MyFirstContribution: configure shallow threads for git format-patch
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
PATCH 1/1 MyFirstContribution: configure shallow threads for git format-patch
Most users on the Git mailing list prefers to use of shallow threads, but this preference was not documented. This commit adds a blurb about how to configure this globally via git config.
--- Documentation/MyFirstContribution.txt | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
Documentation/MyFirstContribution.txt +11 -0
@@ -1004,6 +1004,17 @@ determine the right way to configure it to use your SMTP server; again, as this configuration can change significantly based on your system and email setup, it is out of scope for the context of this tutorial. +[[configure-shallow-threads]] +=== Configuring shallow threads for `git format-patch` + +It is common practice on the Git mailing list to use "shallow" threads, +where every mail is a reply to the first mail of the series. You can +configure the default threading style of `git format-patch` via: + +----- +$ git config format.thread shallow +---- + [[format-patch]] === Preparing Initial Patchset
Signature · 1 line
2.42.0
Documentation/MyFirstContribution.txt determine the right way to configure it to use your SMTP server; again, as this · line 1016
Quoted 10 lines · Stan Hu
+[[configure-shallow-threads]]
+=== Configuring shallow threads forgit format-patchDocumentation/MyFirstContribution.txt +8
-0+ +It is common practice on the Git mailing list to use "shallow" threads, +where every mail is a reply to the first mail of the series. You can +configure the default threading style of `git format-patch` via: + +----- +$ git config format.thread shallow +----
Hmph, I do not think I have such an option defined, yet I send out my series as "shallow" threads. I think the new description is somewhat misleading as-is. Isn't it applicable ONLY to those who let "format-patch" decide the message ID for patches? If the user lets "git send-email" assign the message IDs (and hence the thread structure), the configuration variable would not apply, no?