Skip to contentSkip to conversation

cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor assumptions

PATCH Applied Sander Vanheule 5 participants 22 messages Jul 2, 2022 – Jul 20, 2022

Subsystems (3)

v4 of 5 Applied 5/5 Latest is v5 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

v4 cover cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor assumptions

On uniprocessor builds, it is currently assumed that any cpumask will contain the single CPU: cpu0. This assumption is used to provide optimised implementations.

The current assumption also appears to be wrong, by ignoring the fact that users can provide empty cpumask-s. This can result in bugs as explained in [1].

This series introduces some basic tests, and updates the optimisations for uniprocessor builds.

The x86 patch was written after the kernel test robot [2] ran into a failed build. I have tried to list the files potentially affected by the changes to cpumask.h, in an attempt to find any other cases that fail on !SMP. I've gone through some of the files manually, and ran a few cross builds, but nothing else popped up. I (build) checked about half of the potientally affected files, but I do not have the resources to do them all. I hope we can fix other issues if/when they pop up later.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

Changes since v3:

- Guard againts CPU hotpluggin while testing cpu online/present masks
- Add fix for cpu_llc_shared_map on x86

Changes since v2:

- Put new tests after patch fixes
- Update for_each_* macros

Changes since v1:

- Place tests in lib/test_cpumask.c
- Drop the modified UP code in favor of the generic SMP implementation
- Update declaration of cpumask_next_wrap()

Sander Vanheule (5):
x86/cacheinfo: move shared cache map definitions
cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor mask assumption lib/test: Introduce cpumask KUnit test suite
cpumask: Add UP optimised for_each_*_cpu versions
cpumask: Update cpumask_next_wrap() signature

 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c |   6 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c       |   4 -
 include/linux/cpumask.h         | 108 +++++++------------------
 lib/Kconfig.debug               |   9 +++
 lib/Makefile                    |   4 +-
 lib/cpumask.c                   |   2 +
 lib/test_cpumask.c              | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 7 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 lib/test_cpumask.c
Signature · 1 line
2.36.1
#1 lore raw

PATCH v4 1/5 x86/cacheinfo: move shared cache map definitions

The maps to keep track of shared caches between CPUs on SMP systems are declared in asm/smp.h, among them specifically cpu_llc_shared_map. These maps are externally defined in cpu/smpboot.c. The latter is only compiled on CONFIG_SMP=y, which means the declared extern symbols from asm/smp.h do not have a corresponding definition on uniprocessor builds.

The inline cpu_llc_shared_mask() function from asm/smp.h refers to the map declaration mentioned above. This function is referenced in cacheinfo.c inside for_each_cpu() loop macros, to provide cpumask for the loop. On uniprocessor builds, the symbol for the cpu_llc_shared_map does not exist. However, the current implementation of for_each_cpu() also (wrongly) ignores the provided mask.

By sheer luck, the compiler thus optimises out this unused reference to cpu_llc_shared_map, and the linker therefore does not require the cpu_llc_shared_mask to actually exist on uniprocessor builds. Only on SMP bulids does smpboot.o exist to provide the required symbols.

To no longer rely on compiler optimisations for successful uniprocessor builds, move the definitions of cpu_llc_shared_map and cpu_l2c_shared_map from smpboot.c to cacheinfo.c.

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c | 6 ++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c       | 4 ----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c +6 -0
index fe98a1465be6..66556833d7af 100644
@@ -29,6 +29,12 @@
 #define LVL_3		4
 #define LVL_TRACE	5
 
+/* Shared last level cache maps */
+DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_llc_shared_map);
+
+/* Shared L2 cache maps */
+DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_l2c_shared_map);
+
 struct _cache_table {
 	unsigned char descriptor;
 	char cache_type;
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +0 -4
index 5e7f9532a10d..f24227bc3220 100644
@@ -95,10 +95,6 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_core_map);
 DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_die_map);
 EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_die_map);
 
-DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_llc_shared_map);
-
-DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_l2c_shared_map);
-
 /* Per CPU bogomips and other parameters */
 DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct cpuinfo_x86, cpu_info);
 EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_info);
Signature · 1 line
2.36.1
#16 lore raw

PATCH v4 5/5 cpumask: Update cpumask_next_wrap() signature

In reply to Sander Vanheule

The extern specifier is not needed for this declaration, so drop it. The function also depends only on the input parameters, and has no side effects, so it can be marked __pure like other functions in cpumask.h.

---

Notes:
Changes since v3:
- Add Andy's Reviewed-by

Changes since v1:
- Split off patch from other changes

 include/linux/cpumask.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
include/linux/cpumask.h +1 -1
index 6c5b4ee000f2..523857884ae4 100644
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp);
 		(cpu) = cpumask_next_zero((cpu), (mask)),	\
 		(cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;)
 
-extern int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int start, bool wrap);
+int __pure cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int start, bool wrap);
 
 /**
  * for_each_cpu_wrap - iterate over every cpu in a mask, starting at a specified location
Signature · 1 line
2.36.1
#2 lore raw

PATCH v4 2/5 cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor mask assumption

In reply to Sander Vanheule

On uniprocessor builds, any CPU mask is assumed to contain exactly one CPU (cpu0). This assumption ignores the existence of empty masks, resulting in incorrect behaviour.
cpumask_first_zero(), cpumask_next_zero(), and for_each_cpu_not() don't provide behaviour matching the assumption that a UP mask is always "1", and instead provide behaviour matching the empty mask.

Drop the incorrectly optimised code and use the generic implementations in all cases.

---

Notes:
Changes since v3:
- Add back UP-optimised cpumask_local_spread, cpumask_any_distribute, cpumask_any_and_distribute

Changes since v1:
- Drop UP implementations instead of trying to fix them

 include/linux/cpumask.h | 99 ++++++++---------------------------------
 lib/Makefile            |  3 +-
 lib/cpumask.c           |  2 +
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
include/linux/cpumask.h +19 -80
index fe29ac7cc469..7fbef41b3093 100644
@@ -116,85 +116,6 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int cpumask_check(unsigned int cpu)
 	return cpu;
 }
 
-#if NR_CPUS == 1
-/* Uniprocessor.  Assume all masks are "1". */
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_first(const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_first_zero(const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_first_and(const struct cpumask *srcp1,
-					     const struct cpumask *srcp2)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_last(const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/* Valid inputs for n are -1 and 0. */
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_next(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-	return n+1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_zero(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-	return n+1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_and(int n,
-					    const struct cpumask *srcp,
-					    const struct cpumask *andp)
-{
-	return n+1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask,
-					     int start, bool wrap)
-{
-	/* cpu0 unless stop condition, wrap and at cpu0, then nr_cpumask_bits */
-	return (wrap && n == 0);
-}
-
-/* cpu must be a valid cpu, ie 0, so there's no other choice. */
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask,
-					   unsigned int cpu)
-{
-	return 1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static inline int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
-					     const struct cpumask *src2p) {
-	return cpumask_first_and(src1p, src2p);
-}
-
-static inline int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-	return cpumask_first(srcp);
-}
-
-#define for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)			\
-	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
-#define for_each_cpu_not(cpu, mask)		\
-	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
-#define for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, mask, start)	\
-	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask, (void)(start))
-#define for_each_cpu_and(cpu, mask1, mask2)	\
-	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask1, (void)mask2)
-#else
 /**
  * cpumask_first - get the first cpu in a cpumask
  * @srcp: the cpumask pointer
@@ -260,10 +181,29 @@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_zero(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
 
 int __pure cpumask_next_and(int n, const struct cpumask *, const struct cpumask *);
 int __pure cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int cpu);
+
+#if NR_CPUS == 1
+/* Uniprocessor: there is only one valid CPU */
+static inline unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
+					     const struct cpumask *src2p) {
+	return cpumask_first_and(src1p, src2p);
+}
+
+static inline int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp)
+{
+	return cpumask_first(srcp);
+}
+#else
 unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node);
 int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
 			       const struct cpumask *src2p);
 int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp);
+#endif /* NR_CPUS */
 
