mac_esp, zorro_esp, esp_scsi: Various improvements
v2 cover mac_esp, zorro_esp, esp_scsi: Various improvements
This series has fixes and cleanup for mac_esp, zorro_esp and the core esp_scsi driver.
These improvements include elimination of duplicated code temporarily introduced for zorro_esp.
Finn Thain (6):
zorro_esp: Limit DMA transfers to 65535 bytes
esp_scsi: Track residual for PIO transfers
esp_scsi: Grant disconnect privilege for untagged commands
esp_scsi: Eliminate ESP_FLAG_DOING_SLOWCMD
esp_scsi: De-duplicate PIO routines
esp_scsi: Optimize PIO loops
drivers/scsi/Kconfig | 6 + drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------- drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h | 10 +- drivers/scsi/mac_esp.c | 171 +--------------------------- drivers/scsi/zorro_esp.c | 240 ++++++--------------------------------- 5 files changed, 209 insertions(+), 412 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.18.1
PATCH v2 1/6 zorro_esp: Limit DMA transfers to 65535 bytes
The core driver, esp_scsi, does not use the ESP_CONFIG2_FENAB bit, so the chip's Transfer Counter register is only 16 bits wide (not 24). A larger transfer cannot work and will theoretically result in a failed command and a "DMA length is zero" error.
--- drivers/scsi/zorro_esp.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/scsi/zorro_esp.c +1 -7
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int fastlane_esp_irq_pending(struct esp *esp)static u32 zorro_esp_dma_length_limit (struct esp *esp,u32 dma_addr,u32 dma_len) { -return dma_len >0xFFFFFF ?0xFFFFFF : dma_len; +return dma_len >0xFFFF ?0xFFFF : dma_len; }static void zorro_esp_reset_dma (struct esp *esp)
@@ -484,7 +484,6 @@ static void zorro_esp_send_blz1230_dma_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr,scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_DMA );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>0 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCLOW );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>8 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCMED ); -zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>16 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCHI );scsi_esp_cmd (esp, cmd); }
@@ -529,7 +528,6 @@ static void zorro_esp_send_blz1230II_dma_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr,scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_DMA );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>0 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCLOW );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>8 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCMED ); -zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>16 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCHI );scsi_esp_cmd (esp, cmd); }
@@ -574,7 +572,6 @@ static void zorro_esp_send_blz2060_dma_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr,scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_DMA );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>0 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCLOW );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>8 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCMED ); -zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>16 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCHI );scsi_esp_cmd (esp, cmd); }
@@ -599,7 +596,6 @@ static void zorro_esp_send_cyber_dma_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr,zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>0 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCLOW );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>8 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCMED ); -zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>16 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCHI );if (write) {/* DMA receive */
@@ -649,7 +645,6 @@ static void zorro_esp_send_cyberII_dma_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr,zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>0 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCLOW );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>8 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCMED ); -zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>16 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCHI );if (write) {/* DMA receive */
@@ -691,7 +686,6 @@ static void zorro_esp_send_fastlane_dma_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr,zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>0 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCLOW );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>8 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCMED ); -zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>16 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCHI );if (write) {/* DMA receive */
Signature · 1 line
2.18.1
Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] zorro_esp: Limit DMA transfers to 65535 bytes
Hi Finn,
thanks for spotting this!
Am 14.10.2018 um 19:12 schrieb Finn Thain:
Quoted 9 lines
The core driver,
esp_scsi, does not use theESP_CONFIG2_FENABbit, so the chip's Transfer Counter register is only 16 bits wide (not 24). A larger transfer cannot work and will theoretically result in a failed command and a "DMA length is zero" error.Fixes 3109e5ae0311Signed-off-by Finn Thain <[email protected]>Cc Michael Schmitz <[email protected]>Tested-by Michael Schmitz <[email protected]>
Quoted 66 lines
--- drivers/scsi/zorro_esp.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)drivers/scsi/zorro_esp.c +1
-7@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int fastlane_esp_irq_pending(struct esp *esp)static u32 zorro_esp_dma_length_limit (struct esp *esp,u32 dma_addr,u32 dma_len) { -return dma_len >0xFFFFFF ?0xFFFFFF : dma_len; +return dma_len >0xFFFF ?0xFFFF : dma_len; }static void zorro_esp_reset_dma (struct esp *esp)@@ -484,7 +484,6 @@ static void zorro_esp_send_blz1230_dma_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr,scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_DMA );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>0 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCLOW );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>8 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCMED ); -zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>16 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCHI );scsi_esp_cmd (esp, cmd); }@@ -529,7 +528,6 @@ static void zorro_esp_send_blz1230II_dma_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr,scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_DMA );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>0 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCLOW );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>8 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCMED ); -zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>16 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCHI );scsi_esp_cmd (esp, cmd); }@@ -574,7 +572,6 @@ static void zorro_esp_send_blz2060_dma_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr,scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_DMA );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>0 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCLOW );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>8 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCMED ); -zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>16 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCHI );scsi_esp_cmd (esp, cmd); }@@ -599,7 +596,6 @@ static void zorro_esp_send_cyber_dma_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr,zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>0 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCLOW );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>8 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCMED ); -zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>16 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCHI );if (write) {/* DMA receive */ @@ -649,7 +645,6 @@ static void zorro_esp_send_cyberII_dma_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr,zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>0 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCLOW );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>8 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCMED ); -zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>16 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCHI );if (write) {/* DMA receive */ @@ -691,7 +686,6 @@ static void zorro_esp_send_fastlane_dma_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr,zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>0 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCLOW );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>8 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCMED ); -zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>16 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCHI );if (write) {/* DMA receive */
Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] zorro_esp: Limit DMA transfers to 65535 bytes
In reply to Finn ThainHi Finn,
Quoted 4 lines · Finn Thain
The core driver,
esp_scsi, does not use theESP_CONFIG2_FENABbit, so the chip's Transfer Counter register is only 16 bits wide (not 24). A larger transfer cannot work and will theoretically result in a failed command and a "DMA length is zero" error.
Thanks for your patch!
Quoted 1 line
Fixes 3109e5ae0311
NCR53C9x boards")
$ git help fixes
'fixes' is aliased to 'show --format='Fixes: %h ("%s")' -s'BTW, if you use vim, add
noremap ;gs "zyiw:exe "new \| setlocal buftype=nofile
bufhidden=hide noswapfile syntax=git \| 0r ! git show ".@z."" \| :0<CR><CR>
to .vimrc, and type ";gs" when the cursor is positioned on a commit ID.
Quoted 16 lines
Signed-off-by Finn Thain <[email protected]>Cc Michael Schmitz <[email protected]>Tested-by Michael Schmitz <[email protected]>drivers/scsi/zorro_esp.c +1
-1@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int fastlane_esp_irq_pending(struct esp *esp)static u32 zorro_esp_dma_length_limit (struct esp *esp,u32 dma_addr,u32 dma_len) { -return dma_len >0xFFFFFF ?0xFFFFFF : dma_len; +return dma_len >0xFFFF ?0xFFFF : dma_len; }static void zorro_esp_reset_dma (struct esp *esp)
drivers/scsi/zorro_esp.c static void zorro_esp_send_blz1230_dma_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr, · line 487
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/scsi/zorro_esp.c +0
-1@@ -484,7 +484,6 @@ static void zorro_esp_send_blz1230_dma_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr,scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_DMA );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>0 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCLOW );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>8 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCMED ); -zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>16 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCHI );
Since all these sub-drivers seem to support 24-bit transfers, perhaps this is something to be fixed in the esp_scsi core?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] zorro_esp: Limit DMA transfers to 65535 bytes
Quoted 6 lines · Geert Uytterhoeven
Quoted 2 lines
Fixes 3109e5ae0311Fixes 3109e5ae0311 ("scsi: zorro_esp: New driver for Amiga ZorroNCR53C9x boards")
OK.
Quoted 11 lines
$ git help fixes 'fixes' is aliased to 'show --format='Fixes: %h ("%s")' -s'BTW, if you use vim, add
noremap ;gs "zyiw:exe "new \| setlocal buftype=nofile
bufhidden=hide noswapfile syntax=git \| 0r ! git show ".@z."" \| :0<CR><CR>to .vimrc, and type ";gs" when the cursor is positioned on a commit ID.
Thanks.
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 14 lines
Signed-off-by Finn Thain <[email protected]>Cc Michael Schmitz <[email protected]>Tested-by Michael Schmitz <[email protected]>drivers/scsi/zorro_esp.c +1
-1@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int fastlane_esp_irq_pending(struct esp *esp)static u32 zorro_esp_dma_length_limit (struct esp *esp,u32 dma_addr,u32 dma_len) { -return dma_len >0xFFFFFF ?0xFFFFFF : dma_len; +return dma_len >0xFFFF ?0xFFFF : dma_len; }
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/scsi/zorro_esp.c static void zorro_esp_send_blz1230_dma_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr, · line 487
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/scsi/zorro_esp.c +0
-1static void zorro_esp_reset_dma (struct esp *esp)@@ -484,7 +484,6 @@ static void zorro_esp_send_blz1230_dma_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr,scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_DMA );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>0 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCLOW );zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>8 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCMED ); -zorro_esp_write8 (esp, (esp_count >>16 ) &0xff ,ESP_TCHI );Since all these sub-drivers seem to support 24-bit transfers, perhaps this is something to be fixed in the
esp_scsicore?
I don't think there is anything to fix in the esp_scsi core. The fact that no-one saw the error indicates that large transfers don't occur in practice.
If you said there is an opportunity for an enhancement, I could agree, assuming that you also found a way to produce large IO requests. But I doubt that such an enhancement would make a measurable improvement.
Even if the benefit was measurable, the fix under review would still be needed for stable kernels.
BTW, Michael and I already discussed all this (it probably should have happened on the linux-m68k list).
Please see,
$ grep -lr ESP_CONFIG2_FENAB drivers/scsi/ drivers/scsi/am53c974.c drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h
The authors of am53c974.c obviously decided it wasn't wise to make this feature mandatory (which suggests that perhaps it shouldn't go into common code).
The comments in esp_scsi.c say that ESP_CONFIG2_FENAB has undesirable consequences. There is information in the datasheets on this point but I didn't follow it up because I don't see a performance issue.
PATCH v2 2/6 esp_scsi: Track residual for PIO transfers
In reply to Finn ThainIf a target disconnects during a PIO data transfer the command may fail when the target reconnects:
scsi host1: DMA length is zero!
scsi host1: cur adr[04380000] len[00000000]
The scsi bus is then reset. This happens because the residual reached zero before the transfer was completed.
The usual residual calculation relies on the Transfer Count registers which works for DMA transfers but not for PIO transfers. Fix the problem by storing the PIO transfer residual and using that to correctly calculate bytes_sent.
--- drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c | 1 + drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h | 2 ++ drivers/scsi/mac_esp.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c +1 -0
@@ -1338,6 +1338,7 @@ static int esp_data_bytes_sent(struct esp *esp, struct esp_cmd_entry *ent, bytes_sent = esp->data_dma_len; bytes_sent -= ecount; + bytes_sent -= esp->send_cmd_residual;/* * The am53c974 has a DMA 'pecularity'. The doc states:
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h +2 -0
@@ -540,6 +540,8 @@ struct esp {void *dma;int dmarev; + +int send_cmd_residual; };/* A front-end driver for the ESP chip should do the following in
drivers/scsi/mac_esp.c +2 -0
@@ -427,6 +427,8 @@ static void mac_esp_send_pio_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr, u32 esp_count,scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_TI ); } } + + esp->send_cmd_residual = esp_count; }static int mac_esp_irq_pending (struct esp *esp)
Signature · 1 line
2.18.1
Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] esp_scsi: Track residual for PIO transfers
Hi Finn,
Quoted 6 lines · Finn Thain
If a target disconnects during a PIO data transfer the command may fail when the target reconnects:
scsi host1: DMA length is zero!
scsi host1: cur adr[04380000] len[00000000]
Quoted 7 lines
The scsi bus is then reset. This happens because the residual reached zero before the transfer was completed.
The usual residual calculation relies on the Transfer Count registers which works for DMA transfers but not for PIO transfers. Fix the problem by storing the PIO transfer residual and using that to correctly calculate
bytes_sent.
Thanks for yur patch!
