Handle FW failures to destroy QP/RQ objects
Subsystems (5)
cover Handle FW failures to destroy QP/RQ objects
From: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Changelog:
v1:
* Dropped EQ changes
v0: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
This series from Patrisious extends mlx5 driver to convey FW failures back to the upper layers and allow retry to delete these hardware resources.
Thanks
Patrisious Haddad (3):
net/mlx5: Nullify qp->dbg pointer post destruction RDMA/mlx5: Handling dct common resource destruction upon firmware
failure
RDMA/mlx5: Return the firmware result upon destroying QP/RQ
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/qpc.c | 13 +++++++------ drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/debugfs.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.39.2
PATCH 1/3 net/mlx5: Nullify qp->dbg pointer post destruction
From: Patrisious Haddad <[email protected]>
Nullifying qp->dbg is a preparation for the next patches from the series in which mlx5_core_destroy_qp() could actually fail, and then it can be called again which causes a kernel crash, since qp->dbg was not nullified in previous call.
--- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/debugfs.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/debugfs.c +3 -3
@@ -513,11 +513,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mlx5_debug_qp_add);void mlx5_debug_qp_remove (struct mlx5_core_dev *dev,struct mlx5_core_qp *qp) { -if (!mlx5_debugfs_root) +if (!mlx5_debugfs_root || !qp->dbg)return ; -if (qp->dbg) -rem_res_tree (qp->dbg); +rem_res_tree (qp->dbg); + qp->dbg =NULL ; }EXPORT_SYMBOL (mlx5_debug_qp_remove);
Signature · 1 line
2.39.2
PATCH 2/3 RDMA/mlx5: Handling dct common resource destruction upon firmware failure
In reply to Leon RomanovskyFrom: Patrisious Haddad <[email protected]>
Previously when destroying a DCT, if the firmware function for the destruction failed, the common resource would have been destroyed either way, since it was destroyed before the firmware object. Which leads to kernel warning "refcount_t: underflow" which indicates possible use-after-free.
Which is triggered when we try to destroy the common resource for the second time and execute refcount_dec_and_test(&common->refcount).
So, currently before destroying the common resource we check its refcount and continue with the destruction only if it isn't zero.
refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 1002 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0xd8/0xe0 Modules linked in: xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xt_addrtype iptable_nat nf_nat br_netfilter rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ib_umad rdma_cm ib_ipoib iw_cm ib_cm mlx5_ib ib_uverbs ib_core overlay mlx5_core fuse CPU: 8 PID: 1002 Comm: python3 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc5+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xd8/0xe0 Code: ff 48 c7 c7 18 f5 23 82 c6 05 60 70 ff 00 01 e8 d0 0a 45 00 0f 0b c3 48 c7 c7 c0 f4 23 82 c6 05 4c 70 ff 00 01 e8 ba 0a 45 00 <0f> 0b c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 8b 07 3d 00 00 00 c0 74 12 83 f8 01 74 13 RSP: 0018:ffff8881221d3aa8 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881313e8d40 RCX: ffff88852cc1b5c8 RDX: 00000000ffffffd8 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff88852cc1b5c0 RBP: ffff888100f70000 R08: ffff88853ffd1ba8 R09: 0000000000000003 R10: 00000000fffff000 R11: 3fffffffffffffff R12: 0000000000000246 R13: ffff888100f71fa0 R14: ffff8881221d3c68 R15: 0000000000000020 FS: 00007efebbb13740(0000) GS:ffff88852cc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005611aac29f80 CR3: 00000001313de004 CR4: 0000000000370ea0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> destroy_resource_common+0x6e/0x95 [mlx5_ib] mlx5_core_destroy_rq_tracked+0x38/0xbe [mlx5_ib] mlx5_ib_destroy_wq+0x22/0x80 [mlx5_ib] ib_destroy_wq_user+0x1f/0x40 [ib_core] uverbs_free_wq+0x19/0x40 [ib_uverbs] destroy_hw_idr_uobject+0x18/0x50 [ib_uverbs] uverbs_destroy_uobject+0x2f/0x190 [ib_uverbs] uobj_destroy+0x3c/0x80 [ib_uverbs] ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs+0x3e4/0xb80 [ib_uverbs] ? uverbs_free_wq+0x40/0x40 [ib_uverbs] ? ip_list_rcv+0xf7/0x120 ? netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1b6/0x2d0 ? task_tick_fair+0xbf/0x450 ? __handle_mm_fault+0x11fc/0x1450 ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xa4/0x110 [ib_uverbs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x3e4/0x8e0 ? handle_mm_fault+0xb9/0x210 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7efebc0be17b Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 1d ad 0c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d ed ac 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffe71813e78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe71813fb8 RCX: 00007efebc0be17b RDX: 00007ffe71813fa0 RSI: 00000000c0181b01 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007ffe71813f80 R08: 00005611aae96020 R09: 000000000000004f R10: 00007efebbf9ffa0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffe71813f80 R13: 00007ffe71813f4c R14: 00005611aae2eca0 R15: 00007efeae6c89d0 </TASK>
--- drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/qpc.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/qpc.c +3 -0
@@ -179,6 +179,9 @@ static void destroy_resource_common(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,struct mlx5_qp_table *table = &dev->qp_table;unsigned long flags; +if (refcount_read (&qp->common.refcount) ==0 ) +return ; +spin_lock_irqsave (&table->lock, flags);radix_tree_delete (&table->tree, qp->qpn | (qp->common.res <<MLX5_USER_INDEX_LEN ));
Signature · 1 line
2.39.2
Jason Gunthorpe
maintainerRe: [PATCH rdma-next v1 2/3] RDMA/mlx5: Handling dct common resource destruction upon firmware failure
Quoted 10 lines · Leon Romanovsky
From: Patrisious Haddad <[email protected]>
Previously when destroying a DCT, if the firmware function for the destruction failed, the common resource would have been destroyed either way, since it was destroyed before the firmware object. Which leads to kernel warning "
refcount_t: underflow" which indicates possible use-after-free.
Which is triggered when we try to destroy the common resource for the second time and executerefcount_dec_and_test(&common->refcount).
Quoted 2 lines
So, currently before destroying the common resource we check its refcount and continue with the destruction only if it isn't zero.
This seems super sketchy
If the destruction fails why not set the refcount back to 1?
Jason
Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 2/3] RDMA/mlx5: Handling dct common resource destruction upon firmware failure
Quoted 11 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 10 lines · Leon Romanovsky
From: Patrisious Haddad <[email protected]>
Previously when destroying a DCT, if the firmware function for the destruction failed, the common resource would have been destroyed either way, since it was destroyed before the firmware object. Which leads to kernel warning "
refcount_t: underflow" which indicates possible use-after-free.
Which is triggered when we try to destroy the common resource for the second time and executerefcount_dec_and_test(&common->refcount).
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
So, currently before destroying the common resource we check its refcount and continue with the destruction only if it isn't zero.
This seems super sketchy
If the destruction fails why not set the refcount back to 1?
Because destruction will fail in destroy_rq_tracked() which is after destroy_resource_common().
In first destruction attempt, we delete qp from radix tree and wait for all reference to drop. In order do not undo all this logic (setting 1 alone is not enough), it is much safer simply skip destroy_resource_common() in reentry case.
Failure to delete means that something external to kernel holds reference to that QP, but it is safe to delete from kernel as nothing in kernel can use it after call to destroy_resource_common().
Thanks
Quoted 2 lines
Jason
Jason Gunthorpe
maintainerRe: [PATCH rdma-next v1 2/3] RDMA/mlx5: Handling dct common resource destruction upon firmware failure
Quoted 19 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Quoted 11 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 10 lines · Leon Romanovsky
From: Patrisious Haddad <[email protected]>
Previously when destroying a DCT, if the firmware function for the destruction failed, the common resource would have been destroyed either way, since it was destroyed before the firmware object. Which leads to kernel warning "
refcount_t: underflow" which indicates possible use-after-free.
Which is triggered when we try to destroy the common resource for the second time and executerefcount_dec_and_test(&common->refcount).Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
So, currently before destroying the common resource we check its refcount and continue with the destruction only if it isn't zero.
This seems super sketchy
If the destruction fails why not set the refcount back to 1?
Quoted 7 lines
Because destruction will fail in
destroy_rq_tracked()which is afterdestroy_resource_common().In first destruction attempt, we delete qp from radix tree and wait for all reference to drop. In order do not undo all this logic (setting 1 alone is not enough), it is much safer simply skip
destroy_resource_common()in reentry case.