 /**
  * for_each_cpu - iterate over every cpu in a mask
@@ -324,7 +264,6 @@ extern int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int start, bool
 	for ((cpu) = -1;						\
 		(cpu) = cpumask_next_and((cpu), (mask1), (mask2)),	\
 		(cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;)
-#endif /* SMP */
 
 #define CPU_BITS_NONE						\
 {								\
lib/Makefile +1 -2
index f99bf61f8bbc..bcc7e8ea0cde 100644
@@ -34,10 +34,9 @@ lib-y := ctype.o string.o vsprintf.o cmdline.o \
 	 is_single_threaded.o plist.o decompress.o kobject_uevent.o \
 	 earlycpio.o seq_buf.o siphash.o dec_and_lock.o \
 	 nmi_backtrace.o nodemask.o win_minmax.o memcat_p.o \
-	 buildid.o
+	 buildid.o cpumask.o
 
 lib-$(CONFIG_PRINTK) += dump_stack.o
-lib-$(CONFIG_SMP) += cpumask.o
 
 lib-y	+= kobject.o klist.o
 obj-y	+= lockref.o
lib/cpumask.c +2 -0
index a971a82d2f43..b9728513a4d4 100644
@@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ void __init free_bootmem_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t mask)
 }
 #endif
 
+#if NR_CPUS > 1
 /**
  * cpumask_local_spread - select the i'th cpu with local numa cpu's first
  * @i: index number
@@ -279,3 +280,4 @@ int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp)
 	return next;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpumask_any_distribute);
+#endif /* NR_CPUS */
Signature · 1 line
2.36.1
#5 lore raw

PATCH v4 3/5 lib/test: Introduce cpumask KUnit test suite

In reply to Sander Vanheule

Add a basic suite of tests for cpumask, providing some tests for empty and completely filled cpumasks.

---

Notes:
Changes since v3:
- Test for_each_cpu*() over empty mask and cpu_possible_mask
- Add Andy's Reviewed-by
- Use num_{online,present,possible}_cpus() for builtin masks
- Guard against CPU hotplugging during test for dynamic builtin CPU masks

Changes since v2:
- Rework for_each_* test macros, as suggested by Yury

Changes since v1:
- New patch

 lib/Kconfig.debug  |   9 +++
 lib/Makefile       |   1 +
 lib/test_cpumask.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 lib/test_cpumask.c
lib/Kconfig.debug +9 -0
index 2e24db4bff19..04aaa20d50f9 100644
@@ -2021,6 +2021,15 @@ config LKDTM
 	Documentation on how to use the module can be found in
 	Documentation/fault-injection/provoke-crashes.rst
 
+config TEST_CPUMASK
+	tristate "cpumask tests" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	depends on KUNIT
+	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	help
+	  Enable to turn on cpumask tests, running at boot or module load time.
+
+	  If unsure, say N.
+
 config TEST_LIST_SORT
 	tristate "Linked list sorting test" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
 	depends on KUNIT
lib/Makefile +1 -0
index bcc7e8ea0cde..de3e47453fe8 100644
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_HMM) += test_hmm.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_FREE_PAGES) += test_free_pages.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_kprobes.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_REF_TRACKER) += test_ref_tracker.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_CPUMASK) += test_cpumask.o
 CFLAGS_test_fprobe.o += $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
 obj-$(CONFIG_FPROBE_SANITY_TEST) += test_fprobe.o
 #
lib/test_cpumask.c new file +138 -0

138 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.36.1
#12 lore raw

PATCH v4 4/5 cpumask: Add UP optimised for_each_*_cpu versions

In reply to Sander Vanheule

On uniprocessor builds, the following loops will always run over a mask that contains one enabled CPU (cpu0):
- for_each_possible_cpu
- for_each_online_cpu
- for_each_present_cpu

Provide uniprocessor-specific macros for these loops, that always run exactly once.

---
 include/linux/cpumask.h | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
include/linux/cpumask.h +7 -0
index 7fbef41b3093..6c5b4ee000f2 100644
@@ -750,9 +750,16 @@ extern const DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_all_bits, NR_CPUS);
 /* First bits of cpu_bit_bitmap are in fact unset. */
 #define cpu_none_mask to_cpumask(cpu_bit_bitmap[0])
 
+#if NR_CPUS == 1
+/* Uniprocessor: the possible/online/present masks are always "1" */
+#define for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++)
+#define for_each_online_cpu(cpu)	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++)
+#define for_each_present_cpu(cpu)	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++)
+#else
 #define for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask)
 #define for_each_online_cpu(cpu)   for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_online_mask)
 #define for_each_present_cpu(cpu)  for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_present_mask)
+#endif
 
 /* Wrappers for arch boot code to manipulate normally-constant masks */
 void init_cpu_present(const struct cpumask *src);
Signature · 1 line
2.36.1
maintainer
#17 lore raw
In reply to Sander Vanheule
Quoted 7 lines · On Sat, 2 Jul 2022 18:08:23 +0200 Sander Vanheule <[email protected]> wrote:

On uniprocessor builds, it is currently assumed that any cpumask will contain the single CPU: cpu0. This assumption is used to provide optimised implementations.

The current assumption also appears to be wrong, by ignoring the fact that users can provide empty cpumask-s. This can result in bugs as explained in [1].

It's a little unkind to send people off to some link to explain the very core issue which this patchset addresses! So I enhanced this paragraph:

: The current assumption also appears to be wrong, by ignoring the fact that : users can provide empty cpumasks. This can result in bugs as explained in : [1] - for_each_cpu() will run one iteration of the loop even when passed : an empty cpumask.

Quoted 13 lines

This series introduces some basic tests, and updates the optimisations for uniprocessor builds.

The x86 patch was written after the kernel test robot [2] ran into a failed build. I have tried to list the files potentially affected by the changes to cpumask.h, in an attempt to find any other cases that fail on !SMP. I've gone through some of the files manually, and ran a few cross builds, but nothing else popped up. I (build) checked about half of the potientally affected files, but I do not have the resources to do them all. I hope we can fix other issues if/when they pop up later.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

maintainer
#3 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor mask assumption

In reply to Sander Vanheule
Quoted 11 lines · Sander Vanheule

On uniprocessor builds, any CPU mask is assumed to contain exactly one CPU (cpu0). This assumption ignores the existence of empty masks, resulting in incorrect behaviour.
cpumask_first_zero(), cpumask_next_zero(), and for_each_cpu_not() don't provide behaviour matching the assumption that a UP mask is always "1", and instead provide behaviour matching the empty mask.