Quoted 1 line
Fixes 6fe07aaffbf0
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h struct esp { · line 544
Quoted 12 lines
Tested-by Stan Johnson <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Finn Thain <[email protected]>Tested-by Michael Schmitz <[email protected]>drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h +2
-0@@ -540,6 +540,8 @@ struct esp {void *dma;int dmarev; + +int send_cmd_residual;
unsigned int?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] esp_scsi: Track residual for PIO transfers
Quoted 5 lines · Geert Uytterhoeven
Quoted 2 lines
Fixes 6fe07aaffbf0Fixes 6fe07aaffbf0 ("[SCSI] m68k: new mac_esp scsi driver")
Fixed.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Tested-by Stan Johnson <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Finn Thain <[email protected]>Tested-by Michael Schmitz <[email protected]>drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h +0
-0@@ -540,6 +540,8 @@ struct esp {
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h struct esp { · line 544
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h +2
-0void *dma;int dmarev; + +int send_cmd_residual;unsigned int?
My first thought was to use u32, same as esp_count. But it turns out that the end result really is an int --
static int esp_data_bytes_sent(struct esp *esp, struct esp_cmd_entry *ent,
struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
{
int fifo_cnt, ecount, bytes_sent, flush_fifo;
...
bytes_sent = esp->data_dma_len;
bytes_sent -= ecount;
bytes_sent -= esp->send_cmd_residual;
...
return bytes_sent;
}Apparently over/underflow is a real possibility, because there is a test for this in esp_process_event().
Quoted 11 lines
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
PATCH v2 3/6 esp_scsi: Grant disconnect privilege for untagged commands
In reply to Finn ThainA SCSI device is not granted disconnect privilege by an esp_scsi host unless that device has its simple_tags flag set. However, a device may support disconnect/reselect and not support command queueing. Allow these devices to disconnect and improve bus utilization.
--- drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c +2 -6
@@ -800,13 +800,9 @@ static void esp_maybe_execute_command(struct esp *esp) build_identify:/* If we don't have a lun-data struct yet, we're probing -* so do not disconnect. Also, do not disconnect unless -* we have a tag on this command. +* so do not disconnect. */ -if (lp && (tp->flags &ESP_TGT_DISCONNECT ) && ent->tag[0 ]) - *p++ =IDENTIFY (1 , lun); -else - *p++ =IDENTIFY (0 , lun); + *p++ =IDENTIFY (lp && (tp->flags &ESP_TGT_DISCONNECT ), lun);if (ent->tag[0 ] && esp->rev ==ESP100 ) {/* ESP100 lacks select w/atn3 command, use select
Signature · 1 line
2.18.1
Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] esp_scsi: Grant disconnect privilege for untagged commands
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c static void esp_maybe_execute_command(struct esp *esp) · line 805
Quoted 1 line
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c +1
-0+ *p++ =IDENTIFY (lp && (tp->flags &ESP_TGT_DISCONNECT ), lun);
I think lp should always be non-NULL here.
Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] esp_scsi: Grant disconnect privilege for untagged commands
Quoted 2 lines · Christoph Hellwig
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c static void esp_maybe_execute_command(struct esp *esp) · line 805
Quoted 1 line
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c +1
-0+ *p++ =IDENTIFY (lp && (tp->flags &ESP_TGT_DISCONNECT ), lun);I think lp should always be non-NULL here.
That indeed appears to be the case these days.
So we can't rely on !lp to detect when probing the bus any longer. What else would be available? Do commands used for device probing also have a tag these days by default?
Do we really need to make that distinction?
Cheers,
Michael
Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] esp_scsi: Grant disconnect privilege for untagged commands
Quoted 3 lines · Michael Schmitz
Do we really need to make that distinction?
esp_reconnect() dereferences lp, so !lp has to inhibit disconnection.
At least, that's my reading. I can't see any other reason for the lp conditional.
Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] esp_scsi: Grant disconnect privilege for untagged commands
In reply to Christoph HellwigQuoted 4 lines · Christoph Hellwig
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c static void esp_maybe_execute_command(struct esp *esp) · line 805
Quoted 1 line
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c +1
-0+ *p++ =IDENTIFY (lp && (tp->flags &ESP_TGT_DISCONNECT ), lun);I think lp should always be non-NULL here.
It's not clear from Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.txt, but I guess that's true for scanning of targets.
Is it true in general that queuecommand for a device will not occur before its slave_alloc and not after its slave_destroy invocation?
(I'm thinking of queuecommand via the other command submission paths, like ioctl.)
Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] esp_scsi: Grant disconnect privilege for untagged commands
Quoted 7 lines · Finn Thain
Quoted 4 lines · Christoph Hellwig
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c static void esp_maybe_execute_command(struct esp *esp) · line 805
Quoted 1 line
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c +1
-0+ *p++ =IDENTIFY (lp && (tp->flags &ESP_TGT_DISCONNECT ), lun);I think lp should always be non-NULL here.
Quoted 9 lines
It's not clear from
Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.txt, but I guess that's true for scanning of targets.Is it true in general that queuecommand for a device will not occur before its
slave_allocand not after itsslave_destroyinvocation?(I'm thinking of queuecommand via the other command submission paths, like ioctl.)
Nevermind. From a closer reading of the Documentation, I see that it is true in general.
Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] esp_scsi: Grant disconnect privilege for untagged commands
In reply to Finn ThainQuoted 7 lines · Finn Thain
Quoted 4 lines · Christoph Hellwig
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c static void esp_maybe_execute_command(struct esp *esp) · line 805
Quoted 1 line
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c +1
-0+ *p++ =IDENTIFY (lp && (tp->flags &ESP_TGT_DISCONNECT ), lun);I think lp should always be non-NULL here.
Quoted 5 lines
It's not clear from
Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.txt, but I guess that's true for scanning of targets.Is it true in general that queuecommand for a device will not occur before its
slave_allocand not after itsslave_destroyinvocation?
Yes.
PATCH v2 4/6 esp_scsi: Eliminate ESP_FLAG_DOING_SLOWCMD
In reply to Finn ThainThe concept of a 'slow command' as it appears in esp_scsi is confusing because it could refer to an ESP command or a SCSI command. It turns out that it refers to a particular ESP select command which the driver also tracks as 'ESP_SELECT_MSGOUT'. For readability, it is better to use the terminology from the datasheets.
The global ESP_FLAG_DOING_SLOWCMD flag is redundant anyway, as it can be inferred from esp->select_state. Remove the ESP_FLAG_DOING_SLOWCMD cruft and just use a boolean local variable.
--- drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++------------------------ drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c +23 -34
@@ -478,17 +478,6 @@ static void esp_restore_pointers(struct esp *esp, struct esp_cmd_entry *ent) spriv->tot_residue = ent->saved_tot_residue; } -static void esp_check_command_len (struct esp *esp,struct scsi_cmnd *cmd) -{ -if (cmd->cmd_len ==6 || - cmd->cmd_len ==10 || - cmd->cmd_len ==12 ) { - esp->flags &= ~ESP_FLAG_DOING_SLOWCMD ; - }else { - esp->flags |=ESP_FLAG_DOING_SLOWCMD ; - } -} -static void esp_write_tgt_config3 (struct esp *esp,int tgt) {if (esp->rev >ESP100A ) {
@@ -721,6 +710,7 @@ static void esp_maybe_execute_command(struct esp *esp)struct scsi_device *dev;struct scsi_cmnd *cmd;struct esp_cmd_entry *ent; +bool select_and_stop = false;int tgt, lun, i;u32 val, start_cmd;u8 *p;
@@ -752,7 +742,8 @@ static void esp_maybe_execute_command(struct esp *esp)esp_map_dma (esp, cmd);esp_save_pointers (esp, ent); -esp_check_command_len (esp, cmd); +if (!(cmd->cmd_len ==6 || cmd->cmd_len ==10 || cmd->cmd_len ==12 )) + select_and_stop = true; p = esp->command_block;
@@ -793,9 +784,9 @@ static void esp_maybe_execute_command(struct esp *esp) tp->flags &= ~ESP_TGT_CHECK_NEGO ; } -/* Process it like a slow command. */ -if (tp->flags & (ESP_TGT_NEGO_WIDE |ESP_TGT_NEGO_SYNC )) - esp->flags |=ESP_FLAG_DOING_SLOWCMD ; +/* If there are multiple message bytes, use Select and Stop */ +if (esp->msg_out_len) + select_and_stop = true; } build_identify:
@@ -808,23 +799,10 @@ static void esp_maybe_execute_command(struct esp *esp)/* ESP100 lacks select w/atn3 command, use select * and stop instead. */ - esp->flags |=ESP_FLAG_DOING_SLOWCMD ; + select_and_stop = true; } -if (!(esp->flags &ESP_FLAG_DOING_SLOWCMD )) { - start_cmd =ESP_CMD_SELA ; -if (ent->tag[0 ]) { - *p++ = ent->tag[0 ]; - *p++ = ent->tag[1 ]; - - start_cmd =ESP_CMD_SA3 ; - } - -for (i =0 ; i < cmd->cmd_len; i++) - *p++ = cmd->cmnd[i]; - - esp->select_state =ESP_SELECT_BASIC ; - }else { +if (select_and_stop) { esp->cmd_bytes_left = cmd->cmd_len; esp->cmd_bytes_ptr = &cmd->cmnd[0 ];
@@ -839,6 +817,19 @@ static void esp_maybe_execute_command(struct esp *esp) start_cmd =ESP_CMD_SELAS ; esp->select_state =ESP_SELECT_MSGOUT ; + }else { + start_cmd =ESP_CMD_SELA ; +if (ent->tag[0 ]) { + *p++ = ent->tag[0 ]; + *p++ = ent->tag[1 ]; + + start_cmd =ESP_CMD_SA3 ; + } + +for (i =0 ; i < cmd->cmd_len; i++) + *p++ = cmd->cmnd[i]; + + esp->select_state =ESP_SELECT_BASIC ; } val = tgt;if (esp->rev ==FASHME )
@@ -1248,7 +1239,6 @@ static int esp_finish_select(struct esp *esp)esp_unmap_dma (esp, cmd);esp_free_lun_tag (ent, cmd->device->hostdata); tp->flags &= ~(ESP_TGT_NEGO_SYNC |ESP_TGT_NEGO_WIDE ); - esp->flags &= ~ESP_FLAG_DOING_SLOWCMD ; esp->cmd_bytes_ptr =NULL ; esp->cmd_bytes_left =0 ; }else {
@@ -1299,9 +1289,8 @@ static int esp_finish_select(struct esp *esp)esp_flush_fifo (esp); } -/* If we are doing a slow command, negotiation, etc. -* we'll do the right thing as we transition to the -* next phase. +/* If we are doing a Select And Stop command, negotiation, etc. +* we'll do the right thing as we transition to the next phase. */ esp_event (esp,ESP_EVENT_CHECK_PHASE );return 0 ;
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h +1 -2
@@ -490,7 +490,6 @@ struct esp {u32 flags;#define ESP_FLAG_DIFFERENTIAL 0x00000001#define ESP_FLAG_RESETTING 0x00000002 -#define ESP_FLAG_DOING_SLOWCMD 0x00000004#define ESP_FLAG_WIDE_CAPABLE 0x00000008#define ESP_FLAG_QUICKIRQ_CHECK 0x00000010#define ESP_FLAG_DISABLE_SYNC 0x00000020
@@ -532,7 +531,7 @@ struct esp {u32 min_period;u32 radelay; -/* Slow command state. */ +/* ESP_CMD_SELAS command state */ u8 *cmd_bytes_ptr;int cmd_bytes_left;
Signature · 1 line
2.18.1
PATCH v2 5/6 esp_scsi: De-duplicate PIO routines
In reply to Finn ThainAs a temporary measure, the code to implement PIO transfers was duplicated in zorro_esp and mac_esp. Now that it has stabilized move the common code into the core driver but don't build it unless needed.
This replaces the inline assembler with more portable writesb() calls. Optimizing the m68k writesb() implementation is a separate patch.
---
Changed since v1:
- Use shost_printk() instead of pr_err().
- Add new symbol CONFIG_SCSI_ESP_PIO to Kconfig.
--- drivers/scsi/Kconfig | 6 + drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h | 5 + drivers/scsi/mac_esp.c | 173 +---------------------------- drivers/scsi/zorro_esp.c | 232 ++++++--------------------------------- 5 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 365 deletions(-)
drivers/scsi/Kconfig +6 -0
@@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ config SCSI_DMA bool default n +config SCSI_ESP_PIO + bool + default n + config SCSI_NETLINK bool default n
@@ -1355,6 +1359,7 @@ config SCSI_ZORRO_ESP tristate "Zorro ESP SCSI support" depends on ZORRO && SCSI select SCSI_SPI_ATTRS + select SCSI_ESP_PIO help Support for various NCR53C9x (ESP) based SCSI controllers on Zorro expansion boards for the Amiga.