This is the bug I pointed a long time ago, it is ordered wrong to remove restrack before destruction is assured
Jason
Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 2/3] RDMA/mlx5: Handling dct common resource destruction upon firmware failure
Quoted 23 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 22 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Quoted 11 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 10 lines · Leon Romanovsky
From: Patrisious Haddad <[email protected]>
Previously when destroying a DCT, if the firmware function for the destruction failed, the common resource would have been destroyed either way, since it was destroyed before the firmware object. Which leads to kernel warning "
refcount_t: underflow" which indicates possible use-after-free.
Which is triggered when we try to destroy the common resource for the second time and executerefcount_dec_and_test(&common->refcount).Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
So, currently before destroying the common resource we check its refcount and continue with the destruction only if it isn't zero.
This seems super sketchy
If the destruction fails why not set the refcount back to 1?
Because destruction will fail in
destroy_rq_tracked()which is afterdestroy_resource_common().
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
In first destruction attempt, we delete qp from radix tree and wait for all reference to drop. In order do not undo all this logic (setting 1 alone is not enough), it is much safer simply skip
destroy_resource_common()in reentry case.This is the bug I pointed a long time ago, it is ordered wrong to remove restrack before destruction is assured
It is not restrack, but internal to mlx5_core structure.
176 static void destroy_resource_common(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,
177 struct mlx5_core_qp *qp)
178 {
179 struct mlx5_qp_table *table = &dev->qp_table;
180 unsigned long flags;
181....
185 spin_lock_irqsave(&table->lock, flags); 186 radix_tree_delete(&table->tree, 187 qp->qpn | (qp->common.res << MLX5_USER_INDEX_LEN)); 188 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&table->lock, flags); 189 mlx5_core_put_rsc((struct mlx5_core_rsc_common *)qp); 190 wait_for_completion(&qp->common.free); 191 }
Quoted 2 lines
Jason
Jason Gunthorpe
maintainerRe: [PATCH rdma-next v1 2/3] RDMA/mlx5: Handling dct common resource destruction upon firmware failure
Quoted 43 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Quoted 23 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 22 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Quoted 11 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 10 lines · Leon Romanovsky
From: Patrisious Haddad <[email protected]>
Previously when destroying a DCT, if the firmware function for the destruction failed, the common resource would have been destroyed either way, since it was destroyed before the firmware object. Which leads to kernel warning "
refcount_t: underflow" which indicates possible use-after-free.
Which is triggered when we try to destroy the common resource for the second time and executerefcount_dec_and_test(&common->refcount).Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
So, currently before destroying the common resource we check its refcount and continue with the destruction only if it isn't zero.
This seems super sketchy
If the destruction fails why not set the refcount back to 1?
Because destruction will fail in
destroy_rq_tracked()which is afterdestroy_resource_common().Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
In first destruction attempt, we delete qp from radix tree and wait for all reference to drop. In order do not undo all this logic (setting 1 alone is not enough), it is much safer simply skip
destroy_resource_common()in reentry case.This is the bug I pointed a long time ago, it is ordered wrong to remove restrack before destruction is assured
It is not restrack, but internal to
mlx5_corestructure.176 static void destroy_resource_common(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, 177 struct mlx5_core_qp *qp) 178 { 179 struct mlx5_qp_table *table = &dev->qp_table; 180 unsigned long flags; 181....
Quoted 7 lines
185 spin_lock_irqsave(&table->lock, flags); 186 radix_tree_delete(&table->tree, 187 qp->qpn | (qp->common.res << MLX5_USER_INDEX_LEN)); 188 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&table->lock, flags); 189 mlx5_core_put_rsc((struct mlx5_core_rsc_common *)qp); 190 wait_for_completion(&qp->common.free); 191 }
Same basic issue.
"RSC"'s refcount stuff is really only for ODP to use, and the silly pseudo locking should really just be rwsem not a refcount.
Get DCT out of that particular mess and the scheme is quite simple and doesn't nee hacky stuff.
Please make a patch to remove radix tree from this code too...