Drop the incorrectly optimised code and use the generic implementations in all cases.

Quoted 178 lines

---

Notes:
Changes since v3:
- Add back UP-optimised cpumask_local_spread, cpumask_any_distribute, cpumask_any_and_distribute

Changes since v1:
- Drop UP implementations instead of trying to fix them

 include/linux/cpumask.h | 99 ++++++++---------------------------------
 lib/Makefile            |  3 +-
 lib/cpumask.c           |  2 +
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
include/linux/cpumask.h +19 -80
index fe29ac7cc469..7fbef41b3093 100644
@@ -116,85 +116,6 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int cpumask_check(unsigned int cpu)
 	return cpu;
 }
 
-#if NR_CPUS == 1
-/* Uniprocessor.  Assume all masks are "1". */
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_first(const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_first_zero(const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_first_and(const struct cpumask *srcp1,
-					     const struct cpumask *srcp2)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_last(const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/* Valid inputs for n are -1 and 0. */
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_next(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-	return n+1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_zero(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-	return n+1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_and(int n,
-					    const struct cpumask *srcp,
-					    const struct cpumask *andp)
-{
-	return n+1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask,
-					     int start, bool wrap)
-{
-	/* cpu0 unless stop condition, wrap and at cpu0, then nr_cpumask_bits */
-	return (wrap && n == 0);
-}
-
-/* cpu must be a valid cpu, ie 0, so there's no other choice. */
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask,
-					   unsigned int cpu)
-{
-	return 1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static inline int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
-					     const struct cpumask *src2p) {
-	return cpumask_first_and(src1p, src2p);
-}
-
-static inline int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-	return cpumask_first(srcp);
-}
-
-#define for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)			\
-	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
-#define for_each_cpu_not(cpu, mask)		\
-	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
-#define for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, mask, start)	\
-	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask, (void)(start))
-#define for_each_cpu_and(cpu, mask1, mask2)	\
-	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask1, (void)mask2)
-#else
 /**
  * cpumask_first - get the first cpu in a cpumask
  * @srcp: the cpumask pointer
@@ -260,10 +181,29 @@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_zero(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
 
 int __pure cpumask_next_and(int n, const struct cpumask *, const struct cpumask *);
 int __pure cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int cpu);
+
+#if NR_CPUS == 1
+/* Uniprocessor: there is only one valid CPU */
+static inline unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
+					     const struct cpumask *src2p) {
+	return cpumask_first_and(src1p, src2p);
+}
+
+static inline int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp)
+{
+	return cpumask_first(srcp);
+}
+#else
 unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node);
 int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
 			       const struct cpumask *src2p);
 int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp);
+#endif /* NR_CPUS */
 
 /**
  * for_each_cpu - iterate over every cpu in a mask
@@ -324,7 +264,6 @@ extern int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int start, bool
 	for ((cpu) = -1;						\
 		(cpu) = cpumask_next_and((cpu), (mask1), (mask2)),	\
 		(cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;)
-#endif /* SMP */
 
 #define CPU_BITS_NONE						\
 {								\
lib/Makefile +1 -2
index f99bf61f8bbc..bcc7e8ea0cde 100644
@@ -34,10 +34,9 @@ lib-y := ctype.o string.o vsprintf.o cmdline.o \
 	 is_single_threaded.o plist.o decompress.o kobject_uevent.o \
 	 earlycpio.o seq_buf.o siphash.o dec_and_lock.o \
 	 nmi_backtrace.o nodemask.o win_minmax.o memcat_p.o \
-	 buildid.o
+	 buildid.o cpumask.o
 
 lib-$(CONFIG_PRINTK) += dump_stack.o
-lib-$(CONFIG_SMP) += cpumask.o
 
 lib-y	+= kobject.o klist.o
 obj-y	+= lockref.o
lib/cpumask.c +2 -0
index a971a82d2f43..b9728513a4d4 100644
@@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ void __init free_bootmem_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t mask)
 }
 #endif
 
+#if NR_CPUS > 1
 /**
  * cpumask_local_spread - select the i'th cpu with local numa cpu's first
  * @i: index number
@@ -279,3 +280,4 @@ int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp)
 	return next;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpumask_any_distribute);
+#endif /* NR_CPUS */
Signature · 1 line
2.36.1
maintainer
#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] lib/test: Introduce cpumask KUnit test suite

In reply to Sander Vanheule
Quoted 14 lines · Sander Vanheule

Add a basic suite of tests for cpumask, providing some tests for empty and completely filled cpumasks.

---

Notes:
Changes since v3:
- Test for_each_cpu*() over empty mask and cpu_possible_mask
- Add Andy's Reviewed-by
- Use num_{online,present,possible}_cpus() for builtin masks
- Guard against CPU hotplugging during test for dynamic builtin CPU masks

Quoted 2 lines

Changes since v2:
- Rework for_each_* test macros, as suggested by Yury

We have a special tag for it:

Quoted 188 lines

Changes since v1:
- New patch

 lib/Kconfig.debug  |   9 +++
 lib/Makefile       |   1 +
 lib/test_cpumask.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 lib/test_cpumask.c
lib/Kconfig.debug +9 -0
index 2e24db4bff19..04aaa20d50f9 100644
@@ -2021,6 +2021,15 @@ config LKDTM
 	Documentation on how to use the module can be found in
 	Documentation/fault-injection/provoke-crashes.rst
 