@@ -1397,6 +1402,7 @@ config SCSI_MAC_ESP tristate "Macintosh NCR53c9[46] SCSI" depends on MAC && SCSI select SCSI_SPI_ATTRS + select SCSI_ESP_PIO help This is the NCR 53c9x SCSI controller found on most of the 68040 based Macintoshes.
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c +128 -0
131 lines not on this page · raw message
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h +5 -0
@@ -431,6 +431,7 @@ struct esp_driver_ops {struct esp {void __iomem *regs;void __iomem *dma_regs; +u8 __iomem *fifo_reg;const struct esp_driver_ops *ops;
@@ -540,6 +541,7 @@ struct esp {void *dma;int dmarev; +int send_cmd_error;int send_cmd_residual; };
@@ -581,4 +583,7 @@ extern void scsi_esp_unregister(struct esp *);extern irqreturn_t scsi_esp_intr (int ,void *);extern void scsi_esp_cmd (struct esp *,u8 ); +extern void esp_send_pio_cmd (struct esp *esp,u32 dma_addr,u32 esp_count, +u32 dma_count,int write,u8 cmd); +#endif /* !(_ESP_SCSI_H) */
drivers/scsi/mac_esp.c +6 -167
225 lines not on this page · raw message
drivers/scsi/zorro_esp.c +34 -198
343 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.18.1
Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] esp_scsi: De-duplicate PIO routines
Hi Finn,
Quoted 11 lines · Finn Thain
As a temporary measure, the code to implement PIO transfers was duplicated in
zorro_espandmac_esp. Now that it has stabilized move the common code into the core driver but don't build it unless needed.This replaces the inline assembler with more portable
writesb()calls. Optimizing the m68kwritesb()implementation is a separate patch.Tested-by Stan Johnson <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Finn Thain <[email protected]>Tested-by Michael Schmitz <[email protected]>
Thanks for your patch!
drivers/scsi/Kconfig config SCSI_DMA · line 47
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/scsi/Kconfig +3
-0@@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ config SCSI_DMA bool default n +config SCSI_ESP_PIO + bool + default n
"default n" is the default, so please drop this line.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] esp_scsi: De-duplicate PIO routines
Quoted 7 lines · Geert Uytterhoeven
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/scsi/Kconfig +0
-0@@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ config SCSI_DMA bool default n
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/scsi/Kconfig config SCSI_DMA · line 47
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/scsi/Kconfig +3
-0+config SCSI_ESP_PIO + bool + default n"default n" is the default, so please drop this line.
Done. Thanks.
Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] esp_scsi: De-duplicate PIO routines
In reply to Finn ThainQuoted 203 lines · Finn Thain
As a temporary measure, the code to implement PIO transfers was duplicated in
zorro_espandmac_esp. Now that it has stabilized move the common code into the core driver but don't build it unless needed.This replaces the inline assembler with more portable
writesb()calls. Optimizing the m68kwritesb()implementation is a separate patch.Tested-by Stan Johnson <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Finn Thain <[email protected]>Tested-by Michael Schmitz <[email protected]>---
Changed since v1:
- Useshost_printk()instead ofpr_err().
- Add new symbolCONFIG_SCSI_ESP_PIOtoKconfig.--- drivers/scsi/Kconfig | 6 + drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h | 5 + drivers/scsi/mac_esp.c | 173 +---------------------------- drivers/scsi/zorro_esp.c | 232 ++++++--------------------------------- 5 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 365 deletions(-)drivers/scsi/Kconfig +6
-0@@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ config SCSI_DMA bool default n +config SCSI_ESP_PIO + bool + default n + config SCSI_NETLINK bool default n@@ -1355,6 +1359,7 @@ config SCSI_ZORRO_ESP tristate "Zorro ESP SCSI support" depends on ZORRO && SCSI select SCSI_SPI_ATTRS + select SCSI_ESP_PIO help Support for various NCR53C9x (ESP) based SCSI controllers on Zorro expansion boards for the Amiga.@@ -1397,6 +1402,7 @@ config SCSI_MAC_ESP tristate "Macintosh NCR53c9[46] SCSI" depends on MAC && SCSI select SCSI_SPI_ATTRS + select SCSI_ESP_PIO help This is the NCR 53c9x SCSI controller found on most of the 68040 based Macintoshes.drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c +128
-0@@ -2776,3 +2776,131 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(esp_debug,module_init (esp_init);module_exit (esp_exit); + +#ifdef CONFIG_SCSI_ESP_PIO +static inline unsigned int esp_wait_for_fifo (struct esp *esp) +{ +int i =500000 ; + +do { +unsigned int fbytes =esp_read8 (ESP_FFLAGS ) &ESP_FF_FBYTES ; + +if (fbytes) +return fbytes; + +udelay (2 ); + }while (--i); + +shost_printk (KERN_ERR , esp->host,"FIFO is empty (sreg %02x)\n" , +esp_read8 (ESP_STATUS )); +return 0 ; +} + +static inline int esp_wait_for_intr (struct esp *esp) +{ +int i =500000 ; + +do { + esp->sreg =esp_read8 (ESP_STATUS ); +if (esp->sreg &ESP_STAT_INTR ) +return 0 ; + +udelay (2 ); + }while (--i); + +shost_printk (KERN_ERR , esp->host,"IRQ timeout (sreg %02x)\n" , + esp->sreg); +return 1 ; +} + +#define ESP_FIFO_SIZE 16 + +void esp_send_pio_cmd (struct esp *esp,u32 addr,u32 esp_count, +u32 dma_count,int write,u8 cmd) +{ +u8 phase = esp->sreg &ESP_STAT_PMASK ; + + cmd &= ~ESP_CMD_DMA ; + esp->send_cmd_error =0 ; + +if (write) { +u8 *dst = (u8 *)addr; +u8 mask = ~(phase ==ESP_MIP ?ESP_INTR_FDONE :ESP_INTR_BSERV ); + +scsi_esp_cmd (esp, cmd); + +while (1 ) { +if (!esp_wait_for_fifo (esp)) +break ; + + *dst++ =esp_read8 (ESP_FDATA ); + --esp_count; + +if (!esp_count) +break ; + +if (esp_wait_for_intr (esp)) { + esp->send_cmd_error =1 ; +break ; + } + +if ((esp->sreg &ESP_STAT_PMASK ) != phase) +break ; + + esp->ireg =esp_read8 (ESP_INTRPT ); +if (esp->ireg & mask) { + esp->send_cmd_error =1 ; +break ; + } + +if (phase ==ESP_MIP ) +scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_MOK ); + +scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_TI ); + } + }else { +unsigned int n =ESP_FIFO_SIZE ; +u8 *src = (u8 *)addr; + +scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_FLUSH ); + +if (n > esp_count) + n = esp_count; +writesb (esp->fifo_reg, src, n); + src += n; + esp_count -= n; + +scsi_esp_cmd (esp, cmd); + +while (esp_count) { +if (esp_wait_for_intr (esp)) { + esp->send_cmd_error =1 ; +break ; + } + +if ((esp->sreg &ESP_STAT_PMASK ) != phase) +break ; + + esp->ireg =esp_read8 (ESP_INTRPT ); +if (esp->ireg & ~ESP_INTR_BSERV ) { + esp->send_cmd_error =1 ; +break ; + } + + n =ESP_FIFO_SIZE - + (esp_read8 (ESP_FFLAGS ) &ESP_FF_FBYTES ); + +if (n > esp_count) + n = esp_count; +writesb (esp->fifo_reg, src, n); + src += n; + esp_count -= n; + +scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_TI ); + } + } + + esp->send_cmd_residual = esp_count; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL (esp_send_pio_cmd); +#endif drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h +1
-0@@ -431,6 +431,7 @@ struct esp_driver_ops {struct esp {void __iomem *regs;void __iomem *dma_regs; +u8 __iomem *fifo_reg;const struct esp_driver_ops *ops;
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h struct esp { · line 547
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h +1
-0@@ -540,6 +541,7 @@ struct esp {void *dma;int dmarev; +int send_cmd_error;int send_cmd_residual; };
These variables are only used within esp_send_pio_cmd(); consider making them conditional based on the config option.