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/qpc.c +28 -22
@@ -88,23 +88,34 @@ static bool is_event_type_allowed(int rsc_type, int event_type) } } +static int dct_event_notifier (struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,struct mlx5_eqe *eqe) +{ +struct mlx5_core_dct *dct; +u32 qpn; + + qpn =be32_to_cpu (eqe->data.dct.dctn) &0xffffff ; +xa_lock (&dev->qp_table.dct_xa); + dct =xa_load (&dev->qp_table.dct_xa, qpn); +if (dct) +complete (&dct->drained); +xa_unlock (&dev->qp_table.dct_xa); +return NOTIFY_OK ; +} +static int rsc_event_notifier (struct notifier_block *nb,unsigned long type,void *data) { +struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev = + container_of(nb, struct mlx5_ib_dev, qp_table.nb);struct mlx5_core_rsc_common *common; -struct mlx5_qp_table *table; -struct mlx5_core_dct *dct; +struct mlx5_eqe *eqe = data;u8 event_type = (u8 )type;struct mlx5_core_qp *qp; -struct mlx5_eqe *eqe;u32 rsn;switch (event_type) {case MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_DCT_DRAINED : - eqe = data; - rsn =be32_to_cpu (eqe->data.dct.dctn) &0xffffff ; - rsn |= (MLX5_RES_DCT <<MLX5_USER_INDEX_LEN ); -break ; +return dct_event_notifier (dev, eqe);case MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_PATH_MIG :case MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_COMM_EST :case MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_SQ_DRAINED :
@@ -113,7 +124,6 @@ static int rsc_event_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,case MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_PATH_MIG_FAILED :case MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_WQ_INVAL_REQ_ERROR :case MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_WQ_ACCESS_ERROR : - eqe = data; rsn =be32_to_cpu (eqe->data.qp_srq.qp_srq_n) &0xffffff ; rsn |= (eqe->data.qp_srq.type <<MLX5_USER_INDEX_LEN );break ;
@@ -121,8 +131,7 @@ static int rsc_event_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,return NOTIFY_DONE ; } - table = container_of(nb, struct mlx5_qp_table, nb); - common =mlx5_get_rsc (table, rsn); + common =mlx5_get_rsc (&dev->qp_table, rsn);if (!common)return NOTIFY_OK ;
@@ -137,11 +146,6 @@ static int rsc_event_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, qp->event (qp, event_type);/* Need to put resource in event handler */ return NOTIFY_OK ; -case MLX5_RES_DCT : - dct = (struct mlx5_core_dct *)common; -if (event_type ==MLX5_EVENT_TYPE_DCT_DRAINED ) -complete (&dct->drained); -break ;default :break ; }
@@ -188,7 +192,7 @@ static void destroy_resource_common(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, }static int _mlx5_core_destroy_dct (struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, -struct mlx5_core_dct *dct,bool need_cleanup) +struct mlx5_core_dct *dct) {u32 in[MLX5_ST_SZ_DW (destroy_dct_in)] = {};struct mlx5_core_qp *qp = &dct->mqp;
@@ -203,13 +207,14 @@ static int _mlx5_core_destroy_dct(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, }wait_for_completion (&dct->drained); destroy: -if (need_cleanup) -destroy_resource_common (dev, &dct->mqp);MLX5_SET (destroy_dct_in, in, opcode,MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_DCT );MLX5_SET (destroy_dct_in, in, dctn, qp->qpn);MLX5_SET (destroy_dct_in, in, uid, qp->uid); err =mlx5_cmd_exec_in (dev->mdev, destroy_dct, in); -return err; +if (err) +return err; +xa_cmpxchg (&dev->qp_table.dct_xa, dct->mqp.qpn, dct,NULL ,GFP_KERNEL ); +return 0 ; } int mlx5_core_create_dct(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, struct mlx5_core_dct *dct,
@@ -227,13 +232,13 @@ int mlx5_core_create_dct(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, struct mlx5_core_dct *dct, qp->qpn =MLX5_GET (create_dct_out, out, dctn); qp->uid =MLX5_GET (create_dct_in, in, uid); - err =create_resource_common (dev, qp,MLX5_RES_DCT ); + err =xa_err (xa_store (&dev->qp_table.dct_xa, qp->qpn, dct,GFP_KERNEL ));if (err) goto err_cmd;return 0 ; err_cmd: -_mlx5_core_destroy_dct (dev, dct, false); +_mlx5_core_destroy_dct (dev, dct);return err; }
@@ -284,7 +289,7 @@ static int mlx5_core_drain_dct(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,int mlx5_core_destroy_dct (struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,struct mlx5_core_dct *dct) { -return _mlx5_core_destroy_dct (dev, dct, true); +return _mlx5_core_destroy_dct (dev, dct); }int mlx5_core_destroy_qp (struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,struct mlx5_core_qp *qp)
@@ -488,6 +493,7 @@ int mlx5_init_qp_table(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev)spin_lock_init (&table->lock);INIT_RADIX_TREE (&table->tree,GFP_ATOMIC ); +xa_init (&table->dct_xa);mlx5_qp_debugfs_init (dev->mdev); table->nb.notifier_call = rsc_event_notifier;
include/linux/mlx5/driver.h +1 -1
@@ -381,7 +381,6 @@ enum mlx5_res_type {MLX5_RES_SRQ =3 ,MLX5_RES_XSRQ =4 , MLX5_RES_XRQ = 5, - MLX5_RES_DCT = MLX5_EVENT_QUEUE_TYPE_DCT, }; struct mlx5_core_rsc_common {
@@ -443,6 +442,7 @@ struct mlx5_core_health {struct mlx5_qp_table {struct notifier_block nb; +struct xarray dct_xa;/* protect radix tree */
Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 2/3] RDMA/mlx5: Handling dct common resource destruction upon firmware failure
Quoted 54 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 43 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Quoted 23 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 22 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Quoted 11 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 10 lines · Leon Romanovsky
From: Patrisious Haddad <[email protected]>
Previously when destroying a DCT, if the firmware function for the destruction failed, the common resource would have been destroyed either way, since it was destroyed before the firmware object. Which leads to kernel warning "
refcount_t: underflow" which indicates possible use-after-free.
Which is triggered when we try to destroy the common resource for the second time and executerefcount_dec_and_test(&common->refcount).Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
So, currently before destroying the common resource we check its refcount and continue with the destruction only if it isn't zero.
This seems super sketchy
If the destruction fails why not set the refcount back to 1?
Because destruction will fail in
destroy_rq_tracked()which is afterdestroy_resource_common().Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
In first destruction attempt, we delete qp from radix tree and wait for all reference to drop. In order do not undo all this logic (setting 1 alone is not enough), it is much safer simply skip
destroy_resource_common()in reentry case.This is the bug I pointed a long time ago, it is ordered wrong to remove restrack before destruction is assured
It is not restrack, but internal to
mlx5_corestructure.176 static void destroy_resource_common(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, 177 struct mlx5_core_qp *qp) 178 { 179 struct mlx5_qp_table *table = &dev->qp_table; 180 unsigned long flags; 181....
Quoted 7 lines
185 spin_lock_irqsave(&table->lock, flags); 186 radix_tree_delete(&table->tree, 187 qp->qpn | (qp->common.res << MLX5_USER_INDEX_LEN)); 188 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&table->lock, flags); 189 mlx5_core_put_rsc((struct mlx5_core_rsc_common *)qp); 190 wait_for_completion(&qp->common.free); 191 }Same basic issue.
Quoted 7 lines
"RSC"'s refcount stuff is really only for ODP to use, and the silly pseudo locking should really just be rwsem not a refcount.
Get DCT out of that particular mess and the scheme is quite simple and doesn't nee hacky stuff.
Please make a patch to remove radix tree from this code too...
ok, I'll take a look.
Thanks
PATCH 3/3 RDMA/mlx5: Return the firmware result upon destroying QP/RQ
In reply to Leon RomanovskyFrom: Patrisious Haddad <[email protected]>
Previously when destroying a QP/RQ, the result of the firmware destruction function was ignored and upper layers weren't informed about the failure.
Which in turn could lead to various problems since when upper layer isn't aware of the failure it continues its operation thinking that the related QP/RQ was successfully destroyed while it actually wasn't, which could lead to the below kernel WARN.
Currently, we return the correct firmware destruction status to upper layers which in case of the RQ would be mlx5_ib_destroy_wq() which was already capable of handling RQ destruction failure or in case of a QP to destroy_qp_common(), which now would actually warn upon qp destruction failure.
