change v2->v3:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
Change v3->v4:
- Changed summary line to match the drivers/PCI convention and changelog to maintain the consistency (thanks Bjorn).
Change v4->v5:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
drivers/pci/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 18 ------------------ 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/dwc/pci-imx6.c +0 -18
@@ -545,15 +545,6 @@ static int imx6_pcie_wait_for_speed_change(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)return -EINVAL ; } -static irqreturn_t imx6_pcie_msi_handler (int irq,void *arg) -{ -struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie = arg; -struct dw_pcie *pci = imx6_pcie->pci; -struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp; - -return dw_handle_msi_irq (pp); -} -static int imx6_pcie_establish_link (struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) {struct dw_pcie *pci = imx6_pcie->pci;
@@ -677,15 +668,6 @@ static int imx6_add_pcie_port(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie,dev_err (dev,"failed to get MSI irq\n" );return -ENODEV ; } - - ret =devm_request_irq (dev, pp->msi_irq, - imx6_pcie_msi_handler, -IRQF_SHARED |IRQF_NO_THREAD , -"mx6-pcie-msi" , imx6_pcie); -if (ret) { -dev_err (dev,"failed to request MSI irq\n" ); -return ret; - } } pp->root_bus_nr =-1 ;
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
PATCH v5 4/9 PCI: dwc: artpec6: Switch to use the IRQ chained API
In reply to Gustavo PimentelChanges ARTPEC-6 SoC specific driver to use the IRQ chained API available in pcie-designware.
---
Change v1->v2:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
Change v2->v3:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
Change v3->v4:
- Changed summary line to match the drivers/PCI convention and changelog to maintain the consistency (thanks Bjorn).
Change v4->v5:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c | 18 ------------------ 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c +0 -18
@@ -386,15 +386,6 @@ static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops artpec6_pcie_host_ops = { .host_init = artpec6_pcie_host_init, }; -static irqreturn_t artpec6_pcie_msi_handler (int irq,void *arg) -{ -struct artpec6_pcie *artpec6_pcie = arg; -struct dw_pcie *pci = artpec6_pcie->pci; -struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp; - -return dw_handle_msi_irq (pp); -} -static int artpec6_add_pcie_port (struct artpec6_pcie *artpec6_pcie,struct platform_device *pdev) {
@@ -409,15 +400,6 @@ static int artpec6_add_pcie_port(struct artpec6_pcie *artpec6_pcie,dev_err (dev,"failed to get MSI irq\n" );return pp->msi_irq; } - - ret =devm_request_irq (dev, pp->msi_irq, - artpec6_pcie_msi_handler, -IRQF_SHARED |IRQF_NO_THREAD , -"artpec6-pcie-msi" , artpec6_pcie); -if (ret) { -dev_err (dev,"failed to request MSI irq\n" ); -return ret; - } } pp->root_bus_nr =-1 ;
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
PATCH v5 5/9 PCI: dwc: designware: Switch to use the IRQ chained API
In reply to Gustavo PimentelChanges designware generic driver to use the IRQ chained API available in pcie-designware.
---
Change v1->v2:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
Change v2->v3:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
Change v3->v4:
- Changed summary line to match the drivers/PCI convention and changelog to maintain the consistency (thanks Bjorn).
Change v4->v5:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c | 16 ---------------- 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c +0 -16
@@ -28,13 +28,6 @@ struct dw_plat_pcie {struct dw_pcie *pci; }; -static irqreturn_t dw_plat_pcie_msi_irq_handler (int irq,void *arg) -{ -struct pcie_port *pp = arg; - -return dw_handle_msi_irq (pp); -} -static int dw_plat_pcie_host_init (struct pcie_port *pp) {struct dw_pcie *pci =to_dw_pcie_from_pp (pp);
@@ -66,15 +59,6 @@ static int dw_plat_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp, pp->msi_irq =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 );if (pp->msi_irq <0 )return pp->msi_irq; - - ret =devm_request_irq (dev, pp->msi_irq, - dw_plat_pcie_msi_irq_handler, -IRQF_SHARED |IRQF_NO_THREAD , -"dw-plat-pcie-msi" , pp); -if (ret) { -dev_err (dev,"failed to request MSI IRQ\n" ); -return ret; - } } pp->root_bus_nr =-1 ;
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
PATCH v5 6/9 PCI: dwc: qcom: Switch to use the IRQ chained API
In reply to Gustavo PimentelChanges QCOM SoC specific driver to use the IRQ chained API available in pcie-designware.
---
Change v1->v2:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
Change v2->v3:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
Change v3->v4:
- Changed summary line to match the drivers/PCI convention and changelog to maintain the consistency (thanks Bjorn).
Change v4->v5:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 16 ---------------- 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c +0 -16
@@ -188,13 +188,6 @@ static void qcom_ep_reset_deassert(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)usleep_range (PERST_DELAY_US ,PERST_DELAY_US +500 ); } -static irqreturn_t qcom_pcie_msi_irq_handler (int irq,void *arg) -{ -struct pcie_port *pp = arg; - -return dw_handle_msi_irq (pp); -} -static int qcom_pcie_establish_link (struct qcom_pcie *pcie) {struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
@@ -1270,15 +1263,6 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) pp->msi_irq =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"msi" );if (pp->msi_irq <0 )return pp->msi_irq; - - ret =devm_request_irq (dev, pp->msi_irq, - qcom_pcie_msi_irq_handler, -IRQF_SHARED |IRQF_NO_THREAD , -"qcom-pcie-msi" , pp); -if (ret) { -dev_err (dev,"cannot request msi irq\n" ); -return ret; - } } ret =phy_init (pcie->phy);
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
PATCH v5 7/9 PCI: dwc: keystone: Switch to use the IRQ chained API
In reply to Gustavo PimentelChanges KeyStone SoC specific driver to use the IRQ chained API available in pcie-designware.
Adds new callback (ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_ack) to dw_pcie_host_ops to handle a specific KeyStone behavior.
---
Change v1->v2:
- Removed hardcoded num_vectors configuration (now it is done in the core driver by default).
Change v2->v3:
- Added Kishon's fixes (PCI end point error and a dra7xx warning). Change v3->v4:
- Moved Kishon's fixes to v4-0001 patch file.
- Moved msi_host_init function signature change to a new v4-0008 patch file.
- Changed summary line to match the drivers/PCI convention and changelog to maintain the consistency (thanks Bjorn).
Change v4->v5:
- Fix rebase problem.
- Implemented Kishon's suggestion.
drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone-dw.c | 89 ++------------------------------------- drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.c | 1 + drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone-dw.c +4 -85
@@ -124,20 +124,15 @@ void ks_dw_pcie_handle_msi_irq(struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie, int offset) } } -static void ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_ack (struct irq_data *d) +void ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_ack (int irq,struct pcie_port *pp) { -u32 offset, reg_offset, bit_pos; +u32 reg_offset, bit_pos;struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie; -struct msi_desc *msi; -struct pcie_port *pp;struct dw_pcie *pci; - msi =irq_data_get_msi_desc (d); - pp = (struct pcie_port *)msi_desc_to_pci_sysdata (msi); pci =to_dw_pcie_from_pp (pp); ks_pcie =to_keystone_pcie (pci); - offset = d->irq -irq_linear_revmap (pp->irq_domain,0 ); -update_reg_offset_bit_pos (offset, ®_offset, &bit_pos); +update_reg_offset_bit_pos (irq, ®_offset, &bit_pos);ks_dw_app_writel (ks_pcie,MSI0_IRQ_STATUS + (reg_offset <<4 ),BIT (bit_pos));
@@ -166,85 +161,9 @@ void ks_dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq) BIT(bit_pos)); } -static void ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_mask (struct irq_data *d) -{ -struct msi_desc *msi; -struct pcie_port *pp; -u32 offset; - - msi =irq_data_get_msi_desc (d); - pp = (struct pcie_port *)msi_desc_to_pci_sysdata (msi); - offset = d->irq -irq_linear_revmap (pp->irq_domain,0 ); - -/* Mask the end point if PVM implemented */ -if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_PCI_MSI )) { -if (msi->msi_attrib.maskbit) -pci_msi_mask_irq (d); - } - -ks_dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq (pp, offset); -} - -static void ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_unmask (struct irq_data *d) -{ -struct msi_desc *msi; -struct pcie_port *pp; -u32 offset; - - msi =irq_data_get_msi_desc (d); - pp = (struct pcie_port *)msi_desc_to_pci_sysdata (msi); - offset = d->irq -irq_linear_revmap (pp->irq_domain,0 ); - -/* Mask the end point if PVM implemented */ -if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_PCI_MSI )) { -if (msi->msi_attrib.maskbit) -pci_msi_unmask_irq (d); - } - -ks_dw_pcie_msi_set_irq (pp, offset); -} - -static struct irq_chip ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_chip = { - .name ="Keystone-PCIe-MSI-IRQ" , - .irq_ack = ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_ack, - .irq_mask = ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_mask, - .irq_unmask = ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_unmask, -}; - -static int ks_dw_pcie_msi_map (struct irq_domain *domain,unsigned int irq, -irq_hw_number_t hwirq) -{ -irq_set_chip_and_handler (irq, &ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_chip, - handle_level_irq); -irq_set_chip_data (irq, domain->host_data); - -return 0 ; -} - -static const struct irq_domain_ops ks_dw_pcie_msi_domain_ops = { - .map = ks_dw_pcie_msi_map, -}; -int ks_dw_pcie_msi_host_init (struct pcie_port *pp,struct msi_controller *chip) { -struct dw_pcie *pci =to_dw_pcie_from_pp (pp); -struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie =to_keystone_pcie (pci); -struct device *dev = pci->dev; -int i; - - pp->irq_domain =irq_domain_add_linear (ks_pcie->msi_intc_np, -MAX_MSI_IRQS , - &ks_dw_pcie_msi_domain_ops, - chip); -if (!pp->irq_domain) { -dev_err (dev,"irq domain init failed\n" ); -return -ENXIO ; - } - -for (i =0 ; i <MAX_MSI_IRQS ; i++) -irq_create_mapping (pp->irq_domain, i); - -return 0 ; +return dw_pcie_allocate_domains (pp); }void ks_dw_pcie_enable_legacy_irqs (struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie)
drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.c +1 -0
@@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops keystone_pcie_host_ops = { .msi_clear_irq = ks_dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq, .get_msi_addr = ks_dw_pcie_get_msi_addr, .msi_host_init = ks_dw_pcie_msi_host_init, + .msi_irq_ack = ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_ack, .scan_bus = ks_dw_pcie_v3_65_scan_bus, };
drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.h +1 -0
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ int ks_dw_pcie_rd_other_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int where, int size, u32 *val);void ks_dw_pcie_setup_rc_app_regs (struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie);void ks_dw_pcie_initiate_link_train (struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie); +void ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_ack (int i,struct pcie_port *pp);void ks_dw_pcie_msi_set_irq (struct pcie_port *pp,int irq);void ks_dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq (struct pcie_port *pp,int irq);void ks_dw_pcie_v3_65_scan_bus (struct pcie_port *pp);
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
PATCH v5 8/9 PCI: dwc: Remove IRQ domain hierarchy API support
In reply to Gustavo PimentelRemoves the unused IRQ domain hierarchy API support from pcie-designware.
---
Change v1->v2:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
Change v2->v3:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
Change v3->v4:
- Patch renamed from v3-0008 to v4-0009.
- Changed summary line to match the drivers/PCI convention and changelog to maintain the consistency (thanks Bjorn).
