Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update and Telemetry drivers
Subsystems (4)
v3 cover Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update and Telemetry drivers
High Service Level Agreements (SLAs) requires that the system runs without service interruptions. Generally, system firmware provides runtime services such as RAS(Reliability, Availability and Serviceability) features, UEFI runtime services and ACPI services. Currently if there is any firmware code changes in these code area, the system firmware update and reboot is required. Example of bug fix could be wrong register size or location of the register. This means customer services are not available during the firmware upgrade, which could approach several minutes, resulting in not able to meet SLAs.
Intel provides a mechanism named Management Mode Runtime Update to help the users update the firmware without having to reboot[1].
This series provides the following facilities.
1. Perform a runtime firmware driver update and activate.
2. Ability to inject firmware code at runtime, for dynamic instrumentation.
3. Facility to retrieve logs from runtime firmware update and activate telemetry. (The telemetry is based on runtime firmware update: it records the logs during runtime update(code injection and driver update).
The Management Mode Runtime Update OS Interface Specification[1] provides two ACPI device objects to interface with system firmware to perform these updates. This patch series introduces the drivers for those ACPI devices.
[1] https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/Intel_MM_OS_Interface_Spec_Rev100.pdf
=============
- Change from v2 to v3:
- Use valid types for structures that cross the user/kernel boundry in the uapi header. (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
- Rename the structure in uapi to start with a prefix pfru so as to avoid confusing in the global namespace. (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
- Change from v1 to v2:
- Add a spot in index.rst so it becomes part of the docs build (Jonathan Corbet).
- Sticking to the 80-column limit(Jonathan Corbet).
- Underline lengths should match the title text(Jonathan Corbet).
- Use literal blocks for the code samples(Jonathan Corbet).
- Add sanity check for duplicated instance of ACPI device.
- Update the driver to work with allocated pfru_device objects. (Mike Rapoport)
- For each switch case pair, get rid of the magic case numbers and add a default clause with the error handling.(Mike Rapoport)
- Move the obj->type checks outside the switch to reduce redundancy. (Mike Rapoport)
- Parse the code_inj_id and drv_update_id at driver initialization time to reduce the re-parsing at runtime. (Mike Rapoport)
- Explain in detail how the size needs to be adjusted when doing version check. (Mike Rapoport)
- Rename parse_update_result() to dump_update_result() (Mike Rapoport)
- Remove redundant return.(Mike Rapoport)
- Do not expose struct capsulate_buf_info to uapi, since it is not needed in userspace. (Mike Rapoport)
- Do not allow non-root user to run this test.(Shuah Khan)
- Test runs on platform without pfru_telemetry should skip instead of reporting failure/error.(Shuah Khan)
- Reuse uapi/linux/pfru.h instead of copying it into the test directory. (Mike Rapoport)
Chen Yu (5):
Documentation: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update
documentation
efi: Introduce EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER and
corresponding structures
drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update device driver drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update Telemetry selftests/pfru: add test for Platform Firmware Runtime Update and
Telemetry
.../userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst | 1 + Documentation/x86/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/x86/pfru.rst | 100 +++ drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 + drivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig | 29 + drivers/acpi/pfru/Makefile | 3 + drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c | 412 +++++++++++++ drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c | 567 ++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/efi.h | 50 ++ include/uapi/linux/pfru.h | 149 +++++ tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/pfru/Makefile | 7 + tools/testing/selftests/pfru/config | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/pfru/pfru_test.c | 328 ++++++++++ 15 files changed, 1652 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/x86/pfru.rst create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/pfru/Makefile create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/pfru.h create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/pfru/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/pfru/config create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/pfru/pfru_test.c
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
PATCH v3 1/5 Documentation: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update documentation
Add the Platform Firmware Runtime Update/Telemetry documentation.
---
v3: No change since v2.
v2: Add a spot in index.rst so it becomes part of the docs build
(Jonathan Corbet).
Sticking to the 80-column limit(Jonathan Corbet). Underline lengths should match the title text(Jonathan Corbet). Use literal blocks for the code samples(Jonathan Corbet).
--- Documentation/x86/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/x86/pfru.rst | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/x86/pfru.rst
Documentation/x86/index.rst +1 -0
@@ -37,3 +37,4 @@ x86-specific Documentation sgx features elf_auxvec + pfru
Documentation/x86/pfru.rst new file +100 -0
100 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Rafael J. Wysocki
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 1/5] Documentation: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update documentation
Quoted 11 lines · Chen Yu
Add the Platform Firmware Runtime Update/Telemetry documentation.
Signed-off-by Chen Yu <[email protected]>---
v3: No change since v2.
v2: Add a spot inindex.rstso it becomes part of the docs build
(Jonathan Corbet).
Sticking to the 80-column limit(Jonathan Corbet). Underline lengths should match the title text(Jonathan Corbet). Use literal blocks for the code samples(Jonathan Corbet).
Quoted 3 lines
--- Documentation/x86/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/x86/pfru.rst | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The location of this file is somewhat questionable to me.
The interface described by it talks to the platform firmware via ACPI methods, there's nothing x86-specific in it.
Besides, it is hard to say who's the target audience of this document.
Quoted 18 lines
2 files changed, 101 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/x86/pfru.rstDocumentation/x86/index.rst +1
-0@@ -37,3 +37,4 @@ x86-specific Documentation sgx features elf_auxvec + pfruDocumentation/x86/pfru.rst new file +0
-0
Documentation/x86/pfru.rst line 5
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/x86/pfru.rst new file +5
-0@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +======================================================== +The Linux Platform Firmware Runtime Update and Telemetry +========================================================
The "The Linux" piece doesn't add any value here IMO.
Documentation/x86/pfru.rst line 17
Quoted 12 lines
Documentation/x86/pfru.rst new file +12
-0+ +According to the specification of `Management Mode Firmware Runtime Update +<https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/Intel_MM_OS_Interface_Spec_ +Rev100.pdf>`_, certain computing systems require high Service Level Agreements +(SLAs) where system reboot fewer firmware updates are required to deploy +firmware changes to address bug fixes, security updates and to debug and root +cause issues. This technology is called Intel Seamless Update. The management +mode (MM), UEFI runtime services and ACPI services handle most of the system +runtime functions. Changing the MM code execution during runtime is called MM +Runtime Update. Since the "MM" acronyms might be misunderstood as "Memory +Management", this driver uses the name of "Platform Firmware Runtime Update" +(PFRU).
In the above paragraph it is not necessary to mention the "high SLAs" at all. IMO it would be sufficient to say something like "The PFRU (Platform Firmware Runtime Update) kernel interface is designed to interact with the platform firmware interface defined in the `Management Mode Firmware Runtime Update
<https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/Intel_MM_OS_Interface_Spec_Rev100.pdf>`_
specification."
Documentation/x86/pfru.rst line 26
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/x86/pfru.rst new file +9
-0+ +PFRU provides the following facilities: Performs a runtime firmware driver +update and activate. Ability to inject firmware code at runtime, for dynamic +instrumentation. PFRU Telemetry is a service which allows Runtime Update +handler to produce telemetry data to upper layer OS consumer at runtime. The +OS provides interfaces to let the users query the telemetry data via read +operations. The specification specifies the interface and recommended policy +to extract the data, the format and use are left to individual OEM's and BIOS +implementations on what that data represents.
I'd just say "The primary function of PFRU is to carry out runtime updates of the platform firmware, which doesn't require the system to be restarted. It also allows telemetry data to be retrieved from the platform firmware." And the part about how the PFRU telemetry is supposed to work belongs to the description of that part.
Documentation/x86/pfru.rst line 29
Quoted 3 lines
Documentation/x86/pfru.rst new file +3
-0+ +PFRU interfaces +===============
Because this doesn't really specify the kernel ABI, the part below belongs to the man page of the tool that you're going to provide.
In order to document the ABI, please add a document to Documentation/ABI/testing/ along the lines of Documentation/ABI/testing/rtc-cdev
Quoted 50 lines
Documentation/x86/pfru.rst new file +50
-0+ +The user space tool manipulates on /dev/pfru/update for code injection and +driver update. PFRU stands for Platform Firmware Runtime Update, and the +/dev/pfru directory might be reserved for future usage:: + + 1. mmap the capsule file. + fd_capsule = open("capsule.cap", O_RDONLY); + fstat(fd_capsule, &stat); + addr = mmap(0, stat.st_size, PROT_READ, fd_capsule); + + 2. Get the capability information(version control, etc) from BIOS via + read() and do sanity check in user space. + fd_update = open("/dev/pfru/update", O_RDWR); + read(fd_update, &cap, sizeof(cap)); + sanity_check(&cap); + + 3. Write the capsule file to runtime update communication buffer. + kernel might return error if capsule file size is longer than + communication buffer. + write(fd_update, addr, stat.st_size); + + 4. Stage the code injection. + ioctl(fd_update, PFRU_IOC_STATGE); + + 5. Activate the code injection. + ioctl(fd_update, PFRU_IOC_ACTIVATE); + + 6. Stage and activate the code injection. + ioctl(fd_update, PFRU_IOC_STAGE_ACTIVATE); + + PFRU_IOC_STATGE: Stage a capsule image from communication buffer + and perform authentication. + [PFRU_IOC_ACTIVATE] Activate a previous staged capsule image. + [PFRU_IOC_STAGE_ACTIVATE] Perform both stage and activation actions. + + +PFRU Telemetry interfaces +========================= + +The user space tool manipulates on /dev/pfru/telemetry for PFRU telemetry log:: + + 1. Open telemetry device + fd_log = open("/dev/pfru/telemetry", O_RDWR); + + 2. Get log level, log type, revision_id via one ioctl invoke + ioctl(fd_log, PFRU_IOC_GET_LOG_INFO, &info); + + 3. Set log level, log type, revision_id + ioctl(fd_log, PFRU_IOC_SET_LOG_INFO, &info); +
Documentation/x86/pfru.rst line 89
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/x86/pfru.rst new file +10
-0+ 4. ioctl(fd_log, PFRU_IOC_GET_DATA_INFO, &data_info); + Query the information of PFRU telemetry log buffer. The user is + responsible for parsing the result per the specification. + + 5. Read the telemetry data: + read(fd_log, buf, data_info.size); + +Please refer to tools/testing/selftests/pfru/pfru_test.c for detail. + +According to the specification of `Management Mode Firmware Runtime Update
I'd say "According to the ... specification," (ie. without the "of").
Documentation/x86/pfru.rst line 97
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/x86/pfru.rst new file +8
-0+<https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/Intel_MM_OS_Interface_Spec_ +Rev100.pdf>`_, the telemetry buffer is a wrap around buffer. If the telemetry +buffer gets full, most recent log data will overwrite old log data. Besides, +it is required in the spec that the read of telemetry should support both full +data retrieval and delta telemetry data retrieval. Since this requirement is +more likely a policy we leave this implementation in user space. That is to +say, it is recommended for the user to double-read the telemetry parameters +such as chunk1_size, chunk2_size, rollover_cnt in data_info structure to make
It is not clear what you mean by "double read". It looks like you wanted to say that it was recommended to call the PFRU_IOC_GET_DATA_INFO ioctl() before a "continuation" read in order to check if more data was available.
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/x86/pfru.rst new file +3
-1+sure that there is no more data appended while the user is reading the buffer. +Besides, only after the runtime update has been run at least once, the telemetry +log would have valid data, otherwise errno code of EBUSY would be returned. --
PATCH v3 2/5 efi: Introduce EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER and corresponding structures
In reply to Chen YuPlatform Firmware Runtime Update image starts with UEFI headers, and the headers are defined in UEFI specification, but some of them have not been defined in the kernel yet.
For example, the header layout of a capsule file looks like this:
EFI_CAPSULE_HEADEREFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADEREFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_IMAGE_HEADEREFI_FIRMWARE_IMAGE_AUTHENTICATION
These structures would be used by the Platform Firmware Runtime Update driver to parse the format of capsule file to verify if the corresponding version number is valid. The EFI_CAPSULE_HEADER has been defined in the kernel, however the rest are not, thus introduce corresponding UEFI structures accordingly.
The reason why efi_manage_capsule_header_t and efi_manage_capsule_image_header_t are packedi might be that:
According to the uefi spec,
[Figure 23-6 Firmware Management and Firmware Image Management headers] EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER is located at the lowest offset within the body of the capsule. And this structure is designed to be unaligned to save space, because in this way the adjacent drivers and binary payload elements could start on byte boundary with no padding. And the EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_IMAGE_HEADER is at the head of each payload, so packing this structure also makes room for more data.
--- include/linux/efi.h | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
include/linux/efi.h +50 -0
@@ -148,6 +148,56 @@ typedef struct {u32 imagesize; } efi_capsule_header_t; +#pragma pack(1) + +/* EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER */ +typedef struct { +u32 ver; +u16 emb_drv_cnt; +u16 payload_cnt; +/* +* Variable array indicated by number of +* (emb_drv_cnt + payload_cnt) +*/ +u64 offset_list[]; +}efi_manage_capsule_header_t ; + +/* EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_IMAGE_HEADER */ +typedef struct { +u32 ver; +guid_t image_type_id; +u8 image_index; +u8 reserved_bytes[3 ]; +u32 image_size; +u32 vendor_code_size; +/* ver = 2. */ +u64 hw_ins; +/* ver = v3. */ +u64 capsule_support; +}efi_manage_capsule_image_header_t ; + +#pragma pack() + +/* WIN_CERTIFICATE */ +typedef struct { +u32 len; +u16 rev; +u16 cert_type; +}win_cert_t ; + +/* WIN_CERTIFICATE_UEFI_GUID */ +typedef struct { +win_cert_t hdr; +guid_t cert_type; +u8 cert_data[]; +}win_cert_uefi_guid_t ; + +/* EFI_FIRMWARE_IMAGE_AUTHENTICATIO */ +typedef struct { +u64 mon_count; +win_cert_uefi_guid_t auth_info; +}efi_image_auth_t ; +/* * EFI capsule flags */
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Rafael J. Wysocki
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 2/5] efi: Introduce EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER and corresponding structures
Quoted 18 lines · Chen Yu
Platform Firmware Runtime Update image starts with UEFI headers, and the headers are defined in UEFI specification, but some of them have not been defined in the kernel yet.
For example, the header layout of a capsule file looks like this:
EFI_CAPSULE_HEADEREFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADEREFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_IMAGE_HEADEREFI_FIRMWARE_IMAGE_AUTHENTICATIONThese structures would be used by the Platform Firmware Runtime Update driver to parse the format of capsule file to verify if the corresponding version number is valid. The
EFI_CAPSULE_HEADERhas been defined in the kernel, however the rest are not, thus introduce corresponding UEFI structures accordingly.
Quoted 10 lines
The reason why
efi_manage_capsule_header_tandefi_manage_capsule_image_header_tare packedi might be that:
According to the uefi spec,
[Figure 23-6 Firmware Management and Firmware Image Management headers]EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADERis located at the lowest offset within the body of the capsule. And this structure is designed to be unaligned to save space, because in this way the adjacent drivers and binary payload elements could start on byte boundary with no padding. And theEFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_IMAGE_HEADERis at the head of each payload, so packing this structure also makes room for more data.
IMO it would be sufficient to say that both EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER and EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_IMAGE_HEADER need not be aligned and so the corresponding data types should be packed.
Quoted 70 lines
Signed-off-by Chen Yu <[email protected]>--- include/linux/efi.h | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)include/linux/efi.h +50
-1@@ -148,6 +148,56 @@ typedef struct {u32 imagesize; } efi_capsule_header_t; +#pragma pack(1) + +/* EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER */ +typedef struct { +u32 ver; +u16 emb_drv_cnt; +u16 payload_cnt; +/* +* Variable array indicated by number of +* (emb_drv_cnt + payload_cnt) +*/ +u64 offset_list[]; +}efi_manage_capsule_header_t ; + +/* EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_IMAGE_HEADER */ +typedef struct { +u32 ver; +guid_t image_type_id; +u8 image_index; +u8 reserved_bytes[3 ]; +u32 image_size; +u32 vendor_code_size; +/* ver = 2. */ +u64 hw_ins; +/* ver = v3. */ +u64 capsule_support; +}efi_manage_capsule_image_header_t ; + +#pragma pack() + +/* WIN_CERTIFICATE */ +typedef struct { +u32 len; +u16 rev; +u16 cert_type; +}win_cert_t ; + +/* WIN_CERTIFICATE_UEFI_GUID */ +typedef struct { +win_cert_t hdr; +guid_t cert_type; +u8 cert_data[]; +}win_cert_uefi_guid_t ; + +/* EFI_FIRMWARE_IMAGE_AUTHENTICATIO */ +typedef struct { +u64 mon_count; +win_cert_uefi_guid_t auth_info; +}efi_image_auth_t ; +/* * EFI capsule flags */ --2.25.1
PATCH v3 3/5 drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update device driver
In reply to Chen YuIntroduce the pfru_update driver which can be used for Platform Firmware Runtime code injection and driver update. The user is expected to provide the update firmware in the form of capsule file, and pass it to the driver via ioctl. Then the driver would hand this capsule file to the Platform Firmware Runtime Update via the ACPI device _DSM method. At last the low level Management Mode would do the firmware update.
---
v3: Use __u32 instead of int and __64 instead of unsigned long
in include/uapi/linux/pfru.h (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
Rename the structure in uapi to start with a prefix pfru so as to avoid confusing in the global namespace. (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
v2: Add sanity check for duplicated instance of ACPI device.
Update the driver to work with allocated pfru_device objects. (Mike Rapoport)
For each switch case pair, get rid of the magic case numbers and add a default clause with the error handling.
(Mike Rapoport)
Move the obj->type checks outside the switch to reduce redundancy. (Mike Rapoport)
Parse the code_inj_id and drv_update_id at driver initialization time to reduce the re-parsing at runtime.(Mike Rapoport) Explain in detail how the size needs to be adjusted when doing version check.(Mike Rapoport)
Rename parse_update_result() to dump_update_result()(Mike Rapoport) Remove redundant return.(Mike Rapoport)
Do not expose struct capsulate_buf_info to uapi, since it is not needed in userspace.(Mike Rapoport)
--- .../userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst | 1 + drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 + drivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig | 15 + drivers/acpi/pfru/Makefile | 2 + drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c | 567 ++++++++++++++++++ include/uapi/linux/pfru.h | 101 ++++ 7 files changed, 688 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/pfru/Makefile create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/pfru.h
Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst +1 -0
@@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ Code Seq# Include File Comments <mailto:[email protected]> 0xE5 00-3F linux/fuse.h 0xEC 00-01 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_dev.h ChromeOS EC driver +0xEE 00-1F uapi/linux/pfru.h Platform Firmware Runtime Update and Telemetry 0xF3 00-3F drivers/usb/misc/sisusbvga/sisusb.h sisfb (in development) <mailto:[email protected]> 0xF6 all LTTng Linux Trace Toolkit Next Generation
drivers/acpi/Kconfig +1 -0
@@ -482,6 +482,7 @@ source "drivers/acpi/nfit/Kconfig" source "drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig" source "drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig" source "drivers/acpi/dptf/Kconfig" +source "drivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig" config ACPI_WATCHDOG bool
drivers/acpi/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB) += cppc_acpi.o obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SPCR_TABLE) += spcr.o obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUGGER_USER) += acpi_dbg.o obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT) += pptt.o +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PFRU) += pfru/ # processor has its own "processor." module_param namespace processor-y := processor_driver.o
drivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig new file +15 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +config ACPI_PFRU + tristate "ACPI Platform Firmware Runtime Update (PFRU)" + depends on 64BIT + help + In order to reduce the system reboot times and update the platform firmware + in time, Platform Firmware Runtime Update is leveraged to patch the system + without reboot. This driver supports Platform Firmware Runtime Update, + which is composed of two parts: code injection and driver update. + + For more information, see: + <file:Documentation/x86/pfru_update.rst> + + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: + the module will be called pfru_update.
drivers/acpi/pfru/Makefile new file +2 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PFRU) += pfru_update.o
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +567 -0
567 lines not on this page · raw message
include/uapi/linux/pfru.h new file +101 -0
101 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update device driver
Quoted 8 lines · Chen Yu
Introduce the
pfru_updatedriver which can be used for Platform Firmware Runtime code injection and driver update. The user is expected to provide the update firmware in the form of capsule file, and pass it to the driver via ioctl. Then the driver would hand this capsule file to the Platform Firmware Runtime Update via the ACPI device_DSMmethod. At last the low level Management Mode would do the firmware update.Signed-off-by Chen Yu <[email protected]>
Where is the userspace code that uses this ioctl and has tested it out to verify it works properly? A link to that in the changelog would be great to have.
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 297
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +9
-0+static void dump_update_result (struct pfru_updated_result *result) +{ +pr_debug ("Update result:\n" ); +pr_debug ("Status:%d\n" , result->status); +pr_debug ("Extended Status:%d\n" , result->ext_status); +pr_debug ("Authentication Time Low:%lld\n" , result->low_auth_time); +pr_debug ("Authentication Time High:%lld\n" , result->high_auth_time); +pr_debug ("Execution Time Low:%lld\n" , result->low_exec_time); +pr_debug ("Execution Time High:%lld\n" , result->high_exec_time);
Why not dev_dbg()? Same for all pr_* calls in this "driver".
Quoted 16 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +16
-0+static long pfru_ioctl (struct file *file,unsigned int cmd,unsigned long arg) +{ +void __user *p; +int ret =0 , rev; + + p = (void __user *)arg; + +switch (cmd) { +case PFRU_IOC_SET_REV : +if (copy_from_user (&rev, p,sizeof (unsigned int ))) +return -EFAULT ; +if (!pfru_valid_revid (rev)) +return -EFAULT ; + pfru_dev->rev_id = rev; +break ; +case PFRU_IOC_STAGE :
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 385
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +10
-0+ ret =start_acpi_update (START_STAGE ); +break ; +case PFRU_IOC_ACTIVATE : + ret =start_acpi_update (START_ACTIVATE ); +break ; +case PFRU_IOC_STAGE_ACTIVATE : + ret =start_acpi_update (START_STAGE_ACTIVATE ); +break ; +default : + ret = -ENOIOCTLCMD ;
Wrong value :(
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 398
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +13
-0+break ; + } + +return ret; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT +static long compat_pfru_ioctl (struct file *filep,unsigned int cmd, +unsigned long arg) +{ +return pfru_ioctl (filep, cmd, arg); +} +#endif
Why is this compat ioctl needed at all?
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 491
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +4
-0+static struct miscdevice pfru_misc_dev = { + .minor =MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR , + .name ="pfru_update" , + .nodename ="pfru/update" ,
Why is this in a subdirectory? What requires this? Why not just "pfru"?
thanks,
greg k-h
Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update device driver
Hi Greg,
Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 7 lines · Chen Yu
Introduce the
pfru_updatedriver which can be used for Platform Firmware Runtime code injection and driver update. The user is expected to provide the update firmware in the form of capsule file, and pass it to the driver via ioctl. Then the driver would hand this capsule file to the Platform Firmware Runtime Update via the ACPI device_DSMmethod. At last the low level Management Mode would do the firmware update.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Chen Yu <[email protected]>Where is the userspace code that uses this ioctl and has tested it out to verify it works properly? A link to that in the changelog would be great to have.
The patch [5/5] is a self testing tool to test the whole feature. I'll send a new version and Cc you too.
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 297
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +9
-0+static void dump_update_result (struct pfru_updated_result *result) +{ +pr_debug ("Update result:\n" ); +pr_debug ("Status:%d\n" , result->status); +pr_debug ("Extended Status:%d\n" , result->ext_status); +pr_debug ("Authentication Time Low:%lld\n" , result->low_auth_time); +pr_debug ("Authentication Time High:%lld\n" , result->high_auth_time); +pr_debug ("Execution Time Low:%lld\n" , result->low_exec_time); +pr_debug ("Execution Time High:%lld\n" , result->high_exec_time);Why not
dev_dbg()? Same for all pr_* calls in this "driver".
Ok, I'll switch to dev_dbg() in next version.
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 20 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +20
-0+static long pfru_ioctl (struct file *file,unsigned int cmd,unsigned long arg) +{ +void __user *p; +int ret =0 , rev; + + p = (void __user *)arg; + +switch (cmd) { +case PFRU_IOC_SET_REV : +if (copy_from_user (&rev, p,sizeof (unsigned int ))) +return -EFAULT ; +if (!pfru_valid_revid (rev)) +return -EFAULT ; + pfru_dev->rev_id = rev; +break ; +case PFRU_IOC_STAGE : + ret =start_acpi_update (START_STAGE ); +break ; +case PFRU_IOC_ACTIVATE : + ret =start_acpi_update (START_ACTIVATE );
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 385
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +6
-0+break ; +case PFRU_IOC_STAGE_ACTIVATE : + ret =start_acpi_update (START_STAGE_ACTIVATE ); +break ; +default : + ret = -ENOIOCTLCMD ;Wrong value :(
Previously I thought that ENOIOCTLCMD stands for 'invalid ioctl command'. After checking the lkml discussion, it seems that ENOIOCTLCMD should not be returned to user space. ENOTTY might be more suitible if I understand correctly.
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0105.1/0734.html
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +7
-0+break ; + } + +return ret; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 398
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +6
-0+static long compat_pfru_ioctl (struct file *filep,unsigned int cmd, +unsigned long arg) +{ +return pfru_ioctl (filep, cmd, arg); +} +#endif Why is this compat ioctl needed at all?
We can not control if the user space tool would be compiled as 32bit. But I realize that a compat_ptr() was missing. Will fix it in next version.
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 491
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +4
-0+static struct miscdevice pfru_misc_dev = { + .minor =MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR , + .name ="pfru_update" , + .nodename ="pfru/update" ,Why is this in a subdirectory? What requires this? Why not just "pfru"?
The pfru directory might be reused for pfru_telemetry device, whose driver is in 4/5 patch, I'll Cc you with the whole patch set in next version.
Thanks,
Chenyu
Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update device driver
Quoted 10 lines · Chen Yu
Hi Greg,
Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 7 lines · Chen Yu
Introduce the
pfru_updatedriver which can be used for Platform Firmware Runtime code injection and driver update. The user is expected to provide the update firmware in the form of capsule file, and pass it to the driver via ioctl. Then the driver would hand this capsule file to the Platform Firmware Runtime Update via the ACPI device_DSMmethod. At last the low level Management Mode would do the firmware update.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Chen Yu <[email protected]>Where is the userspace code that uses this ioctl and has tested it out to verify it works properly? A link to that in the changelog would be great to have.
The patch [5/5] is a self testing tool to test the whole feature. I'll send a new version and Cc you too.
That tests it, but does not answer the question of who will actually use this. What userspace tool needs this new api?
Quoted 42 lines
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 297
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +9
-0+static void dump_update_result (struct pfru_updated_result *result) +{ +pr_debug ("Update result:\n" ); +pr_debug ("Status:%d\n" , result->status); +pr_debug ("Extended Status:%d\n" , result->ext_status); +pr_debug ("Authentication Time Low:%lld\n" , result->low_auth_time); +pr_debug ("Authentication Time High:%lld\n" , result->high_auth_time); +pr_debug ("Execution Time Low:%lld\n" , result->low_exec_time); +pr_debug ("Execution Time High:%lld\n" , result->high_exec_time);Why not
dev_dbg()? Same for all pr_* calls in this "driver".Ok, I'll switch to
dev_dbg()in next version.Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 20 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +20
-0+static long pfru_ioctl (struct file *file,unsigned int cmd,unsigned long arg) +{ +void __user *p; +int ret =0 , rev; + + p = (void __user *)arg; + +switch (cmd) { +case PFRU_IOC_SET_REV : +if (copy_from_user (&rev, p,sizeof (unsigned int ))) +return -EFAULT ; +if (!pfru_valid_revid (rev)) +return -EFAULT ; + pfru_dev->rev_id = rev; +break ; +case PFRU_IOC_STAGE : + ret =start_acpi_update (START_STAGE ); +break ; +case PFRU_IOC_ACTIVATE : + ret =start_acpi_update (START_ACTIVATE );Quoted 8 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 385
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +6
-0+break ; +case PFRU_IOC_STAGE_ACTIVATE : + ret =start_acpi_update (START_STAGE_ACTIVATE ); +break ; +default : + ret = -ENOIOCTLCMD ;Wrong value :(
Quoted 5 lines
Previously I thought that ENOIOCTLCMD stands for 'invalid ioctl command'. After checking the lkml discussion, it seems that ENOIOCTLCMD should not be returned to user space. ENOTTY might be more suitible if I understand correctly.
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0105.1/0734.html
Yes, ENOTTY is correct.
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +7
-0+break ; + } + +return ret; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT Quoted 9 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 398
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +6
-0+static long compat_pfru_ioctl (struct file *filep,unsigned int cmd, +unsigned long arg) +{ +return pfru_ioctl (filep, cmd, arg); +} +#endif Why is this compat ioctl needed at all?
Quoted 1 line
We can not control if the user space tool would be compiled as 32bit.
Then create your ioctl so that a compat ioctl is not needed at all. There is no need to ever use this for new ioctl commands these days.
Quoted 11 lines
But I realize that a
compat_ptr()was missing. Will fix it in next version.Quoted 8 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 491
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +4
-0+static struct miscdevice pfru_misc_dev = { + .minor =MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR , + .name ="pfru_update" , + .nodename ="pfru/update" ,Why is this in a subdirectory? What requires this? Why not just "pfru"?
The pfru directory might be reused for
pfru_telemetrydevice, whose driver is in 4/5 patch, I'll Cc you with the whole patch set in next version.
"might be" is not a valid reason. Why does this simple driver deserve a whole /dev/ subdirectory?
thanks,
greg k-h
Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update device driver
Quoted 17 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 16 lines · Chen Yu
Hi Greg,
Quoted 14 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 8 lines · Chen Yu
Introduce the
pfru_updatedriver which can be used for Platform Firmware Runtime code injection and driver update. The user is expected to provide the update firmware in the form of capsule file, and pass it to the driver via ioctl. Then the driver would hand this capsule file to the Platform Firmware Runtime Update via the ACPI device_DSMmethod. At last the low level Management Mode would do the firmware update.Signed-off-by Chen Yu <[email protected]>Where is the userspace code that uses this ioctl and has tested it out to verify it works properly? A link to that in the changelog would be great to have.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
The patch [5/5] is a self testing tool to test the whole feature. I'll send a new version and Cc you too.
That tests it, but does not answer the question of who will actually use this. What userspace tool needs this new api?
One end user is the cloud user. Currently there is no dedicated userspace tool developed to use this feature AFAIK. It was expected that the end users could refer to the self test tool to customize their tools. I'm not sure if this is the proper way to propose the feature, may I have your suggestion on this, should I create a separate git repository for this tool, or put it in tools/selftestings as it is now?
Quoted 67 lines
Quoted 42 lines
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 297
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +9
-0+static void dump_update_result (struct pfru_updated_result *result) +{ +pr_debug ("Update result:\n" ); +pr_debug ("Status:%d\n" , result->status); +pr_debug ("Extended Status:%d\n" , result->ext_status); +pr_debug ("Authentication Time Low:%lld\n" , result->low_auth_time); +pr_debug ("Authentication Time High:%lld\n" , result->high_auth_time); +pr_debug ("Execution Time Low:%lld\n" , result->low_exec_time); +pr_debug ("Execution Time High:%lld\n" , result->high_exec_time);Why not
dev_dbg()? Same for all pr_* calls in this "driver".Ok, I'll switch to
dev_dbg()in next version.Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 20 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +20
-0+static long pfru_ioctl (struct file *file,unsigned int cmd,unsigned long arg) +{ +void __user *p; +int ret =0 , rev; + + p = (void __user *)arg; + +switch (cmd) { +case PFRU_IOC_SET_REV : +if (copy_from_user (&rev, p,sizeof (unsigned int ))) +return -EFAULT ; +if (!pfru_valid_revid (rev)) +return -EFAULT ; + pfru_dev->rev_id = rev; +break ; +case PFRU_IOC_STAGE : + ret =start_acpi_update (START_STAGE ); +break ; +case PFRU_IOC_ACTIVATE : + ret =start_acpi_update (START_ACTIVATE );Quoted 8 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 385
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +6
-0+break ; +case PFRU_IOC_STAGE_ACTIVATE : + ret =start_acpi_update (START_STAGE_ACTIVATE ); +break ; +default : + ret = -ENOIOCTLCMD ;Wrong value :(
Quoted 5 lines
Previously I thought that ENOIOCTLCMD stands for 'invalid ioctl command'. After checking the lkml discussion, it seems that ENOIOCTLCMD should not be returned to user space. ENOTTY might be more suitible if I understand correctly.
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0105.1/0734.htmlYes, ENOTTY is correct.
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 16 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 398
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +13
-0+break ; + } + +return ret; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT +static long compat_pfru_ioctl (struct file *filep,unsigned int cmd, +unsigned long arg) +{ +return pfru_ioctl (filep, cmd, arg); +} +#endif Why is this compat ioctl needed at all?
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
We can not control if the user space tool would be compiled as 32bit.
Then create your ioctl so that a compat ioctl is not needed at all. There is no need to ever use this for new ioctl commands these days.
After checking the code, it seems that this driver only needs to deal with unlocked_ioctl() without touching compat_ioctl(). Because even if the user space is 32bit, the compat_ioctl() would invoke unlocked_ioctl() first with a parameter of compat_ptr(arg). It should be safe to remove the compat_ioctl hook in this driver.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
But I realize that a
compat_ptr()was missing. Will fix it in next version.Quoted 8 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 491
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +4
-0+static struct miscdevice pfru_misc_dev = { + .minor =MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR , + .name ="pfru_update" , + .nodename ="pfru/update" ,Why is this in a subdirectory? What requires this? Why not just "pfru"?
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
The pfru directory might be reused for
pfru_telemetrydevice, whose driver is in 4/5 patch, I'll Cc you with the whole patch set in next version."might be" is not a valid reason. Why does this simple driver deserve a whole
/dev/subdirectory?
There are pfru_update and pfru_telemetry in the patch, and there is plan to add a pfru_prm device in the future, which stands for "Platform Runtime Mechanism". I'll move them to /dev/ in next version.
Thanks,
Chenyu
Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update device driver
Quoted 18 lines · Chen Yu
Quoted 17 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 16 lines · Chen Yu
Hi Greg,
Quoted 14 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 8 lines · Chen Yu
Introduce the
pfru_updatedriver which can be used for Platform Firmware Runtime code injection and driver update. The user is expected to provide the update firmware in the form of capsule file, and pass it to the driver via ioctl. Then the driver would hand this capsule file to the Platform Firmware Runtime Update via the ACPI device_DSMmethod. At last the low level Management Mode would do the firmware update.Signed-off-by Chen Yu <[email protected]>Where is the userspace code that uses this ioctl and has tested it out to verify it works properly? A link to that in the changelog would be great to have.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
The patch [5/5] is a self testing tool to test the whole feature. I'll send a new version and Cc you too.
That tests it, but does not answer the question of who will actually use this. What userspace tool needs this new api?
One end user is the cloud user.
What exactly do you mean by "cloud user"?
Quoted 2 lines
Currently there is no dedicated userspace tool developed to use this feature AFAIK.
Wonderful, then it is not needed to be added to the kernel :)
Quoted 5 lines
It was expected that the end users
could refer to the self test tool to customize their tools. I'm not sure if this is the proper way to propose the feature, may I have your suggestion on this, should I create a separate git repository for this tool, or put it intools/selftestingsas it is now?
No, do not add this to the kernel unless you have a real need and user for this.
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 491
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +4
-0+static struct miscdevice pfru_misc_dev = { + .minor =MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR , + .name ="pfru_update" , + .nodename ="pfru/update" ,Why is this in a subdirectory? What requires this? Why not just "pfru"?
The pfru directory might be reused for
pfru_telemetrydevice, whose driver is in 4/5 patch, I'll Cc you with the whole patch set in next version.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
"might be" is not a valid reason. Why does this simple driver deserve a whole
/dev/subdirectory?There are
pfru_updateandpfru_telemetryin the patch, and there is plan to add apfru_prmdevice in the future, which stands for "Platform Runtime Mechanism". I'll move them to/dev/in next version.
That is a very generic name for a very platform specific and arch specific interface. As this is an ACPI interface, why not use that name prefix?
thanks,
greg k-h
Rafael J. Wysocki
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 3/5] drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update device driver
Quoted 59 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 18 lines · Chen Yu
Quoted 17 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 16 lines · Chen Yu
Hi Greg,
Quoted 14 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 8 lines · Chen Yu
Introduce the
pfru_updatedriver which can be used for Platform Firmware Runtime code injection and driver update. The user is expected to provide the update firmware in the form of capsule file, and pass it to the driver via ioctl. Then the driver would hand this capsule file to the Platform Firmware Runtime Update via the ACPI device_DSMmethod. At last the low level Management Mode would do the firmware update.Signed-off-by Chen Yu <[email protected]>Where is the userspace code that uses this ioctl and has tested it out to verify it works properly? A link to that in the changelog would be great to have.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
The patch [5/5] is a self testing tool to test the whole feature. I'll send a new version and Cc you too.
That tests it, but does not answer the question of who will actually use this. What userspace tool needs this new api?
One end user is the cloud user.
What exactly do you mean by "cloud user"?
Quoted 2 lines
Currently there is no dedicated userspace tool developed to use this feature AFAIK.
Wonderful, then it is not needed to be added to the kernel :)
Quoted 5 lines
It was expected that the end users
could refer to the self test tool to customize their tools. I'm not sure if this is the proper way to propose the feature, may I have your suggestion on this, should I create a separate git repository for this tool, or put it intools/selftestingsas it is now?No, do not add this to the kernel unless you have a real need and user for this.
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 491
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +4
-0+static struct miscdevice pfru_misc_dev = { + .minor =MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR , + .name ="pfru_update" , + .nodename ="pfru/update" ,Why is this in a subdirectory? What requires this? Why not just "pfru"?
The pfru directory might be reused for
pfru_telemetrydevice, whose driver is in 4/5 patch, I'll Cc you with the whole patch set in next version."might be" is not a valid reason. Why does this simple driver deserve a whole
/dev/subdirectory?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
There are
pfru_updateandpfru_telemetryin the patch, and there is plan to add apfru_prmdevice in the future, which stands for "Platform Runtime Mechanism". I'll move them to/dev/in next version.That is a very generic name for a very platform specific and arch specific interface. As this is an ACPI interface, why not use that name prefix?
It is not supposed to be either arch-specific or platform-specific. The spec is hosted by the UEFI Forum and it is fairly generic IIUC. In principle, it could be used to update any kind of platform firmware possible to update without system restart.
That said, the I/F to the platform firmware is based on ACPI methods, so "acpi_" would be a reasonable prefix choice.
Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update device driver
Quoted 33 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 31 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 18 lines · Chen Yu
Quoted 17 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 16 lines · Chen Yu
Hi Greg,
Quoted 14 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 8 lines · Chen Yu
Introduce the
pfru_updatedriver which can be used for Platform Firmware Runtime code injection and driver update. The user is expected to provide the update firmware in the form of capsule file, and pass it to the driver via ioctl. Then the driver would hand this capsule file to the Platform Firmware Runtime Update via the ACPI device_DSMmethod. At last the low level Management Mode would do the firmware update.Signed-off-by Chen Yu <[email protected]>Where is the userspace code that uses this ioctl and has tested it out to verify it works properly? A link to that in the changelog would be great to have.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
The patch [5/5] is a self testing tool to test the whole feature. I'll send a new version and Cc you too.
That tests it, but does not answer the question of who will actually use this. What userspace tool needs this new api?
Currently there is no dedicated userspace tool developed to use this feature AFAIK.
Wonderful, then it is not needed to be added to the kernel :)
[snip]
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
It was expected that the end users
could refer to the self test tool to customize their tools. I'm not sure if this is the proper way to propose the feature, may I have your suggestion on this, should I create a separate git repository for this tool, or put it intools/selftestingsas it is now?No, do not add this to the kernel unless you have a real need and user for this.
After revisiting this patch set, I'll revise it to better describe the background and usage model, and also propose the user space tool to fully demonstrate how to use this feature.
thanks,
Chenyu
Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update device driver
In reply to Rafael J. WysockiQuoted 17 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 15 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 13 lines · Chen Yu
Quoted 12 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 11 lines · Chen Yu
Hi Greg,
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 8 lines · Chen Yu
Introduce the
pfru_updatedriver which can be used for Platform Firmware Runtime code injection and driver update. The user is expected to provide the update firmware in the form of capsule file, and pass it to the driver via ioctl. Then the driver would hand this capsule file to the Platform Firmware Runtime Update via the ACPI device_DSMmethod. At last the low level Management Mode would do the firmware update.Signed-off-by Chen Yu <[email protected]>
[snip]
Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Review
Quoted 4 lines
(quoted diff) +4
-0+static struct miscdevice pfru_misc_dev = { + .minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR, + .name = "pfru_update", + .nodename = "pfru/update",Why is this in a subdirectory? What requires this? Why not just "pfru"?
The pfru directory might be reused for
pfru_telemetrydevice, whose driver is in 4/5 patch, I'll Cc you with the whole patch set in next version."might be" is not a valid reason. Why does this simple driver deserve a whole
/dev/subdirectory?Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
There are
pfru_updateandpfru_telemetryin the patch, and there is plan to add apfru_prmdevice in the future, which stands for "Platform Runtime Mechanism". I'll move them to/dev/in next version.That is a very generic name for a very platform specific and arch specific interface. As this is an ACPI interface, why not use that name prefix?
Quoted 7 lines
It is not supposed to be either arch-specific or platform-specific. The spec is hosted by the UEFI Forum and it is fairly generic IIUC. In principle, it could be used to update any kind of platform firmware possible to update without system restart.
That said, the I/F to the platform firmware is based on ACPI methods, so "
acpi_" would be a reasonable prefix choice.
Ok, will change it in next version.
Thanks,
Chenyu
Rafael J. Wysocki
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 3/5] drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update device driver
In reply to Chen YuQuoted 185 lines · Chen Yu
Introduce the
pfru_updatedriver which can be used for Platform Firmware Runtime code injection and driver update. The user is expected to provide the update firmware in the form of capsule file, and pass it to the driver via ioctl. Then the driver would hand this capsule file to the Platform Firmware Runtime Update via the ACPI device_DSMmethod. At last the low level Management Mode would do the firmware update.Signed-off-by Chen Yu <[email protected]>---
v3: Use__u32instead of int and __64 instead of unsigned long
ininclude/uapi/linux/pfru.h(Greg Kroah-Hartman)
Rename the structure in uapi to start with a prefix pfru so as to avoid confusing in the global namespace. (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
v2: Add sanity check for duplicated instance of ACPI device.
Update the driver to work with allocatedpfru_deviceobjects. (Mike Rapoport)
For each switch case pair, get rid of the magic case numbers and add a default clause with the error handling.
(Mike Rapoport)
Move theobj->typechecks outside the switch to reduce redundancy. (Mike Rapoport)
Parse thecode_inj_idanddrv_update_idat driver initialization time to reduce the re-parsing at runtime.(Mike Rapoport) Explain in detail how the size needs to be adjusted when doing version check.(Mike Rapoport)
Renameparse_update_result()to dump_update_result()(Mike Rapoport) Remove redundant return.(Mike Rapoport)
Do not expose structcapsulate_buf_infoto uapi, since it is not needed in userspace.(Mike Rapoport)--- .../userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst | 1 + drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 + drivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig | 15 + drivers/acpi/pfru/Makefile | 2 + drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c | 567 ++++++++++++++++++ include/uapi/linux/pfru.h | 101 ++++ 7 files changed, 688 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/pfru/Makefile create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/pfru.hDocumentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst +1
-0@@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ Code Seq# Include File Comments <mailto:[email protected]> 0xE5 00-3F linux/fuse.h 0xEC 00-01 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_dev.h ChromeOS EC driver +0xEE 00-1F uapi/linux/pfru.h Platform Firmware Runtime Update and Telemetry 0xF3 00-3F drivers/usb/misc/sisusbvga/sisusb.h sisfb (in development) <mailto:[email protected]> 0xF6 all LTTng Linux Trace Toolkit Next Generationdrivers/acpi/Kconfig +1
-0@@ -482,6 +482,7 @@ source "drivers/acpi/nfit/Kconfig" source "drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig" source "drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig" source "drivers/acpi/dptf/Kconfig" +source "drivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig" config ACPI_WATCHDOG booldrivers/acpi/Makefile +1
-0@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB) += cppc_acpi.o obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SPCR_TABLE) += spcr.o obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUGGER_USER) += acpi_dbg.o obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT) += pptt.o +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PFRU) += pfru/ # processor has its own "processor." module_param namespace processor-y := processor_driver.odrivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig new file +15
-0@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +config ACPI_PFRU + tristate "ACPI Platform Firmware Runtime Update (PFRU)" + depends on 64BIT + help + In order to reduce the system reboot times and update the platform firmware + in time, Platform Firmware Runtime Update is leveraged to patch the system + without reboot. This driver supports Platform Firmware Runtime Update, + which is composed of two parts: code injection and driver update. + + For more information, see: + <file:Documentation/x86/pfru_update.rst> + + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: + the module will be called pfru_update.drivers/acpi/pfru/Makefile new file +2
-0@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PFRU) += pfru_update.odrivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +70
-0@@ -0,0 +1,567 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* +* ACPI Platform Firmware Runtime Update Device Driver +* +* Copyright (C) 2021 Intel Corporation +* Author: Chen Yu <[email protected]> +*/ +#include <linux/acpi.h> +#include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/efi.h> +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/errno.h> +#include <linux/file.h> +#include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/string.h> +#include <linux/uaccess.h> +#include <linux/uio.h> +#include <linux/uuid.h> +#include <uapi/linux/pfru.h> + +enum cap_index { +CAP_STATUS_IDX , +CAP_UPDATE_IDX , +CAP_CODE_TYPE_IDX , +CAP_FW_VER_IDX , +CAP_CODE_RT_VER_IDX , +CAP_DRV_TYPE_IDX , +CAP_DRV_RT_VER_IDX , +CAP_DRV_SVN_IDX , +CAP_PLAT_ID_IDX , +CAP_OEM_ID_IDX , +CAP_OEM_INFO_IDX , +}; + +enum buf_index { +BUF_STATUS_IDX , +BUF_EXT_STATUS_IDX , +BUF_ADDR_LOW_IDX , +BUF_ADDR_HI_IDX , +BUF_SIZE_IDX , +}; + +enum update_index { +UPDATE_STATUS_IDX , +UPDATE_EXT_STATUS_IDX , +UPDATE_AUTH_TIME_LOW_IDX , +UPDATE_AUTH_TIME_HI_IDX , +UPDATE_EXEC_TIME_LOW_IDX , +UPDATE_EXEC_TIME_HI_IDX , +}; + +struct pfru_device { +guid_t uuid, code_uuid, drv_uuid; +int rev_id; +struct device *dev; +}; + +/* +* There would be only one instance of pfru_device. +*/ +static struct pfru_device *pfru_dev; + +static bool valid_cap_type (int idx,union acpi_object *obj) +{ +acpi_object_type type = obj->type; + + if (idx == CAP_STATUS_IDX || idx == CAP_UPDATE_IDX ||
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 80
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +10
-0+ idx == CAP_FW_VER_IDX || idx == CAP_CODE_RT_VER_IDX || + idx == CAP_DRV_RT_VER_IDX || idx == CAP_DRV_SVN_IDX) +return type ==ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ; + else if (idx == CAP_CODE_TYPE_IDX || idx == CAP_DRV_TYPE_IDX || + idx == CAP_PLAT_ID_IDX || idx == CAP_OEM_ID_IDX || + idx == CAP_OEM_INFO_IDX) + return type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER; + else + return false; +}
IMO, this is way overdesigned. It is not necessary to do all of these checks for every element of the package in query_capability().
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +5
-0+ +static int query_capability (struct pfru_update_cap_info *cap) +{ +union acpi_object *out_obj; +acpi_handle handle;
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 95
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +10
-0+int i, ret = -EINVAL ; + + handle =ACPI_HANDLE (pfru_dev->dev); + out_obj =acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed (handle, &pfru_dev->uuid, + pfru_dev->rev_id,FUNC_QUERY_UPDATE_CAP , +NULL ,ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE ); +if (!out_obj) +return -EINVAL ; + +for (i =0 ; i < out_obj->package.count; i++) {
It is not very useful to do a loop if there is a switch () on the control variable in every step.
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 104
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +9
-0+union acpi_object *obj = &out_obj->package.elements[i]; + +if (!valid_cap_type (i, obj)) + goto free_acpi_buffer; + +switch (i) { +case CAP_STATUS_IDX : + cap->status = obj->integer.value; +break ;
The above can be written as
if (out_obj->package.elements[CAP_STATUS_IDX].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)
goto free_acpi_buffer;
cap->status = out_obj->package.elements[CAP_STATUS_IDX].integer.value;
and analogously for all of the other index values.
But check the number of elements upfront.
Quoted 26 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +26
-0+case CAP_UPDATE_IDX : + cap->update_cap = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case CAP_CODE_TYPE_IDX : +memcpy (&cap->code_type, obj->buffer.pointer, + obj->buffer.length); +break ; +case CAP_FW_VER_IDX : + cap->fw_version = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case CAP_CODE_RT_VER_IDX : + cap->code_rt_version = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case CAP_DRV_TYPE_IDX : +memcpy (&cap->drv_type, obj->buffer.pointer, + obj->buffer.length); +break ; +case CAP_DRV_RT_VER_IDX : + cap->drv_rt_version = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case CAP_DRV_SVN_IDX : + cap->drv_svn = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case CAP_PLAT_ID_IDX : +memcpy (&cap->platform_id, obj->buffer.pointer, + obj->buffer.length);
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 140
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +10
-0+break ; +case CAP_OEM_ID_IDX : +memcpy (&cap->oem_id, obj->buffer.pointer, + obj->buffer.length); +break ; +case CAP_OEM_INFO_IDX : +/*vendor specific data*/ +break ; +default : +pr_err ("Incorrect format of Update Capability.\n" );
Why pr_err() and not dev_dbg()?
Besides, it looks like you're going to fail if the package has more elements than expected, but is this really a big deal?
Moreover, what if the number of package elements is too small?
Quoted 15 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +15
-0+ goto free_acpi_buffer; + } + } + ret =0 ; + +free_acpi_buffer: +ACPI_FREE (out_obj); + +return ret; +} + +static int query_buffer (struct pfru_com_buf_info *info) +{ +union acpi_object *out_obj; +acpi_handle handle;
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 165
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +10
-0+int i, ret = -EINVAL ; + + handle =ACPI_HANDLE (pfru_dev->dev); + out_obj =acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed (handle, &pfru_dev->uuid, + pfru_dev->rev_id,FUNC_QUERY_BUF , +NULL ,ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE ); +if (!out_obj) +return -EINVAL ; + +for (i =0 ; i < out_obj->package.count; i++) {
Again, what is the benefit from doing this loop?
Quoted 31 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +31
-0+union acpi_object *obj = &out_obj->package.elements[i]; + +if (obj->type !=ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ) + goto free_acpi_buffer; + +switch (i) { +case BUF_STATUS_IDX : + info->status = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case BUF_EXT_STATUS_IDX : + info->ext_status = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case BUF_ADDR_LOW_IDX : + info->addr_lo = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case BUF_ADDR_HI_IDX : + info->addr_hi = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case BUF_SIZE_IDX : + info->buf_size = obj->integer.value; +break ; +default : +pr_err ("Incorrect format of Communication Buffer.\n" ); + goto free_acpi_buffer; + } + } + ret =0 ; + +free_acpi_buffer: +ACPI_FREE (out_obj); +
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 206
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +10
-0+return ret; +} + +static int get_image_type (efi_manage_capsule_image_header_t *img_hdr, +int *type) +{ +guid_t *image_type_id; + +/* check whether this is a code injection or driver update */ + image_type_id = &img_hdr->image_type_id;
Anything wrong with doing this assignment as initialization?
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 210
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +4
-0+if (guid_equal (image_type_id, &pfru_dev->code_uuid)) + *type =CODE_INJECT_TYPE ; +else if (guid_equal (image_type_id, &pfru_dev->drv_uuid)) + *type =DRIVER_UPDATE_TYPE ;
And what would be wrong with returning the type or a negative error code?
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 222
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +12
-0+else +return -EINVAL ; + +return 0 ; +} + +/* +* The (u64 hw_ins) was introduced in UEFI spec version 2, +* and (u64 capsule_support) was introduced in version 3. +* The size needs to be adjusted accordingly. That is to +* say, version 1 should subtract the size of hw_ins+capsule_support, +* and version 2 should sbstract the size of capsule_support.
Either turn this into a kerneldoc comment or put it inside the function.
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +9
-0+*/ +static int adjust_efi_size (efi_manage_capsule_image_header_t *img_hdr, +int *size) +{ +int tmp_size = *size; + + tmp_size +=sizeof (efi_manage_capsule_image_header_t); +switch (img_hdr->ver) { +case 1 :
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 241
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +10
-0+ tmp_size -=2 *sizeof (u64); +break ; +case 2 : + tmp_size -=sizeof (u64); +break ; +default : +/* only support version 1 and 2 */ +return -EINVAL ; + } + *size = tmp_size;
Why not simply return the size or a negative error code?
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 248
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +7
-0+ +return 0 ; +} + +/* +* Sanity check if the capsule image has a newer version than current one. +* Return: true if it is valid, false otherwise.
Would it hurt if this was a proper kerneldoc comment?
Quoted 39 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +39
-0+*/ +static bool valid_version (const void *data,struct pfru_update_cap_info *cap) +{ +struct pfru_payload_hdr *payload_hdr; +efi_capsule_header_t *cap_hdr; +efi_manage_capsule_header_t *m_hdr; +efi_manage_capsule_image_header_t *m_img_hdr; +efi_image_auth_t *auth; +int type, size, ret; + + cap_hdr = (efi_capsule_header_t *)data; + size = cap_hdr->headersize; + m_hdr = (efi_manage_capsule_header_t *)(data + size); +/* +* Current data structure size plus variable array indicated +* by number of (emb_drv_cnt + payload_cnt) +*/ + size +=sizeof (efi_manage_capsule_header_t) + + (m_hdr->emb_drv_cnt + m_hdr->payload_cnt) *sizeof (u64); + m_img_hdr = (efi_manage_capsule_image_header_t *)(data + size); + + ret =get_image_type (m_img_hdr, &type); +if (ret) +return false; + + ret =adjust_efi_size (m_img_hdr, &size); +if (ret) +return false; + + auth = (efi_image_auth_t *)(data + size); + size +=sizeof (u64) + auth->auth_info.hdr.len; + payload_hdr = (struct pfru_payload_hdr *)(data + size); + +/* Finally, compare the version. */ +if (type ==CODE_INJECT_TYPE ) +return payload_hdr->rt_ver >= cap->code_rt_version; +else +return payload_hdr->rt_ver >= cap->drv_rt_version; +}
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 297
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +10
-0+ +static void dump_update_result (struct pfru_updated_result *result) +{ +pr_debug ("Update result:\n" ); +pr_debug ("Status:%d\n" , result->status); +pr_debug ("Extended Status:%d\n" , result->ext_status); +pr_debug ("Authentication Time Low:%lld\n" , result->low_auth_time); +pr_debug ("Authentication Time High:%lld\n" , result->high_auth_time); +pr_debug ("Execution Time Low:%lld\n" , result->low_exec_time); +pr_debug ("Execution Time High:%lld\n" , result->high_exec_time);
All of these could be dev_dbg() I suppose?
Quoted 15 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +15
-0+} + +static int start_acpi_update (int action) +{ +union acpi_object *out_obj, in_obj, in_buf; +struct pfru_updated_result update_result; +acpi_handle handle; +int i, ret = -EINVAL ; + +memset (&in_obj,0 ,sizeof (in_obj)); +memset (&in_buf,0 ,sizeof (in_buf)); + in_obj.type =ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE ; + in_obj.package.count =1 ; + in_obj.package.elements = &in_buf; + in_buf.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ;
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 322
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +10
-0+ in_buf.integer.value = action; + + handle =ACPI_HANDLE (pfru_dev->dev); + out_obj =acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed (handle, &pfru_dev->uuid, + pfru_dev->rev_id,FUNC_START , + &in_obj,ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE ); +if (!out_obj) +return -EINVAL ; + +for (i =0 ; i < out_obj->package.count; i++) {
Same comment regarding the benefit of doing a loop: why is it needed?
Quoted 40 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +40
-0+union acpi_object *obj = &out_obj->package.elements[i]; + +if (obj->type !=ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ) + goto free_acpi_buffer; +switch (i) { +case UPDATE_STATUS_IDX : + update_result.status = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case UPDATE_EXT_STATUS_IDX : + update_result.ext_status = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case UPDATE_AUTH_TIME_LOW_IDX : + update_result.low_auth_time = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case UPDATE_AUTH_TIME_HI_IDX : + update_result.high_auth_time = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case UPDATE_EXEC_TIME_LOW_IDX : + update_result.low_exec_time = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case UPDATE_EXEC_TIME_HI_IDX : + update_result.high_exec_time = obj->integer.value; +break ; +default : +pr_err ("Incorrect format of Runtime Update result.\n" ); + goto free_acpi_buffer; + } + } +dump_update_result (&update_result); + ret =0 ; + +free_acpi_buffer: +ACPI_FREE (out_obj); + +return ret; +} + +static long pfru_ioctl (struct file *file,unsigned int cmd,unsigned long arg) +{ +void __user *p;
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 372
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +10
-0+int ret =0 , rev; + + p = (void __user *)arg; + +switch (cmd) { +case PFRU_IOC_SET_REV : +if (copy_from_user (&rev, p,sizeof (unsigned int ))) +return -EFAULT ; +if (!pfru_valid_revid (rev)) +return -EFAULT ;
Why is this the right error code to return here?
Quoted 49 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +49
-0+ pfru_dev->rev_id = rev; +break ; +case PFRU_IOC_STAGE : + ret =start_acpi_update (START_STAGE ); +break ; +case PFRU_IOC_ACTIVATE : + ret =start_acpi_update (START_ACTIVATE ); +break ; +case PFRU_IOC_STAGE_ACTIVATE : + ret =start_acpi_update (START_STAGE_ACTIVATE ); +break ; +default : + ret = -ENOIOCTLCMD ; +break ; + } + +return ret; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT +static long compat_pfru_ioctl (struct file *filep,unsigned int cmd, +unsigned long arg) +{ +return pfru_ioctl (filep, cmd, arg); +} +#endif + +static int pfru_open (struct inode *inode,struct file *file) +{ +return capable (CAP_SYS_RAWIO ) ?stream_open (inode, file) : -EPERM ; +} + +static ssize_t pfru_write (struct file *file,const char __user *buf, +size_t len,loff_t *ppos) +{ +struct pfru_update_cap_info cap; +struct pfru_com_buf_info info; +phys_addr_t phy_addr; +struct iov_iter iter; +struct iovec iov; +char *buf_ptr; +int ret; + + ret =query_buffer (&info); +if (ret) +return ret; + +if (len > info.buf_size) +return -EINVAL ;
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 431
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +10
-0+ + iov.iov_base = (void __user *)buf; + iov.iov_len = len; +iov_iter_init (&iter,WRITE , &iov,1 , len); + +/* map the communication buffer */ + phy_addr = (phys_addr_t)(info.addr_lo | (info.addr_hi <<32 )); + buf_ptr =memremap (phy_addr, info.buf_size,MEMREMAP_WB ); +if (IS_ERR (buf_ptr)) +return PTR_ERR (buf_ptr);
Empty line here, please.
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 433
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +2
-0+if (!copy_from_iter_full (buf_ptr, len, &iter)) { +pr_err ("error! could not read capsule file\n" );
dev_dbg()?
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 441
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +8
-0+ ret = -EINVAL ; + goto unmap; + } + +/* Check if the capsule header has a valid version number. */ + ret =query_capability (&cap); +if (ret) + goto unmap;
ret is guaranteed to be 0 here, so you can do
if (cap.status != DSM_SUCCEED)
ret = -EBUSY;
else if (!valid_version(buf_ptr, &cap))
ret = -EINVAL;and the gotos and the "ret = 0" statement below won't be necessary.
Quoted 20 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +20
-0+ +if (cap.status !=DSM_SUCCEED ) { + ret = -EBUSY ; + goto unmap; + } +if (!valid_version (buf_ptr, &cap)) { + ret = -EINVAL ; + goto unmap; + } + ret =0 ; +unmap: +memunmap (buf_ptr); + +return ret ?: len; +} + +static ssize_t pfru_read (struct file *filp,char __user *ubuf, +size_t size,loff_t *off) +{ +struct pfru_update_cap_info cap;
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 471
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +10
-0+int ret; + + ret =query_capability (&cap); +if (ret) +return ret; + + size =min_t (size_t, size,sizeof (cap)); + +if (copy_to_user (ubuf, &cap, size)) +return -EFAULT ;
Well, if the read() is only needed for this, maybe consider implementing it as an ioctl() command and using read() for the telemetry retrieval? Then, you won't need the other special device file, the write() will be the code injection/update, the read() will be telemetry retrieval and all of the rest can be ioctl()s under one special device file.
Quoted 204 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +96
-0+ +return size; +} + +static const struct file_operations acpi_pfru_fops = { + .owner =THIS_MODULE , + .write = pfru_write, + .read = pfru_read, + .open = pfru_open, + .unlocked_ioctl = pfru_ioctl, +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT + .compat_ioctl = compat_pfru_ioctl, +#endif + .llseek = noop_llseek, +}; + +static struct miscdevice pfru_misc_dev = { + .minor =MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR , + .name ="pfru_update" , + .nodename ="pfru/update" , + .fops = &acpi_pfru_fops, +}; + +static int acpi_pfru_remove (struct platform_device *pdev) +{ +misc_deregister (&pfru_misc_dev); +kfree (pfru_dev); + pfru_dev =NULL ; + +return 0 ; +} + +static int acpi_pfru_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) +{ +acpi_handle handle; +int ret; + +if (pfru_dev) { +pr_err ("Duplicated PFRU INTC1080 detected, skip...\n" ); +return 0 ; + } + + pfru_dev =kzalloc (sizeof (*pfru_dev),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!pfru_dev) +return -ENOMEM ; + + ret =guid_parse (PFRU_UUID , &pfru_dev->uuid); +if (ret) + goto out; + ret =guid_parse (PFRU_CODE_INJ_UUID , &pfru_dev->code_uuid); +if (ret) + goto out; + ret =guid_parse (PFRU_DRV_UPDATE_UUID , &pfru_dev->drv_uuid); +if (ret) + goto out; + +/* default rev id is 1 */ + pfru_dev->rev_id =1 ; + pfru_dev->dev = &pdev->dev; + handle =ACPI_HANDLE (pfru_dev->dev); +if (!acpi_has_method (handle,"_DSM" )) { +pr_err ("Missing _DSM\n" ); + ret = -ENODEV ; + goto out; + } + + ret =misc_register (&pfru_misc_dev); +if (ret) + goto out; + +return 0 ; +out: +kfree (pfru_dev); + pfru_dev =NULL ; + +return ret; +} + +static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_pfru_ids[] = { + {"INTC1080" ,0 }, + {} +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (acpi, acpi_pfru_ids); + +static struct platform_driver acpi_pfru_driver = { + .driver = { + .name ="pfru_update" , + .acpi_match_table = acpi_pfru_ids, + }, + .probe = acpi_pfru_probe, + .remove = acpi_pfru_remove, +}; +module_platform_driver (acpi_pfru_driver); + +MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("Platform Firmware Runtime Update device driver" ); +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL v2" );include/uapi/linux/pfru.h new file +101
-1@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */ +/* +* Platform Firmware Runtime Update header +* +* Copyright(c) 2021 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. +*/ +#ifndef __PFRU_H__ +#define __PFRU_H__ + +#include <linux/ioctl.h> +#include <linux/uuid.h> + +#define PFRU_UUID "ECF9533B-4A3C-4E89-939E-C77112601C6D" +#define PFRU_CODE_INJ_UUID "B2F84B79-7B6E-4E45-885F-3FB9BB185402" +#define PFRU_DRV_UPDATE_UUID "4569DD8C-75F1-429A-A3D6-24DE8097A0DF" + +#define FUNC_STANDARD_QUERY 0 +#define FUNC_QUERY_UPDATE_CAP 1 +#define FUNC_QUERY_BUF 2 +#define FUNC_START 3 + +#define CODE_INJECT_TYPE 1 +#define DRIVER_UPDATE_TYPE 2 + +#define REVID_1 1 +#define REVID_2 2 + +#define PFRU_MAGIC 0xEE + +#define PFRU_IOC_SET_REV _IOW(PFRU_MAGIC, 0x01, unsigned int) +#define PFRU_IOC_STAGE _IOW(PFRU_MAGIC, 0x02, unsigned int) +#define PFRU_IOC_ACTIVATE _IOW(PFRU_MAGIC, 0x03, unsigned int) +#define PFRU_IOC_STAGE_ACTIVATE _IOW(PFRU_MAGIC, 0x04, unsigned int) + +static inline int pfru_valid_revid (int id) +{ +return (id ==REVID_1 ) || (id ==REVID_2 ); +} + +/* Capsule file payload header */ +struct pfru_payload_hdr { +__u32 sig; +__u32 hdr_version; +__u32 hdr_size; +__u32 hw_ver; +__u32 rt_ver; +uuid_t platform_id; +}; + +enum pfru_start_action { +START_STAGE , +START_ACTIVATE , +START_STAGE_ACTIVATE , +}; + +enum pfru_dsm_status { +DSM_SUCCEED , +DSM_FUNC_NOT_SUPPORT , +DSM_INVAL_INPUT , +DSM_HARDWARE_ERR , +DSM_RETRY_SUGGESTED , +DSM_UNKNOWN , +DSM_FUNC_SPEC_ERR , +}; + +struct pfru_update_cap_info { +enum pfru_dsm_status status; +__u32 update_cap; + +uuid_t code_type; +__u32 fw_version; +__u32 code_rt_version; + +uuid_t drv_type; +__u32 drv_rt_version; +__u32 drv_svn; + +uuid_t platform_id; +uuid_t oem_id; + +char oem_info[]; +}; + +struct pfru_com_buf_info { +enum pfru_dsm_status status; +enum pfru_dsm_status ext_status; +__u64 addr_lo; +__u64 addr_hi; +__u32 buf_size; +}; + +struct pfru_updated_result { +enum pfru_dsm_status status; +enum pfru_dsm_status ext_status; +__u64 low_auth_time; +__u64 high_auth_time; +__u64 low_exec_time; +__u64 high_exec_time; +}; + +#endif /* __PFRU_H__ */ --
Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update device driver
Quoted 1 line · Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 5:56 PM Chen Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
[snip]
Quoted 19 lines
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +5
-0+static bool valid_cap_type (int idx,union acpi_object *obj) +{ +acpi_object_type type = obj->type; + + if (idx == CAP_STATUS_IDX || idx == CAP_UPDATE_IDX ||drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 80
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +10
-0+ idx == CAP_FW_VER_IDX || idx == CAP_CODE_RT_VER_IDX || + idx == CAP_DRV_RT_VER_IDX || idx == CAP_DRV_SVN_IDX) +return type ==ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ; + else if (idx == CAP_CODE_TYPE_IDX || idx == CAP_DRV_TYPE_IDX || + idx == CAP_PLAT_ID_IDX || idx == CAP_OEM_ID_IDX || + idx == CAP_OEM_INFO_IDX) + return type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER; + else + return false; +}IMO, this is way overdesigned. It is not necessary to do all of these checks for every element of the package in
query_capability().
[snip]
Quoted 15 lines
It is not very useful to do a loop if there is a switch () on the control variable in every step.
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 104
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +9
-0+union acpi_object *obj = &out_obj->package.elements[i]; + +if (!valid_cap_type (i, obj)) + goto free_acpi_buffer; + +switch (i) { +case CAP_STATUS_IDX : + cap->status = obj->integer.value; +break ;The above can be written as
Quoted 9 lines
if (out_obj->package.elements[CAP_STATUS_IDX].type !=
ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)goto free_acpi_buffer;
cap->status= out_obj->package.elements[CAP_STATUS_IDX].integer.value;and analogously for all of the other index values.
But check the number of elements upfront.
Ok, got it. The next version will combine above together, and eliminate the loop, switch logic.
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 26 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +26
-0+case CAP_UPDATE_IDX : + cap->update_cap = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case CAP_CODE_TYPE_IDX : +memcpy (&cap->code_type, obj->buffer.pointer, + obj->buffer.length); +break ; +case CAP_FW_VER_IDX : + cap->fw_version = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case CAP_CODE_RT_VER_IDX : + cap->code_rt_version = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case CAP_DRV_TYPE_IDX : +memcpy (&cap->drv_type, obj->buffer.pointer, + obj->buffer.length); +break ; +case CAP_DRV_RT_VER_IDX : + cap->drv_rt_version = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case CAP_DRV_SVN_IDX : + cap->drv_svn = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case CAP_PLAT_ID_IDX : +memcpy (&cap->platform_id, obj->buffer.pointer, + obj->buffer.length);drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 140
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +10
-0+break ; +case CAP_OEM_ID_IDX : +memcpy (&cap->oem_id, obj->buffer.pointer, + obj->buffer.length); +break ; +case CAP_OEM_INFO_IDX : +/*vendor specific data*/ +break ; +default : +pr_err ("Incorrect format of Update Capability.\n" );
Quoted 2 lines
Why
pr_err()and notdev_dbg()?
Will change to dev_dbg() in next version.
Quoted 5 lines
Besides, it looks like you're going to fail if the package has more elements than expected, but is this really a big deal?
Moreover, what if the number of package elements is too small?
Ok, will change it to check if the number of package elements is larger/equals to expected in the spec.
Quoted 19 lines
Quoted 19 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +19
-0+ goto free_acpi_buffer; + } + } + ret =0 ; + +free_acpi_buffer: +ACPI_FREE (out_obj); + +return ret; +} + +static int query_buffer (struct pfru_com_buf_info *info) +{ +union acpi_object *out_obj; +acpi_handle handle; +int i, ret = -EINVAL ; + + handle =ACPI_HANDLE (pfru_dev->dev); + out_obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, &pfru_dev->uuid,
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 165
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +6
-0+ pfru_dev->rev_id,FUNC_QUERY_BUF , + NULL, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE); +if (!out_obj) +return -EINVAL ; + +for (i =0 ; i < out_obj->package.count; i++) {Again, what is the benefit from doing this loop?
Will eliminate the loop in next version.
[snip]
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 206
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +8
-0+ +static int get_image_type (efi_manage_capsule_image_header_t *img_hdr, +int *type) +{ +guid_t *image_type_id; + +/* check whether this is a code injection or driver update */ + image_type_id = &img_hdr->image_type_id;Anything wrong with doing this assignment as initialization?
Ok, will change it in next version.
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 210
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +4
-0+if (guid_equal (image_type_id, &pfru_dev->code_uuid)) + *type =CODE_INJECT_TYPE ; +else if (guid_equal (image_type_id, &pfru_dev->drv_uuid)) + *type =DRIVER_UPDATE_TYPE ;And what would be wrong with returning the type or a negative error code?
Will change it in next version.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +6
-0+else +return -EINVAL ; + +return 0 ; +} +
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines
+/*
+ * The (u64hw_ins) was introduced in UEFI spec version 2,
+ * and (u64capsule_support) was introduced in version 3.
+ * The size needs to be adjusted accordingly. That is to
+ * say, version 1 should subtract the size of hw_ins+capsule_support,
+ * and version 2 should sbstract the size ofcapsule_support.Either turn this into a kerneldoc comment or put it inside the function.
Will put it inside the function.
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 13 lines
+ */
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +12
-0+static int adjust_efi_size (efi_manage_capsule_image_header_t *img_hdr, +int *size) +{ +int tmp_size = *size; + + tmp_size +=sizeof (efi_manage_capsule_image_header_t); +switch (img_hdr->ver) { +case 1 : + tmp_size -=2 *sizeof (u64); +break ; +case 2 : + tmp_size -=sizeof (u64);
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 241
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +6
-0+break ; +default : +/* only support version 1 and 2 */ +return -EINVAL ; + } + *size = tmp_size;Why not simply return the size or a negative error code?
Will change it in next version.
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 248
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +7
-0+ +return 0 ; +} + +/* +* Sanity check if the capsule image has a newer version than current one. +* Return: true if it is valid, false otherwise. Would it hurt if this was a proper kerneldoc comment?
Will put it inside the function.
[snip]
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +4
-0+ +static void dump_update_result (struct pfru_updated_result *result) +{ +pr_debug ("Update result:\n" );
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 297
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +6
-0+pr_debug ("Status:%d\n" , result->status); +pr_debug ("Extended Status:%d\n" , result->ext_status); +pr_debug ("Authentication Time Low:%lld\n" , result->low_auth_time); +pr_debug ("Authentication Time High:%lld\n" , result->high_auth_time); +pr_debug ("Execution Time Low:%lld\n" , result->low_exec_time); +pr_debug ("Execution Time High:%lld\n" , result->high_exec_time);All of these could be
dev_dbg()I suppose?
Ok, will change it in next version.
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +3
-0+} + +
[snip]
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
+ for (i = 0; i <
out_obj->package.count; i++) {Same comment regarding the benefit of doing a loop: why is it needed?
Will remove the loop in next version.
[snip]
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 372
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +7
-0+ +switch (cmd) { +case PFRU_IOC_SET_REV : +if (copy_from_user (&rev, p,sizeof (unsigned int ))) +return -EFAULT ; +if (!pfru_valid_revid (rev)) +return -EFAULT ;Why is this the right error code to return here?
Will change EFAULT to EINVAL in next version.
[snip]
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 431
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +5
-0+/* map the communication buffer */ + phy_addr = (phys_addr_t)(info.addr_lo | (info.addr_hi <<32 )); + buf_ptr =memremap (phy_addr, info.buf_size,MEMREMAP_WB ); +if (IS_ERR (buf_ptr)) +return PTR_ERR (buf_ptr);Empty line here, please.
Ok, will do.
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 433
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +2
-0+if (!copy_from_iter_full (buf_ptr, len, &iter)) { +pr_err ("error! could not read capsule file\n" );
dev_dbg()?
Ok, will change it in next version.
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c line 441
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +8
-0+ ret = -EINVAL ; + goto unmap; + } + +/* Check if the capsule header has a valid version number. */ + ret =query_capability (&cap); +if (ret) + goto unmap;
Quoted 9 lines
ret is guaranteed to be 0 here, so you can do
if (cap.status !=
DSM_SUCCEED)ret = -EBUSY; else if (!valid_version(buf_ptr, &cap)) ret = -EINVAL;and the gotos and the "ret = 0" statement below won't be necessary.
Ok, will do in next version.
[snip]
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_update.c new file +13
-0+static ssize_t pfru_read (struct file *filp,char __user *ubuf, +size_t size,loff_t *off) +{ +struct pfru_update_cap_info cap; +int ret; + + ret =query_capability (&cap); +if (ret) +return ret; + + size =min_t (size_t, size,sizeof (cap)); + +if (copy_to_user (ubuf, &cap, size))
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 1 line
+ return
-EFAULT;Well, if the
read()is only needed for this, maybe consider implementing it as anioctl()command and usingread()for the telemetry retrieval? Then, you won't need the other special device file, thewrite()will be the code injection/update, theread()will be telemetry retrieval and all of the rest can be ioctl()s under one special device file.
Got it, will try to combine the two modules into one.
thanks,
Chenyu
PATCH v3 4/5 drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update Telemetry
In reply to Chen YuPlatform Firmware Runtime Update(PFRU) Telemetry Service is part of RoT (Root of Trust), which allows PFRU handler and other PFRU drivers to produce telemetry data to upper layer OS consumer at runtime.
The linux provides interfaces for the user to query the parameters of telemetry data, and the user could read out the telemetry data accordingly.
Typical log looks like:
[SmmRuntimeUpdateHandler.ProcessSmmRuntimeUpdate] ProcessSmmRuntimeUpdate = START, Action = 2 [SmmRuntimeUpdateHandler.ProcessSmmRuntimeUpdate]
FwVersion = 0, CodeInjectionVersion = 1 [ShadowSmmRuntimeUpdateImage]
Image = 0x74D9B000, ImageSize = 0x1172 [ProcessSmmRuntimeUpdate]
ShadowSmmRuntimeUpdateImage.Status = Success [ValidateSmmRuntimeUpdateImage]
CapsuleHeader.CapsuleGuid = 6DCBD5ED-E82D-4C44-BDA1-7194199AD92A [ValidateSmmRuntimeUpdateImage]
FmpCapHeader.Version = 1
[ValidateSmmRuntimeUpdateImage] FmpCapImageHeader.UpdateImageTypeId = B2F84B79-7B6E-4E45-885F-3FB9BB185402 [ValidateSmmRuntimeUpdateImage] SmmRuntimeUpdateVerifyImageWithDenylist.Status = Success [ValidateSmmRuntimeUpdateImage] SmmRuntimeUpdateVerifyImageWithAllowlist.Status = Success [SmmCodeInjectionVerifyPayloadHeader]
PayloadHeader.Signature = 0x31494353 [SmmCodeInjectionVerifyPayloadHeader]
PayloadHeader.PlatformId = 63462139-A8B1-AA4E-9024-F2BB53EA4723 [SmmCodeInjectionVerifyPayloadHeader] PayloadHeader.SupportedSmmFirmwareVersion = 0, PayloadHeader.SmmCodeInjectionRuntimeVersion = 1 [ProcessSmmRuntimeUpdate]
ValidateSmmRuntimeUpdateImage.Status = Success
CPU CSR[0B102D28] Before = 7FBF830E
CPU CSR[0B102D28] After = 7FBF8310
[ProcessSmmRuntimeUpdate] ProcessSmmCodeInjection.Status = Success [SmmRuntimeUpdateHandler.ProcessSmmRuntimeUpdate] ProcessSmmRuntimeUpdate = End, Status = Success
---
v3: Use __u32 instead of int and __64 instead of unsigned long
in include/uapi/linux/pfru.h (Greg Kroah-Hartman) Rename the structure in uapi to start with a prefix pfru so as to avoid confusing in the global namespace. (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
v2: Do similar clean up as pfru_update driver:
Add sanity check for duplicated instance of ACPI device. Update the driver to work with allocated telem_device objects. (Mike Rapoport)
For each switch case pair, get rid of the magic case numbers and add a default clause with the error handling. (Mike Rapoport)
--- drivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig | 14 + drivers/acpi/pfru/Makefile | 1 + drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c | 412 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/uapi/linux/pfru.h | 43 +++ 4 files changed, 470 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c
drivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig +14 -0
@@ -13,3 +13,17 @@ config ACPI_PFRU To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will be called pfru_update. + +config ACPI_PFRU_TELEMETRY + tristate "ACPI Platform Firmware Runtime Update Telemetry Service" + depends on ACPI_PFRU + help + PFRU(Platform Firmware Runtime Update) Telemetry Service is part of + RoT(Root of Trust), which allows Platform Firmware Runtime Update handler + and other PFRU drivers to produce telemetry data to upper layer OS consumer + at runtime. + + For more information, see: + <file:Documentation/x86/pfru_update.rst> + + If unsure, please say N.
drivers/acpi/pfru/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PFRU) += pfru_update.o +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PFRU_TELEMETRY) += pfru_telemetry.o
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +412 -0
412 lines not on this page · raw message
include/uapi/linux/pfru.h +43 -0
47 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Rafael J. Wysocki
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 4/5] drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update Telemetry
Quoted 70 lines · Chen Yu
Platform Firmware Runtime Update(PFRU) Telemetry Service is part of RoT (Root of Trust), which allows PFRU handler and other PFRU drivers to produce telemetry data to upper layer OS consumer at runtime.
The linux provides interfaces for the user to query the parameters of telemetry data, and the user could read out the telemetry data accordingly.
Typical log looks like:
[SmmRuntimeUpdateHandler.ProcessSmmRuntimeUpdate] ProcessSmmRuntimeUpdate = START, Action = 2 [SmmRuntimeUpdateHandler.ProcessSmmRuntimeUpdate]
FwVersion = 0, CodeInjectionVersion = 1 [ShadowSmmRuntimeUpdateImage]
Image =0x74D9B000, ImageSize =0x1172[ProcessSmmRuntimeUpdate]
ShadowSmmRuntimeUpdateImage.Status = Success [ValidateSmmRuntimeUpdateImage]
CapsuleHeader.CapsuleGuid = 6DCBD5ED-E82D-4C44-BDA1-7194199AD92A [ValidateSmmRuntimeUpdateImage]
FmpCapHeader.Version = 1
[ValidateSmmRuntimeUpdateImage] FmpCapImageHeader.UpdateImageTypeId = B2F84B79-7B6E-4E45-885F-3FB9BB185402 [ValidateSmmRuntimeUpdateImage] SmmRuntimeUpdateVerifyImageWithDenylist.Status = Success [ValidateSmmRuntimeUpdateImage] SmmRuntimeUpdateVerifyImageWithAllowlist.Status = Success [SmmCodeInjectionVerifyPayloadHeader]
PayloadHeader.Signature =0x31494353[SmmCodeInjectionVerifyPayloadHeader]
PayloadHeader.PlatformId = 63462139-A8B1-AA4E-9024-F2BB53EA4723 [SmmCodeInjectionVerifyPayloadHeader] PayloadHeader.SupportedSmmFirmwareVersion = 0, PayloadHeader.SmmCodeInjectionRuntimeVersion = 1 [ProcessSmmRuntimeUpdate]
ValidateSmmRuntimeUpdateImage.Status = Success
CPU CSR[0B102D28] Before = 7FBF830E
CPU CSR[0B102D28] After = 7FBF8310
[ProcessSmmRuntimeUpdate] ProcessSmmCodeInjection.Status = Success [SmmRuntimeUpdateHandler.ProcessSmmRuntimeUpdate] ProcessSmmRuntimeUpdate = End, Status = SuccessSigned-off-by Chen Yu <[email protected]>---
v3: Use__u32instead of int and __64 instead of unsigned long
ininclude/uapi/linux/pfru.h(Greg Kroah-Hartman) Rename the structure in uapi to start with a prefix pfru so as to avoid confusing in the global namespace. (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
v2: Do similar clean up aspfru_updatedriver:
Add sanity check for duplicated instance of ACPI device. Update the driver to work with allocatedtelem_deviceobjects. (Mike Rapoport)
For each switch case pair, get rid of the magic case numbers and add a default clause with the error handling. (Mike Rapoport)--- drivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig | 14 + drivers/acpi/pfru/Makefile | 1 + drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c | 412 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/uapi/linux/pfru.h | 43 +++ 4 files changed, 470 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.cdrivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig +0
-0
drivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig config ACPI_PFRU · line 17
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig +2
-0@@ -13,3 +13,17 @@ config ACPI_PFRU To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will be called pfru_update. + +config ACPI_PFRU_TELEMETRY
Why does this need a separate Kconfig option?
Quoted 17 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/Kconfig +12
-0+ tristate "ACPI Platform Firmware Runtime Update Telemetry Service" + depends on ACPI_PFRU + help + PFRU(Platform Firmware Runtime Update) Telemetry Service is part of + RoT(Root of Trust), which allows Platform Firmware Runtime Update handler + and other PFRU drivers to produce telemetry data to upper layer OS consumer + at runtime. + + For more information, see: + <file:Documentation/x86/pfru_update.rst> + + If unsure, please say N.drivers/acpi/pfru/Makefile +0
-0
drivers/acpi/pfru/Makefile line 3
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/Makefile +1
-0@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PFRU) += pfru_update.o +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PFRU_TELEMETRY) += pfru_telemetry.o
I'm not sure about this ...
Quoted 68 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +62
-0@@ -0,0 +1,412 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* +* ACPI Platform Firmware Runtime Update +* Telemetry Service Device Driver +* +* Copyright (C) 2021 Intel Corporation +* Author: Chen Yu <[email protected]> +*/ +#include <linux/acpi.h> +#include <linux/errno.h> +#include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/file.h> +#include <linux/minmax.h> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/mm.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/uuid.h> +#include <linux/uaccess.h> +#include <uapi/linux/pfru.h> + +enum update_index { +LOG_STATUS_IDX , +LOG_EXT_STATUS_IDX , +LOG_MAX_SZ_IDX , +LOG_CHUNK1_LO_IDX , +LOG_CHUNK1_HI_IDX , +LOG_CHUNK1_SZ_IDX , +LOG_CHUNK2_LO_IDX , +LOG_CHUNK2_HI_IDX , +LOG_CHUNK2_SZ_IDX , +LOG_ROLLOVER_CNT_IDX , +LOG_RESET_CNT_IDX , +}; + +struct pfru_telem_device { +struct device *dev; +guid_t uuid; +struct pfru_telem_info info; +}; + +/* +* There would be only one instance of pfru_telem_device. +*/ +static struct pfru_telem_device *telem_dev; + +static int get_pfru_data_info (struct pfru_telem_data_info *data_info, +int log_type) +{ +union acpi_object *out_obj, in_obj, in_buf; +acpi_handle handle; +int i, ret = -EINVAL ; + + handle =ACPI_HANDLE (telem_dev->dev); + +memset (&in_obj,0 ,sizeof (in_obj)); +memset (&in_buf,0 ,sizeof (in_buf)); + in_obj.type =ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE ; + in_obj.package.count =1 ; + in_obj.package.elements = &in_buf; + in_buf.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ; + in_buf.integer.value = log_type;
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c line 72
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +10
-0+ + out_obj =acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed (handle, &telem_dev->uuid, + telem_dev->info.log_revid,FUNC_GET_DATA , + &in_obj,ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE ); +if (!out_obj) { +pr_err ("Failed to invoke _DSM\n" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + +for (i =0 ; i < out_obj->package.count; i++) {
Is the loop really necessary?
Quoted 31 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +31
-0+union acpi_object *obj = &out_obj->package.elements[i]; + +if (obj->type !=ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ) + goto free_acpi_buffer; + +switch (i) { +case LOG_STATUS_IDX : + data_info->status = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case LOG_EXT_STATUS_IDX : + data_info->ext_status = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case LOG_MAX_SZ_IDX : + data_info->max_data_size = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case LOG_CHUNK1_LO_IDX : + data_info->chunk1_addr_lo = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case LOG_CHUNK1_HI_IDX : + data_info->chunk1_addr_hi = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case LOG_CHUNK1_SZ_IDX : + data_info->chunk1_size = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case LOG_CHUNK2_LO_IDX : + data_info->chunk2_addr_lo = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case LOG_CHUNK2_HI_IDX : + data_info->chunk2_addr_hi = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case LOG_CHUNK2_SZ_IDX :
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c line 113
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +10
-0+ data_info->chunk2_size = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case LOG_ROLLOVER_CNT_IDX : + data_info->rollover_cnt = obj->integer.value; +break ; +case LOG_RESET_CNT_IDX : + data_info->reset_cnt = obj->integer.value; +break ; +default : +pr_err ("Incorrect format of Telemetry info.\n" );
dev_dbg()? And likewise below.
Quoted 98 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +98
-0+ goto free_acpi_buffer; + } + } + ret =0 ; + +free_acpi_buffer: +ACPI_FREE (out_obj); + +return ret; +} + +static int set_pfru_log_level (int level) +{ +union acpi_object *out_obj, *obj, in_obj, in_buf; +enum pfru_dsm_status status; +acpi_handle handle; +int ret = -EINVAL ; + + handle =ACPI_HANDLE (telem_dev->dev); + +memset (&in_obj,0 ,sizeof (in_obj)); +memset (&in_buf,0 ,sizeof (in_buf)); + in_obj.type =ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE ; + in_obj.package.count =1 ; + in_obj.package.elements = &in_buf; + in_buf.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ; + in_buf.integer.value = level; + + out_obj =acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed (handle, &telem_dev->uuid, + telem_dev->info.log_revid,FUNC_SET_LEV , + &in_obj,ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE ); +if (!out_obj) +return -EINVAL ; + + obj = &out_obj->package.elements[0 ]; + status = obj->integer.value; +if (status) { +pr_err ("get MM telemetry level error status %d\n" , + status); + goto free_acpi_buffer; + } + + obj = &out_obj->package.elements[1 ]; + status = obj->integer.value; +if (status) { +pr_err ("get MM telemetry level error extend status %d\n" , + status); + goto free_acpi_buffer; + } + ret =0 ; + +free_acpi_buffer: +ACPI_FREE (out_obj); + +return ret; +} + +static int get_pfru_log_level (int *level) +{ +union acpi_object *out_obj, *obj; +enum pfru_dsm_status status; +acpi_handle handle; +int ret = -EINVAL ; + + handle =ACPI_HANDLE (telem_dev->dev); + out_obj =acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed (handle, &telem_dev->uuid, + telem_dev->info.log_revid,FUNC_GET_LEV , +NULL ,ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE ); +if (!out_obj) +return -EINVAL ; + + obj = &out_obj->package.elements[0 ]; +if (obj->type !=ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ) + goto free_acpi_buffer; + status = obj->integer.value; +if (status) { +pr_err ("get MM telemetry level error status %d\n" , + status); + goto free_acpi_buffer; + } + + obj = &out_obj->package.elements[1 ]; +if (obj->type !=ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ) + goto free_acpi_buffer; + status = obj->integer.value; +if (status) { +pr_err ("get MM telemetry level error status %d\n" , + status); + goto free_acpi_buffer; + } + + obj = &out_obj->package.elements[2 ]; +if (obj->type !=ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ) + goto free_acpi_buffer; + *level = obj->integer.value; + + ret =0 ; +
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c line 221
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +10
-0+free_acpi_buffer: +ACPI_FREE (out_obj); + +return ret; +} + +static int valid_log_level (int level) +{ +return (level ==LOG_ERR ) || (level ==LOG_WARN ) || + (level ==LOG_INFO ) || (level ==LOG_VERB );
The parens are redundant AFAICS.
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c line 226
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +5
-0+} + +static int valid_log_type (int type) +{ +return (type ==LOG_EXEC_IDX ) || (type ==LOG_HISTORY_IDX );
And here too.
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +6
-0+} + +static long pfru_telemetry_ioctl (struct file *file,unsigned int cmd,unsigned long arg) + +{ +struct pfru_telem_data_info data_info;
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c line 242
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +10
-0+struct pfru_telem_info info; +void __user *p; +int ret =0 ; + + p = (void __user *)arg; + +switch (cmd) { +case PFRU_LOG_IOC_SET_INFO : +if (copy_from_user (&info, p,sizeof (info))) +return -EFAULT ;
Empty line, please.
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c line 249
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +7
-0+if (pfru_valid_revid (info.log_revid)) + telem_dev->info.log_revid = info.log_revid; + +if (valid_log_level (info.log_level)) { + ret =set_pfru_log_level (info.log_level); +if (ret) +return ret;
And here.
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c line 253
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +4
-0+ telem_dev->info.log_level = info.log_level; + } +if (valid_log_type (info.log_type)) + telem_dev->info.log_type = info.log_type;
And here. And analogously below.
Generally speaking, I tend to prefer putting empty code lines after an if () statement that is not followed by a block.
Quoted 33 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +33
-0+break ; +case PFRU_LOG_IOC_GET_INFO : + ret =get_pfru_log_level (&info.log_level); +if (ret) +return ret; + info.log_type = telem_dev->info.log_type; + info.log_revid = telem_dev->info.log_revid; +if (copy_to_user (p, &info,sizeof (info))) + ret = -EFAULT ; +break ; +case PFRU_LOG_IOC_GET_DATA_INFO : + ret =get_pfru_data_info (&data_info, telem_dev->info.log_type); +if (ret) +return ret; +if (copy_to_user (p, &data_info,sizeof (struct pfru_telem_data_info ))) + ret = -EFAULT ; +break ; +default : + ret = -ENOIOCTLCMD ; +break ; + } +return ret; +} + +static ssize_t pfru_telemetry_read (struct file *filp,char __user *ubuf, +size_t size,loff_t *off) +{ +struct pfru_telem_data_info info; +phys_addr_t base_addr; +int buf_size, ret; +char *buf_ptr; + +if (*off <0 )
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c line 296
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +10
-0+return -EINVAL ; + + ret =get_pfru_data_info (&info, telem_dev->info.log_type); +if (ret) { +pr_err ("Could not get telemetry data info %d\n" , ret); +return ret; + } + + base_addr = (phys_addr_t)(info.chunk2_addr_lo | + (info.chunk2_addr_hi <<32 ));
This line doesn't need to be broken as far as I'm concerned.
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +9
-0+if (!base_addr) { +pr_err ("Telemetry data not ready\n" ); +return -EBUSY ; + } + + buf_size = info.max_data_size; +if (*off >= buf_size) +return 0 ; +
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c line 315
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +10
-0+ buf_ptr =memremap (base_addr, buf_size,MEMREMAP_WB ); +if (IS_ERR (buf_ptr)) +return PTR_ERR (buf_ptr); + + size =min_t (size_t, size, buf_size - *off); + + ret = -EFAULT ; +if (copy_to_user (ubuf, buf_ptr + *off, size)) + goto out; + ret =0 ;
So this would be far more readable in the following form IMO:
size = min_t(size_t, size, buf_size - *off);
if (copy_to_user(ubuf, buf_ptr + *off, size))
ret = -EFAULT;
else
ret = 0;And it looks like you won't need the "out" label any more then.
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +13
-0+out: +memunmap (buf_ptr); + +return ret ? ret : size; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT +static long compat_pfru_telemetry_ioctl (struct file *filep,unsigned int cmd, +unsigned long arg) +{ +return pfru_telemetry_ioctl (filep, cmd, arg); +} +#endif
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c line 338
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +10
-0+ +static const struct file_operations acpi_pfru_telemetry_fops = { + .owner =THIS_MODULE , + .read = pfru_telemetry_read, + .unlocked_ioctl = pfru_telemetry_ioctl, +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT + .compat_ioctl = compat_pfru_telemetry_ioctl, +#endif + .llseek = noop_llseek, +};
And I would consider combining this with the update interface so that the write() updates the firmware code and the read() gets telemetry data from it.
Quoted 127 lines
drivers/acpi/pfru/pfru_telemetry.c new file +74
-0+ +static struct miscdevice pfru_telemetry_misc_dev = { + .minor =MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR , + .name ="pfru_telemetry" , + .nodename ="pfru/telemetry" , + .fops = &acpi_pfru_telemetry_fops, +}; + +static int acpi_pfru_telemetry_remove (struct platform_device *pdev) +{ +misc_deregister (&pfru_telemetry_misc_dev); +kfree (telem_dev); + telem_dev =NULL ; + +return 0 ; +} + +static int acpi_pfru_telemetry_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) +{ +acpi_handle handle; +int ret; + +if (telem_dev) { +pr_err ("Duplicated PFRU Telemetry INTC1081 detected, skip...\n" ); +return 0 ; + } + + telem_dev =kzalloc (sizeof (*telem_dev),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!telem_dev) +return -ENOMEM ; + + ret =guid_parse (PFRU_TELEMETRY_UUID , &telem_dev->uuid); +if (ret) + goto out; + + telem_dev->info.log_revid =1 ; + telem_dev->dev = &pdev->dev; + handle =ACPI_HANDLE (telem_dev->dev); +if (!acpi_has_method (handle,"_DSM" )) { +pr_err ("Missing _DSM\n" ); + ret = -ENODEV ; + goto out; + } + + ret =misc_register (&pfru_telemetry_misc_dev); +if (ret) + goto out; + +return 0 ; +out: +kfree (telem_dev); + telem_dev =NULL ; + +return ret; +} + +static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_pfru_telemetry_ids[] = { + {"INTC1081" ,0 }, + {} +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (acpi, acpi_pfru_telemetry_ids); + +static struct platform_driver acpi_pfru_telemetry_driver = { + .driver = { + .name ="pfru_telemetry" , + .acpi_match_table = acpi_pfru_telemetry_ids, + }, + .probe = acpi_pfru_telemetry_probe, + .remove = acpi_pfru_telemetry_remove, +}; +module_platform_driver (acpi_pfru_telemetry_driver); + +MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("Platform Firmware Runtime Update Telemetry Service device driver" ); +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL v2" );include/uapi/linux/pfru.h +43
-1@@ -98,4 +98,47 @@ struct pfru_updated_result { __u64 high_exec_time; }; +#define PFRU_TELEMETRY_UUID "75191659-8178-4D9D-B88F-AC5E5E93E8BF" + +/* Telemetry structures. */ +struct pfru_telem_data_info { +enum pfru_dsm_status status; +enum pfru_dsm_status ext_status; +__u64 chunk1_addr_lo; +__u64 chunk1_addr_hi; +__u64 chunk2_addr_lo; +__u64 chunk2_addr_hi; +__u32 max_data_size; +__u32 chunk1_size; +__u32 chunk2_size; +__u32 rollover_cnt; +__u32 reset_cnt; +}; + +struct pfru_telem_info { +__u32 log_level; +__u32 log_type; +__u32 log_revid; +}; + +/* Two logs: history and execution log */ +#define LOG_EXEC_IDX 0 +#define LOG_HISTORY_IDX 1 +#define NR_LOG_TYPE 2 + +#define LOG_ERR 0 +#define LOG_WARN 1 +#define LOG_INFO 2 +#define LOG_VERB 4 + +#define FUNC_SET_LEV 1 +#define FUNC_GET_LEV 2 +#define FUNC_GET_DATA 3 + +#define LOG_NAME_SIZE 10 + +#define PFRU_LOG_IOC_SET_INFO _IOW(PFRU_MAGIC, 0x05, struct pfru_telem_info) +#define PFRU_LOG_IOC_GET_INFO _IOR(PFRU_MAGIC, 0x06, struct pfru_telem_info) +#define PFRU_LOG_IOC_GET_DATA_INFO _IOR(PFRU_MAGIC, 0x07, struct pfru_telem_data_info) +#endif /* __PFRU_H__ */ --
PATCH v3 5/5 selftests/pfru: add test for Platform Firmware Runtime Update and Telemetry
In reply to Chen YuIntroduce a simple test for Platform Firmware Runtime Update and Telemetry drivers. It is based on ioctl to either update firmware driver or code injection, and read corresponding PFRU Telemetry log into user space.
For example:
./pfru_test -h
usage: pfru_test [OPTIONS]
code injection:
-l, --load
-s, --stage
-a, --activate
-u, --update [stage and activate]
-q, --query
-d, --revid update
telemetry:
-G, --getloginfo
-T, --type(0:execution, 1:history)
-L, --level(0, 1, 2, 4)
-R, --read
-D, --revid log
./pfru_test -G
log_level:4
log_type:0
log_revid:2
max_data_size:65536
chunk1_size:0
chunk2_size:1401
rollover_cnt:0
reset_cnt:4
./pfru_test -q
code injection image type:794bf8b2-6e7b-454e-885f-3fb9bb185402 fw_version:0
code_rt_version:1
driver update image type:0e5f0b14-f849-7945-ad81-bc7b6d2bb245 drv_rt_version:0
drv_svn:0
platform id:39214663-b1a8-4eaa-9024-f2bb53ea4723
oem id:a36db54f-ea2a-e14e-b7c4-b5780e51ba3d
launch the update:
./pfru_test -l yours.cap -u -T 1 -L 4
---
v3: No change since v2.
v2: Do not allow non-root user to run this test.
(Shuah Khan)
Test runs on platform without pfru_telemetry should skip instead of reporting failure/error.
(Shuah Khan)
Reuse uapi/linux/pfru.h instead of copying it into the test directory.
(Mike Rapoport)
--- include/uapi/linux/pfru.h | 5 + tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/pfru/Makefile | 7 + tools/testing/selftests/pfru/config | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/pfru/pfru_test.c | 328 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 343 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/pfru/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/pfru/config create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/pfru/pfru_test.c
include/uapi/linux/pfru.h +5 -0
@@ -8,7 +8,12 @@#define __PFRU_H__#include <linux/ioctl.h> +#ifdef __KERNEL__#include <linux/uuid.h> +#else +#include <uuid/uuid.h> +#include <linux/types.h> +#endif #define PFRU_UUID "ECF9533B-4A3C-4E89-939E-C77112601C6D"#define PFRU_CODE_INJ_UUID "B2F84B79-7B6E-4E45-885F-3FB9BB185402"
tools/testing/selftests/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ TARGETS += seccomp TARGETS += sgx TARGETS += sigaltstack TARGETS += size +TARGETS += pfru TARGETS += sparc64 TARGETS += splice TARGETS += static_keys
tools/testing/selftests/pfru/Makefile new file +7 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ + +CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 +LDLIBS := -luuid + +TEST_GEN_PROGS := pfru_test +include ../lib.mk
tools/testing/selftests/pfru/config new file +2 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +CONFIG_ACPI_PFRU=m +CONFIG_ACPI_PFRU_TELEMETRY=m
tools/testing/selftests/pfru/pfru_test.c new file +328 -0
328 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1