btrfs: Kconfig: Replace obsolete wiki link
Subsystems (2)
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
PATCH 1/3 btrfs: MAINTAINERS: Remove obsolete wiki link
Removed the obsolete link.
--- MAINTAINERS | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
MAINTAINERS +0 -1
@@ -4360,7 +4360,6 @@ M: David Sterba <[email protected]> L: [email protected] S: Maintained W: https://btrfs.readthedocs.io -W: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/ Q: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-btrfs/list/ C: irc://irc.libera.chat/btrfs T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git
--
2.41.0
PATCH 2/3 btrfs: Kconfig: Replace obsolete wiki link
In reply to a message not in the archiveReplace the obsolete wiki link to maintained link.
--- fs/btrfs/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
fs/btrfs/Kconfig +1 -1
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ config BTRFS_FS continue to be mountable and usable by newer kernels. For more information, please see the web pages at - http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org. + https://btrfs.readthedocs.io To compile this file system support as a module, choose M here. The module will be called btrfs.
--
2.41.0
PATCH 3/3 Docu: filesystems: btrfs: Remove obsolete wiki link
In reply to a message not in the archiveRemoved the obsolete wiki link.
--- Documentation/filesystems/btrfs.rst | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
Documentation/filesystems/btrfs.rst +0 -1
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ For more information please refer to the documentation site or wiki https://btrfs.readthedocs.io - https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org that maintains information about administration tasks, frequently asked questions, use cases, mount options, comprehensible changelogs, features,
--
2.41.0
Re: [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: kconfig: Doc: MAINTAINERS: Obsolete wiki link replace
In reply to a message not in the archiveQuoted 6 lines · Bhaskar Chowdhury
Remove and replace old and obsolete wiki link to active maintained link.
Bhaskar Chowdhury (3):
Remove obsolete wiki link
Replace obsolete wiki link
Remove obsolete wiki link
I'd rather merge all the patches into one, it's not a functional change nor a potentially conflicting change so I don't see a reason to send them separately.