Change v4->v5:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone-dw.c | 2 +- drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.h | 3 +- drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 3 +- drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 190 +-------------------------------- drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 2 +- 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 195 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone-dw.c +1 -1
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ void ks_dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq) BIT(bit_pos)); } -int ks_dw_pcie_msi_host_init (struct pcie_port *pp,struct msi_controller *chip) +int ks_dw_pcie_msi_host_init (struct pcie_port *pp) {return dw_pcie_allocate_domains (pp); }
drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.h +1 -2
@@ -57,6 +57,5 @@ void ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_ack(int i, struct pcie_port *pp);void ks_dw_pcie_msi_set_irq (struct pcie_port *pp,int irq);void ks_dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq (struct pcie_port *pp,int irq);void ks_dw_pcie_v3_65_scan_bus (struct pcie_port *pp); -int ks_dw_pcie_msi_host_init (struct pcie_port *pp, -struct msi_controller *chip); +int ks_dw_pcie_msi_host_init (struct pcie_port *pp);int ks_dw_pcie_link_up (struct dw_pcie *pci);
drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c +1 -2
@@ -185,8 +185,7 @@ static int ls1021_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)return ls_pcie_host_init (pp); } -static int ls_pcie_msi_host_init (struct pcie_port *pp, -struct msi_controller *chip) +static int ls_pcie_msi_host_init (struct pcie_port *pp) {struct dw_pcie *pci =to_dw_pcie_from_pp (pp);struct device *dev = pci->dev;
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c +1 -189
208 lines not on this page · raw message
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h +1 -1
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ struct dw_pcie_host_ops {u32 (*get_msi_data)(struct pcie_port *pp,int pos);void (*scan_bus)(struct pcie_port *pp);void (*set_num_vectors)(struct pcie_port *pp); -int (*msi_host_init)(struct pcie_port *pp,struct msi_controller *chip); +int (*msi_host_init)(struct pcie_port *pp);void (*msi_irq_ack)(int irq,struct pcie_port *pp); };
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
PATCH v5 9/9 PCI: dwc: Expand maximum number of IRQs from 32 to 256
In reply to Gustavo PimentelThe Synopsys PCIe Root Complex supports up to 256 IRQs distributed by 8 controller registers.
Having this in mind, the number of the maximum number of IRQs was changed to 256 and now the number of controllers is calculated based on the number of vectors used by the specific SoC driver.
---
Change v1->v2:
- New patch file.
Change v2->v3:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
Change v3->v4:
- Patch renamed from v3-0009 to v4-0010.
- Changed summary line to match the drivers/PCI convention and changelog to maintain the consistency (thanks Bjorn).
Change v4->v5:
- Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 12 ++++++++---- drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 10 +++------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c +8 -4
@@ -79,11 +79,13 @@ static struct msi_domain_info dw_pcie_msi_domain_info = {/* MSI int handler */ irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq (struct pcie_port *pp) { -u32 val;int i, pos, irq; +u32 val, num_ctrls;irqreturn_t ret =IRQ_NONE ; -for (i =0 ; i <MAX_MSI_CTRLS ; i++) { + num_ctrls = pp->num_vectors /MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL ; + +for (i =0 ; i < num_ctrls; i++) {dw_pcie_rd_own_conf (pp,PCIE_MSI_INTR0_STATUS + i *12 ,4 , &val);if (!val)
@@ -644,13 +646,15 @@ static u8 dw_pcie_iatu_unroll_enabled(struct dw_pcie *pci)void dw_pcie_setup_rc (struct pcie_port *pp) { -u32 val, ctrl; +u32 val, ctrl, num_ctrls;struct dw_pcie *pci =to_dw_pcie_from_pp (pp);dw_pcie_setup (pci); + num_ctrls = pp->num_vectors /MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL ; +/* Initialize IRQ Status array */ -for (ctrl =0 ; ctrl <MAX_MSI_CTRLS ; ctrl++) +for (ctrl =0 ; ctrl < num_ctrls; ctrl++)dw_pcie_rd_own_conf (pp,PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + (ctrl *12 ),4 , &pp->irq_status[ctrl]);/* setup RC BARs */
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h +3 -7
@@ -110,13 +110,9 @@#define MSI_MESSAGE_DATA_32 0x58#define MSI_MESSAGE_DATA_64 0x5C -/* -* Maximum number of MSI IRQs can be 256 per controller. But keep -* it 32 as of now. Probably we will never need more than 32. If needed, -* then increment it in multiple of 32. -*/ -#define MAX_MSI_IRQS 32 -#define MAX_MSI_CTRLS (MAX_MSI_IRQS / 32) +#define MAX_MSI_IRQS 256 +#define MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL 32 +#define MAX_MSI_CTRLS (MAX_MSI_IRQS / MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL)#define MSI_DEF_NUM_VECTORS 32/* Maximum number of inbound/outbound iATUs */
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4