+config TEST_CPUMASK
+	tristate "cpumask tests" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	depends on KUNIT
+	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	help
+	  Enable to turn on cpumask tests, running at boot or module load time.
+
+	  If unsure, say N.
+
 config TEST_LIST_SORT
 	tristate "Linked list sorting test" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
 	depends on KUNIT
lib/Makefile +1 -0
index bcc7e8ea0cde..de3e47453fe8 100644
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_HMM) += test_hmm.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_FREE_PAGES) += test_free_pages.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_kprobes.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_REF_TRACKER) += test_ref_tracker.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_CPUMASK) += test_cpumask.o
 CFLAGS_test_fprobe.o += $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
 obj-$(CONFIG_FPROBE_SANITY_TEST) += test_fprobe.o
 #
lib/test_cpumask.c new file +138 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a31a1622f1f6
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * KUnit tests for cpumask.
+ *
+ * Author: Sander Vanheule <[email protected]>
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+
+#define EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_EQ(test, mask)			\
+	do {							\
+		const cpumask_t *m = (mask);			\
+		int mask_weight = cpumask_weight(m);		\
+		int cpu, iter = 0;				\
+		for_each_cpu(cpu, m)				\
+			iter++;					\
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ((test), mask_weight, iter);	\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_NOT_EQ(test, mask)					\
+	do {									\
+		const cpumask_t *m = (mask);					\
+		int mask_weight = cpumask_weight(m);				\
+		int cpu, iter = 0;						\
+		for_each_cpu_not(cpu, m)					\
+			iter++;							\
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ((test), nr_cpu_ids - mask_weight, iter);	\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_WRAP_EQ(test, mask)			\
+	do {							\
+		const cpumask_t *m = (mask);			\
+		int mask_weight = cpumask_weight(m);		\
+		int cpu, iter = 0;				\
+		for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, m, nr_cpu_ids / 2)	\
+			iter++;					\
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ((test), mask_weight, iter);	\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_BUILTIN_EQ(test, name)		\
+	do {							\
+		int mask_weight = num_##name##_cpus();		\
+		int cpu, iter = 0;				\
+		for_each_##name##_cpu(cpu)			\
+			iter++;					\
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ((test), mask_weight, iter);	\
+	} while (0)
+
+static cpumask_t mask_empty;
+static cpumask_t mask_all;
+
+static void test_cpumask_weight(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_empty(&mask_empty));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(cpu_possible_mask));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(&mask_all));
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_weight(&mask_empty));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpumask_bits, cpumask_weight(&mask_all));
+}
+
+static void test_cpumask_first(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_first(&mask_empty));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_first(cpu_possible_mask));
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_first_zero(&mask_empty));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_first_zero(cpu_possible_mask));
+}
+
+static void test_cpumask_last(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpumask_bits, cpumask_last(&mask_empty));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpumask_bits - 1, cpumask_last(cpu_possible_mask));
+}
+
+static void test_cpumask_next(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_next_zero(-1, &mask_empty));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_next_zero(-1, cpu_possible_mask));
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_next(-1, &mask_empty));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_next(-1, cpu_possible_mask));
+}
+
+static void test_cpumask_iterators(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_EQ(test, &mask_empty);
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_NOT_EQ(test, &mask_empty);
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_WRAP_EQ(test, &mask_empty);
+
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_EQ(test, cpu_possible_mask);
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_NOT_EQ(test, cpu_possible_mask);
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_WRAP_EQ(test, cpu_possible_mask);
+}
+
+static void test_cpumask_iterators_builtin(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_BUILTIN_EQ(test, possible);
+
+	/* Ensure the dynamic masks are stable while running the tests */
+	cpu_hotplug_disable();
+
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_BUILTIN_EQ(test, online);
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_BUILTIN_EQ(test, present);
+
+	cpu_hotplug_enable();
+}
+
+static int test_cpumask_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	cpumask_clear(&mask_empty);
+	cpumask_setall(&mask_all);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case test_cpumask_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_weight),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_first),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_last),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_next),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_iterators),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_iterators_builtin),
+	{}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite test_cpumask_suite = {
+	.name = "cpumask",
+	.init = test_cpumask_init,
+	.test_cases = test_cpumask_cases,
+};
+kunit_test_suite(test_cpumask_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Signature · 1 line
2.36.1
maintainer Acked-by on v4 4/5
#13 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] cpumask: Add UP optimised for_each_*_cpu versions

In reply to Sander Vanheule
Quoted 10 lines · Sander Vanheule

On uniprocessor builds, the following loops will always run over a mask that contains one enabled CPU (cpu0):
- for_each_possible_cpu
- for_each_online_cpu
- for_each_present_cpu

Provide uniprocessor-specific macros for these loops, that always run exactly once.

Quoted 27 lines
---
 include/linux/cpumask.h | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
include/linux/cpumask.h +7 -0
index 7fbef41b3093..6c5b4ee000f2 100644
@@ -750,9 +750,16 @@ extern const DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_all_bits, NR_CPUS);
 /* First bits of cpu_bit_bitmap are in fact unset. */
 #define cpu_none_mask to_cpumask(cpu_bit_bitmap[0])
 
+#if NR_CPUS == 1
+/* Uniprocessor: the possible/online/present masks are always "1" */
+#define for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++)
+#define for_each_online_cpu(cpu)	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++)
+#define for_each_present_cpu(cpu)	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++)
+#else
 #define for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask)
 #define for_each_online_cpu(cpu)   for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_online_mask)
 #define for_each_present_cpu(cpu)  for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_present_mask)
+#endif
 
 /* Wrappers for arch boot code to manipulate normally-constant masks */
 void init_cpu_present(const struct cpumask *src);
Signature · 1 line
2.36.1
maintainer
#14 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] cpumask: Add UP optimised for_each_*_cpu versions

Quoted 7 lines · Yury Norov
Quoted 6 lines · Sander Vanheule

On uniprocessor builds, the following loops will always run over a mask that contains one enabled CPU (cpu0):
- for_each_possible_cpu
- for_each_online_cpu
- for_each_present_cpu

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Provide uniprocessor-specific macros for these loops, that always run exactly once.

I think this patch should go before #2 to avoid possible issues while bisecting...

Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 28 lines
---
 include/linux/cpumask.h | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
include/linux/cpumask.h +7 -0
index 7fbef41b3093..6c5b4ee000f2 100644
@@ -750,9 +750,16 @@ extern const DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_all_bits, NR_CPUS);
 /* First bits of cpu_bit_bitmap are in fact unset. */
 #define cpu_none_mask to_cpumask(cpu_bit_bitmap[0])
 
+#if NR_CPUS == 1
+/* Uniprocessor: the possible/online/present masks are always "1" */
+#define for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++)
+#define for_each_online_cpu(cpu)	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++)
+#define for_each_present_cpu(cpu)	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++)
+#else
 #define for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask)
 #define for_each_online_cpu(cpu)   for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_online_mask)
 #define for_each_present_cpu(cpu)  for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_present_mask)
+#endif
 
 /* Wrappers for arch boot code to manipulate normally-constant masks */
 void init_cpu_present(const struct cpumask *src);
Signature · 1 line
2.36.1
#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] lib/test: Introduce cpumask KUnit test suite

In reply to Yury Norov
Quoted 18 lines · Yury Norov
Quoted 18 lines · Sander Vanheule
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 16 lines

Add a basic suite of tests for cpumask, providing some tests for empty and completely filled cpumasks.

---

Notes:
    Changes since v3:
    - Test for_each_cpu*() over empty mask and cpu_possible_mask
    - Add Andy's Reviewed-by
    - Use num_{online,present,possible}_cpus() for builtin masks
    - Guard against CPU hotplugging during test for dynamic builtin CPU masks
    Changes since v2:
    - Rework for_each_* test macros, as suggested by Yury

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

We have a special tag for it:

Of course, sorry I forgot about this. I should've included this already when introducing this patch anyway.

Best,
Sander

#15 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] cpumask: Add UP optimised for_each_*_cpu versions

In reply to Yury Norov
Quoted 11 lines · Yury Norov
Quoted 10 lines · Yury Norov
Quoted 9 lines · Sander Vanheule

On uniprocessor builds, the following loops will always run over a mask that contains one enabled CPU (cpu0):
    - for_each_possible_cpu
    - for_each_online_cpu
    - for_each_present_cpu

Provide uniprocessor-specific macros for these loops, that always run exactly once.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line

I think this patch should go before #2 to avoid possible issues while bisecting...

The old assumption was valid in this case, but I agree it makes sense to move this patch forward in the series. Also to avoid a cycle of optimised/generic/optimised, even if the behaviour doesn't change.

