Addition of new tests for extsize hints
v3 cover Addition of new tests for extsize hints
This test checks the behaviour of xfs/ext4 filesystems when extsize hint is set on files with inode size as 0, non-empty
files with allocated and delalloc extents and so on.
This test set also tests one of the scenarios where setting extsize hints on files with delayed allocation incorrectly succeeds and there is a recent patch series[1] that got merged[2] which fixes this.
Currently this test only runs in xfs but there is a patch series[3] in review that adds support for the extsize hints for ext4 as well.
I have tested it on ppc64le (with page size 64k) and x86_64 (with page size 4k). The block sizes I have tested with are 2k, 4k, 8k, 16k, 32k, 64k with extsize being twice of the block size or 4 * block size(if the default extsize is 2 * blocksize). I have also tested with configurations where I added extszinherit mkfs option on the root. I had to enable CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE to enable block size greater than 4k on x86_64.
Changes since [v2]
- Renamed _test_fsx_xflags_field() to _test_fsxattr_xflag().
- Changed the definition of _test_fsx_xflags_field (now renamed to _test_fsxattr_xflag) to accept xflag names (like extsize, cowextsize) instead of single characters (like 'e') and modified the callers of this function accordingly (in xfs/207 and generic/366)
- Some changes in the comments in the setup() function of tests/generic/366.
- Added another helper function _require_scratch_extsize().
- Replaced the usage of _require_scratch() with _require_scratch_extsize() in tests/generic/366.
- Fixed some indentation issues in the test scripts(xfs/207, generic/366) and the commit messages.
Changes since [v1]
- Making the definition of _test_xfs_xflags_field() more compact and renamed _test_xfs_xflags_field() to _test_fsx_xflags_field() since I moved it to common/rc.
- Removed the explicit import of common/xfs from the test script.
- Renamed the test file from generic/365 to generic/366 since generic/365 was taken.
- Made the following functions in tests/generic/366 accept a second parameter (extsize)
a) check_extsz_xflag_across_remount()
b) check_extsz_and_xflag()
c) read_file_extsize()
d) filter_extsz
This will help filter out any extsize that the test wants. This is required because, this version no longer assumes any particular fixed value of the default extsize.
- Removed the check for xflags in test_data_allocated() and test_data_delayed() test
- Added an extra line in output that denotes that we are checking that the extent size hasn't changed if the xfs_io command fails (in test_data_allocated() and test_data_delayed() test).
- Changed the new extsize to 4*blocksize if default extsize size is 2*blocksize to make sure that the new extsize is not the same as the default extsize so that we can observe it changing.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
[2] kernel commit - 2a492ff66673
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/[email protected]/
[v1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
[v2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Nirjhar Roy (3):
common/rc,xfs/207: Add a common helper function to check xflag bits common/rc: Add a new _require_scratch_extsize helper function
generic: Addition of new tests for extsize hints
common/rc | 24 ++++++ tests/generic/366 | 175 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tests/generic/366.out | 26 +++++++ tests/xfs/207 | 15 +--- 4 files changed, 229 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) create mode 100755 tests/generic/366 create mode 100644 tests/generic/366.out
Signature · 1 line
2.43.5
PATCH v3 1/3 common/rc,xfs/207: Add a common helper function to check xflag bits
This patch defines a common helper function to test whether any of fsxattr xflags field is set or not. We will use this helper in an upcoming patch for checking extsize (e) flag.
--- common/rc | 7 +++++++ tests/xfs/207 | 15 ++++----------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
common/rc +7 -0
@@ -41,6 +41,13 @@ _md5_checksum() md5sum $1 | cut -d ' ' -f1 } +# Check whether a fsxattr xflags name ($2) field is set on a given file ($1). +# e.g, fsxattr.xflags = 0x80000800 [extsize, has-xattr] +_test_fsxattr_xflag() +{ + grep -q "fsxattr.xflags.*\[.*$2.*\]" <($XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat -v" "$1") +} + # Write a byte into a range of a file _pwrite_byte() { local pattern="$1"
tests/xfs/207 +4 -11
@@ -21,15 +21,6 @@ _require_cp_reflink _require_xfs_io_command "fiemap" _require_xfs_io_command "cowextsize" -# Takes the fsxattr.xflags line, -# i.e. fsxattr.xflags = 0x0 [--------------C-] -# and tests whether a flag character is set -test_xflag() -{ - local flg=$1 - grep -q "\[.*${flg}.*\]" && echo "$flg flag set" || echo "$flg flag unset" -} - echo "Format and mount" _scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full 2>&1
@@ -65,14 +56,16 @@ echo "Set cowextsize and check flag" $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize 1048576" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch _scratch_cycle_mount -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat" $testdir/file3 | grep 'fsxattr.xflags' | test_xflag "C" +_test_fsxattr_xflag "$testdir/file3" "cowextsize" && echo "C flag set" || \ + echo "C flag unset" $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch echo "Unset cowextsize and check flag" $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize 0" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch _scratch_cycle_mount -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat" $testdir/file3 | grep 'fsxattr.xflags' | test_xflag "C" +_test_fsxattr_xflag "$testdir/file3" "cowextsize" && echo "C flag set" || \ + echo "C flag unset" $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch status=0
Signature · 1 line
2.43.5
Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] common/rc,xfs/207: Add a common helper function to check xflag bits
Quoted 7 lines · Nirjhar Roy
This patch defines a common helper function to test whether any of fsxattr xflags field is set or not. We will use this helper in an upcoming patch for checking extsize (e) flag.
Reviewed-by Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Ojaswin Mujoo <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Nirjhar Roy <[email protected]>
Looks good to me now,
--D
Quoted 66 lines
--- common/rc | 7 +++++++ tests/xfs/207 | 15 ++++----------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)common/rc +7
-0@@ -41,6 +41,13 @@ _md5_checksum() md5sum $1 | cut -d ' ' -f1 } +# Check whether a fsxattr xflags name ($2) field is set on a given file ($1). +# e.g, fsxattr.xflags = 0x80000800 [extsize, has-xattr] +_test_fsxattr_xflag() +{ + grep -q "fsxattr.xflags.*\[.*$2.*\]" <($XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat -v" "$1") +} + # Write a byte into a range of a file _pwrite_byte() { local pattern="$1"tests/xfs/207 +4
-11@@ -21,15 +21,6 @@ _require_cp_reflink _require_xfs_io_command "fiemap" _require_xfs_io_command "cowextsize" -# Takes the fsxattr.xflags line, -# i.e. fsxattr.xflags = 0x0 [--------------C-] -# and tests whether a flag character is set -test_xflag() -{ - local flg=$1 - grep -q "\[.*${flg}.*\]" && echo "$flg flag set" || echo "$flg flag unset" -} - echo "Format and mount" _scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full 2>&1@@ -65,14 +56,16 @@ echo "Set cowextsize and check flag" $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize 1048576" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch _scratch_cycle_mount -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat" $testdir/file3 | grep 'fsxattr.xflags' | test_xflag "C" +_test_fsxattr_xflag "$testdir/file3" "cowextsize" && echo "C flag set" || \ + echo "C flag unset" $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch echo "Unset cowextsize and check flag" $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize 0" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch _scratch_cycle_mount -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat" $testdir/file3 | grep 'fsxattr.xflags' | test_xflag "C" +_test_fsxattr_xflag "$testdir/file3" "cowextsize" && echo "C flag set" || \ + echo "C flag unset" $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch status=0Signature · 1 line
2.43.5
Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] common/rc,xfs/207: Add a common helper function to check xflag bits
Quoted 5 lines · Darrick J. Wong
Quoted 4 lines · Nirjhar Roy
This patch defines a common helper function to test whether any of fsxattr xflags field is set or not. We will use this helper in an upcoming patch for checking extsize (e) flag.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Reviewed-by Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Ojaswin Mujoo <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Nirjhar Roy <[email protected]>Looks good to me now,
Reviewed-by "Darrick J. Wong" <[email protected]>--D
Thank you.
--NR
Quoted 67 lines
Quoted 67 lines
--- common/rc | 7 +++++++ tests/xfs/207 | 15 ++++----------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)common/rc +7
-0@@ -41,6 +41,13 @@ _md5_checksum() md5sum $1 | cut -d ' ' -f1 } +# Check whether a fsxattr xflags name ($2) field is set on a given file ($1). +# e.g, fsxattr.xflags = 0x80000800 [extsize, has-xattr] +_test_fsxattr_xflag() +{ + grep -q "fsxattr.xflags.*\[.*$2.*\]" <($XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat -v" "$1") +} + # Write a byte into a range of a file _pwrite_byte() { local pattern="$1"tests/xfs/207 +4
-11@@ -21,15 +21,6 @@ _require_cp_reflink _require_xfs_io_command "fiemap" _require_xfs_io_command "cowextsize" -# Takes the fsxattr.xflags line, -# i.e. fsxattr.xflags = 0x0 [--------------C-] -# and tests whether a flag character is set -test_xflag() -{ - local flg=$1 - grep -q "\[.*${flg}.*\]" && echo "$flg flag set" || echo "$flg flag unset" -} - echo "Format and mount" _scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full 2>&1@@ -65,14 +56,16 @@ echo "Set cowextsize and check flag" $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize 1048576" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch _scratch_cycle_mount -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat" $testdir/file3 | grep 'fsxattr.xflags' | test_xflag "C" +_test_fsxattr_xflag "$testdir/file3" "cowextsize" && echo "C flag set" || \ + echo "C flag unset" $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch echo "Unset cowextsize and check flag" $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize 0" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch _scratch_cycle_mount -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat" $testdir/file3 | grep 'fsxattr.xflags' | test_xflag "C" +_test_fsxattr_xflag "$testdir/file3" "cowextsize" && echo "C flag set" || \ + echo "C flag unset" $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch status=0Signature · 1 line
2.43.5
Signature · 4 lines
--- Nirjhar Roy Linux Kernel Developer IBM, Bangalore
PATCH v3 2/3 common/rc: Add a new _require_scratch_extsize helper function
In reply to Nirjhar Roy_require_scratch_extsize helper function will be used in the the next patch to make the test run only on filesystems with extsize support.
--- common/rc | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
common/rc +17 -0
@@ -48,6 +48,23 @@ _test_fsxattr_xflag() grep -q "fsxattr.xflags.*\[.*$2.*\]" <($XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat -v" "$1") } +# This test requires extsize support on the filesystem +_require_scratch_extsize() +{ + _require_scratch + _scratch_mkfs > /dev/null + _scratch_mount + local filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/$RANDOM + local blksz=$(_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT) + local extsz=$(( blksz*2 )) + local res=$($XFS_IO_PROG -c "open -f $filename" -c "extsize $extsz" \ + -c "extsize") + _scratch_unmount + grep -q "\[$extsz\] $filename" <(echo $res) || \ + _notrun "this test requires extsize support on the filesystem" +} + + # Write a byte into a range of a file _pwrite_byte() { local pattern="$1"
Signature · 1 line
2.43.5
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] common/rc: Add a new _require_scratch_extsize helper function
Quoted 15 lines · Nirjhar Roy
_require_scratch_extsizehelper function will be used in the the next patch to make the test run only on filesystems with extsize support.Reviewed-by Ojaswin Mujoo <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Nirjhar Roy <[email protected]>--- common/rc | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)common/rc +0
-0
common/rc _test_fsxattr_xflag() · line 54
Quoted 7 lines
common/rc +4
-0@@ -48,6 +48,23 @@ _test_fsxattr_xflag() grep -q "fsxattr.xflags.*\[.*$2.*\]" <($XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat -v" "$1") } +# This test requires extsize support on the filesystem +_require_scratch_extsize() +{ + _require_scratch
_require_xfs_io_command "extsize"
^^^ Don't we need this too?
common/rc _test_fsxattr_xflag() · line 64
Quoted 10 lines
common/rc +10
-0+ _scratch_mkfs > /dev/null + _scratch_mount + local filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/$RANDOM + local blksz=$(_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT) + local extsz=$(( blksz*2 )) + local res=$($XFS_IO_PROG -c "open -f $filename" -c "extsize $extsz" \ + -c "extsize") + _scratch_unmount + grep -q "\[$extsz\] $filename" <(echo $res) || \ + _notrun "this test requires extsize support on the filesystem"
Why grep when we can simply just check the return value of previous xfs_io command?
common/rc _test_fsxattr_xflag() · line 67
Quoted 3 lines
common/rc +3
-0+} + +
^^ Extra newline.
Quoted 5 lines
common/rc +0
-0# Write a byte into a range of a file _pwrite_byte() { local pattern="$1"Signature · 1 line
2.43.5
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] common/rc: Add a new _require_scratch_extsize helper function
Quoted 20 lines · Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
Quoted 18 lines · Nirjhar Roy
_require_scratch_extsizehelper function will be used in the the next patch to make the test run only on filesystems with extsize support.Reviewed-by Ojaswin Mujoo <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Nirjhar Roy <[email protected]>--- common/rc | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)common/rc +0
-0@@ -48,6 +48,23 @@ _test_fsxattr_xflag() grep -q "fsxattr.xflags.*\[.*$2.*\]" <($XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat -v" "$1") }
Quoted 7 lines
common/rc _test_fsxattr_xflag() · line 54
Quoted 4 lines
common/rc +4
-0+# This test requires extsize support on the filesystem +_require_scratch_extsize() +{ + _require_scratch
_require_xfs_io_command"extsize"^^^ Don't we need this too?
Yes, good point. I will add this in the next revision.
Quoted 12 lines
common/rc _test_fsxattr_xflag() · line 64
Quoted 11 lines
common/rc +10
-0+ _scratch_mkfs > /dev/null + _scratch_mount + local filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/$RANDOM + local blksz=$(_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT) + local extsz=$(( blksz*2 )) + local res=$($XFS_IO_PROG -c "open -f $filename" -c "extsize $extsz" \ + -c "extsize") + _scratch_unmount + grep -q "\[$extsz\] $filename" <(echo $res) || \ + _notrun "this test requires extsize support on the filesystem"Why grep when we can simply just check the return value of previous
xfs_iocommand?
No, I don't think we can rely on the return value of xfs_io. For ex, let's look at the following set of commands which are ran on an ext4 system:
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$ xfs_io -Vxfs_io version 5.13.0
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$ touch new
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$ xfs_io -c "extsize 8k" new
foreign file active, extsize command is for XFS filesystems only
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$ echo "$?"
0
This incorrect return value might have been fixed in some later versions of xfs_io but there are still versions where we can't solely rely on the return value.
Quoted 5 lines
common/rc _test_fsxattr_xflag() · line 67
Quoted 4 lines
common/rc +3
-0+} + +^^ Extra newline.
Noted. I will fix this.
--NR
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
common/rc +0
-0# Write a byte into a range of a file _pwrite_byte() { local pattern="$1"Signature · 1 line
2.43.5
Signature · 4 lines
--- Nirjhar Roy Linux Kernel Developer IBM, Bangalore
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] common/rc: Add a new _require_scratch_extsize helper function
Quoted 44 lines · Nirjhar Roy
Quoted 20 lines · Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
Quoted 18 lines · Nirjhar Roy
_require_scratch_extsizehelper function will be used in the the next patch to make the test run only on filesystems with extsize support.Reviewed-by Ojaswin Mujoo <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Nirjhar Roy <[email protected]>--- common/rc | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)common/rc +0
-0@@ -48,6 +48,23 @@ _test_fsxattr_xflag() grep -q "fsxattr.xflags.*\[.*$2.*\]" <($XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat -v" "$1") }Quoted 7 lines
common/rc _test_fsxattr_xflag() · line 54
Quoted 4 lines
common/rc +4
-0+# This test requires extsize support on the filesystem +_require_scratch_extsize() +{ + _require_scratch
_require_xfs_io_command"extsize"^^^ Don't we need this too?
Yes, good point. I will add this in the next revision.
Quoted 12 lines
common/rc _test_fsxattr_xflag() · line 64
Quoted 11 lines
common/rc +10
-0+ _scratch_mkfs > /dev/null + _scratch_mount + local filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/$RANDOM + local blksz=$(_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT) + local extsz=$(( blksz*2 )) + local res=$($XFS_IO_PROG -c "open -f $filename" -c "extsize $extsz" \ + -c "extsize") + _scratch_unmount + grep -q "\[$extsz\] $filename" <(echo $res) || \ + _notrun "this test requires extsize support on the filesystem"Why grep when we can simply just check the return value of previous
xfs_iocommand?No, I don't think we can rely on the return value of
xfs_io. For ex, let's look at the following set of commands which are ran on an ext4 system:
Quoted 10 lines
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$
xfs_io-Vxfs_ioversion 5.13.0
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$ touch new
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$xfs_io-c "extsize 8k" new
foreign file active, extsize command is for XFS filesystems only root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$ echo "$?"
0
This incorrect return value might have been fixed in some later versions ofxfs_iobut there are still versions where we can't solely rely on the return value.
Ok. That's bad, we then have to rely on grep.
Sure, thanks for checking and confirming that.
-ritesh
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] common/rc: Add a new _require_scratch_extsize helper function
Quoted 57 lines · Ritesh Harjani
Quoted 44 lines · Nirjhar Roy
Quoted 20 lines · Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
Quoted 18 lines · Nirjhar Roy
_require_scratch_extsizehelper function will be used in the the next patch to make the test run only on filesystems with extsize support.Reviewed-by Ojaswin Mujoo <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Nirjhar Roy <[email protected]>--- common/rc | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)common/rc +0
-0@@ -48,6 +48,23 @@ _test_fsxattr_xflag() grep -q "fsxattr.xflags.*\[.*$2.*\]" <($XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat -v" "$1") }Quoted 7 lines
common/rc _test_fsxattr_xflag() · line 54
Quoted 4 lines
common/rc +4
-0+# This test requires extsize support on the filesystem +_require_scratch_extsize() +{ + _require_scratch
_require_xfs_io_command"extsize"^^^ Don't we need this too?
Yes, good point. I will add this in the next revision.
Quoted 12 lines
common/rc _test_fsxattr_xflag() · line 64
Quoted 11 lines
common/rc +10
-0+ _scratch_mkfs > /dev/null + _scratch_mount + local filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/$RANDOM + local blksz=$(_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT) + local extsz=$(( blksz*2 )) + local res=$($XFS_IO_PROG -c "open -f $filename" -c "extsize $extsz" \ + -c "extsize") + _scratch_unmount + grep -q "\[$extsz\] $filename" <(echo $res) || \ + _notrun "this test requires extsize support on the filesystem"Why grep when we can simply just check the return value of previous
xfs_iocommand?No, I don't think we can rely on the return value of
xfs_io. For ex, let's look at the following set of commands which are ran on an ext4 system:Quoted 10 lines
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$
xfs_io-Vxfs_ioversion 5.13.0
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$ touch new
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$xfs_io-c "extsize 8k" new
foreign file active, extsize command is for XFS filesystems only root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$ echo "$?"
0
This incorrect return value might have been fixed in some later versions ofxfs_iobut there are still versions where we can't solely rely on the return value.
Quoted 2 lines
Ok. That's bad, we then have to rely on grep.
Sure, thanks for checking and confirming that.
You all should add CMD_FOREIGN_OK to the extsize command in xfs_io, assuming that you've not already done that in your dev workspace.
--D
Quoted 2 lines
-ritesh
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] common/rc: Add a new _require_scratch_extsize helper function
Quoted 56 lines · Darrick J. Wong
Quoted 55 lines · Ritesh Harjani
Quoted 53 lines · Nirjhar Roy
Quoted 20 lines · Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
Quoted 18 lines · Nirjhar Roy
_require_scratch_extsizehelper function will be used in the the next patch to make the test run only on filesystems with extsize support.Reviewed-by Ojaswin Mujoo <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Nirjhar Roy <[email protected]>--- common/rc | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)common/rc +0
-0@@ -48,6 +48,23 @@ _test_fsxattr_xflag() grep -q "fsxattr.xflags.*\[.*$2.*\]" <($XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat -v" "$1") }Quoted 7 lines
common/rc _test_fsxattr_xflag() · line 54
Quoted 4 lines
common/rc +4
-0+# This test requires extsize support on the filesystem +_require_scratch_extsize() +{ + _require_scratch
_require_xfs_io_command"extsize"^^^ Don't we need this too?
Yes, good point. I will add this in the next revision.
Quoted 11 lines
common/rc _test_fsxattr_xflag() · line 64
Quoted 10 lines
common/rc +10
-0+ _scratch_mkfs > /dev/null + _scratch_mount + local filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/$RANDOM + local blksz=$(_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT) + local extsz=$(( blksz*2 )) + local res=$($XFS_IO_PROG -c "open -f $filename" -c "extsize $extsz" \ + -c "extsize") + _scratch_unmount + grep -q "\[$extsz\] $filename" <(echo $res) || \ + _notrun "this test requires extsize support on the filesystem"Why grep when we can simply just check the return value of previous
xfs_iocommand?No, I don't think we can rely on the return value of
xfs_io. For ex, let's look at the following set of commands which are ran on an ext4 system:root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$
xfs_io-Vxfs_ioversion 5.13.0
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$ touch new
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$xfs_io-c "extsize 8k" new
foreign file active, extsize command is for XFS filesystems only root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$ echo "$?"
0
This incorrect return value might have been fixed in some later versions ofxfs_iobut there are still versions where we can't solely rely on the return value.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Ok. That's bad, we then have to rely on grep.
Sure, thanks for checking and confirming that.You all should add
CMD_FOREIGN_OKto the extsize command inxfs_io, assuming that you've not already done that in your dev workspace.--D
Yes, I have tested with that as well. I have applied the following patch to xfsprogs and tested with the modified xfs_io.
io/open.c +0 -0
@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ open_init(void)
extsize_cmd.args = _("[-D | -R] [extsize]"); extsize_cmd.argmin = 0;
extsize_cmd.argmax = -1;
- extsize_cmd.flags = CMD_NOMAP_OK;
+ extsize_cmd.flags = CMD_NOMAP_OK | CMD_FOREIGN_OK; extsize_cmd.oneline =
_("get/set preferred extent size (in bytes) for the open file"); extsize_cmd.help = extsize_help;
The return values are similar.
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/scratch$ touch new
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/scratch$ /home/ubuntu/xfsprogs-dev/io/xfs_io -c "extsize 8k" new root@AMARPC: /mnt1/scratch$ echo "$?"
0
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/scratch$ /home/ubuntu/xfsprogs-dev/io/xfs_io -c "extsize" new
[0] new
This is the reason I am not relying on the return value, instead I am checking if only the extsize gets changed, we will assume that the extsize support is there, else the test will _notrun.
Also,
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/scratch$ strace -f /mnt1/scratch$ /home/ubuntu/xfsprogs-dev/io/xfs_io -c "extsize 16k" new
...
...
ioctl(3, FS_IOC_FSGETXATTR, {fsx_xflags=0, fsx_extsize=0, fsx_nextents=0, fsx_projid=0, fsx_cowextsize=0}) = 0 ioctl(3, FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR, {fsx_xflags=FS_XFLAG_EXTSIZE, fsx_extsize=16384, fsx_projid=0, fsx_cowextsize=0}) = 0 exit_group(0)
Looking at the existing code for ext4_fileattr_set(), We validate the flags but I think we silently don't validate(and ignore) the xflags. Like, we have
int err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (flags & ~EXT4_FL_USER_VISIBLE)
goto out;
BUT we do NOT have something like
int err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (fa->fsx_flags & ~EXT4_VALID_XFLAGS) // where EXT4_VALID_XFLAGS should be an || of all the supported xflags in ext4. goto out;
I am not sure what other filesystems do, but if we check whether the extsize got changed, then we can correctly determine extsize support.
Does that make sense?
--NR
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
-ritesh
Signature · 4 lines
--- Nirjhar Roy Linux Kernel Developer IBM, Bangalore
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] common/rc: Add a new _require_scratch_extsize helper function
Quoted 126 lines · Nirjhar Roy
Quoted 55 lines · Darrick J. Wong
Quoted 54 lines · Ritesh Harjani
Quoted 52 lines · Nirjhar Roy
Quoted 25 lines · Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
Quoted 15 lines · Nirjhar Roy
_require_scratch_extsizehelper function will be used in the the next patch to make the test run only on filesystems with extsize support.Reviewed-by Ojaswin Mujoo <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Nirjhar Roy <[email protected]>--- common/rc | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)common/rc +0
-0common/rc _test_fsxattr_xflag() · line 53
Quoted 6 lines
common/rc +4
-0@@ -48,6 +48,23 @@ _test_fsxattr_xflag() grep -q "fsxattr.xflags.*\[.*$2.*\]" <($XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat -v" "$1") } +# This test requires extsize support on the filesystem +_require_scratch_extsize() +{ + _require_scratch
_require_xfs_io_command"extsize"Quoted 1 line
^^^ Don't we need this too?
Yes, good point. I will add this in the next revision.
Quoted 11 lines
common/rc _test_fsxattr_xflag() · line 63
Quoted 10 lines
common/rc +10
-0+ _scratch_mkfs > /dev/null + _scratch_mount + local filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/$RANDOM + local blksz=$(_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT) + local extsz=$(( blksz*2 )) + local res=$($XFS_IO_PROG -c "open -f $filename" -c "extsize $extsz" \ + -c "extsize") + _scratch_unmount + grep -q "\[$extsz\] $filename" <(echo $res) || \ + _notrun "this test requires extsize support on the filesystem"Why grep when we can simply just check the return value of previous
xfs_iocommand?No, I don't think we can rely on the return value of
xfs_io. For ex, let's look at the following set of commands which are ran on an ext4 system:root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$
xfs_io-Vxfs_ioversion 5.13.0
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$ touch new
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$xfs_io-c "extsize 8k" new
foreign file active, extsize command is for XFS filesystems only root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$ echo "$?"
0
This incorrect return value might have been fixed in some later versions ofxfs_iobut there are still versions where we can't solely rely on the return value.Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Ok. That's bad, we then have to rely on grep.
Sure, thanks for checking and confirming that.You all should add
CMD_FOREIGN_OKto the extsize command inxfs_io, assuming that you've not already done that in your dev workspace.--D
Yes, I have tested with that as well. I have applied the following patch to xfsprogs and tested with the modified
xfs_io.io/open.c +1
-1@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ open_init(void) extsize_cmd.args = _("[-D | -R] [extsize]"); extsize_cmd.argmin = 0; extsize_cmd.argmax = -1; - extsize_cmd.flags = CMD_NOMAP_OK; + extsize_cmd.flags = CMD_NOMAP_OK | CMD_FOREIGN_OK;extsize_cmd.oneline =
_("get/set preferred extent size (in bytes) for the open file");
extsize_cmd.help =extsize_help;The return values are similar.
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/scratch$ touch new
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/scratch$/home/ubuntu/xfsprogs-dev/io/xfs_io-c "extsize 8k" new
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/scratch$ echo "$?"
0
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/scratch$/home/ubuntu/xfsprogs-dev/io/xfs_io-c "extsize" new
[0] newThis is the reason I am not relying on the return value, instead I am checking if only the extsize gets changed, we will assume that the extsize support is there, else the test will
_notrun.Also,
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/scratch$ strace -f /mnt1/scratch$
/home/ubuntu/xfsprogs-dev/io/xfs_io-c "extsize 16k" new...
...
ioctl(3,
FS_IOC_FSGETXATTR, {fsx_xflags=0, fsx_extsize=0, fsx_nextents=0, fsx_projid=0, fsx_cowextsize=0}) = 0
ioctl(3,FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR, {fsx_xflags=FS_XFLAG_EXTSIZE, fsx_extsize=16384, fsx_projid=0, fsx_cowextsize=0}) = 0exit_group(0)Looking at the existing code for
ext4_fileattr_set(), We validate the flags but I think we silently don't validate(and ignore) the xflags. Like, we haveint err =
-EOPNOTSUPP;
if (flags & ~EXT4_FL_USER_VISIBLE)
goto out;BUT we do NOT have something like
int err =
-EOPNOTSUPP;
if (fa->fsx_flags& ~EXT4_VALID_XFLAGS) // whereEXT4_VALID_XFLAGSshould be an || of all the supported xflags in ext4.
goto out;
Quoted 4 lines
I am not sure what other filesystems do, but if we check whether the extsize got changed, then we can correctly determine extsize support.
Does that make sense?
You don't have to check fsx_flags if you don't use fileattr_fill_xflags. ext4 doesn't use that.
--D
Quoted 13 lines
--NR
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
-ritesh
Signature · 4 lines
--- Nirjhar Roy Linux Kernel Developer IBM, Bangalore
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] common/rc: Add a new _require_scratch_extsize helper function
Quoted 125 lines · Darrick J. Wong
Quoted 124 lines · Nirjhar Roy
Quoted 55 lines · Darrick J. Wong
Quoted 54 lines · Ritesh Harjani
Quoted 52 lines · Nirjhar Roy
Quoted 25 lines · Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
Quoted 15 lines · Nirjhar Roy
_require_scratch_extsizehelper function will be used in the the next patch to make the test run only on filesystems with extsize support.Reviewed-by Ojaswin Mujoo <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Nirjhar Roy <[email protected]>--- common/rc | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)common/rc +0
-0common/rc _test_fsxattr_xflag() · line 53
Quoted 6 lines
common/rc +4
-0@@ -48,6 +48,23 @@ _test_fsxattr_xflag() grep -q "fsxattr.xflags.*\[.*$2.*\]" <($XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat -v" "$1") } +# This test requires extsize support on the filesystem +_require_scratch_extsize() +{ + _require_scratch
_require_xfs_io_command"extsize"Quoted 1 line
^^^ Don't we need this too?
Yes, good point. I will add this in the next revision.
Quoted 11 lines
common/rc _test_fsxattr_xflag() · line 63
Quoted 10 lines
common/rc +10
-0+ _scratch_mkfs > /dev/null + _scratch_mount + local filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/$RANDOM + local blksz=$(_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT) + local extsz=$(( blksz*2 )) + local res=$($XFS_IO_PROG -c "open -f $filename" -c "extsize $extsz" \ + -c "extsize") + _scratch_unmount + grep -q "\[$extsz\] $filename" <(echo $res) || \ + _notrun "this test requires extsize support on the filesystem"Why grep when we can simply just check the return value of previous
xfs_iocommand?No, I don't think we can rely on the return value of
xfs_io. For ex, let's look at the following set of commands which are ran on an ext4 system:root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$
xfs_io-Vxfs_ioversion 5.13.0
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$ touch new
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$xfs_io-c "extsize 8k" new
foreign file active, extsize command is for XFS filesystems only root@AMARPC: /mnt1/test$ echo "$?"
0
This incorrect return value might have been fixed in some later versions ofxfs_iobut there are still versions where we can't solely rely on the return value.Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Ok. That's bad, we then have to rely on grep.
Sure, thanks for checking and confirming that.You all should add
CMD_FOREIGN_OKto the extsize command inxfs_io, assuming that you've not already done that in your dev workspace.--D
Yes, I have tested with that as well. I have applied the following patch to xfsprogs and tested with the modified
xfs_io.io/open.c +1
-1@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ open_init(void) extsize_cmd.args = _("[-D | -R] [extsize]"); extsize_cmd.argmin = 0; extsize_cmd.argmax = -1; - extsize_cmd.flags = CMD_NOMAP_OK; + extsize_cmd.flags = CMD_NOMAP_OK | CMD_FOREIGN_OK; extsize_cmd.oneline = _("get/set preferred extent size (in bytes) for the open file");extsize_cmd.help =
extsize_help;The return values are similar.
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/scratch$ touch new
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/scratch$/home/ubuntu/xfsprogs-dev/io/xfs_io-c "extsize 8k" new
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/scratch$ echo "$?"
0
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/scratch$/home/ubuntu/xfsprogs-dev/io/xfs_io-c "extsize" new
[0] newThis is the reason I am not relying on the return value, instead I am checking if only the extsize gets changed, we will assume that the extsize support is there, else the test will
_notrun.Also,
root@AMARPC: /mnt1/scratch$ strace -f /mnt1/scratch$
/home/ubuntu/xfsprogs-dev/io/xfs_io-c "extsize 16k" new...
...
ioctl(3,
FS_IOC_FSGETXATTR, {fsx_xflags=0, fsx_extsize=0, fsx_nextents=0, fsx_projid=0, fsx_cowextsize=0}) = 0
ioctl(3,FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR, {fsx_xflags=FS_XFLAG_EXTSIZE, fsx_extsize=16384, fsx_projid=0, fsx_cowextsize=0}) = 0exit_group(0)Looking at the existing code for
ext4_fileattr_set(), We validate the flags but I think we silently don't validate(and ignore) the xflags. Like, we haveint err =
-EOPNOTSUPP;
if (flags & ~EXT4_FL_USER_VISIBLE)
goto out;BUT we do NOT have something like
int err =
-EOPNOTSUPP;
if (fa->fsx_flags& ~EXT4_VALID_XFLAGS) // whereEXT4_VALID_XFLAGSshould be an || of all the supported xflags in ext4.
goto out;
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
I am not sure what other filesystems do, but if we check whether the extsize got changed, then we can correctly determine extsize support.
Does that make sense?
You don't have to check
fsx_flagsif you don't usefileattr_fill_xflags. ext4 doesn't use that.--D
Okay got it. Thank you. How does the overall logic of the _require_scratch_extsize() look?
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 13 lines
--NR
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
-ritesh
Signature · 4 lines
--- Nirjhar Roy Linux Kernel Developer IBM, Bangalore
Signature · 4 lines
--- Nirjhar Roy Linux Kernel Developer IBM, Bangalore
PATCH v3 3/3 generic: Addition of new tests for extsize hints
In reply to Nirjhar RoyThis commit adds new tests that checks the behaviour of xfs/ext4 filesystems when extsize hint is set on file with inode size as 0, non-empty files with allocated and delalloc extents and so on. Although currently this test is placed under tests/generic, it only runs on xfs and there is an ongoing patch series[1] to enable extsize hints for ext4 as well.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/[email protected]/
Reviewed-by Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <[email protected]>
--- tests/generic/366 | 175 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tests/generic/366.out | 26 +++++++ 2 files changed, 201 insertions(+) create mode 100755 tests/generic/366 create mode 100644 tests/generic/366.out
tests/generic/366 new file +175 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@ +#! /bin/bash +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +# Copyright (c) 2024 Nirjhar Roy ([email protected]). All Rights Reserved. +# +# FS QA Test 366 +# +# This test verifies that extent allocation hint setting works correctly on +# files with no extents allocated and non-empty files which are truncated. +# It also checks that the extent hints setting fails with non-empty file +# i.e, with any file with allocated extents or delayed allocation. We also +# check if the extsize value and the xflag bit actually got reflected after +# setting/re-setting the extsize value. + +. ./common/config +. ./common/filter +. ./common/preamble + +_begin_fstest ioctl quick + +_fixed_by_kernel_commit "2a492ff66673 \ + xfs: Check for delayed allocations before setting \ + extsize" + +_require_scratch_extsize + +FILE_DATA_SIZE=1M + +get_default_extsize() +{ + if [ -z $1 ] || [ ! -d $1 ]; then + echo "Missing mount point argument for get_default_extsize" + exit 1 + fi + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "extsize" "$1" | sed 's/^\[\([0-9]\+\)\].*/\1/' +} + +filter_extsz() +{ + sed "s/\[$1\]/\[EXTSIZE\]/g" +} + +setup() +{ + _scratch_mkfs >> "$seqres.full" 2>&1 + _scratch_mount >> "$seqres.full" 2>&1 + BLKSZ=`_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT` + DEFAULT_EXTSIZE=`get_default_extsize $SCRATCH_MNT` + EXTSIZE=$(( BLKSZ*2 )) + # Make sure the new extsize is not the same as the default + # extsize so that we can observe it changing + [[ "$DEFAULT_EXTSIZE" -eq "$EXTSIZE" ]] && EXTSIZE=$(( BLKSZ*4 )) +} + +read_file_extsize() +{ + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "extsize" $1 | _filter_scratch | filter_extsz $2 +} + +check_extsz_and_xflag() +{ + local filename=$1 + local extsize=$2 + read_file_extsize $filename $extsize + _test_fsxattr_xflag $filename "extsize" && echo "e flag set" || \ + echo "e flag unset" +} + +check_extsz_xflag_across_remount() +{ + local filename=$1 + local extsize=$2 + _scratch_cycle_mount + check_extsz_and_xflag $filename $extsize +} + +# Extsize flag should be cleared when extsize is reset, so this function +# checks that this behavior is followed. +reset_extsz_and_recheck_extsz_xflag() +{ + local filename=$1 + echo "Re-setting extsize hint to 0" + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "extsize 0" $filename + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename "0" +} + +check_extsz_xflag_before_and_after_reset() +{ + local filename=$1 + local extsize=$2 + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename $extsize + reset_extsz_and_recheck_extsz_xflag $filename +} + +test_empty_file() +{ + echo "TEST: Set extsize on empty file" + local filename=$1 + $XFS_IO_PROG \ + -c "open -f $filename" \ + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" \ + + check_extsz_xflag_before_and_after_reset $filename $EXTSIZE + echo +} + +test_data_delayed() +{ + echo "TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with delayed allocation" + local filename=$1 + $XFS_IO_PROG \ + -c "open -f $filename" \ + -c "pwrite -q 0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \ + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" | _filter_scratch + + echo "test for default extsize setting if any" + read_file_extsize $filename $DEFAULT_EXTSIZE + echo +} + +test_data_allocated() +{ + echo "TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with allocated extents" + local filename=$1 + $XFS_IO_PROG \ + -c "open -f $filename" \ + -c "pwrite -qW 0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \ + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" | _filter_scratch + + echo "test for default extsize setting if any" + read_file_extsize $filename $DEFAULT_EXTSIZE + echo +} + +test_truncate_allocated() +{ + echo "TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with allocated extents" + local filename=$1 + $XFS_IO_PROG \ + -c "open -f $filename" \ + -c "pwrite -qW 0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \ + -c "truncate 0" \ + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" \ + + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename $EXTSIZE + echo +} + +test_truncate_delayed() +{ + echo "TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with delayed allocation" + local filename=$1 + $XFS_IO_PROG \ + -c "open -f $filename" \ + -c "pwrite -q 0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \ + -c "truncate 0" \ + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" \ + + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename $EXTSIZE + echo +} + +setup +echo -e "EXTSIZE = $EXTSIZE DEFAULT_EXTSIZE = $DEFAULT_EXTSIZE \ + BLOCKSIZE = $BLKSZ\n" >> "$seqres.full" + +NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX=$SCRATCH_MNT/new-file- + +test_empty_file "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"00 +test_data_delayed "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"01 +test_data_allocated "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"02 +test_truncate_allocated "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"03 +test_truncate_delayed "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"04 + +status=0 +exit
tests/generic/366.out new file +26 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +QA output created by 366 +TEST: Set extsize on empty file +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-00 +e flag set +Re-setting extsize hint to 0 +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-00 +e flag unset + +TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with delayed allocation +xfs_io: FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-01: Invalid argument +test for default extsize setting if any +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-01 + +TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with allocated extents +xfs_io: FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-02: Invalid argument +test for default extsize setting if any +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-02 + +TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with allocated extents +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-03 +e flag set + +TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with delayed allocation +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-04 +e flag set +
Signature · 1 line
2.43.5
Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] generic: Addition of new tests for extsize hints
Quoted 7 lines · Nirjhar Roy
This commit adds new tests that checks the behaviour of xfs/ext4 filesystems when extsize hint is set on file with inode size as 0, non-empty files with allocated and delalloc extents and so on. Although currently this test is placed under tests/generic, it only runs on xfs and there is an ongoing patch series[1] to enable extsize hints for ext4 as well.
Quoted 6 lines
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/[email protected]/
Reviewed-by Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by Ojaswin Mujoo <[email protected]>Suggested-by Ojaswin Mujoo <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Nirjhar Roy <[email protected]>
Looks ok, though you might want to change generic/366 to a higher number because that's now taken.
--D
Quoted 224 lines
--- tests/generic/366 | 175 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tests/generic/366.out | 26 +++++++ 2 files changed, 201 insertions(+) create mode 100755 tests/generic/366 create mode 100644 tests/generic/366.outtests/generic/366 new file +175
-0@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@ +#! /bin/bash +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +# Copyright (c) 2024 Nirjhar Roy ([email protected]). All Rights Reserved. +# +# FS QA Test 366 +# +# This test verifies that extent allocation hint setting works correctly on +# files with no extents allocated and non-empty files which are truncated. +# It also checks that the extent hints setting fails with non-empty file +# i.e, with any file with allocated extents or delayed allocation. We also +# check if the extsize value and the xflag bit actually got reflected after +# setting/re-setting the extsize value. + +. ./common/config +. ./common/filter +. ./common/preamble + +_begin_fstest ioctl quick + +_fixed_by_kernel_commit "2a492ff66673 \ + xfs: Check for delayed allocations before setting \ + extsize" + +_require_scratch_extsize + +FILE_DATA_SIZE=1M + +get_default_extsize() +{ + if [ -z $1 ] || [ ! -d $1 ]; then + echo "Missing mount point argument for get_default_extsize" + exit 1 + fi + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "extsize" "$1" | sed 's/^\[\([0-9]\+\)\].*/\1/' +} + +filter_extsz() +{ + sed "s/\[$1\]/\[EXTSIZE\]/g" +} + +setup() +{ + _scratch_mkfs >> "$seqres.full" 2>&1 + _scratch_mount >> "$seqres.full" 2>&1 + BLKSZ=`_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT` + DEFAULT_EXTSIZE=`get_default_extsize $SCRATCH_MNT` + EXTSIZE=$(( BLKSZ*2 )) + # Make sure the new extsize is not the same as the default + # extsize so that we can observe it changing + [[ "$DEFAULT_EXTSIZE" -eq "$EXTSIZE" ]] && EXTSIZE=$(( BLKSZ*4 )) +} + +read_file_extsize() +{ + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "extsize" $1 | _filter_scratch | filter_extsz $2 +} + +check_extsz_and_xflag() +{ + local filename=$1 + local extsize=$2 + read_file_extsize $filename $extsize + _test_fsxattr_xflag $filename "extsize" && echo "e flag set" || \ + echo "e flag unset" +} + +check_extsz_xflag_across_remount() +{ + local filename=$1 + local extsize=$2 + _scratch_cycle_mount + check_extsz_and_xflag $filename $extsize +} + +# Extsize flag should be cleared when extsize is reset, so this function +# checks that this behavior is followed. +reset_extsz_and_recheck_extsz_xflag() +{ + local filename=$1 + echo "Re-setting extsize hint to 0" + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "extsize 0" $filename + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename "0" +} + +check_extsz_xflag_before_and_after_reset() +{ + local filename=$1 + local extsize=$2 + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename $extsize + reset_extsz_and_recheck_extsz_xflag $filename +} + +test_empty_file() +{ + echo "TEST: Set extsize on empty file" + local filename=$1 + $XFS_IO_PROG \ + -c "open -f $filename" \ + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" \ + + check_extsz_xflag_before_and_after_reset $filename $EXTSIZE + echo +} + +test_data_delayed() +{ + echo "TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with delayed allocation" + local filename=$1 + $XFS_IO_PROG \ + -c "open -f $filename" \ + -c "pwrite -q 0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \ + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" | _filter_scratch + + echo "test for default extsize setting if any" + read_file_extsize $filename $DEFAULT_EXTSIZE + echo +} + +test_data_allocated() +{ + echo "TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with allocated extents" + local filename=$1 + $XFS_IO_PROG \ + -c "open -f $filename" \ + -c "pwrite -qW 0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \ + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" | _filter_scratch + + echo "test for default extsize setting if any" + read_file_extsize $filename $DEFAULT_EXTSIZE + echo +} + +test_truncate_allocated() +{ + echo "TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with allocated extents" + local filename=$1 + $XFS_IO_PROG \ + -c "open -f $filename" \ + -c "pwrite -qW 0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \ + -c "truncate 0" \ + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" \ + + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename $EXTSIZE + echo +} + +test_truncate_delayed() +{ + echo "TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with delayed allocation" + local filename=$1 + $XFS_IO_PROG \ + -c "open -f $filename" \ + -c "pwrite -q 0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \ + -c "truncate 0" \ + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" \ + + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename $EXTSIZE + echo +} + +setup +echo -e "EXTSIZE = $EXTSIZE DEFAULT_EXTSIZE = $DEFAULT_EXTSIZE \ + BLOCKSIZE = $BLKSZ\n" >> "$seqres.full" + +NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX=$SCRATCH_MNT/new-file- + +test_empty_file "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"00 +test_data_delayed "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"01 +test_data_allocated "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"02 +test_truncate_allocated "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"03 +test_truncate_delayed "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"04 + +status=0 +exittests/generic/366.out new file +26
-0@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +QA output created by 366 +TEST: Set extsize on empty file +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-00 +e flag set +Re-setting extsize hint to 0 +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-00 +e flag unset + +TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with delayed allocation +xfs_io: FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-01: Invalid argument +test for default extsize setting if any +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-01 + +TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with allocated extents +xfs_io: FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-02: Invalid argument +test for default extsize setting if any +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-02 + +TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with allocated extents +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-03 +e flag set + +TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with delayed allocation +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-04 +e flag set +Signature · 1 line
2.43.5
Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] generic: Addition of new tests for extsize hints
Quoted 14 lines · Darrick J. Wong
Quoted 7 lines · Nirjhar Roy
This commit adds new tests that checks the behaviour of xfs/ext4 filesystems when extsize hint is set on file with inode size as 0, non-empty files with allocated and delalloc extents and so on. Although currently this test is placed under tests/generic, it only runs on xfs and there is an ongoing patch series[1] to enable extsize hints for ext4 as well.
Quoted 6 lines
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/[email protected]/
Reviewed-by Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by Ojaswin Mujoo <[email protected]>Suggested-by Ojaswin Mujoo <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Nirjhar Roy <[email protected]>
Quoted 6 lines
Looks ok, though you might want to change generic/366 to a higher number because that's now taken.
Reviewed-by "Darrick J. Wong" <[email protected]>--D
Okay. I will update the test sequence number in the next revision.
--NR
Quoted 224 lines
Quoted 224 lines
--- tests/generic/366 | 175 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tests/generic/366.out | 26 +++++++ 2 files changed, 201 insertions(+)create mode 100755 tests/generic/366
create mode 100644 tests/generic/366.outtests/generic/366 new file +175
-0@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@ +#! /bin/bash +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +# Copyright (c) 2024 Nirjhar Roy ([email protected]). All Rights Reserved. +# +# FS QA Test 366 +# +# This test verifies that extent allocation hint setting works correctly on +# files with no extents allocated and non-empty files which are truncated. +# It also checks that the extent hints setting fails with non-empty file +# i.e, with any file with allocated extents or delayed allocation. We also +# check if the extsize value and the xflag bit actually got reflected after +# setting/re-setting the extsize value. + +. ./common/config +. ./common/filter +. ./common/preamble + +_begin_fstest ioctl quick + +_fixed_by_kernel_commit "2a492ff66673 \ + xfs: Check for delayed allocations before setting \ + extsize" + +_require_scratch_extsize + +FILE_DATA_SIZE=1M + +get_default_extsize() +{ + if [ -z $1 ] || [ ! -d $1 ]; then + echo "Missing mount point argument for get_default_extsize" + exit 1 + fi + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "extsize" "$1" | sed 's/^\[\([0-9]\+\)\].*/\1/' +} + +filter_extsz() +{ + sed "s/\[$1\]/\[EXTSIZE\]/g" +} + +setup() +{ + _scratch_mkfs >> "$seqres.full" 2>&1 + _scratch_mount >> "$seqres.full" 2>&1 + BLKSZ=`_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT` + DEFAULT_EXTSIZE=`get_default_extsize $SCRATCH_MNT` + EXTSIZE=$(( BLKSZ*2 )) + # Make sure the new extsize is not the same as the default + # extsize so that we can observe it changing + [[ "$DEFAULT_EXTSIZE" -eq "$EXTSIZE" ]] && EXTSIZE=$(( BLKSZ*4 )) +} + +read_file_extsize() +{ + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "extsize" $1 | _filter_scratch | filter_extsz $2 +} + +check_extsz_and_xflag() +{ + local filename=$1 + local extsize=$2 + read_file_extsize $filename $extsize + _test_fsxattr_xflag $filename "extsize" && echo "e flag set" || \ + echo "e flag unset" +} + +check_extsz_xflag_across_remount() +{ + local filename=$1 + local extsize=$2 + _scratch_cycle_mount + check_extsz_and_xflag $filename $extsize +} + +# Extsize flag should be cleared when extsize is reset, so this function +# checks that this behavior is followed. +reset_extsz_and_recheck_extsz_xflag() +{ + local filename=$1 + echo "Re-setting extsize hint to 0" + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "extsize 0" $filename + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename "0" +} + +check_extsz_xflag_before_and_after_reset() +{ + local filename=$1 + local extsize=$2 + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename $extsize + reset_extsz_and_recheck_extsz_xflag $filename +} + +test_empty_file() +{ + echo "TEST: Set extsize on empty file" + local filename=$1 + $XFS_IO_PROG \ + -c "open -f $filename" \ + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" \ + + check_extsz_xflag_before_and_after_reset $filename $EXTSIZE + echo +} + +test_data_delayed() +{ + echo "TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with delayed allocation" + local filename=$1 + $XFS_IO_PROG \ + -c "open -f $filename" \ + -c "pwrite -q 0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \ + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" | _filter_scratch + + echo "test for default extsize setting if any" + read_file_extsize $filename $DEFAULT_EXTSIZE + echo +} + +test_data_allocated() +{ + echo "TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with allocated extents" + local filename=$1 + $XFS_IO_PROG \ + -c "open -f $filename" \ + -c "pwrite -qW 0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \ + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" | _filter_scratch + + echo "test for default extsize setting if any" + read_file_extsize $filename $DEFAULT_EXTSIZE + echo +} + +test_truncate_allocated() +{ + echo "TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with allocated extents" + local filename=$1 + $XFS_IO_PROG \ + -c "open -f $filename" \ + -c "pwrite -qW 0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \ + -c "truncate 0" \ + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" \ + + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename $EXTSIZE + echo +} + +test_truncate_delayed() +{ + echo "TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with delayed allocation" + local filename=$1 + $XFS_IO_PROG \ + -c "open -f $filename" \ + -c "pwrite -q 0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \ + -c "truncate 0" \ + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" \ + + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename $EXTSIZE + echo +} + +setup +echo -e "EXTSIZE = $EXTSIZE DEFAULT_EXTSIZE = $DEFAULT_EXTSIZE \ + BLOCKSIZE = $BLKSZ\n" >> "$seqres.full" + +NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX=$SCRATCH_MNT/new-file- + +test_empty_file "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"00 +test_data_delayed "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"01 +test_data_allocated "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"02 +test_truncate_allocated "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"03 +test_truncate_delayed "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"04 + +status=0 +exittests/generic/366.out new file +26
-0@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +QA output created by 366 +TEST: Set extsize on empty file +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-00 +e flag set +Re-setting extsize hint to 0 +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-00 +e flag unset + +TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with delayed allocation +xfs_io: FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-01: Invalid argument +test for default extsize setting if any +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-01 + +TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with allocated extents +xfs_io: FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-02: Invalid argument +test for default extsize setting if any +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-02 + +TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with allocated extents +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-03 +e flag set + +TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with delayed allocation +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-04 +e flag set +Signature · 1 line
2.43.5
Signature · 4 lines
--- Nirjhar Roy Linux Kernel Developer IBM, Bangalore