Inline sqe_submit
Subsystems (3)
v2 cover Inline sqe_submit
The idea is to not pass struct sqe_submit as a separate entity, but always use req->submit instead, so there will be less stuff to care about.
Also, I've got steady +1% throughput improvement for nop tests. Though, it's highly system-dependent, and I wouldn't count on it.
v2: fix use-after-free catched by Jens
Pavel Begunkov (3):
io_uring: allocate io_kiocb upfront
io_uring: Use submit info inlined into req
io_uring: use inlined struct sqe_submit
fs/io_uring.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.23.0
PATCH v2 1/3 io_uring: allocate io_kiocb upfront
Let io_submit_sqes() to allocate io_kiocb before fetching an sqe.
--- fs/io_uring.c | 25 ++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
fs/io_uring.c +12 -13
@@ -2551,30 +2551,23 @@ static int io_queue_link_head(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,#define SQE_VALID_FLAGS (IOSQE_FIXED_FILE|IOSQE_IO_DRAIN|IOSQE_IO_LINK) -static void io_submit_sqe (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,struct sqe_submit *s, -struct io_submit_state *state,struct io_kiocb **link) +static void io_submit_sqe (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,struct io_kiocb *req, +struct sqe_submit *s,struct io_submit_state *state, +struct io_kiocb **link) {struct io_uring_sqe *sqe_copy; -struct io_kiocb *req;int ret;/* enforce forwards compatibility on users */ if (unlikely (s->sqe->flags & ~SQE_VALID_FLAGS )) { ret = -EINVAL ; - goto err; - } - - req =io_get_req (ctx, state); -if (unlikely (!req)) { - ret = -EAGAIN ; - goto err; + goto err_req; } ret =io_req_set_file (ctx, s, state, req);if (unlikely (ret)) { err_req:io_free_req (req,NULL ); -err:io_cqring_add_event (ctx, s->sqe->user_data, ret);return ; }
@@ -2710,9 +2703,15 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr,for (i =0 ; i < nr; i++) {struct sqe_submit s; +struct io_kiocb *req; -if (!io_get_sqring (ctx, &s)) + req =io_get_req (ctx, statep); +if (unlikely (!req))break ; +if (!io_get_sqring (ctx, &s)) { +__io_free_req (req); +break ; + }if (io_sqe_needs_user (s.sqe) && !*mm) { mm_fault = mm_fault || !mmget_not_zero (ctx->sqo_mm);
@@ -2740,7 +2739,7 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr, s.in_async = async; s.needs_fixed_file = async;trace_io_uring_submit_sqe (ctx, s.sqe->user_data, true, async); -io_submit_sqe (ctx, &s, statep, &link); +io_submit_sqe (ctx, req, &s, statep, &link); submitted++;/*
Signature · 1 line
2.23.0
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] io_uring: allocate io_kiocb upfront
This one changes behaviour a bit. If we haven't been able to allocate req before, it would post an completion event with -EAGAIN. Now it will break imidiately without consuming sqe. So the user will see, that 0 sqes was submitted/consumed.
Is that ok or we need to do something about it?
Quoted 73 lines · Pavel Begunkov
Let
io_submit_sqes()to allocateio_kiocbbefore fetching an sqe.Signed-off-by Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>--- fs/io_uring.c | 25 ++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)fs/io_uring.c +12
-13@@ -2551,30 +2551,23 @@ static int io_queue_link_head(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,#define SQE_VALID_FLAGS (IOSQE_FIXED_FILE|IOSQE_IO_DRAIN|IOSQE_IO_LINK) -static void io_submit_sqe (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,struct sqe_submit *s, -struct io_submit_state *state,struct io_kiocb **link) +static void io_submit_sqe (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,struct io_kiocb *req, +struct sqe_submit *s,struct io_submit_state *state, +struct io_kiocb **link) {struct io_uring_sqe *sqe_copy; -struct io_kiocb *req;int ret;/* enforce forwards compatibility on users */ if (unlikely (s->sqe->flags & ~SQE_VALID_FLAGS )) { ret = -EINVAL ; - goto err; - } - - req =io_get_req (ctx, state); -if (unlikely (!req)) { - ret = -EAGAIN ; - goto err; + goto err_req; } ret =io_req_set_file (ctx, s, state, req);if (unlikely (ret)) { err_req:io_free_req (req,NULL ); -err:io_cqring_add_event (ctx, s->sqe->user_data, ret);return ; }@@ -2710,9 +2703,15 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr,for (i =0 ; i < nr; i++) {struct sqe_submit s; +struct io_kiocb *req; -if (!io_get_sqring (ctx, &s)) + req =io_get_req (ctx, statep); +if (unlikely (!req))break ; +if (!io_get_sqring (ctx, &s)) { +__io_free_req (req); +break ; + }if (io_sqe_needs_user (s.sqe) && !*mm) { mm_fault = mm_fault || !mmget_not_zero (ctx->sqo_mm);@@ -2740,7 +2739,7 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr, s.in_async = async; s.needs_fixed_file = async;trace_io_uring_submit_sqe (ctx, s.sqe->user_data, true, async); -io_submit_sqe (ctx, &s, statep, &link); +io_submit_sqe (ctx, req, &s, statep, &link); submitted++;/*
Signature · 1 line
Pavel Begunkov
Jens Axboe
maintainerRe: [PATCH v2 1/3] io_uring: allocate io_kiocb upfront
Quoted 6 lines · Pavel Begunkov
This one changes behaviour a bit. If we haven't been able to allocate req before, it would post an completion event with
-EAGAIN. Now it will break imidiately without consuming sqe. So the user will see, that 0 sqes was submitted/consumed.Is that ok or we need to do something about it?
