Support UDP encapsulation in packet offload mode
Subsystems (6)
cover Support UDP encapsulation in packet offload mode
From: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Hi,
As was raised by Ilia in this thread [1], the ESP over UDP feature is supported in packet offload mode. So comes this series, which adds relevant bits to the mlx5 driver and opens XFRM core code to accept such configuration.
NAT-T is part of IKEv2 and strongswan uses it automatically [2].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
[2] https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/1/wiki/NatTraversal
Leon Romanovsky (4):
net/mlx5: Add relevant capabilities bits to support NAT-T net/mlx5e: Check for IPsec NAT-T support net/mlx5e: Support IPsec NAT-T functionality
xfrm: Support UDP encapsulation in packet offload mode
.../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c | 27 +++++++- .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h | 12 +++- .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.c | 61 ++++++++++++++----- .../mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_offload.c | 6 ++ include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h | 7 ++- net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 13 ++-- 6 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.41.0
PATCH 1/4 net/mlx5: Add relevant capabilities bits to support NAT-T
From: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Provide an ability to check if flow steering supports UDP encapsulation and decapsulation of IPsec ESP packets.
--- include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h +5 -2
@@ -464,10 +464,10 @@ struct mlx5_ifc_flow_table_prop_layout_bits {u8 reformat_add_esp_trasport[0x1 ];u8 reformat_l2_to_l3_esp_tunnel[0x1 ]; -u8 reserved_at_42[0x1 ]; +u8 reformat_add_esp_transport_over_udp[0x1 ];u8 reformat_del_esp_trasport[0x1 ];u8 reformat_l3_esp_tunnel_to_l2[0x1 ]; -u8 reserved_at_45[0x1 ]; +u8 reformat_del_esp_transport_over_udp[0x1 ];u8 execute_aso[0x1 ];u8 reserved_at_47[0x19 ];
@@ -6665,9 +6665,12 @@ enum mlx5_reformat_ctx_type {MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_L2_TO_L3_TUNNEL =0x4 ,MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_ADD_ESP_TRANSPORT_OVER_IPV4 =0x5 ,MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_L2_TO_L3_ESP_TUNNEL =0x6 , +MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_ADD_ESP_TRANSPORT_OVER_UDPV4 =0x7 ,MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_DEL_ESP_TRANSPORT =0x8 ,MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_L3_ESP_TUNNEL_TO_L2 =0x9 , +MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_DEL_ESP_TRANSPORT_OVER_UDP =0xa ,MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_ADD_ESP_TRANSPORT_OVER_IPV6 =0xb , +MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_ADD_ESP_TRANSPORT_OVER_UDPV6 =0xc ,MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_INSERT_HDR =0xf ,MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_REMOVE_HDR =0x10 , MLX5_REFORMAT_TYPE_ADD_MACSEC = 0x11,
Signature · 1 line
2.41.0
PATCH 2/4 net/mlx5e: Check for IPsec NAT-T support
In reply to Leon RomanovskyFrom: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Set relevant IPsec capability to indicate if flow steering supports UDP encapsulation and decapsulation of IPsec ESP packets.
--- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h | 1 + .../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_offload.c | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h +1 -0
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ enum mlx5_ipsec_cap {MLX5_IPSEC_CAP_ROCE =1 <<3 ,MLX5_IPSEC_CAP_PRIO =1 <<4 ,MLX5_IPSEC_CAP_TUNNEL =1 <<5 , + MLX5_IPSEC_CAP_ESPINUDP = 1 << 6, };struct mlx5e_priv ;
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_offload.c +6 -0
@@ -54,6 +54,12 @@ u32 mlx5_ipsec_device_caps(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev) MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_NIC_RX(mdev, reformat_l3_esp_tunnel_to_l2)) caps |=MLX5_IPSEC_CAP_TUNNEL ; + +if (MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_NIC_TX (mdev, + reformat_add_esp_transport_over_udp) && +MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_NIC_RX (mdev, + reformat_del_esp_transport_over_udp)) + caps |=MLX5_IPSEC_CAP_ESPINUDP ; } if (mlx5_get_roce_state(mdev) &&
Signature · 1 line
2.41.0
PATCH 3/4 net/mlx5e: Support IPsec NAT-T functionality
In reply to Leon RomanovskyFrom: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Extend mlx5 IPsec packet offload to support UDP encapsulation of IPsec ESP packets.
--- .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c | 27 +++++++- .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h | 11 +++- .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.c | 61 ++++++++++++++----- 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c +25 -2
@@ -354,6 +354,12 @@ void mlx5e_ipsec_build_accel_xfrm_attrs(struct mlx5e_ipsec_sa_entry *sa_entry,mlx5e_ipsec_init_limits (sa_entry, attrs);mlx5e_ipsec_init_macs (sa_entry, attrs); + +if (x->encap) { + attrs->encap = true; + attrs->sport = x->encap->encap_sport; + attrs->dport = x->encap->encap_dport; + } } static int mlx5e_xfrm_validate_state(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev,
@@ -387,8 +393,25 @@ static int mlx5e_xfrm_validate_state(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev,return -EINVAL ; }if (x->encap) { -NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD (extack,"Encapsulated xfrm state may not be offloaded" ); -return -EINVAL ; +if (!(mlx5_ipsec_device_caps (mdev) &MLX5_IPSEC_CAP_ESPINUDP )) { +NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD (extack,"Encapsulation is not supported" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + +if (x->encap->encap_type !=UDP_ENCAP_ESPINUDP ) { +NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD (extack,"Encapsulation other than UDP is not supported" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + +if (x->xso.type !=XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_PACKET ) { +NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD (extack,"Encapsulation is supported in packet offload mode only" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + +if (x->props.mode !=XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT ) { +NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD (extack,"Encapsulation is supported in transport mode only" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } }if (!x->aead) {NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD (extack,"Cannot offload xfrm states without aead" );
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h +9 -2
@@ -94,13 +94,20 @@ struct mlx5_accel_esp_xfrm_attrs { u8 dir : 2; u8 type : 2; u8 drop : 1; + u8 encap : 1;u8 family;struct mlx5_replay_esn replay_esn;u32 authsize;u32 reqid;struct mlx5_ipsec_lft lft; -u8 smac[ETH_ALEN ]; -u8 dmac[ETH_ALEN ]; +union { +u8 smac[ETH_ALEN ]; +__be16 sport; + }; +union { +u8 dmac[ETH_ALEN ]; +__be16 dport; + }; };enum mlx5_ipsec_cap {
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.c +47 -14
84 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.41.0
PATCH 4/4 xfrm: Support UDP encapsulation in packet offload mode
In reply to Leon RomanovskyFrom: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Since mlx5 supports UDP encapsulation in packet offload, change the XFRM core to allow users to configure it.
--- net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c +7 -6
@@ -247,12 +247,6 @@ int xfrm_dev_state_add(struct net *net, struct xfrm_state *x,return -EINVAL ; } -/* We don't yet support UDP encapsulation and TFC padding. */ -if (x->encap || x->tfcpad) { -NL_SET_ERR_MSG (extack,"Encapsulation and TFC padding can't be offloaded" ); -return -EINVAL ; - } -if (xuo->flags & ~(XFRM_OFFLOAD_IPV6 |XFRM_OFFLOAD_INBOUND |XFRM_OFFLOAD_PACKET )) {NL_SET_ERR_MSG (extack,"Unrecognized flags in offload request" );
@@ -260,6 +254,13 @@ int xfrm_dev_state_add(struct net *net, struct xfrm_state *x, } is_packet_offload = xuo->flags &XFRM_OFFLOAD_PACKET ; + +/* We don't yet support UDP encapsulation and TFC padding. */ +if ((!is_packet_offload && x->encap) || x->tfcpad) { +NL_SET_ERR_MSG (extack,"Encapsulation and TFC padding can't be offloaded" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + dev =dev_get_by_index (net, xuo->ifindex);if (!dev) {if (!(xuo->flags &XFRM_OFFLOAD_INBOUND )) {
Signature · 1 line
2.41.0
Jakub Kicinski
maintainerRe: [PATCH net-next 4/4] xfrm: Support UDP encapsulation in packet offload mode
Quoted 6 lines · On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 12:26:56 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
From: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Since mlx5 supports UDP encapsulation in packet offload, change the XFRM core to allow users to configure it.
Signed-off-by Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Steffen, any opinion on this one? Would you like to take the whole series?
Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] xfrm: Support UDP encapsulation in packet offload mode
Quoted 9 lines · Jakub Kicinski
Quoted 6 lines · On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 12:26:56 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
From: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Since mlx5 supports UDP encapsulation in packet offload, change the XFRM core to allow users to configure it.
Signed-off-by Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>Steffen, any opinion on this one? Would you like to take the whole series?
The xfrm changes are quite trivial compared to the driver changes. So it will likely create less conflicts if you take it directly.
In case you want to do that:
Otherwise I can take it of course.
Paolo Abeni
maintainerRe: [PATCH net-next 4/4] xfrm: Support UDP encapsulation in packet offload mode
Quoted 9 lines · Steffen Klassert
Quoted 8 lines · Jakub Kicinski
Quoted 6 lines · On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 12:26:56 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
From: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Since mlx5 supports UDP encapsulation in packet offload, change the XFRM core to allow users to configure it.
Signed-off-by Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Steffen, any opinion on this one? Would you like to take the whole series?
The xfrm changes are quite trivial compared to the driver changes. So it will likely create less conflicts if you take it directly.
In case you want to do that:
Acked-by Steffen Klassert <[email protected]>
Sounds good to me! I'm reviving the series in PW and applying it.
Thanks,
Paolo
Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] xfrm: Support UDP encapsulation in packet offload mode
Quoted 12 lines · Paolo Abeni
Quoted 11 lines · Steffen Klassert
Quoted 9 lines · Jakub Kicinski
Quoted 6 lines · On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 12:26:56 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
From: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Since mlx5 supports UDP encapsulation in packet offload, change the XFRM core to allow users to configure it.
Signed-off-by Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>Steffen, any opinion on this one? Would you like to take the whole series?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
The xfrm changes are quite trivial compared to the driver changes. So it will likely create less conflicts if you take it directly.
In case you want to do that:
Acked-by Steffen Klassert <[email protected]>Sounds good to me! I'm reviving the series in PW and applying it.
Thanks a lot.
Quoted 5 lines
Thanks,
Paolo
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>:
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>:
Quoted 10 lines · On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 12:26:52 +0300 you wrote:
From: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Hi,
As was raised by Ilia in this thread [1], the ESP over UDP feature is supported in packet offload mode. So comes this series, which adds relevant bits to the mlx5 driver and opens XFRM core code to accept such configuration.
[...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,1/4] net/mlx5: Add relevant capabilities bits to support NAT-T
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/57266281271a - [net-next,2/4] net/mlx5e: Check for IPsec NAT-T support https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/4acea83a849a - [net-next,3/4] net/mlx5e: Support IPsec NAT-T functionality https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/d65954934937 - [net-next,4/4] xfrm: Support UDP encapsulation in packet offload mode https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/89edf40220be
You are awesome, thank you!
Signature · 2 lines
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html