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h extern void scsi_esp_unregister(struct esp *); · line 589
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h +3
-0@@ -581,4 +583,7 @@ extern void scsi_esp_unregister(struct esp *);extern irqreturn_t scsi_esp_intr (int ,void *);extern void scsi_esp_cmd (struct esp *,u8 ); +extern void esp_send_pio_cmd (struct esp *esp,u32 dma_addr,u32 esp_count, +u32 dma_count,int write,u8 cmd); +#endif /* !(_ESP_SCSI_H) */
Same here; the declaration only makes sense when the config option is set.
Cheers,
Hannes
Signature · 5 lines
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking [email protected] +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] esp_scsi: De-duplicate PIO routines
Quoted 201 lines · Hannes Reinecke
Quoted 200 lines · Finn Thain
As a temporary measure, the code to implement PIO transfers was duplicated in
zorro_espandmac_esp. Now that it has stabilized move the common code into the core driver but don't build it unless needed.This replaces the inline assembler with more portable
writesb()calls. Optimizing the m68kwritesb()implementation is a separate patch.Tested-by Stan Johnson <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Finn Thain <[email protected]>Tested-by Michael Schmitz <[email protected]>---
Changed since v1:
- Useshost_printk()instead ofpr_err().
- Add new symbolCONFIG_SCSI_ESP_PIOtoKconfig.--- drivers/scsi/Kconfig | 6 + drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h | 5 + drivers/scsi/mac_esp.c | 173 +---------------------------- drivers/scsi/zorro_esp.c | 232 ++++++--------------------------------- 5 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 365 deletions(-)drivers/scsi/Kconfig +5
-0@@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ config SCSI_DMA bool default n +config SCSI_ESP_PIO + bool + default n + config SCSI_NETLINK bool default n@@ -1355,6 +1359,7 @@ config SCSI_ZORRO_ESP tristate "Zorro ESP SCSI support" depends on ZORRO && SCSI select SCSI_SPI_ATTRS + select SCSI_ESP_PIO help Support for various NCR53C9x (ESP) based SCSI controllers on Zorro expansion boards for the Amiga.@@ -1397,6 +1402,7 @@ config SCSI_MAC_ESP tristate "Macintosh NCR53c9[46] SCSI" depends on MAC && SCSI select SCSI_SPI_ATTRS + select SCSI_ESP_PIO help This is the NCR 53c9x SCSI controller found on most of the 68040 based Macintoshes.drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c +128
-0@@ -2776,3 +2776,131 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(esp_debug,module_init (esp_init);module_exit (esp_exit); + +#ifdef CONFIG_SCSI_ESP_PIO +static inline unsigned int esp_wait_for_fifo (struct esp *esp) +{ +int i =500000 ; + +do { +unsigned int fbytes =esp_read8 (ESP_FFLAGS ) &ESP_FF_FBYTES ; + +if (fbytes) +return fbytes; + +udelay (2 ); + }while (--i); + +shost_printk (KERN_ERR , esp->host,"FIFO is empty (sreg %02x)\n" , +esp_read8 (ESP_STATUS )); +return 0 ; +} + +static inline int esp_wait_for_intr (struct esp *esp) +{ +int i =500000 ; + +do { + esp->sreg =esp_read8 (ESP_STATUS ); +if (esp->sreg &ESP_STAT_INTR ) +return 0 ; + +udelay (2 ); + }while (--i); + +shost_printk (KERN_ERR , esp->host,"IRQ timeout (sreg %02x)\n" , + esp->sreg); +return 1 ; +} + +#define ESP_FIFO_SIZE 16 + +void esp_send_pio_cmd (struct esp *esp,u32 addr,u32 esp_count, +u32 dma_count,int write,u8 cmd) +{ +u8 phase = esp->sreg &ESP_STAT_PMASK ; + + cmd &= ~ESP_CMD_DMA ; + esp->send_cmd_error =0 ; + +if (write) { +u8 *dst = (u8 *)addr; +u8 mask = ~(phase ==ESP_MIP ?ESP_INTR_FDONE :ESP_INTR_BSERV ); + +scsi_esp_cmd (esp, cmd); + +while (1 ) { +if (!esp_wait_for_fifo (esp)) +break ; + + *dst++ =esp_read8 (ESP_FDATA ); + --esp_count; + +if (!esp_count) +break ; + +if (esp_wait_for_intr (esp)) { + esp->send_cmd_error =1 ; +break ; + } + +if ((esp->sreg &ESP_STAT_PMASK ) != phase) +break ; + + esp->ireg =esp_read8 (ESP_INTRPT ); +if (esp->ireg & mask) { + esp->send_cmd_error =1 ; +break ; + } + +if (phase ==ESP_MIP ) +scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_MOK ); + +scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_TI ); + } + }else { +unsigned int n =ESP_FIFO_SIZE ; +u8 *src = (u8 *)addr; + +scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_FLUSH ); + +if (n > esp_count) + n = esp_count; +writesb (esp->fifo_reg, src, n); + src += n; + esp_count -= n; + +scsi_esp_cmd (esp, cmd); + +while (esp_count) { +if (esp_wait_for_intr (esp)) { + esp->send_cmd_error =1 ; +break ; + } + +if ((esp->sreg &ESP_STAT_PMASK ) != phase) +break ; + + esp->ireg =esp_read8 (ESP_INTRPT ); +if (esp->ireg & ~ESP_INTR_BSERV ) { + esp->send_cmd_error =1 ; +break ; + } + + n =ESP_FIFO_SIZE - + (esp_read8 (ESP_FFLAGS ) &ESP_FF_FBYTES ); + +if (n > esp_count) + n = esp_count; +writesb (esp->fifo_reg, src, n); + src += n; + esp_count -= n; + +scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_TI ); + } + } + + esp->send_cmd_residual = esp_count; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL (esp_send_pio_cmd); +#endif drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h +1
-0@@ -431,6 +431,7 @@ struct esp_driver_ops { struct esp { void __iomem *regs; void __iomem *dma_regs; + u8 __iomem *fifo_reg; const struct esp_driver_ops *ops; @@ -540,6 +541,7 @@ struct esp {
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h +0
-0void *dma;int dmarev; + int send_cmd_error; int send_cmd_residual; };These variables are only used within
esp_send_pio_cmd(); consider making them conditional based on the config option.
