bpf: Fix [::] -> [::1] rewrite in sys_sendmsg
Subsystems (6)
v2 cover bpf: Fix [::] -> [::1] rewrite in sys_sendmsg
The patch set fixes BSD'ism in sys_sendmsg to rewrite unspecified destination IPv6 for unconnected UDP sockets in sys_sendmsg with [::1] in case when either CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF is enabled or when sys_sendmsg BPF hook sets destination IPv6 to [::].
Patch 1 is the fix and provides more details.
Patch 2 adds two test cases to verify the fix.
v1->v2:
* Fix compile error in patch 1.
Andrey Ignatov (2):
bpf: Fix [::] -> [::1] rewrite in sys_sendmsg selftests/bpf: Test [::] -> [::1] rewrite in sys_sendmsg in
test_sock_addr
net/ipv6/udp.c | 8 +-- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
PATCH v2 1/2 bpf: Fix [::] -> [::1] rewrite in sys_sendmsg
sys_sendmsg has supported unspecified destination IPv6 (wildcard) for unconnected UDP sockets since 876c7f41. When [::] is passed by user as destination, sys_sendmsg rewrites it with [::1] to be consistent with BSD (see "BSD'ism" comment in the code).
This didn't work when cgroup-bpf was enabled though since the rewrite [::] -> [::1] happened before passing control to cgroup-bpf block where fl6.daddr was updated with passed by user sockaddr_in6.sin6_addr (that might or might not be changed by BPF program). That way if user passed [::] as dst IPv6 it was first rewritten with [::1] by original code from 876c7f41, but then rewritten back with [::] by cgroup-bpf block.
It happened even when BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG program was not present (CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF=y was enough).
The fix is to apply BSD'ism after cgroup-bpf block so that [::] is replaced with [::1] no matter where it came from: passed by user to sys_sendmsg or set by BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG program.
--- net/ipv6/udp.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
net/ipv6/udp.c +4 -4
@@ -1390,10 +1390,7 @@ int udpv6_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len) ipc6.opt = opt; fl6.flowi6_proto = sk->sk_protocol; -if (!ipv6_addr_any (daddr)) - fl6.daddr = *daddr; -else - fl6.daddr.s6_addr[15 ] =0x1 ;/* :: means loopback (BSD'ism) */ + fl6.daddr = *daddr;if (ipv6_addr_any (&fl6.saddr) && !ipv6_addr_any (&np->saddr)) fl6.saddr = np->saddr; fl6.fl6_sport = inet->inet_sport;
@@ -1421,6 +1418,9 @@ int udpv6_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len) } } +if (ipv6_addr_any (&fl6.daddr)) + fl6.daddr.s6_addr[15 ] =0x1 ;/* :: means loopback (BSD'ism) */ + final_p =fl6_update_dst (&fl6, opt, &final);if (final_p) connected = false;
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
PATCH v2 2/2 selftests/bpf: Test [::] -> [::1] rewrite in sys_sendmsg in test_sock_addr
In reply to Andrey IgnatovTest that sys_sendmsg BPF hook doesn't break sys_sendmsg behaviour to rewrite destination IPv6 = [::] with [::1] (BSD'ism).
Two test cases are added:
1) User passes dst IPv6 = [::] and BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG program doesn't touch it.
2) User passes dst IPv6 != [::], but BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG program rewrites it with [::].
In both cases [::1] is used by sys_sendmsg code eventually and datagram is sent successfully for unconnected UDP socket.
Example of relevant output:
Test case: sendmsg6: set dst IP = [::] (BSD'ism) .. [PASS] Test case: sendmsg6: preserve dst IP = [::] (BSD'ism) .. [PASS]
--- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c +50 -3
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@#define SERV6_V4MAPPED_IP "::ffff:192.168.0.4"#define SRC6_IP "::1"#define SRC6_REWRITE_IP "::6" +#define WILDCARD6_IP "::"#define SERV6_PORT 6060#define SERV6_REWRITE_PORT 6666
@@ -85,12 +86,14 @@ static int bind4_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test);static int bind6_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test);static int connect4_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test);static int connect6_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test); +static int sendmsg_allow_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test);static int sendmsg_deny_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test);static int sendmsg4_rw_asm_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test);static int sendmsg4_rw_c_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test);static int sendmsg6_rw_asm_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test);static int sendmsg6_rw_c_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test);static int sendmsg6_rw_v4mapped_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test); +static int sendmsg6_rw_wildcard_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test);static struct sock_addr_test tests[] = {/* bind */
@@ -462,6 +465,34 @@ static struct sock_addr_test tests[] = {SRC6_REWRITE_IP ,SYSCALL_ENOTSUPP , }, + { +"sendmsg6: set dst IP = [::] (BSD'ism)" , + sendmsg6_rw_wildcard_prog_load, +BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG , +BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG , +AF_INET6 , +SOCK_DGRAM , +SERV6_IP , +SERV6_PORT , +SERV6_REWRITE_IP , +SERV6_REWRITE_PORT , +SRC6_REWRITE_IP , +SUCCESS , + }, + { +"sendmsg6: preserve dst IP = [::] (BSD'ism)" , + sendmsg_allow_prog_load, +BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG , +BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG , +AF_INET6 , +SOCK_DGRAM , +WILDCARD6_IP , +SERV6_PORT , +SERV6_REWRITE_IP , +SERV6_PORT , +SRC6_IP , +SUCCESS , + }, {"sendmsg6: deny call" , sendmsg_deny_prog_load,
@@ -734,16 +765,27 @@ static int connect6_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test)return load_path (test,CONNECT6_PROG_PATH ); } -static int sendmsg_deny_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test) +static int sendmsg_ret_only_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test, +int32_t rc) {struct bpf_insn insns[] = { -/* return 0 */ -BPF_MOV64_IMM (BPF_REG_0 ,0 ), +/* return rc */ +BPF_MOV64_IMM (BPF_REG_0 , rc),BPF_EXIT_INSN (), };return load_insns (test, insns,sizeof (insns) /sizeof (struct bpf_insn )); } +static int sendmsg_allow_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test) +{ +return sendmsg_ret_only_prog_load (test,/*rc*/ 1 ); +} + +static int sendmsg_deny_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test) +{ +return sendmsg_ret_only_prog_load (test,/*rc*/ 0 ); +} +static int sendmsg4_rw_asm_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test) {struct sockaddr_in dst4_rw_addr;
@@ -864,6 +906,11 @@ static int sendmsg6_rw_v4mapped_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test)return sendmsg6_rw_dst_asm_prog_load (test,SERV6_V4MAPPED_IP ); } +static int sendmsg6_rw_wildcard_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test) +{ +return sendmsg6_rw_dst_asm_prog_load (test,WILDCARD6_IP ); +} +static int sendmsg6_rw_c_prog_load (const struct sock_addr_test *test) {return load_path (test,SENDMSG6_PROG_PATH );
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Alexei Starovoitov
AppliedQuoted 10 lines · Andrey Ignatov
The patch set fixes BSD'ism in
sys_sendmsgto rewrite unspecified destination IPv6 for unconnected UDP sockets insys_sendmsgwith [::1] in case when eitherCONFIG_CGROUP_BPFis enabled or whensys_sendmsgBPF hook sets destination IPv6 to [::].Patch 1 is the fix and provides more details.
Patch 2 adds two test cases to verify the fix.
v1->v2:
* Fix compile error in patch 1.
Applied, Thanks