Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Package upgrades

PATCH In review Denys Dmytriyenko 4 participants 14 messages May 21, 2018 – Jun 21, 2018

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

cover Package upgrades

From: Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]>

Upgrades for hdparm, lz4, mtd-utils and wayland-protocols.

The following changes since commit 9611485bba03ef77ff31121e3b1da7cd57990c3e:

patchreview: don't disable malformed SoB check (2018-05-15 10:00:33 +0100)

are available in the git repository at:

git://push.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib denix/master

Denys Dmytriyenko (4):
hdparm: upgrade 9.55 -> 9.56
lz4: upgrade 1.8.1.2 -> 1.8.2
mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2
wayland-protocols: upgrade 1.13 -> 1.14

 meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb                            | 4 ++--
 meta/recipes-extended/hdparm/{hdparm_9.55.bb => hdparm_9.56.bb}       | 4 ++--
 .../wayland/{wayland-protocols_1.13.bb => wayland-protocols_1.14.bb}  | 4 ++--
 meta/recipes-support/lz4/{lz4_1.8.1.2.bb => lz4_1.8.2.bb}             | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 rename meta/recipes-extended/hdparm/{hdparm_9.55.bb => hdparm_9.56.bb} (90%)
 rename meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/{wayland-protocols_1.13.bb => wayland-protocols_1.14.bb} (85%)
 rename meta/recipes-support/lz4/{lz4_1.8.1.2.bb => lz4_1.8.2.bb} (94%)
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/4 hdparm: upgrade 9.55 -> 9.56

From: Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]>

---
 meta/recipes-extended/hdparm/{hdparm_9.55.bb => hdparm_9.56.bb} | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 rename meta/recipes-extended/hdparm/{hdparm_9.55.bb => hdparm_9.56.bb} (90%)
meta/recipes-extended/hdparm/hdparm_9.56.bb renamed from meta/recipes-extended/hdparm/hdparm_9.55.bb +2 -2
similarity index 90%
rename from meta/recipes-extended/hdparm/hdparm_9.55.bb
rename to meta/recipes-extended/hdparm/hdparm_9.56.bb
index c50e73f..17932ad 100644
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ SRC_URI = "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/hdparm/${BP}.tar.gz \
            file://wiper.sh-fix-stat-path.patch \
           "
 
-SRC_URI[md5sum] = "adae46e9564075ae288af8082d5ad9fd"
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "b5c76b732483df36bf08001a209b95b45558016615f935008e5ea91a7fde6dc7"
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "7900608e32834f65d2654fdb696e71a0"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "6ff9ed695f1017396eec4101f990f114b7b0e0a04c5aa6369c0394053d16e4da"
 
 EXTRA_OEMAKE = 'STRIP="echo" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS}"'
 
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
#2 lore raw

PATCH 2/4 lz4: upgrade 1.8.1.2 -> 1.8.2

In reply to Denys Dmytriyenko

From: Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]>

---
 meta/recipes-support/lz4/{lz4_1.8.1.2.bb => lz4_1.8.2.bb} | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
 rename meta/recipes-support/lz4/{lz4_1.8.1.2.bb => lz4_1.8.2.bb} (94%)
meta/recipes-support/lz4/lz4_1.8.2.bb renamed from meta/recipes-support/lz4/lz4_1.8.1.2.bb +1 -1
similarity index 94%
rename from meta/recipes-support/lz4/lz4_1.8.1.2.bb
rename to meta/recipes-support/lz4/lz4_1.8.2.bb
index 03017b3..5ad17e1 100644
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://lib/LICENSE;md5=ebc2ea4814a64de7708f1571904b32cc \
 
 PE = "1"
 
-SRCREV = "dfed9fa1d77f0434306d377c4da1f7191d3ba08a"
+SRCREV = "b3692db46d2b23a7c0af2d5e69988c94f126e10a"
 
 SRC_URI = "git://github.com/lz4/lz4.git \
            file://run-ptest \
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
#3 lore raw

PATCH 3/4 mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

In reply to Denys Dmytriyenko

From: Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]>

---
 meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb +2 -2
index a0e1cf7..97a3e0c 100644
@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ inherit autotools pkgconfig update-alternatives
 DEPENDS = "zlib lzo e2fsprogs util-linux"
 RDEPENDS_mtd-utils-tests += "bash"
 
-PV = "2.0.1+${SRCPV}"
+PV = "2.0.2+${SRCPV}"
 
-SRCREV = "9c6173559f95e939e66efb2ec3193d6f3618cf69"
+SRCREV = "bc63d36e39f389c8c17f6a8e9db47f2acc884659"
 SRC_URI = "git://git.infradead.org/mtd-utils.git \
            file://add-exclusion-to-mkfs-jffs2-git-2.patch \
 "
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

Quoted 12 lines · Denys Dmytriyenko

From: Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]>

---
 meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb +0 -0
index a0e1cf7..97a3e0c 100644

meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb inherit autotools pkgconfig update-alternatives · line 17

Quoted 10 lines
meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb +2 -2
@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ inherit autotools pkgconfig update-alternatives
 DEPENDS = "zlib lzo e2fsprogs util-linux"
 RDEPENDS_mtd-utils-tests += "bash"
 
-PV = "2.0.1+${SRCPV}"
+PV = "2.0.2+${SRCPV}"
 
-SRCREV = "9c6173559f95e939e66efb2ec3193d6f3618cf69"
+SRCREV = "bc63d36e39f389c8c17f6a8e9db47f2acc884659"
 SRC_URI = "git://git.infradead.org/mtd-utils.git \
            file://add-exclusion-to-mkfs-jffs2-git-2.patch \

Hi Denys,

I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and is still marked as pending.
Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you remember?

Just curious...

Cheers
Andrea

[1] Denys Dmytriyenko 2009-03-17
http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/log/recipes/mtd/mtd-utils/add-exclusion-to-mkfs-jffs2-git-2.patch

Quoted 9 lines
meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb +0 -1
 "
--

2.7.4

--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

Quoted 3 lines · Andrea Adami

I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and is still marked as pending.
Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you remember?

Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it:

commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26

Author: Chris Larson <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000

Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i cmdline option to -I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and mtd-utils-native, respectively.

Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a BitKeeper clone to mine...

Ross

#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

Quoted 11 lines · Ross
Quoted 3 lines · Andrea Adami

I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and is still marked as pending.
Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you remember?

Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it:

commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26

Author: Chris Larson <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000
Quoted 6 lines

Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i cmdline option to -I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and mtd-utils-native, respectively.

Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a BitKeeper clone to mine...

So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged?

Signature · 1 line
Denys
#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

Sorry, no it doesn't. I've just picked this in ross/mut but a follow-up patch to remove that mystery patch (can't see it being used in image generation anywhere) would be good.

Ross

Quoted 23 lines · Denys Dmytriyenko
Quoted 11 lines · Ross
Quoted 3 lines · Andrea Adami

I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and is still marked as pending.
Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you remember?

Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it:

commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26

Author: Chris Larson <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000
Quoted 6 lines

Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i cmdline option to -I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and mtd-utils-native, respectively.

Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a BitKeeper clone to mine...

So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged?

--
Denys

#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

Does this upgrade fix the build failure with gcc8?

With current master I'm seeing:
super0.c:238:32: error: 'snprintf' output may be truncated before the last format character [-Werror=format-truncation=]

Quoted 38 lines · Ross

Sorry, no it doesn't. I've just picked this in ross/mut but a follow-up patch to remove that mystery patch (can't see it being used in image generation anywhere) would be good.

Ross

Quoted 5 lines · Denys Dmytriyenko
Quoted 4 lines · Ross
Quoted 3 lines · Andrea Adami

I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and is still marked as pending.
Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you

remember?

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines

Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it:

commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26

Author: Chris Larson <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000

Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i cmdline

option to

Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 5 lines

-I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and mtd-utils-native, respectively.

Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a BitKeeper clone to mine...

So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged?

--
Denys

--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

#9 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

Master builds fine for me, but interestingly I don't see that in my mtd-utils unpack. Do you have patches?

Ross

Quoted 46 lines · Martin Jansa

Does this upgrade fix the build failure with gcc8?

With current master I'm seeing:
super0.c:238:32: error: 'snprintf' output may be truncated before the last format character [-Werror=format-truncation=]

Quoted 39 lines · Ross

Sorry, no it doesn't. I've just picked this in ross/mut but a follow-up patch to remove that mystery patch (can't see it being used in image generation anywhere) would be good.

Ross

Quoted 19 lines · Denys Dmytriyenko
Quoted 18 lines · Ross
Quoted 4 lines · Andrea Adami

I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and is still marked as pending.
Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you remember?

Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it:

commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26

Author: Chris Larson <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000

Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i cmdline
option to
-I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and
mtd-utils-native,
respectively.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a BitKeeper clone to mine...

So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged?

--
Denys

--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

#10 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

It might be DEBUG_BUILD enabled in my builds, let me check.

Quoted 58 lines · Ross

Master builds fine for me, but interestingly I don't see that in my mtd-utils unpack. Do you have patches?

Ross

Quoted 4 lines · Martin Jansa

Does this upgrade fix the build failure with gcc8?

With current master I'm seeing:
super0.c:238:32: error: 'snprintf' output may be truncated before the

last

Quoted 3 lines

format character [-Werror=format-truncation=]

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:33 PM Burton, Ross <[email protected]>

Quoted 10 lines · wrote:
Quoted 10 lines

Sorry, no it doesn't. I've just picked this in ross/mut but a follow-up patch to remove that mystery patch (can't see it being used in image generation anywhere) would be good.

Ross

Quoted 2 lines · Denys Dmytriyenko
Quoted 1 line · Ross

On 22 May 2018 at 08:49, Andrea Adami <[email protected]>

Quoted 1 line · wrote:
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1]

and

Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 3 lines

is still marked as pending.
Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you remember?

Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it:

commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26

Author: Chris Larson <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000

Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i

cmdline

Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines

option to
-I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and
mtd-utils-native,
respectively.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a BitKeeper clone to mine...

So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged?

--
Denys

--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

#11 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

I'm sorry, it's one of those days where "mtd-utils" and "mdadm" look exactly the same to me - yeah both are in oe-core, both start with m and are related to block devices.

And the build failure with mdadm is reproducible with DEBUG_BUILD, -O2 and above work fine thanks to -ftree-vrp (similarly like systemd gcc8 issue fixed in
http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=b0fdaedc6e9c233f357022b0fb706cb19757f5c4
)

Quoted 64 lines · Martin Jansa

It might be DEBUG_BUILD enabled in my builds, let me check.

Quoted 58 lines · Ross

Master builds fine for me, but interestingly I don't see that in my mtd-utils unpack. Do you have patches?

Ross

Quoted 4 lines · Martin Jansa

Does this upgrade fix the build failure with gcc8?

With current master I'm seeing:
super0.c:238:32: error: 'snprintf' output may be truncated before the

last

Quoted 3 lines

format character [-Werror=format-truncation=]

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:33 PM Burton, Ross <[email protected]>

Quoted 10 lines · wrote:
Quoted 10 lines

Sorry, no it doesn't. I've just picked this in ross/mut but a follow-up patch to remove that mystery patch (can't see it being used in image generation anywhere) would be good.

Ross

Quoted 2 lines · Denys Dmytriyenko
Quoted 1 line · Ross

On 22 May 2018 at 08:49, Andrea Adami <[email protected]>

Quoted 1 line · wrote:
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1]

and

Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 3 lines

is still marked as pending.
Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you remember?

Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it:

commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26

Author: Chris Larson <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000

Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i

cmdline

Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines

option to
-I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and
mtd-utils-native,
respectively.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a BitKeeper clone to mine...

So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged?

--
Denys

--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

#12 lore raw

PATCH 4/4 wayland-protocols: upgrade 1.13 -> 1.14

In reply to Denys Dmytriyenko

From: Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]>

---
 .../wayland/{wayland-protocols_1.13.bb => wayland-protocols_1.14.bb}  | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 rename meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/{wayland-protocols_1.13.bb => wayland-protocols_1.14.bb} (85%)
meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/wayland-protocols_1.14.bb renamed from meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/wayland-protocols_1.13.bb +2 -2
similarity index 85%
rename from meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/wayland-protocols_1.13.bb
rename to meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/wayland-protocols_1.14.bb
index 1ef1ee1..3393a2c 100644
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=c7b12b6702da38ca028ace54aae3d484 \
 
 SRC_URI = "https://wayland.freedesktop.org/releases/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.xz \
            "
-SRC_URI[md5sum] = "29312149dafcd4a0e739ba94995a574d"
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "0758bc8008d5332f431b2a84fea7de64d971ce270ed208206a098ff2ebc68f38"
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "5d32eaf0f5d6b7da7f5ad0959e2551e6"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "9648896b2462b49b15a69b60f44656593c170c0e73121c890eb16d0c1d9376f6"
 
 inherit allarch autotools pkgconfig
 
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
#13 lore raw
In reply to Denys Dmytriyenko
Quoted 11 lines · Denys Dmytriyenko

From: Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]>

Upgrades for hdparm, lz4, mtd-utils and wayland-protocols.

The following changes since commit 9611485bba03ef77ff31121e3b1da7cd57990c3e:

patchreview: don't disable malformed SoB check (2018-05-15 10:00:33 +0100)

are available in the git repository at:

git://push.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib denix/master

BTW, create-pull-request doesn't seem to handle push.oe.org vs. git.oe.org

Quoted 24 lines

Denys Dmytriyenko (4):
hdparm: upgrade 9.55 -> 9.56
lz4: upgrade 1.8.1.2 -> 1.8.2
mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2
wayland-protocols: upgrade 1.13 -> 1.14

 meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb                            | 4 ++--
 meta/recipes-extended/hdparm/{hdparm_9.55.bb => hdparm_9.56.bb}       | 4 ++--
 .../wayland/{wayland-protocols_1.13.bb => wayland-protocols_1.14.bb}  | 4 ++--
 meta/recipes-support/lz4/{lz4_1.8.1.2.bb => lz4_1.8.2.bb}             | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 rename meta/recipes-extended/hdparm/{hdparm_9.55.bb => hdparm_9.56.bb} (90%)
 rename meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/{wayland-protocols_1.13.bb => wayland-protocols_1.14.bb} (85%)
 rename meta/recipes-support/lz4/{lz4_1.8.1.2.bb => lz4_1.8.2.bb} (94%)
Signature · 7 lines
2.7.4

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core