At the very least we need to return -EAGAIN to the application. So something ala:
return submitted ? submitted : ret;
where ret is 0 or -EAGAIN if we failed to get a request.
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] io_uring: allocate io_kiocb upfront
Quoted 6 lines · Jens Axboe
Quoted 5 lines · Pavel Begunkov
This one changes behaviour a bit. If we haven't been able to allocate req before, it would post an completion event with
-EAGAIN. Now it will break imidiately without consuming sqe. So the user will see, that 0 sqes was submitted/consumed.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 1 line
Is that ok or we need to do something about it?
At the very least we need to return
-EAGAINto the application. So something ala:return submitted ? submitted : ret;
where ret is 0 or
-EAGAINif we failed to get a request.
This one is even better, as the old one didn't care about links
Signature · 1 line
Pavel Begunkov
PATCH v2 2/3 io_uring: Use submit info inlined into req
In reply to Pavel BegunkovStack allocated struct sqe_submit is passed down to the submission path along with a request (a.k.a. struct io_kiocb), and will be copied into req->submit for async requests.
As space for it is already allocated, fill req->submit in the first place instead of using on-stack one. As a result:
1. sqe->submit is the only place for sqe_submit and is always valid, so we don't need to track which one to use.
2. don't need to copy in case of async
3. allows to simplify the code by not carrying it as an argument all the way down
4. allows to reduce number of function arguments / potentially improve spilling
The downside is that stack is most probably be cached, that's not true for just allocated memory for a request. Another concern is cache pollution. Though, a request would be touched and fetched along with req->submit at some point anyway, so shouldn't be a problem.
--- fs/io_uring.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
fs/io_uring.c +16 -16
@@ -2456,7 +2456,6 @@ static int __io_queue_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req, sqe_copy =kmemdup (s->sqe,sizeof (*sqe_copy),GFP_KERNEL );if (sqe_copy) { s->sqe = sqe_copy; -memcpy (&req->submit, s,sizeof (*s));if (req->work.flags &IO_WQ_WORK_NEEDS_FILES ) { ret =io_grab_files (ctx, req);if (ret) {
@@ -2591,13 +2590,11 @@ static void io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req, } s->sqe = sqe_copy; -memcpy (&req->submit, s,sizeof (*s));trace_io_uring_link (ctx, req, prev);list_add_tail (&req->list, &prev->link_list); }else if (s->sqe->flags &IOSQE_IO_LINK ) { req->flags |=REQ_F_LINK ; -memcpy (&req->submit, s,sizeof (*s));INIT_LIST_HEAD (&req->link_list); *link = req; }else {
@@ -2702,18 +2699,18 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr, }for (i =0 ; i < nr; i++) { -struct sqe_submit s;struct io_kiocb *req; +unsigned int sqe_flags; req =io_get_req (ctx, statep);if (unlikely (!req))break ; -if (!io_get_sqring (ctx, &s)) { +if (!io_get_sqring (ctx, &req->submit)) {__io_free_req (req);break ; } -if (io_sqe_needs_user (s.sqe) && !*mm) { +if (io_sqe_needs_user (req->submit.sqe) && !*mm) { mm_fault = mm_fault || !mmget_not_zero (ctx->sqo_mm);if (!mm_fault) {use_mm (ctx->sqo_mm);
@@ -2721,7 +2718,9 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr, } } -if (link && (s.sqe->flags &IOSQE_IO_DRAIN )) { + sqe_flags = req->submit.sqe->flags; + +if (link && (sqe_flags &IOSQE_IO_DRAIN )) {if (!shadow_req) { shadow_req =io_get_req (ctx,NULL );if (unlikely (!shadow_req))
@@ -2729,24 +2728,25 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr, shadow_req->flags |= (REQ_F_IO_DRAIN |REQ_F_SHADOW_DRAIN );refcount_dec (&shadow_req->refs); } - shadow_req->sequence = s.sequence; + shadow_req->sequence = req->submit.sequence; } out: - s.ring_file = ring_file; - s.ring_fd = ring_fd; - s.has_user = *mm !=NULL ; - s.in_async = async; - s.needs_fixed_file = async; -trace_io_uring_submit_sqe (ctx, s.sqe->user_data, true, async); -io_submit_sqe (ctx, req, &s, statep, &link); + req->submit.ring_file = ring_file; + req->submit.ring_fd = ring_fd; + req->submit.has_user = *mm !=NULL ; + req->submit.in_async = async; + req->submit.needs_fixed_file = async; +trace_io_uring_submit_sqe (ctx, req->submit.sqe->user_data, + true, async); +io_submit_sqe (ctx, req, &req->submit, statep, &link); submitted++;/* * If previous wasn't linked and we have a linked command, * that's the end of the chain. Submit the previous link. */ -if (!(s.sqe->flags &IOSQE_IO_LINK ) && link) { +if (!(sqe_flags &IOSQE_IO_LINK ) && link) {io_queue_link_head (ctx, link, &link->submit, shadow_req); link =NULL ; shadow_req =NULL ;
Signature · 1 line
2.23.0
PATCH v2 3/3 io_uring: use inlined struct sqe_submit
In reply to Pavel Begunkovreq->submit is always up-to-date, use it directly
--- fs/io_uring.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
fs/io_uring.c +43 -44
@@ -1155,10 +1155,9 @@ static bool io_file_supports_async(struct file *file)return false; } -static int io_prep_rw (struct io_kiocb *req,const struct sqe_submit *s, -bool force_nonblock) +static int io_prep_rw (struct io_kiocb *req,bool force_nonblock) { -const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe = s->sqe; +const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe = req->submit.sqe;struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;struct kiocb *kiocb = &req->rw;unsigned ioprio;
@@ -1406,8 +1405,8 @@ static ssize_t loop_rw_iter(int rw, struct file *file, struct kiocb *kiocb,return ret; } -static int io_read (struct io_kiocb *req,const struct sqe_submit *s, -struct io_kiocb **nxt,bool force_nonblock) +static int io_read (struct io_kiocb *req,struct io_kiocb **nxt, +bool force_nonblock) {struct iovec inline_vecs[UIO_FASTIOV ], *iovec = inline_vecs;struct kiocb *kiocb = &req->rw;
@@ -1416,7 +1415,7 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct sqe_submit *s,size_t iov_count;ssize_t read_size, ret; - ret =io_prep_rw (req, s, force_nonblock); + ret =io_prep_rw (req, force_nonblock);if (ret)return ret; file = kiocb->ki_filp;
@@ -1424,7 +1423,7 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct sqe_submit *s,if (unlikely (!(file->f_mode &FMODE_READ )))return -EBADF ; - ret =io_import_iovec (req->ctx,READ , s, &iovec, &iter); + ret =io_import_iovec (req->ctx,READ , &req->submit, &iovec, &iter);if (ret <0 )return ret;
@@ -1456,7 +1455,7 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct sqe_submit *s, ret2 = -EAGAIN ;/* Catch -EAGAIN return for forced non-blocking submission */ if (!force_nonblock || ret2 != -EAGAIN ) -kiocb_done (kiocb, ret2, nxt, s->in_async); +kiocb_done (kiocb, ret2, nxt, req->submit.in_async);else ret = -EAGAIN ; }
@@ -1464,8 +1463,8 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct sqe_submit *s,return ret; } -static int io_write (struct io_kiocb *req,const struct sqe_submit *s, -struct io_kiocb **nxt,bool force_nonblock) +static int io_write (struct io_kiocb *req,struct io_kiocb **nxt, +bool force_nonblock) {struct iovec inline_vecs[UIO_FASTIOV ], *iovec = inline_vecs;struct kiocb *kiocb = &req->rw;
@@ -1474,7 +1473,7 @@ static int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct sqe_submit *s,size_t iov_count;ssize_t ret; - ret =io_prep_rw (req, s, force_nonblock); + ret =io_prep_rw (req, force_nonblock);if (ret)return ret;
@@ -1482,7 +1481,7 @@ static int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct sqe_submit *s,if (unlikely (!(file->f_mode &FMODE_WRITE )))return -EBADF ; - ret =io_import_iovec (req->ctx,WRITE , s, &iovec, &iter); + ret =io_import_iovec (req->ctx,WRITE , &req->submit, &iovec, &iter);if (ret <0 )return ret;
@@ -1519,7 +1518,7 @@ static int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct sqe_submit *s,else ret2 =loop_rw_iter (WRITE , file, kiocb, &iter);if (!force_nonblock || ret2 != -EAGAIN ) -kiocb_done (kiocb, ret2, nxt, s->in_async); +kiocb_done (kiocb, ret2, nxt, req->submit.in_async);else ret = -EAGAIN ; }
@@ -2188,9 +2187,9 @@ static int io_async_cancel(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe,return 0 ; } -static int io_req_defer (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,struct io_kiocb *req, -const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe) +static int io_req_defer (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,struct io_kiocb *req) { +const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe = req->submit.sqe;struct io_uring_sqe *sqe_copy;if (!io_sequence_defer (ctx, req) &&list_empty (&ctx->defer_list))
@@ -2217,10 +2216,10 @@ static int io_req_defer(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req, }static int __io_submit_sqe (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,struct io_kiocb *req, -const struct sqe_submit *s,struct io_kiocb **nxt, -bool force_nonblock) +struct io_kiocb **nxt,bool force_nonblock) {int ret, opcode; +struct sqe_submit *s = &req->submit; req->user_data =READ_ONCE (s->sqe->user_data);
@@ -2232,18 +2231,18 @@ static int __io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,case IORING_OP_READV :if (unlikely (s->sqe->buf_index))return -EINVAL ; - ret =io_read (req, s, nxt, force_nonblock); + ret =io_read (req, nxt, force_nonblock);break ;case IORING_OP_WRITEV :if (unlikely (s->sqe->buf_index))return -EINVAL ; - ret =io_write (req, s, nxt, force_nonblock); + ret =io_write (req, nxt, force_nonblock);break ;case IORING_OP_READ_FIXED : - ret =io_read (req, s, nxt, force_nonblock); + ret =io_read (req, nxt, force_nonblock);break ;case IORING_OP_WRITE_FIXED : - ret =io_write (req, s, nxt, force_nonblock); + ret =io_write (req, nxt, force_nonblock);break ;case IORING_OP_FSYNC : ret =io_fsync (req, s->sqe, nxt, force_nonblock);
@@ -2318,7 +2317,7 @@ static void io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work **workptr) s->has_user = (work->flags &IO_WQ_WORK_HAS_MM ) !=0 ; s->in_async = true; do { - ret = __io_submit_sqe(ctx, req, s, &nxt, false); + ret = __io_submit_sqe(ctx, req, &nxt, false); /* * We can get EAGAIN for polled IO even though we're * forcing a sync submission from here, since we can't
@@ -2372,9 +2371,10 @@ static inline struct file *io_file_from_index(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,return table->files[index &IORING_FILE_TABLE_MASK ]; } -static int io_req_set_file (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,const struct sqe_submit *s, +static int io_req_set_file (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,struct io_submit_state *state,struct io_kiocb *req) { +struct sqe_submit *s = &req->submit;unsigned flags;int fd;
@@ -2438,12 +2438,11 @@ static int io_grab_files(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req)return ret; } -static int __io_queue_sqe (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,struct io_kiocb *req, -struct sqe_submit *s) +static int __io_queue_sqe (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,struct io_kiocb *req) {int ret; - ret =__io_submit_sqe (ctx, req, s,NULL , true); + ret =__io_submit_sqe (ctx, req,NULL , true);/* * We async punt it if the file wasn't marked NOWAIT, or if the file
@@ -2451,6 +2450,7 @@ static int __io_queue_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,*/ if (ret == -EAGAIN && (!(req->flags &REQ_F_NOWAIT ) || (req->flags &REQ_F_MUST_PUNT ))) { +struct sqe_submit *s = &req->submit;struct io_uring_sqe *sqe_copy; sqe_copy =kmemdup (s->sqe,sizeof (*sqe_copy),GFP_KERNEL );
@@ -2488,31 +2488,30 @@ static int __io_queue_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,return ret; } -static int io_queue_sqe (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,struct io_kiocb *req, -struct sqe_submit *s) +static int io_queue_sqe (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,struct io_kiocb *req) {int ret; - ret =io_req_defer (ctx, req, s->sqe); + ret =io_req_defer (ctx, req);if (ret) {if (ret != -EIOCBQUEUED ) { +io_cqring_add_event (ctx, req->submit.sqe->user_data, ret);io_free_req (req,NULL ); -io_cqring_add_event (ctx, s->sqe->user_data, ret); }return 0 ; } -return __io_queue_sqe (ctx, req, s); +return __io_queue_sqe (ctx, req); }static int io_queue_link_head (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,struct io_kiocb *req, -struct sqe_submit *s,struct io_kiocb *shadow) +struct io_kiocb *shadow) {int ret;int need_submit = false;if (!shadow) -return io_queue_sqe (ctx, req, s); +return io_queue_sqe (ctx, req);/* * Mark the first IO in link list as DRAIN, let all the following
@@ -2520,12 +2519,12 @@ static int io_queue_link_head(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,* list. */ req->flags |=REQ_F_IO_DRAIN ; - ret =io_req_defer (ctx, req, s->sqe); + ret =io_req_defer (ctx, req);if (ret) {if (ret != -EIOCBQUEUED ) { +io_cqring_add_event (ctx, req->submit.sqe->user_data, ret);io_free_req (req,NULL );__io_free_req (shadow); -io_cqring_add_event (ctx, s->sqe->user_data, ret);return 0 ; } }else {
@@ -2543,7 +2542,7 @@ static int io_queue_link_head(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,spin_unlock_irq (&ctx->completion_lock);if (need_submit) -return __io_queue_sqe (ctx, req, s); +return __io_queue_sqe (ctx, req);return 0 ; }
@@ -2551,10 +2550,10 @@ static int io_queue_link_head(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,#define SQE_VALID_FLAGS (IOSQE_FIXED_FILE|IOSQE_IO_DRAIN|IOSQE_IO_LINK)static void io_submit_sqe (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,struct io_kiocb *req, -struct sqe_submit *s,struct io_submit_state *state, -struct io_kiocb **link) +struct io_submit_state *state,struct io_kiocb **link) {struct io_uring_sqe *sqe_copy; +struct sqe_submit *s = &req->submit;int ret;/* enforce forwards compatibility on users */
@@ -2563,11 +2562,11 @@ static void io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req, goto err_req; } - ret =io_req_set_file (ctx, s, state, req); + ret =io_req_set_file (ctx, state, req);if (unlikely (ret)) { err_req: -io_free_req (req,NULL );io_cqring_add_event (ctx, s->sqe->user_data, ret); +io_free_req (req,NULL );return ; }
@@ -2598,7 +2597,7 @@ static void io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,INIT_LIST_HEAD (&req->link_list); *link = req; }else { -io_queue_sqe (ctx, req, s); +io_queue_sqe (ctx, req); } }
@@ -2739,7 +2738,7 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr, req->submit.needs_fixed_file = async;trace_io_uring_submit_sqe (ctx, req->submit.sqe->user_data, true, async); -io_submit_sqe (ctx, req, &req->submit, statep, &link); +io_submit_sqe (ctx, req, statep, &link); submitted++;/*
@@ -2747,14 +2746,14 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr,* that's the end of the chain. Submit the previous link. */ if (!(sqe_flags &IOSQE_IO_LINK ) && link) { -io_queue_link_head (ctx, link, &link->submit, shadow_req); +io_queue_link_head (ctx, link, shadow_req); link =NULL ; shadow_req =NULL ; } }if (link) -io_queue_link_head (ctx, link, &link->submit, shadow_req); +io_queue_link_head (ctx, link, shadow_req);if (statep)io_submit_state_end (&state);
Signature · 1 line
2.23.0
Quoted 4 lines · Pavel Begunkov
The idea is to not pass struct
sqe_submitas a separate entity, but always usereq->submitinstead, so there will be less stuff to care about.
Hope, I didn't missed anything here. In the meantime I'll run tests and will let you know when it's done.
Quoted 14 lines
Also, I've got steady +1% throughput improvement for nop tests. Though, it's highly system-dependent, and I wouldn't count on it.
v2: fix use-after-free catched by Jens
Pavel Begunkov (3):
io_uring: allocateio_kiocbupfront
io_uring: Use submit info inlined into req
io_uring: use inlined structsqe_submitfs/io_uring.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
Pavel Begunkov