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 995 at drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c:940 uverbs_destroy_ufile_hw+0xcb/0xe0 [ib_uverbs] Modules linked in: xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xt_addrtype iptable_nat nf_nat br_netfilter rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi rdma_cm ib_umad ib_ipoib iw_cm ib_cm mlx5_ib ib_uverbs ib_core overlay mlx5_core fuse CPU: 3 PID: 995 Comm: python3 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc5+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:uverbs_destroy_ufile_hw+0xcb/0xe0 [ib_uverbs] Code: 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e e9 44 34 f0 e0 48 89 df e8 4c 77 ff ff 49 8b 86 10 01 00 00 48 85 c0 74 a1 4c 89 e7 ff d0 eb 9a 0f 0b eb c1 <0f> 0b be 04 00 00 00 48 89 df e8 b6 f6 ff ff e9 75 ff ff ff 90 0f RSP: 0018:ffff8881533e3e78 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: ffff88811b2cf3e0 RBX: ffff888106209700 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff888106209780 RSI: ffff8881533e3d30 RDI: ffff888109b101a0 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffff888127cb381c R09: 0de9890000000009 R10: ffff888127cb3800 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff888106209780 R13: ffff888106209750 R14: ffff888100f20660 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f8be353b740(0000) GS:ffff88852c980000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f8bd5b117c0 CR3: 000000012cd8a004 CR4: 0000000000370ea0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ib_uverbs_close+0x1a/0x90 [ib_uverbs] __fput+0x82/0x230 task_work_run+0x59/0x90 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x138/0x140 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x50 ? __x64_sys_close+0xe/0x40 do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f8be3ae0abb Code: 03 00 00 00 0f 05 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 41 c3 48 83 ec 18 89 7c 24 0c e8 83 43 f9 ff 8b 7c 24 0c 41 89 c0 b8 03 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 35 44 89 c7 89 44 24 0c e8 c1 43 f9 ff 8b 44 RSP: 002b:00007ffdb51909c0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000003 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000557bb7f7c020 RCX: 00007f8be3ae0abb RDX: 0000557bb7c74010 RSI: 0000557bb7f14ca0 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 0000557bb7fbd598 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000557bb7fbd5b8 R13: 0000557bb7fbd5a8 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: 0000557bb7f7c020 </TASK>
--- drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/qpc.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/qpc.c +4 -6
@@ -301,8 +301,7 @@ int mlx5_core_destroy_qp(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, struct mlx5_core_qp *qp)MLX5_SET (destroy_qp_in, in, opcode,MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_QP );MLX5_SET (destroy_qp_in, in, qpn, qp->qpn);MLX5_SET (destroy_qp_in, in, uid, qp->uid); -mlx5_cmd_exec_in (dev->mdev, destroy_qp, in); -return 0 ; +return mlx5_cmd_exec_in (dev->mdev, destroy_qp, in); } int mlx5_core_set_delay_drop(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,
@@ -554,14 +553,14 @@ int mlx5_core_xrcd_dealloc(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, u32 xrcdn)return mlx5_cmd_exec_in (dev->mdev, dealloc_xrcd, in); } -static void destroy_rq_tracked (struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,u32 rqn,u16 uid) +static int destroy_rq_tracked (struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,u32 rqn,u16 uid) {u32 in[MLX5_ST_SZ_DW (destroy_rq_in)] = {};MLX5_SET (destroy_rq_in, in, opcode,MLX5_CMD_OP_DESTROY_RQ );MLX5_SET (destroy_rq_in, in, rqn, rqn);MLX5_SET (destroy_rq_in, in, uid, uid); -mlx5_cmd_exec_in (dev->mdev, destroy_rq, in); +return mlx5_cmd_exec_in (dev->mdev, destroy_rq, in); } int mlx5_core_create_rq_tracked(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, u32 *in, int inlen,
@@ -592,8 +591,7 @@ int mlx5_core_destroy_rq_tracked(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, struct mlx5_core_qp *rq) {destroy_resource_common (dev, rq); -destroy_rq_tracked (dev, rq->qpn, rq->uid); -return 0 ; +return destroy_rq_tracked (dev, rq->qpn, rq->uid); }static void destroy_sq_tracked (struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,u32 sqn,u16 uid)
Signature · 1 line
2.39.2