Best,
Sander

Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 28 lines

---
 include/linux/cpumask.h | 7 +++++++

 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
include/linux/cpumask.h +0 -0
index 7fbef41b3093..6c5b4ee000f2 100644
@@ -750,9 +750,16 @@ extern const DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_all_bits, NR_CPUS);
  /* First bits of cpu_bit_bitmap are in fact unset. */
  #define cpu_none_mask to_cpumask(cpu_bit_bitmap[0])

include/linux/cpumask.h +6 -0
+#if NR_CPUS == 1
+/* Uniprocessor: the possible/online/present masks are always "1" */
+#define for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)     for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++)
+#define for_each_online_cpu(cpu)       for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++)
+#define for_each_present_cpu(cpu)      for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++)
+#else

 #define for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask) #define for_each_online_cpu(cpu)   for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_online_mask) #define for_each_present_cpu(cpu)  for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_present_mask) +#endif

 /* Wrappers for arch boot code to manipulate normally-constant masks */ void init_cpu_present(const struct cpumask *src);

Signature · 1 line
2.36.1
#18 lore raw
In reply to Andrew Morton
Quoted 10 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 7 lines · On Sat,  2 Jul 2022 18:08:23 +0200 Sander Vanheule <[email protected]> wrote:

On uniprocessor builds, it is currently assumed that any cpumask will contain the single CPU: cpu0. This assumption is used to provide optimised implementations.

The current assumption also appears to be wrong, by ignoring the fact that users can provide empty cpumask-s. This can result in bugs as explained in [1].

Quoted 8 lines

It's a little unkind to send people off to some link to explain the very core issue which this patchset addresses!  So I enhanced this paragraph:

: The current assumption also appears to be wrong, by ignoring the fact that : users can provide empty cpumasks.  This can result in bugs as explained in : [1] - for_each_cpu() will run one iteration of the loop even when passed : an empty cpumask.

Makes sense to add this, sorry for the inconvenience.

Just to make sure, since I'm not familiar with the process for patches going through the mm tree, can I still send a v5 to move the last patch forward in the series, and to include Yury's tags?

Best,
Sander

Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 13 lines

This series introduces some basic tests, and updates the optimisations for uniprocessor builds.

The x86 patch was written after the kernel test robot [2] ran into a failed build. I have tried to list the files potentially affected by the changes to cpumask.h, in an attempt to find any other cases that fail on !SMP. I've gone through some of the files manually, and ran a few cross builds, but nothing else popped up. I (build) checked about half of the potientally affected files, but I do not have the resources to do them all. I hope we can fix other issues if/when they pop up later.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor mask assumption

In reply to Yury Norov
Quoted 8 lines · Yury Norov
Quoted 7 lines · Sander Vanheule

On uniprocessor builds, any CPU mask is assumed to contain exactly one CPU (cpu0). This assumption ignores the existence of empty masks, resulting in incorrect behaviour.
cpumask_first_zero(), cpumask_next_zero(), and for_each_cpu_not() don't provide behaviour matching the assumption that a UP mask is always "1", and instead provide behaviour matching the empty mask.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Drop the incorrectly optimised code and use the generic implementations in all cases.

To be honest, I was somewhat taken aback by this Suggested-by. I certainly appreciate the feedback you've provided, and I think the patch has gotten better for it, so I do want to acknowledge that. During reviews of other patches however, I haven't had a reviewer request this for suggestions that couldn't be spun off into a separate patch. If you are OK with this patch, a Reviewed-by would definitely be warranted and seems more appropriate IMHO.

Best,
Sander

Quoted 180 lines
Quoted 180 lines

---

Notes:
    Changes since v3:
    - Add back UP-optimised cpumask_local_spread, cpumask_any_distribute, cpumask_any_and_distribute

    Changes since v1:
    - Drop UP implementations instead of trying to fix them

 include/linux/cpumask.h | 99 ++++++++--------------------------------- lib/Makefile            |  3 +-
 lib/cpumask.c           |  2 +

 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
include/linux/cpumask.h +0 -0
index fe29ac7cc469..7fbef41b3093 100644
@@ -116,85 +116,6 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int cpumask_check(unsigned int cpu)
         return cpu;
  }

include/linux/cpumask.h +0 -79
-#if NR_CPUS == 1
-/* Uniprocessor.  Assume all masks are "1". */
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_first(const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-       return 0;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_first_zero(const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-       return 0;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_first_and(const struct cpumask *srcp1,
-                                            const struct cpumask *srcp2)
-{
-       return 0;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_last(const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-       return 0;
-}
-
-/* Valid inputs for n are -1 and 0. */
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_next(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-       return n+1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_zero(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-       return n+1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_and(int n,
-                                           const struct cpumask *srcp,
-                                           const struct cpumask *andp)
-{
-       return n+1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask,
-                                            int start, bool wrap)
-{
-       /* cpu0 unless stop condition, wrap and at cpu0, then nr_cpumask_bits */
-       return (wrap && n == 0);
-}
-
-/* cpu must be a valid cpu, ie 0, so there's no other choice. */
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask,
-                                          unsigned int cpu)
-{
-       return 1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
-{
-       return 0;
-}
-
-static inline int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
-                                            const struct cpumask *src2p) {
-       return cpumask_first_and(src1p, src2p);
-}
-
-static inline int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
-       return cpumask_first(srcp);
-}
-
-#define for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)                        \
-       for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
-#define for_each_cpu_not(cpu, mask)            \
-       for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
-#define for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, mask, start)    \
-       for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask, (void)(start))
-#define for_each_cpu_and(cpu, mask1, mask2)    \
-       for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask1, (void)mask2)
-#else

 /**
  * cpumask_first - get the first cpu in a cpumask
  * @srcp: the cpumask pointer

include/linux/cpumask.h +0 -0
@@ -260,10 +181,29 @@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_zero(int n, const struct cpumask
 *srcp)


 int __pure cpumask_next_and(int n, const struct cpumask *, const struct cpumask *); int __pure cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int cpu);

include/linux/cpumask.h +18 -0
+
+#if NR_CPUS == 1
+/* Uniprocessor: there is only one valid CPU */
+static inline unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
+{
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
+                                            const struct cpumask *src2p) {
+       return cpumask_first_and(src1p, src2p);
+}
+
+static inline int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp)
+{
+       return cpumask_first(srcp);
+}
+#else

 unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node); int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p, const struct cpumask *src2p); int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp); +#endif /* NR_CPUS */

 /**
  * for_each_cpu - iterate over every cpu in a mask

include/linux/cpumask.h +0 -0
@@ -324,7 +264,6 @@ extern int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int start,

bool
        for ((cpu) = -1;                                                \
                (cpu) = cpumask_next_and((cpu), (mask1), (mask2)),      \
                (cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;)
-#endif /* SMP */

 #define CPU_BITS_NONE                                          \
 {                                                              \

lib/Makefile +1 -1
index f99bf61f8bbc..bcc7e8ea0cde 100644
@@ -34,10 +34,9 @@ lib-y := ctype.o string.o vsprintf.o cmdline.o \
          is_single_threaded.o plist.o decompress.o kobject_uevent.o \
          earlycpio.o seq_buf.o siphash.o dec_and_lock.o \
          nmi_backtrace.o nodemask.o win_minmax.o memcat_p.o \
-        buildid.o
+        buildid.o cpumask.o


 lib-$(CONFIG_PRINTK) += dump_stack.o
-lib-$(CONFIG_SMP) += cpumask.o

 lib-y  += kobject.o klist.o
 obj-y  += lockref.o

lib/cpumask.c +0 -0
index a971a82d2f43..b9728513a4d4 100644
@@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ void __init free_bootmem_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t mask)
  }
  #endif


+#if NR_CPUS > 1
 /**
  * cpumask_local_spread - select the i'th cpu with local numa cpu's first
  * @i: index number

lib/cpumask.c +1 -0
@@ -279,3 +280,4 @@ int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp)
         return next;
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpumask_any_distribute);
+#endif /* NR_CPUS */
Signature · 1 line
2.36.1
maintainer
#19 lore raw
In reply to Sander Vanheule
Quoted 15 lines · On Sun, 03 Jul 2022 09:50:51 +0200 Sander Vanheule <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 14 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 7 lines · On Sat,  2 Jul 2022 18:08:23 +0200 Sander Vanheule <[email protected]> wrote:

On uniprocessor builds, it is currently assumed that any cpumask will contain the single CPU: cpu0. This assumption is used to provide optimised implementations.

The current assumption also appears to be wrong, by ignoring the fact that users can provide empty cpumask-s. This can result in bugs as explained in [1].

It's a little unkind to send people off to some link to explain the very core issue which this patchset addresses!  So I enhanced this paragraph:

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

: The current assumption also appears to be wrong, by ignoring the fact that : users can provide empty cpumasks.  This can result in bugs as explained in : [1] - for_each_cpu() will run one iteration of the loop even when passed : an empty cpumask.

Makes sense to add this, sorry for the inconvenience.

Just to make sure, since I'm not familiar with the process for patches going through the mm tree,

Patches enter -mm in quilt form and are published in the (rebasing) mm-unstable branch
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm. Once they have stopped changing and have been stabilized, I move them into the non-rebasing mm-stable branch.

Quoted 1 line

can I still send a v5 to move the last patch forward in the series, and to include Yury's tags?

I already added Yury's ack. Please tell me the specific patch ordering and I'll take care of that.

#20 lore raw

Hi Andrew,

Quoted 37 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 23 lines · On Sun, 03 Jul 2022 09:50:51 +0200 Sander Vanheule <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 15 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 7 lines · On Sat,  2 Jul 2022 18:08:23 +0200 Sander Vanheule <[email protected]> wrote:

On uniprocessor builds, it is currently assumed that any cpumask will contain the single CPU: cpu0. This assumption is used to provide optimised implementations.

The current assumption also appears to be wrong, by ignoring the fact that users can provide empty cpumask-s. This can result in bugs as explained in [1].

It's a little unkind to send people off to some link to explain the very core issue which this patchset addresses!  So I enhanced this paragraph:

Quoted 6 lines

: The current assumption also appears to be wrong, by ignoring the fact that
: users can provide empty cpumasks.  This can result in bugs as explained in
: [1] - for_each_cpu() will run one iteration of the loop even when passed : an empty cpumask.

Quoted 4 lines

Makes sense to add this, sorry for the inconvenience.

Just to make sure, since I'm not familiar with the process for patches going through the mm tree,

Patches enter -mm in quilt form and are published in the (rebasing) mm-unstable branch
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.  Once they have stopped changing and have been stabilized, I move them into the non-rebasing mm-stable branch.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines

can I still send a v5 to move the last patch forward in the series, and to include Yury's tags?

I already added Yury's ack.  Please tell me the specific patch ordering and I'll take care of that.

The updated patch order should be:
x86/cacheinfo: move shared cache map definitions
cpumask: add UP optimised for_each_*_cpu versions
cpumask: fix invalid uniprocessor mask assumption lib/test: introduce cpumask KUnit test suite
cpumask: update cpumask_next_wrap() signature

Reordering the patches on my tree didn't produce any conflicts.

Best,
Sander

maintainer
#21 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 08:51:08 +0200 Sander Vanheule <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines

can I still send a v5 to move the last patch forward in the series, and to include Yury's tags?

I already added Yury's ack.  Please tell me the specific patch ordering and I'll take care of that.

Quoted 8 lines

The updated patch order should be:
x86/cacheinfo: move shared cache map definitions
cpumask: add UP optimised for_each_*_cpu versions
cpumask: fix invalid uniprocessor mask assumption lib/test: introduce cpumask KUnit test suite
cpumask: update cpumask_next_wrap() signature

Reordering the patches on my tree didn't produce any conflicts.

Got it, thanks.

#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] lib/test: Introduce cpumask KUnit test suite

In reply to Sander Vanheule
Quoted 5 lines

Add a basic suite of tests for cpumask, providing some tests for empty and completely filled cpumasks.

The tests test_cpumask_weight and test_cpumask_last are failing on all architectures, as can be seen on [1]. Also this test doesn't follow the standard style for KUnit tests [2].

[1]
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20220718/testrun/10865066/suite/kunit/tests/
[2] https://docs.kernel.org/dev-tools/kunit/style.html

CC Brendan Higgins <[email protected]>
CC David Gow <[email protected]>

Best Regards,
- Maíra Canal

Quoted 199 lines

---

Notes:
Changes since v3:
- Test for_each_cpu*() over empty mask and cpu_possible_mask
- Add Andy's Reviewed-by
- Use num_{online,present,possible}_cpus() for builtin masks
- Guard against CPU hotplugging during test for dynamic builtin CPU masks

Changes since v2:
- Rework for_each_* test macros, as suggested by Yury

Changes since v1:
- New patch

 lib/Kconfig.debug  |   9 +++
 lib/Makefile       |   1 +
 lib/test_cpumask.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 lib/test_cpumask.c
lib/Kconfig.debug +9 -0
index 2e24db4bff19..04aaa20d50f9 100644
@@ -2021,6 +2021,15 @@ config LKDTM
 	Documentation on how to use the module can be found in
 	Documentation/fault-injection/provoke-crashes.rst
 
+config TEST_CPUMASK
+	tristate "cpumask tests" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	depends on KUNIT
+	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	help
+	  Enable to turn on cpumask tests, running at boot or module load time.
+
+	  If unsure, say N.
+
 config TEST_LIST_SORT
 	tristate "Linked list sorting test" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
 	depends on KUNIT
lib/Makefile +1 -0
index bcc7e8ea0cde..de3e47453fe8 100644
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_HMM) += test_hmm.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_FREE_PAGES) += test_free_pages.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_kprobes.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_REF_TRACKER) += test_ref_tracker.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_CPUMASK) += test_cpumask.o
 CFLAGS_test_fprobe.o += $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
 obj-$(CONFIG_FPROBE_SANITY_TEST) += test_fprobe.o
 #
lib/test_cpumask.c new file +138 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a31a1622f1f6
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * KUnit tests for cpumask.
+ *
+ * Author: Sander Vanheule <[email protected]>
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+
+#define EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_EQ(test, mask)			\
+	do {							\
+		const cpumask_t *m = (mask);			\
+		int mask_weight = cpumask_weight(m);		\
+		int cpu, iter = 0;				\
+		for_each_cpu(cpu, m)				\
+			iter++;					\
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ((test), mask_weight, iter);	\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_NOT_EQ(test, mask)					\
+	do {									\
+		const cpumask_t *m = (mask);					\
+		int mask_weight = cpumask_weight(m);				\
+		int cpu, iter = 0;						\
+		for_each_cpu_not(cpu, m)					\
+			iter++;							\
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ((test), nr_cpu_ids - mask_weight, iter);	\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_WRAP_EQ(test, mask)			\
+	do {							\
+		const cpumask_t *m = (mask);			\
+		int mask_weight = cpumask_weight(m);		\
+		int cpu, iter = 0;				\
+		for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, m, nr_cpu_ids / 2)	\
+			iter++;					\
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ((test), mask_weight, iter);	\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_BUILTIN_EQ(test, name)		\
+	do {							\
+		int mask_weight = num_##name##_cpus();		\
+		int cpu, iter = 0;				\
+		for_each_##name##_cpu(cpu)			\
+			iter++;					\
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ((test), mask_weight, iter);	\
+	} while (0)
+
+static cpumask_t mask_empty;
+static cpumask_t mask_all;
+
+static void test_cpumask_weight(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_empty(&mask_empty));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(cpu_possible_mask));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(&mask_all));
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_weight(&mask_empty));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpumask_bits, cpumask_weight(&mask_all));
+}
+
+static void test_cpumask_first(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_first(&mask_empty));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_first(cpu_possible_mask));
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_first_zero(&mask_empty));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_first_zero(cpu_possible_mask));
+}
+
+static void test_cpumask_last(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpumask_bits, cpumask_last(&mask_empty));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpumask_bits - 1, cpumask_last(cpu_possible_mask));
+}
+
+static void test_cpumask_next(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_next_zero(-1, &mask_empty));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_next_zero(-1, cpu_possible_mask));
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_next(-1, &mask_empty));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_next(-1, cpu_possible_mask));
+}
+
+static void test_cpumask_iterators(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_EQ(test, &mask_empty);
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_NOT_EQ(test, &mask_empty);
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_WRAP_EQ(test, &mask_empty);
+
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_EQ(test, cpu_possible_mask);
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_NOT_EQ(test, cpu_possible_mask);
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_WRAP_EQ(test, cpu_possible_mask);
+}
+
+static void test_cpumask_iterators_builtin(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_BUILTIN_EQ(test, possible);
+
+	/* Ensure the dynamic masks are stable while running the tests */
+	cpu_hotplug_disable();
+
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_BUILTIN_EQ(test, online);
+	EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_BUILTIN_EQ(test, present);
+
+	cpu_hotplug_enable();
+}
+
+static int test_cpumask_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	cpumask_clear(&mask_empty);
+	cpumask_setall(&mask_all);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case test_cpumask_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_weight),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_first),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_last),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_next),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_iterators),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_iterators_builtin),
+	{}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite test_cpumask_suite = {
+	.name = "cpumask",
+	.init = test_cpumask_init,
+	.test_cases = test_cpumask_cases,
+};
+kunit_test_suite(test_cpumask_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Signature · 1 line
2.36.1
#9 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] lib/test: Introduce cpumask KUnit test suite

Quoted 15 lines · Maíra Canal
Quoted 6 lines

Add a basic suite of tests for cpumask, providing some tests for empty and completely filled cpumasks.

The tests test_cpumask_weight and test_cpumask_last are failing on all architectures, as can be seen on [1]. Also this test doesn't follow the standard style for KUnit tests [2].

[1]
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20220718/testrun/10865066/suite/kunit/tests/
[2] https://docs.kernel.org/dev-tools/kunit/style.html

Quoted 6 lines
CC Brendan Higgins <[email protected]>
CC David Gow <[email protected]>

Best Regards,
- Maíra Canal

Hmm... this test passes on the default kunit_tool configs for UML and x86_64, which are all without SMP.

It looks like the flaw is that, if CONFIG_NR_CPUS is greater than the actual number of CPUs present, then the cpu_possible_mask (correctly) won't be full.

I'm not sure what the right fix is: but removing the checks for cpu_possible_mask being full is probably the way to go. Unless we want to plumb through some actual detail about the underlying system and check against that, it doesn't make sense. (Or, we could generate an artificial "possilbe_mask" which is always full, and test the cpu against that. But we sort-of already do that with mask_all anyway.)

So, my recommendation for a fix would be:
- Get rid of "KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(cpu_possible_mask));"
- Replace "KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpumask_bits - 1, cpumask_last(cpu_possible_mask));" with a KUNIT_EXPECT_GE()
- _Maybe_ add some debug logging with the cpumask value being checked, as it's a pain to tell from the expectation failure messages. e.g., kunit_info(test, "cpu_possible_mask = '%*pb[l]'\n", cpumask_pr_args(cpu_possible_mask));

Cheers,
-- David

Quoted 201 lines
Quoted 199 lines

---

Notes:
Changes since v3:
- Test for_each_cpu*() over empty mask and cpu_possible_mask
- Add Andy's Reviewed-by
- Use num_{online,present,possible}_cpus() for builtin masks
- Guard against CPU hotplugging during test for dynamic builtin CPU masks

Changes since v2:
- Rework for_each_* test macros, as suggested by Yury

Changes since v1:
- New patch

 lib/Kconfig.debug  |   9 +++
 lib/Makefile       |   1 +
 lib/test_cpumask.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 lib/test_cpumask.c
lib/Kconfig.debug +9 -0
index 2e24db4bff19..04aaa20d50f9 100644
@@ -2021,6 +2021,15 @@ config LKDTM
      Documentation on how to use the module can be found in
      Documentation/fault-injection/provoke-crashes.rst
 
+config TEST_CPUMASK
+     tristate "cpumask tests" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+     depends on KUNIT
+     default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+     help
+       Enable to turn on cpumask tests, running at boot or module load time.
+
+       If unsure, say N.
+
 config TEST_LIST_SORT
      tristate "Linked list sorting test" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
      depends on KUNIT
lib/Makefile +1 -0
index bcc7e8ea0cde..de3e47453fe8 100644
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_HMM) += test_hmm.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_FREE_PAGES) += test_free_pages.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_kprobes.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_REF_TRACKER) += test_ref_tracker.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_CPUMASK) += test_cpumask.o
 CFLAGS_test_fprobe.o += $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
 obj-$(CONFIG_FPROBE_SANITY_TEST) += test_fprobe.o
 #
lib/test_cpumask.c new file +138 -1
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a31a1622f1f6
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * KUnit tests for cpumask.
+ *
+ * Author: Sander Vanheule <[email protected]>
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+
+#define EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_EQ(test, mask)                   \
+     do {                                                    \
+             const cpumask_t *m = (mask);                    \
+             int mask_weight = cpumask_weight(m);            \
+             int cpu, iter = 0;                              \
+             for_each_cpu(cpu, m)                            \
+                     iter++;                                 \
+             KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ((test), mask_weight, iter);     \
+     } while (0)
+
+#define EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_NOT_EQ(test, mask)                                       \
+     do {                                                                    \
+             const cpumask_t *m = (mask);                                    \
+             int mask_weight = cpumask_weight(m);                            \
+             int cpu, iter = 0;                                              \
+             for_each_cpu_not(cpu, m)                                        \
+                     iter++;                                                 \
+             KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ((test), nr_cpu_ids - mask_weight, iter);        \
+     } while (0)
+
+#define EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_WRAP_EQ(test, mask)                      \
+     do {                                                    \
+             const cpumask_t *m = (mask);                    \
+             int mask_weight = cpumask_weight(m);            \
+             int cpu, iter = 0;                              \
+             for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, m, nr_cpu_ids / 2)       \
+                     iter++;                                 \
+             KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ((test), mask_weight, iter);     \
+     } while (0)
+
+#define EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_BUILTIN_EQ(test, name)           \
+     do {                                                    \
+             int mask_weight = num_##name##_cpus();          \
+             int cpu, iter = 0;                              \
+             for_each_##name##_cpu(cpu)                      \
+                     iter++;                                 \
+             KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ((test), mask_weight, iter);     \
+     } while (0)
+
+static cpumask_t mask_empty;
+static cpumask_t mask_all;
+
+static void test_cpumask_weight(struct kunit *test)
+{
+     KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_empty(&mask_empty));
+     KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(cpu_possible_mask));
+     KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(&mask_all));
+
+     KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_weight(&mask_empty));
+     KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask));
+     KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpumask_bits, cpumask_weight(&mask_all));
+}
+
+static void test_cpumask_first(struct kunit *test)
+{
+     KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_first(&mask_empty));
+     KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_first(cpu_possible_mask));
+
+     KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_first_zero(&mask_empty));
+     KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_first_zero(cpu_possible_mask));
+}
+
+static void test_cpumask_last(struct kunit *test)
+{
+     KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpumask_bits, cpumask_last(&mask_empty));
+     KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpumask_bits - 1, cpumask_last(cpu_possible_mask));
+}
+
+static void test_cpumask_next(struct kunit *test)
+{
+     KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_next_zero(-1, &mask_empty));
+     KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_next_zero(-1, cpu_possible_mask));
+
+     KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_next(-1, &mask_empty));
+     KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_next(-1, cpu_possible_mask));
+}
+
+static void test_cpumask_iterators(struct kunit *test)
+{
+     EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_EQ(test, &mask_empty);
+     EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_NOT_EQ(test, &mask_empty);
+     EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_WRAP_EQ(test, &mask_empty);
+
+     EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_EQ(test, cpu_possible_mask);
+     EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_NOT_EQ(test, cpu_possible_mask);
+     EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_WRAP_EQ(test, cpu_possible_mask);
+}
+
+static void test_cpumask_iterators_builtin(struct kunit *test)
+{
+     EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_BUILTIN_EQ(test, possible);
+
+     /* Ensure the dynamic masks are stable while running the tests */
+     cpu_hotplug_disable();
+
+     EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_BUILTIN_EQ(test, online);
+     EXPECT_FOR_EACH_CPU_BUILTIN_EQ(test, present);
+
+     cpu_hotplug_enable();
+}
+
+static int test_cpumask_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+     cpumask_clear(&mask_empty);
+     cpumask_setall(&mask_all);
+
+     return 0;
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case test_cpumask_cases[] = {
+     KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_weight),
+     KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_first),
+     KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_last),
+     KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_next),
+     KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_iterators),
+     KUNIT_CASE(test_cpumask_iterators_builtin),
+     {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite test_cpumask_suite = {
+     .name = "cpumask",
+     .init = test_cpumask_init,
+     .test_cases = test_cpumask_cases,
+};
+kunit_test_suite(test_cpumask_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
--

2.36.1

#10 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] lib/test: Introduce cpumask KUnit test suite

Hi David, Maíra,

Quoted 30 lines · David Gow
Quoted 15 lines · Maíra Canal
Quoted 6 lines

Add a basic suite of tests for cpumask, providing some tests for empty and completely filled cpumasks.

The tests test_cpumask_weight and test_cpumask_last are failing on all architectures, as can be seen on [1]. Also this test doesn't follow the standard style for KUnit tests [2].

[1]
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20220718/testrun/10865066/suite/kunit/tests/
[2] https://docs.kernel.org/dev-tools/kunit/style.html

Quoted 6 lines
CC Brendan Higgins <[email protected]>
CC David Gow <[email protected]>

Best Regards,
- Maíra Canal

Hmm... this test passes on the default kunit_tool configs for UML and x86_64, which are all without SMP.

It looks like the flaw is that, if CONFIG_NR_CPUS is greater than the actual number of CPUs present, then the cpu_possible_mask (correctly) won't be full.

Quoted 6 lines

I'm not sure what the right fix is: but removing the checks for cpu_possible_mask being full is probably the way to go. Unless we want to plumb through some actual detail about the underlying system and check against that, it doesn't make sense. (Or, we could generate an artificial "possilbe_mask" which is always full, and test the cpu against that. But we sort-of already do that with mask_all anyway.)

The description of cpu_possible_mask does indeed allow for it to not be filled completely.

Quoted 3 lines

So, my recommendation for a fix would be:
- Get rid of "KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(cpu_possible_mask));"

As per the above, I'll remove this (faulty) check.

Quoted 2 lines

- Replace "KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpumask_bits - 1, cpumask_last(cpu_possible_mask));" with a KUNIT_EXPECT_GE()

I think we can actually use KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpu_ids - 1, ...) here.

Since cpumask_first() on the same mask must return at most nr_cpu_ids - 1 for a valid result, cpumask_last() cannot return anything larger than this value. This implies that cpu_possible_mask cannot contain gaps if its weight equals nr_cpu_ids (which is checked in test_cpumask_weight).

Quoted 4 lines

- _Maybe_ add some debug logging with the cpumask value being checked, as it's a pain to tell from the expectation failure messages. e.g., kunit_info(test, "cpu_possible_mask = '%*pb[l]'\n", cpumask_pr_args(cpu_possible_mask));

That would be a useful addition, I'll see where I can add it.

Best,
Sander

Quoted 1 line
#11 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] lib/test: Introduce cpumask KUnit test suite

In reply to Maíra Canal

Hi,

Quoted 6 lines · Maíra Canal
Quoted 5 lines

Add a basic suite of tests for cpumask, providing some tests for empty and completely filled cpumasks.

Quoted 7 lines

The tests test_cpumask_weight and test_cpumask_last are failing on all architectures, as can be seen on [1]. Also this test doesn't follow the standard style for KUnit tests [2].

[1]
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20220718/testrun/10865066/suite/kunit/tests/
[2] https://docs.kernel.org/dev-tools/kunit/style.html

Thanks for the feedback, I wasn't aware of the style guidelines. See my reply to David's message for the issues with the cpu_possible_mask tests.

Andrew, would you like me to resubmit the entire series, or can I just send a new version of this patch?

Best,
Sander