In the case of send_cmd_residual, that would mean a second #ifdef added to esp_data_bytes_sent() where it gets used. I'm happy to comply but I fear that all these #ifdefs may harm readability...
There are already other variables in struct esp that may go unused, such as dma_regs, that don't have #ifdefs to elide them. Are these also problematic in some way?
Thanks for your review.
Quoted 14 lines
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h extern void scsi_esp_unregister(struct esp *); · line 589
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h +2
-0@@ -581,4 +583,7 @@ extern void scsi_esp_unregister(struct esp *);extern irqreturn_t scsi_esp_intr (int ,void *);extern void scsi_esp_cmd (struct esp *,u8 ); +extern void esp_send_pio_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 dma_addr, u32 esp_count, +u32 dma_count,int write,u8 cmd); +#endif /* !(_ESP_SCSI_H) */ Same here; the declaration only makes sense when the config option is set.
Cheers,
Hannes
Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] esp_scsi: De-duplicate PIO routines
Quoted 26 lines · Finn Thain
Quoted 24 lines · Hannes Reinecke
Quoted 23 lines · Finn Thain
As a temporary measure, the code to implement PIO transfers was duplicated in
zorro_espandmac_esp. Now that it has stabilized move the common code into the core driver but don't build it unless needed.This replaces the inline assembler with more portable
writesb()calls. Optimizing the m68kwritesb()implementation is a separate patch.Tested-by Stan Johnson <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Finn Thain <[email protected]>Tested-by Michael Schmitz <[email protected]>---
Changed since v1:
- Useshost_printk()instead ofpr_err().
- Add new symbolCONFIG_SCSI_ESP_PIOtoKconfig.--- drivers/scsi/Kconfig | 6 + drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h | 5 + drivers/scsi/mac_esp.c | 173 +---------------------------- drivers/scsi/zorro_esp.c | 232 ++++++--------------------------------- 5 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 365 deletions(-)
[ .. ]
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h +1
-0@@ -431,6 +431,7 @@ struct esp_driver_ops { struct esp { void __iomem *regs; void __iomem *dma_regs; + u8 __iomem *fifo_reg; const struct esp_driver_ops *ops; @@ -540,6 +541,7 @@ struct esp {Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h +0
-0void *dma;int dmarev; + int send_cmd_error; int send_cmd_residual; };These variables are only used within
esp_send_pio_cmd(); consider making them conditional based on the config option.
Quoted 8 lines
In the case of
send_cmd_residual, that would mean a second #ifdef added toesp_data_bytes_sent()where it gets used. I'm happy to comply but I fear that all these #ifdefs may harm readability...There are already other variables in struct esp that may go unused, such as
dma_regs, that don't have #ifdefs to elide them. Are these also problematic in some way?
The unused fields in the struct are not so much an issue; in fact, it rather complicated things when having individual fields in the struct surrounded by CONFIG_XXX, as then the order of the fields would change
depending on the configuration. Which makes it really hard to debug ..
However, the function declaration really is a worry, as the actual function body only exists when the config option is enabled. So either add a dummy function or surround the function declaration by CONFIG_ESP_PIO.
Otherwise I think Dan Carpenter and the likes are guaranteed to send you a nice mail complaining about this ...
Cheers,
Hannes
Signature · 5 lines
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking [email protected] +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] esp_scsi: De-duplicate PIO routines
Quoted 2 lines · Hannes Reinecke
However, the function declaration really is a worry, as the actual function body only exists when the config option is enabled.
Having a prototype without an implementation is no problem at all. We have this case all over the kernel, either intentionally to keep things simple or due to bitrot.
Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] esp_scsi: De-duplicate PIO routines
In reply to Hannes ReineckeQuoted 5 lines · Hannes Reinecke
Quoted 5 lines
In the case of
send_cmd_residual, that would mean a second #ifdef added toesp_data_bytes_sent()where it gets used. I'm happy to comply but I fear that all these #ifdefs may harm readability...
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
There are already other variables in struct esp that may go unused, such as
dma_regs, that don't have #ifdefs to elide them. Are these also problematic in some way?The unused fields in the struct are not so much an issue; in fact, it rather complicated things when having individual fields in the struct surrounded by
CONFIG_XXX, as then the order of the fields would change depending on the configuration. Which makes it really hard to debug ..
True enough. We agree that this #ifdef is undesirable. And yet when I tried it, I found an unexpected readability benefit to your suggestion:
#ifdef CONFIG_SCSI_ESP_PIO
u8 __iomem *fifo_reg;
int send_cmd_error;
u32 send_cmd_residual;#endif
This grouping does help convey the purpose of these struct members, even though the #ifdef is meant for the compiler not for the human reader.
So maybe it makes sense to group these definitions (they are all the same size):
/* These are used by esp_scsi_send_pio_cmd() */
u8 __iomem *fifo_reg;
int send_cmd_error;
u32 send_cmd_residual;Quoted 7 lines
However, the function declaration really is a worry, as the actual function body only exists when the config option is enabled. So either add a dummy function or surround the function declaration by
CONFIG_ESP_PIO.
Otherwise I think Dan Carpenter and the likes are guaranteed to send you a nice mail complaining about this ...
Do static checkers really complain about this? I think the validity of an extern can't be known until the final linkage is done.
At that point the checker may complain that no compilation unit references a symbol in a header.
But this would lead to false positives where a header file is shared by separate programs which share library code but not macros.
Quoted 4 lines
Cheers,
Hannes
Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] esp_scsi: De-duplicate PIO routines
Quoted 12 lines · Finn Thain
True enough. We agree that this #ifdef is undesirable. And yet when I tried it, I found an unexpected readability benefit to your suggestion:
#ifdef CONFIG_SCSI_ESP_PIO u8 __iomem *fifo_reg; int send_cmd_error; u32 send_cmd_residual;#endif
This grouping does help convey the purpose of these struct members, even though the #ifdef is meant for the compiler not for the human reader.
Quoted 7 lines
So maybe it makes sense to group these definitions (they are all the same size):
/* These are used by esp_scsi_send_pio_cmd() */ u8 __iomem *fifo_reg; int send_cmd_error; u32 send_cmd_residual;
I like the grouping, and in fact the ifdef sounds fine to me as well.
Quoted 2 lines
Do static checkers really complain about this? I think the validity of an extern can't be known until the final linkage is done.
None that I know of does, and as said before this patterns is very common all over the kernel.
Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] esp_scsi: De-duplicate PIO routines
In reply to Hannes ReineckeQuoted 8 lines · Hannes Reinecke
However, the function declaration really is a worry, as the actual function body only exists when the config option is enabled.
So either add a dummy function or surround the function declaration byCONFIG_ESP_PIO.
Otherwise I think Dan Carpenter and the likes are guaranteed to send you a nice mail complaining about this ...
Perhaps I've misunderstood your concern here. Is it a problem that esp_scsi.ko may or may not export the function, depending on .config?
For example, if esp_scsi.ko came from a build with CONFIG_SUN3X_ESP=y && !CONFIG_SCSI_ZORRO_ESP && !CONFIG_SCSI_MAC_ESP, then it would export no esp_send_pio_cmd() symbol.
A dummy function (mentioned above) might then avoid a link error from "modprobe zorro_esp" or "modprobe mac_esp" in this scenario. (The modules would load but fail to work properly.)
This seems a bit too contrived so I'll post v3 for you to consider.
Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] esp_scsi: De-duplicate PIO routines
Quoted 8 lines · Finn Thain
Perhaps I've misunderstood your concern here. Is it a problem that esp_scsi.ko may or may not export the function, depending on .config?
For example, if esp_scsi.ko came from a build with
CONFIG_SUN3X_ESP=y&& !CONFIG_SCSI_ZORRO_ESP && !CONFIG_SCSI_MAC_ESP, then it would export noesp_send_pio_cmd()symbol.
Quoted 5 lines
A dummy function (mentioned above) might then avoid a link error from "modprobe
zorro_esp" or "modprobemac_esp" in this scenario. (The modules would load but fail to work properly.)This seems a bit too contrived so I'll post v3 for you to consider.
Please leave the possibly unused exports as-is.
Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] esp_scsi: De-duplicate PIO routines
Quoted 3 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Please leave the possibly unused exports as-is.
I take that to mean "leave the conditional export as-is". Hence, I think v3 (posted on the 16th) should address all of the concerns raised by reviewers...
PATCH v2 6/6 esp_scsi: Optimize PIO loops
In reply to Finn ThainAvoid function calls in the inner PIO loops. On a Centris 660av this improves throughput for sequential read transfers by about 40% and sequential write by about 10%.
Unfortunately it is not possible to have method calls like esp_write8() placed inline so this is always going to be slow (even with LTO).
---
Changed since v1:
- Don't touch the scsi_esp_cmd(esp, ESP_CMD_FLUSH) that's outside the loop.
--- drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c +6 -6
@@ -2788,7 +2788,7 @@ static inline unsigned int esp_wait_for_fifo(struct esp *esp)if (fbytes)return fbytes; -udelay (2 ); +udelay (1 ); }while (--i); shost_printk(KERN_ERR, esp->host, "FIFO is empty (sreg %02x)\n",
@@ -2805,7 +2805,7 @@ static inline int esp_wait_for_intr(struct esp *esp)if (esp->sreg &ESP_STAT_INTR )return 0 ; -udelay (2 ); +udelay (1 ); }while (--i); shost_printk(KERN_ERR, esp->host, "IRQ timeout (sreg %02x)\n",
@@ -2833,7 +2833,7 @@ void esp_send_pio_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr, u32 esp_count,if (!esp_wait_for_fifo (esp))break ; - *dst++ =esp_read8 (ESP_FDATA ); + *dst++ =readb (esp->fifo_reg); --esp_count;if (!esp_count)
@@ -2854,9 +2854,9 @@ void esp_send_pio_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr, u32 esp_count, }if (phase ==ESP_MIP ) -scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_MOK ); +esp_write8 (ESP_CMD_MOK ,ESP_CMD ); -scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_TI ); +esp_write8 (ESP_CMD_TI ,ESP_CMD ); } }else {unsigned int n =ESP_FIFO_SIZE ;
@@ -2896,7 +2896,7 @@ void esp_send_pio_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr, u32 esp_count, src += n; esp_count -= n; -scsi_esp_cmd (esp,ESP_CMD_TI ); +esp_write8 (ESP_CMD_TI ,ESP_CMD ); } }
Signature · 1 line
2.18.1
Martin K. Petersen
AppliedFinn,
Quoted 5 lines
This series has fixes and cleanup for
mac_esp,zorro_espand the coreesp_scsidriver.These improvements include elimination of duplicated code temporarily introduced for
zorro_esp.
Had to hand-apply patch #5. Otherwise OK.
Applied to 4.20/scsi-queue. Thank you!
Signature · 1 line
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering