fix hangs with shared sqpoll
Subsystems (3)
v2 cover fix hangs with shared sqpoll
Jens' reproducers catches shared sqpoll hangs, address them.
v2: do full cancel, and remove ctx from the sqd_list _after_ running
sqpoll cancel as it depends on it.
Pavel Begunkov (2):
io_uring: remove extra sqpoll submission halting
io_uring: fix shared sqpoll cancellation hangs
fs/io_uring.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.31.1
PATCH v2 1/2 io_uring: remove extra sqpoll submission halting
SQPOLL task won't submit requests for a context that is currently dying, so no need to remove ctx from sqd_list prior the main loop of io_ring_exit_work(). Kill it, will be removed by io_sq_thread_finish() and only brings confusion and lockups.
--- fs/io_uring.c | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
fs/io_uring.c +4 -8
@@ -6744,6 +6744,10 @@ static int __io_sq_thread(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool cap_entries)if (!list_empty (&ctx->iopoll_list))io_do_iopoll (ctx, &nr_events,0 ); +/* +* Don't submit if refs are dying, good for io_uring_register(), +* but also it is relied upon by io_ring_exit_work() +*/ if (to_submit &&likely (!percpu_ref_is_dying (&ctx->refs)) && !(ctx->flags &IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED )) ret =io_submit_sqes (ctx, to_submit);
@@ -8537,14 +8541,6 @@ static void io_ring_exit_work(struct work_struct *work)struct io_tctx_node *node;int ret; -/* prevent SQPOLL from submitting new requests */ -if (ctx->sq_data) { -io_sq_thread_park (ctx->sq_data); -list_del_init (&ctx->sqd_list); -io_sqd_update_thread_idle (ctx->sq_data); -io_sq_thread_unpark (ctx->sq_data); - } -/* * If we're doing polled IO and end up having requests being * submitted async (out-of-line), then completions can come in while
Signature · 1 line
2.31.1
PATCH v2 2/2 io_uring: fix shared sqpoll cancellation hangs
In reply to Pavel Begunkov[ 736.982891] INFO: task iou-sqp-4294:4295 blocked for more than 122 seconds. [ 736.982897] Call Trace: [ 736.982901] schedule+0x68/0xe0 [ 736.982903] io_uring_cancel_sqpoll+0xdb/0x110 [ 736.982908] io_sqpoll_cancel_cb+0x24/0x30 [ 736.982911] io_run_task_work_head+0x28/0x50 [ 736.982913] io_sq_thread+0x4e3/0x720
We call io_uring_cancel_sqpoll() one by one for each ctx either in sq_thread() itself or via task works, and it's intended to cancel all requests of a specified context. However the function uses per-task counters to track the number of inflight requests, so it counts more requests than available via currect io_uring ctx and goes to sleep for them to appear (e.g. from IRQ), that will never happen.
Cancel a bit more than before, i.e. all ctxs that share sqpoll and continue to use shared counters. Don't forget that we should not remove ctx from the list before running that task_work sqpoll-cancel, otherwise the function wouldn't be able to find the context and will hang.
--- fs/io_uring.c | 27 ++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
fs/io_uring.c +14 -13
@@ -1022,7 +1022,7 @@ static void io_uring_del_task_file(unsigned long index);static void io_uring_try_cancel_requests (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,struct task_struct *task,struct files_struct *files); -static void io_uring_cancel_sqpoll (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx); +static void io_uring_cancel_sqpoll (struct io_sq_data *sqd);static struct io_rsrc_node *io_rsrc_node_alloc (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx);static bool io_cqring_fill_event (struct io_kiocb *req,long res,unsigned cflags);
@@ -6867,15 +6867,14 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data) timeout = jiffies + sqd->sq_thread_idle; } -list_for_each_entry (ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list) -io_uring_cancel_sqpoll (ctx); +io_uring_cancel_sqpoll (sqd); sqd->thread =NULL ;list_for_each_entry (ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list)io_ring_set_wakeup_flag (ctx); -mutex_unlock (&sqd->lock); -io_run_task_work ();io_run_task_work_head (&sqd->park_task_work); +mutex_unlock (&sqd->lock); +complete (&sqd->exited);do_exit (0 ); }
@@ -8867,11 +8866,11 @@ static s64 tctx_inflight(struct io_uring_task *tctx, bool tracked)static void io_sqpoll_cancel_cb (struct callback_head *cb) { struct io_tctx_exit *work = container_of(cb, struct io_tctx_exit, task_work); -struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = work->ctx; -struct io_sq_data *sqd = ctx->sq_data; +struct io_sq_data *sqd = work->ctx->sq_data;if (sqd->thread) -io_uring_cancel_sqpoll (ctx); +io_uring_cancel_sqpoll (sqd); +list_del_init (&work->ctx->sqd_list);complete (&work->completion); }
@@ -8882,7 +8881,6 @@ static void io_sqpoll_cancel_sync(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)struct task_struct *task;io_sq_thread_park (sqd); -list_del_init (&ctx->sqd_list);io_sqd_update_thread_idle (sqd); task = sqd->thread;if (task) {
@@ -8890,6 +8888,8 @@ static void io_sqpoll_cancel_sync(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)init_task_work (&work.task_work, io_sqpoll_cancel_cb);io_task_work_add_head (&sqd->park_task_work, &work.task_work);wake_up_process (task); + }else { +list_del_init (&ctx->sqd_list); }io_sq_thread_unpark (sqd);
@@ -8915,14 +8915,14 @@ static void io_uring_try_cancel(struct files_struct *files) }/* should only be called by SQPOLL task */ -static void io_uring_cancel_sqpoll (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) +static void io_uring_cancel_sqpoll (struct io_sq_data *sqd) { -struct io_sq_data *sqd = ctx->sq_data;struct io_uring_task *tctx = current->io_uring; +struct io_ring_ctx *ctx;s64 inflight;DEFINE_WAIT (wait); -WARN_ON_ONCE (!sqd || ctx->sq_data->thread != current); +WARN_ON_ONCE (!sqd || sqd->thread != current);atomic_inc (&tctx->in_idle); do {
@@ -8930,7 +8930,8 @@ static void io_uring_cancel_sqpoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) inflight =tctx_inflight (tctx, false);if (!inflight)break ; -io_uring_try_cancel_requests (ctx, current,NULL ); +list_for_each_entry (ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list) +io_uring_try_cancel_requests (ctx, current,NULL );prepare_to_wait (&tctx->wait, &wait,TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE );/*
Signature · 1 line
2.31.1
Jens Axboe
maintainerQuoted 4 lines · Pavel Begunkov
Jens' reproducers catches shared sqpoll hangs, address them.
v2: do full cancel, and remove ctx from the
sqd_list_after_ running
sqpoll cancel as it depends on it.
Tests good for me, applied for 5.13 - thanks!
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe