Skip to contentSkip to conversation

pwm: Add pwm driver for Sophgo SG2042

PATCH Superseded Chen Wang 3 participants 12 messages Dec 4, 2024 – Jan 22, 2025

Subsystems (4)

v6 of 7 Superseded Latest is v7 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

Chen Wang

author
#0 lore raw

v6 cover pwm: Add pwm driver for Sophgo SG2042

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add driver for pwm controller of Sophgo SG2042 SoC.

Thanks,
Chen

---

Changes in v6:
Nothing major changes just rebased onto v6.13-rc1 and retested.

Changes in v5:
The patch series is based on v6.12-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [5].

Updated driver to add resets property for pwm controller node as per suggestion from Inochi.

Changes in v4:
The patch series is based on v6.12-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [4].

Updated driver to set property atomic of pwm_chip to true as per suggestion from Sean.

Changes in v3:
The patch series is catched up with v6.12-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [3].

Add patch #3 for dts part change.

Changes in v2:
The patch series is based on v6.11-rc6. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [2].

Fixed following issues as per comments from Yixun Lan, Krzysztof Kozlowski and Uwe Kleine-König, thanks.

- Some minor issues in dt-bindings.
- driver issues, use macros with name prefix for registers access; add limitations comments; fixed potential calculation overflow problem; add .get_state() callback and other miscellaneous code improvements.

Changes in v1:
The patch series is based on v6.11-rc6. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [1].

---

Chen Wang (3):
dt-bindings: pwm: sophgo: add PWM controller for SG2042
pwm: sophgo: add driver for Sophgo SG2042 PWM
riscv: sophgo: dts: add pwm controller for SG2042 SoC

 .../bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml       |  58 ++++++
 arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi        |   9 +
 drivers/pwm/Kconfig                           |  10 +
 drivers/pwm/Makefile                          |   1 +
 drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c               | 194 ++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 272 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c

base-commit: 40384c840ea1944d7c5a392e8975ed088ecf0b37

Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
author
#1 lore raw

PATCH v6 1/3 dt-bindings: pwm: sophgo: add PWM controller for SG2042

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Sophgo SG2042 contains a PWM controller, which has 4 channels and can generate PWM waveforms output.

---
 .../bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml       | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml new file +58 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5dea41fa4c44
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Sophgo SG2042 PWM controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Chen Wang <[email protected]>
+
+description:
+  This controller contains 4 channels which can generate PWM waveforms.
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: pwm.yaml#
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: sophgo,sg2042-pwm
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clocks:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clock-names:
+    items:
+      - const: apb
+
+  resets:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  "#pwm-cells":
+    const: 2
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - clocks
+  - clock-names
+  - resets
+
+unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/reset/sophgo,sg2042-reset.h>
+
+    pwm@7f006000 {
+        compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-pwm";
+        reg = <0x7f006000 0x1000>;
+        #pwm-cells = <2>;
+        clocks = <&clock 67>;
+        clock-names = "apb";
+        resets = <&rstgen RST_PWM>;
+    };
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
#2 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: sophgo: add PWM controller for SG2042

Hello,

Quoted 7 lines · Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Sophgo SG2042 contains a PWM controller, which has 4 channels and can generate PWM waveforms output.

Nitpick: Put your S-o-b last.

Quoted 37 lines
---
 .../bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml       | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml new file +26 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5dea41fa4c44
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Sophgo SG2042 PWM controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Chen Wang <[email protected]>
+
+description:
+  This controller contains 4 channels which can generate PWM waveforms.
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: pwm.yaml#
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: sophgo,sg2042-pwm
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clocks:
+    maxItems: 1

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml line 36

Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml new file +10 -0
+
+  clock-names:
+    items:
+      - const: apb
+
+  resets:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  "#pwm-cells":
+    const: 2

Please use 3 here.

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml line 45

Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml new file +9 -0
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - clocks
+  - clock-names
+  - resets
+
+unevaluatedProperties: false

Best regards
Uwe

#3 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: sophgo: add PWM controller for SG2042

Quoted 11 lines · Uwe Kleine-König

Hello,

Quoted 7 lines · Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Sophgo SG2042 contains a PWM controller, which has 4 channels and can generate PWM waveforms output.

Nitpick: Put your S-o-b last.

ok.

Quoted 40 lines
Quoted 40 lines
---
  .../bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml       | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)

create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml new file +29 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5dea41fa4c44
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Sophgo SG2042 PWM controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Chen Wang <[email protected]>
+
+description:
+  This controller contains 4 channels which can generate PWM waveforms.
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: pwm.yaml#
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: sophgo,sg2042-pwm
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clocks:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clock-names:
+    items:
Quoted 8 lines

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml line 36

Quoted 7 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml new file +7 -0
+      - const: apb
+
+  resets:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  "#pwm-cells":
+    const: 2

Please use 3 here.

Accepted.

Thanks.

Chen

[......]

author
#4 lore raw

PATCH v6 2/3 pwm: sophgo: add driver for Sophgo SG2042 PWM

In reply to Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add a PWM driver for PWM controller in Sophgo SG2042 SoC.

---
 drivers/pwm/Kconfig             |  10 ++
 drivers/pwm/Makefile            |   1 +
 drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 205 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c
drivers/pwm/Kconfig +10 -0
index 0915c1e7df16..ec85f3895936 100644
@@ -584,6 +584,16 @@ config PWM_SL28CPLD
 	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
 	  will be called pwm-sl28cpld.
 
+config PWM_SOPHGO_SG2042
+	tristate "Sophgo SG2042 PWM support"
+	depends on ARCH_SOPHGO || COMPILE_TEST
+	help
+	  PWM driver for the PWM controller on Sophgo SG2042 SoC. The PWM
+	  controller supports outputing 4 channels of PWM waveforms.
+
+	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
+	  will be called pwm_sophgo_sg2042.
+
 config PWM_SPEAR
 	tristate "STMicroelectronics SPEAr PWM support"
 	depends on PLAT_SPEAR || COMPILE_TEST
drivers/pwm/Makefile +1 -0
index 9081e0c0e9e0..539e0def3f82 100644
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_RZ_MTU3)	+= pwm-rz-mtu3.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SAMSUNG)	+= pwm-samsung.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SIFIVE)	+= pwm-sifive.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SL28CPLD)	+= pwm-sl28cpld.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SOPHGO_SG2042)	+= pwm-sophgo-sg2042.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SPEAR)		+= pwm-spear.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SPRD)		+= pwm-sprd.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_STI)		+= pwm-sti.o
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +194 -0

194 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] pwm: sophgo: add driver for Sophgo SG2042 PWM

Quoted 57 lines · Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add a PWM driver for PWM controller in Sophgo SG2042 SoC.

---
 drivers/pwm/Kconfig             |  10 ++
 drivers/pwm/Makefile            |   1 +
 drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 205 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c
drivers/pwm/Kconfig +10 -0
index 0915c1e7df16..ec85f3895936 100644
@@ -584,6 +584,16 @@ config PWM_SL28CPLD
 	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
 	  will be called pwm-sl28cpld.
 
+config PWM_SOPHGO_SG2042
+	tristate "Sophgo SG2042 PWM support"
+	depends on ARCH_SOPHGO || COMPILE_TEST
+	help
+	  PWM driver for the PWM controller on Sophgo SG2042 SoC. The PWM
+	  controller supports outputing 4 channels of PWM waveforms.
+
+	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
+	  will be called pwm_sophgo_sg2042.
+
 config PWM_SPEAR
 	tristate "STMicroelectronics SPEAr PWM support"
 	depends on PLAT_SPEAR || COMPILE_TEST
drivers/pwm/Makefile +1 -0
index 9081e0c0e9e0..539e0def3f82 100644
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_RZ_MTU3)	+= pwm-rz-mtu3.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SAMSUNG)	+= pwm-samsung.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SIFIVE)	+= pwm-sifive.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SL28CPLD)	+= pwm-sl28cpld.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SOPHGO_SG2042)	+= pwm-sophgo-sg2042.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SPEAR)		+= pwm-spear.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SPRD)		+= pwm-sprd.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_STI)		+= pwm-sti.o
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +5 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a3d12505e4aa
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Sophgo SG2042 PWM Controller Driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Sophgo Technology Inc.

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 15

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +10 -0
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Chen Wang <[email protected]>
+ *
+ * Limitations:
+ * - After reset, the output of the PWM channel is always high.
+ *   The value of HLPERIOD/PERIOD is 0.
+ * - When HLPERIOD or PERIOD is reconfigured, PWM will start to
+ *   output waveforms with the new configuration after completing
+ *   the running period.
+ * - When PERIOD and HLPERIOD is set to 0, the PWM wave output will
+ *   be stopped and the output is pulled to high.

Maybe I already asked: If there is a public manual for this chip, please add a link to it here.

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 26

Quoted 11 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +11 -0
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pwm.h>
+#include <linux/reset.h>
+
+#include <asm/div64.h>

The canonical include for that is <linux/math64.h>. This is also the header that defines mul_u64_u64_div_u64(). Your driver seems to compile only because clk.h includes math64.h via <linux/notifier.h> -> <linux/srcu.h> -> <linux/workqueue.h> -> <linux/timer.h> -> <linux/ktime.h> -> <linux/jiffies.h> -> <linux/math64.h>.

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +4 -0
+/*
+ * Offset RegisterName
+ * 0x0000 HLPERIOD0
+ * 0x0004 PERIOD0

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 41

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +10 -0
+ * 0x0008 HLPERIOD1
+ * 0x000C PERIOD1
+ * 0x0010 HLPERIOD2
+ * 0x0014 PERIOD2
+ * 0x0018 HLPERIOD3
+ * 0x001C PERIOD3
+ * Four groups and every group is composed of HLPERIOD & PERIOD
+ */
+#define SG2042_HLPERIOD(chan) ((chan) * 8 + 0)
+#define SG2042_PERIOD(chan) ((chan) * 8 + 4)

s/SG2042_/SG2042_PWM_/ to match the function prefix and driver name?

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +4 -0
+
+#define SG2042_PWM_CHANNELNUM	4
+
+/**

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 55

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +10 -0
+ * struct sg2042_pwm_ddata - private driver data
+ * @base:		base address of mapped PWM registers
+ * @clk_rate_hz:	rate of base clock in HZ
+ */
+struct sg2042_pwm_ddata {
+	void __iomem *base;
+	unsigned long clk_rate_hz;
+};
+
+static void pwm_sg2042_config(void __iomem *base, unsigned int chan, u32 period, u32 hlperiod)

Maybe pass ddata here instead of base and add

	void __iomem *base = ddata->base;

to the function body. Then the calls simplify from

	pwm_sg2042_config(ddata->base, pwm->hwpwm, period, hlperiod);

to

	pwm_sg2042_config(ddata, pwm->hwpwm, period, hlperiod);

.

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 66

Quoted 11 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +11 -0
+{
+	writel(period, base + SG2042_PERIOD(chan));
+	writel(hlperiod, base + SG2042_HLPERIOD(chan));
+}
+
+static int pwm_sg2042_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+			    const struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	struct sg2042_pwm_ddata *ddata = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+	u32 hlperiod;
+	u32 period;

state->period is measured in ns, the local variable period however holds a value measured in clock ticks. To make this still clearer than it already is, I suggest to rename the variable to period_ticks. Ditto for hlperiod.

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 78

Quoted 11 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +11 -0
+	if (state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!state->enabled) {
+		pwm_sg2042_config(ddata->base, pwm->hwpwm, 0, 0);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Period of High level (duty_cycle) = HLPERIOD x Period_clk
+	 * Period of One Cycle (period) = PERIOD x Period_clk

s/Period/Duration/ ? What is Period_clk?

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 85

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +7 -0
+	 */
+	period = min(mul_u64_u64_div_u64(ddata->clk_rate_hz, state->period, NSEC_PER_SEC), U32_MAX);
+	hlperiod = min(mul_u64_u64_div_u64(ddata->clk_rate_hz, state->duty_cycle, NSEC_PER_SEC), U32_MAX);
+
+	if (hlperiod > period) {
+		dev_err(pwmchip_parent(chip), "period < hlperiod, failed to apply current setting\n");
+		return -EINVAL;

No need to check for that, .apply() is only called with state->duty_cycle <= state->period.

Quoted 15 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +15 -0
+	}
+
+	dev_dbg(pwmchip_parent(chip), "chan[%u]: period=%u, hlperiod=%u\n",
+		pwm->hwpwm, period, hlperiod);
+
+	pwm_sg2042_config(ddata->base, pwm->hwpwm, period, hlperiod);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int pwm_sg2042_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	struct sg2042_pwm_ddata *ddata = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+	unsigned int chan = pwm->hwpwm;

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 110

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +10 -0
+	u32 hlperiod;
+	u32 period;
+
+	period = readl(ddata->base + SG2042_PERIOD(chan));
+	hlperiod = readl(ddata->base + SG2042_HLPERIOD(chan));
+
+	if (!period && !hlperiod)
+		state->enabled = false;
+	else
+		state->enabled = true;

What happens if hlperiod > period? Isn't period==0 enough for state->enabled = false? Also if period==0 there is no use in determining state->period and state->duty_cycle.

So I would expect here:

	period_ticks = readl(ddata->base + SG2042_PERIOD(chan));
	hlperiod_ticks = readl(ddata->base + SG2042_HLPERIOD(chan));

	if (!period_ticks) {
		state->enabled = false;
		return 0;
	}

	if (hlperiod_ticks > period_ticks)
		hlperiod_ticks = period_ticks;

	state->enabled = true;
	state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)period_ticks * NSEC_PER_SEC, ddata->clk_rate_hz);
	state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)hlperiod_ticks * NSEC_PER_SEC, ddata->clk_rate_hz);
	state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
Quoted 30 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +30 -0
+	state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)period * NSEC_PER_SEC, ddata->clk_rate_hz);
+	state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)hlperiod * NSEC_PER_SEC, ddata->clk_rate_hz);
+
+	state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct pwm_ops pwm_sg2042_ops = {
+	.apply = pwm_sg2042_apply,
+	.get_state = pwm_sg2042_get_state,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id sg2042_pwm_ids[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-pwm" },
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sg2042_pwm_ids);
+
+static int pwm_sg2042_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct sg2042_pwm_ddata *ddata;
+	struct reset_control *rst;
+	struct pwm_chip *chip;
+	struct clk *clk;
+	int ret;
+
+	chip = devm_pwmchip_alloc(dev, SG2042_PWM_CHANNELNUM, sizeof(*ddata));
+	if (IS_ERR(chip))

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 151

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +10 -0
+		return PTR_ERR(chip);
+	ddata = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+
+	ddata->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(ddata->base))
+		return PTR_ERR(ddata->base);
+
+	clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "apb");
+	if (IS_ERR(clk))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(clk), "failed to get base clk\n");

I like error messages to start consistently with a capital letter.

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 158

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +6 -0
+	ret = devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get(dev, clk);
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get exclusive rate\n");
+
+	ddata->clk_rate_hz = clk_get_rate(clk);
+	if (!ddata->clk_rate_hz || ddata->clk_rate_hz > NSEC_PER_SEC)

Please add a comment about why you check for > NSEC_PER_SEC.

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 169

Quoted 11 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +11 -0
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
+				     "Invalid clock rate: %lu\n", ddata->clk_rate_hz);
+
+	rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(dev, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(rst))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rst), "failed to get reset\n");
+
+	/* Deassert reset */
+	ret = reset_control_deassert(rst);
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to deassert\n");

There is devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared_deasserted() that does the two calls devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared() and reset_control_deassert() together and also cares for reasserting the reset at remove time.

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 181

Quoted 11 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +11 -0
+	chip->ops = &pwm_sg2042_ops;
+	chip->atomic = true;
+
+	ret = devm_pwmchip_add(dev, chip);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		reset_control_assert(rst);
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to register PWM chip\n");
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}

Best regards
Uwe

#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] pwm: sophgo: add driver for Sophgo SG2042 PWM

Quoted 13 lines · Uwe Kleine-König
Quoted 12 lines · Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add a PWM driver for PWM controller in Sophgo SG2042 SoC.

---
  drivers/pwm/Kconfig             |  10 ++
  drivers/pwm/Makefile            |   1 +
  drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 205 insertions(+)

create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c

[......]

Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 15 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +9 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a3d12505e4aa
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Sophgo SG2042 PWM Controller Driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Sophgo Technology Inc.
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Chen Wang <[email protected]>
+ *
+ * Limitations:
+ * - After reset, the output of the PWM channel is always high.
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 15

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +6 -0
+ *   The value of HLPERIOD/PERIOD is 0.
+ * - When HLPERIOD or PERIOD is reconfigured, PWM will start to
+ *   output waveforms with the new configuration after completing
+ *   the running period.
+ * - When PERIOD and HLPERIOD is set to 0, the PWM wave output will
+ *   be stopped and the output is pulled to high.

Maybe I already asked: If there is a public manual for this chip, please add a link to it here.

There is a TRM on line, I will add the link here in next version.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +8 -0
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pwm.h>
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 26

Quoted 3 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +3 -0
+#include <linux/reset.h>
+
+#include <asm/div64.h>

The canonical include for that is <linux/math64.h>. This is also the header that defines mul_u64_u64_div_u64(). Your driver seems to compile only because clk.h includes math64.h via <linux/notifier.h> -> <linux/srcu.h> -> <linux/workqueue.h> -> <linux/timer.h> -> <linux/ktime.h> -> <linux/jiffies.h> -> <linux/math64.h>.

Thanks, I will correct this.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +7 -0
+/*
+ * Offset RegisterName
+ * 0x0000 HLPERIOD0
+ * 0x0004 PERIOD0
+ * 0x0008 HLPERIOD1
+ * 0x000C PERIOD1
+ * 0x0010 HLPERIOD2
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 41

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +7 -0
+ * 0x0014 PERIOD2
+ * 0x0018 HLPERIOD3
+ * 0x001C PERIOD3
+ * Four groups and every group is composed of HLPERIOD & PERIOD
+ */
+#define SG2042_HLPERIOD(chan) ((chan) * 8 + 0)
+#define SG2042_PERIOD(chan) ((chan) * 8 + 4)

s/SG2042_/SG2042_PWM_/ to match the function prefix and driver name?

Accepted.

Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +4 -0
+
+#define SG2042_PWM_CHANNELNUM	4
+
+/**

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 55

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +10 -0
+ * struct sg2042_pwm_ddata - private driver data
+ * @base:		base address of mapped PWM registers
+ * @clk_rate_hz:	rate of base clock in HZ
+ */
+struct sg2042_pwm_ddata {
+	void __iomem *base;
+	unsigned long clk_rate_hz;
+};
+
+static void pwm_sg2042_config(void __iomem *base, unsigned int chan, u32 period, u32 hlperiod)

Maybe pass ddata here instead of base and add

	void __iomem *base = ddata->base;

to the function body. Then the calls simplify from

Quoted 7 lines
	pwm_sg2042_config(ddata->base, pwm->hwpwm, period, hlperiod);

to

	pwm_sg2042_config(ddata, pwm->hwpwm, period, hlperiod);

.

ok

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +7 -0
+{
+	writel(period, base + SG2042_PERIOD(chan));
+	writel(hlperiod, base + SG2042_HLPERIOD(chan));
+}
+
+static int pwm_sg2042_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+			    const struct pwm_state *state)
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 66

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +4 -0
+{
+	struct sg2042_pwm_ddata *ddata = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+	u32 hlperiod;
+	u32 period;

state->period is measured in ns, the local variable period however holds a value measured in clock ticks. To make this still clearer than it already is, I suggest to rename the variable to period_ticks. Ditto for hlperiod.

Agree, changing the name would indeed make it clearer

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +4 -0
+	if (state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!state->enabled) {
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 78

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +7 -0
+		pwm_sg2042_config(ddata->base, pwm->hwpwm, 0, 0);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Period of High level (duty_cycle) = HLPERIOD x Period_clk
+	 * Period of One Cycle (period) = PERIOD x Period_clk

s/Period/Duration/ ? What is Period_clk?

Period_clk is period of the input clock, i.e. 1/(ddata->clk_rate_hz).

Quoted 10 lines

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 85

Quoted 8 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +7 -0
+	 */
+	period = min(mul_u64_u64_div_u64(ddata->clk_rate_hz, state->period, NSEC_PER_SEC), U32_MAX);
+	hlperiod = min(mul_u64_u64_div_u64(ddata->clk_rate_hz, state->duty_cycle, NSEC_PER_SEC), U32_MAX);
+
+	if (hlperiod > period) {
+		dev_err(pwmchip_parent(chip), "period < hlperiod, failed to apply current setting\n");
+		return -EINVAL;

No need to check for that, .apply() is only called with state->duty_cycle <= state->period.

ok.

Quoted 31 lines
Quoted 15 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +15 -0
+	}
+
+	dev_dbg(pwmchip_parent(chip), "chan[%u]: period=%u, hlperiod=%u\n",
+		pwm->hwpwm, period, hlperiod);
+
+	pwm_sg2042_config(ddata->base, pwm->hwpwm, period, hlperiod);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int pwm_sg2042_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	struct sg2042_pwm_ddata *ddata = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+	unsigned int chan = pwm->hwpwm;

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 110

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +10 -0
+	u32 hlperiod;
+	u32 period;
+
+	period = readl(ddata->base + SG2042_PERIOD(chan));
+	hlperiod = readl(ddata->base + SG2042_HLPERIOD(chan));
+
+	if (!period && !hlperiod)
+		state->enabled = false;
+	else
+		state->enabled = true;

What happens if hlperiod > period? Isn't period==0 enough for state->enabled = false? Also if period==0 there is no use in determining state->period and state->duty_cycle.

So I would expect here:

Quoted 15 lines
	period_ticks = readl(ddata->base + SG2042_PERIOD(chan));
	hlperiod_ticks = readl(ddata->base + SG2042_HLPERIOD(chan));

	if (!period_ticks) {
		state->enabled = false;
		return 0;
	}

	if (hlperiod_ticks > period_ticks)
		hlperiod_ticks = period_ticks;

	state->enabled = true;
	state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)period_ticks * NSEC_PER_SEC, ddata->clk_rate_hz);
	state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)hlperiod_ticks * NSEC_PER_SEC, ddata->clk_rate_hz);
	state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;

Thanks, I will improve this.

Quoted 33 lines
Quoted 33 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +33 -0
+	state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)period * NSEC_PER_SEC, ddata->clk_rate_hz);
+	state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)hlperiod * NSEC_PER_SEC, ddata->clk_rate_hz);
+
+	state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct pwm_ops pwm_sg2042_ops = {
+	.apply = pwm_sg2042_apply,
+	.get_state = pwm_sg2042_get_state,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id sg2042_pwm_ids[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-pwm" },
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sg2042_pwm_ids);
+
+static int pwm_sg2042_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct sg2042_pwm_ddata *ddata;
+	struct reset_control *rst;
+	struct pwm_chip *chip;
+	struct clk *clk;
+	int ret;
+
+	chip = devm_pwmchip_alloc(dev, SG2042_PWM_CHANNELNUM, sizeof(*ddata));
+	if (IS_ERR(chip))
+		return PTR_ERR(chip);
+	ddata = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 151

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +7 -0
+	ddata->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(ddata->base))
+		return PTR_ERR(ddata->base);
+
+	clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "apb");
+	if (IS_ERR(clk))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(clk), "failed to get base clk\n");

I like error messages to start consistently with a capital letter.

ok.

Quoted 8 lines

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 158

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +6 -0
+	ret = devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get(dev, clk);
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get exclusive rate\n");
+
+	ddata->clk_rate_hz = clk_get_rate(clk);
+	if (!ddata->clk_rate_hz || ddata->clk_rate_hz > NSEC_PER_SEC)

Please add a comment about why you check for > NSEC_PER_SEC.

Seems no need to check this (> NSEC_PER_SEC ), I will remove it in next version.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +7 -0
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
+				     "Invalid clock rate: %lu\n", ddata->clk_rate_hz);
+
+	rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(dev, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(rst))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rst), "failed to get reset\n");
+
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 169

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +4 -0
+	/* Deassert reset */
+	ret = reset_control_deassert(rst);
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to deassert\n");

There is devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared_deasserted() that does the two calls devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared() and reset_control_deassert() together and also cares for reasserting the reset at remove time.

ok, I will check this out in next version.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +5 -0
+	chip->ops = &pwm_sg2042_ops;
+	chip->atomic = true;
+
+	ret = devm_pwmchip_add(dev, chip);
+	if (ret < 0) {
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 181

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +6 -0
+		reset_control_assert(rst);
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to register PWM chip\n");
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}

Best regards
Uwe

Thanks,

Chen.

#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] pwm: sophgo: add driver for Sophgo SG2042 PWM

Hello,

Quoted 11 lines · Chen Wang
Quoted 9 lines · Uwe Kleine-König

drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c line 158

Quoted 6 lines · Chen Wang
drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +6 -0
+	ret = devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get(dev, clk);
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get exclusive rate\n");
+
+	ddata->clk_rate_hz = clk_get_rate(clk);
+	if (!ddata->clk_rate_hz || ddata->clk_rate_hz > NSEC_PER_SEC)

Please add a comment about why you check for > NSEC_PER_SEC.

Quoted 2 lines

Seems no need to check this (> NSEC_PER_SEC ), I will remove it in next version.

The rational is usually that

	mul_u64_u64_div_u64(ddata->clk_rate_hz, state->period, NSEC_PER_SEC)

cannot overflow. Your driver relies on that, too. (Which somewhat proves that a comment is indeed necessary :-)

Best regards
Uwe

#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] pwm: sophgo: add driver for Sophgo SG2042 PWM

Quoted 6 lines · Uwe Kleine-König

The rational is usually that

	mul_u64_u64_div_u64(ddata->clk_rate_hz, state->period, NSEC_PER_SEC)

cannot overflow. Your driver relies on that, too. (Which somewhat proves that a comment is indeed necessary 🙂

Oh, thanks for pointing that out, I almost forgot about that. Will check this out in the next version.

Regards,

Chen

author
#9 lore raw

PATCH v6 3/3 riscv: sophgo: dts: add pwm controller for SG2042 SoC

In reply to Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

SG2042 has one PWM controller, which has 4 pwm output channels.

---
 arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi +9 -0
index e62ac51ac55a..77dd65d79946 100644
@@ -165,6 +165,15 @@ port2a: gpio-controller@0 {
 			};
 		};
 
+		pwm: pwm@703000c000 {
+			compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-pwm";
+			reg = <0x70 0x3000c000 0x0 0x20>;
+			#pwm-cells = <2>;
+			clocks = <&clkgen GATE_CLK_APB_PWM>;
+			clock-names = "apb";
+			resets = <&rstgen RST_PWM>;
+		};
+
 		pllclk: clock-controller@70300100c0 {
 			compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-pll";
 			reg = <0x70 0x300100c0 0x0 0x40>;
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
#10 lore raw
In reply to Chen Wang

Hi, Uwe,

I just upgraded this patchset and rebased it to the latest v6.13-rc1, hope you can merge it in v6.14.

BTW, you just please handle the bindings & driver part, I will handle the left DTS part.

Thanks,

Chen

Quoted 71 lines · Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add driver for pwm controller of Sophgo SG2042 SoC.

Thanks,
Chen

---

Changes in v6:
Nothing major changes just rebased onto v6.13-rc1 and retested.

Changes in v5:
The patch series is based on v6.12-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [5].

Updated driver to add resets property for pwm controller node as per suggestion from Inochi.

Changes in v4:
The patch series is based on v6.12-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [4].

Updated driver to set property atomic of pwm_chip to true as per suggestion from Sean.

Changes in v3:
The patch series is catched up with v6.12-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [3].

Add patch #3 for dts part change.

Changes in v2:
The patch series is based on v6.11-rc6. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [2].

Fixed following issues as per comments from Yixun Lan, Krzysztof Kozlowski and Uwe Kleine-König, thanks.

- Some minor issues in dt-bindings.
- driver issues, use macros with name prefix for registers access; add limitations comments; fixed potential calculation overflow problem; add .get_state() callback and other miscellaneous code improvements.

Changes in v1:
The patch series is based on v6.11-rc6. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [1].

---

Chen Wang (3):
dt-bindings: pwm: sophgo: add PWM controller for SG2042
pwm: sophgo: add driver for Sophgo SG2042 PWM
riscv: sophgo: dts: add pwm controller for SG2042 SoC

  .../bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml       |  58 ++++++
  arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi        |   9 +
  drivers/pwm/Kconfig                           |  10 +
  drivers/pwm/Makefile                          |   1 +
  drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c               | 194 ++++++++++++++++++
  5 files changed, 272 insertions(+)

create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c

base-commit: 40384c840ea1944d7c5a392e8975ed088ecf0b37

#11 lore raw
In reply to Chen Wang

Hello & Happy new year, Uwe,

Just ping and want to know if this will be picked by pwm/for-next for targeting 6.14?

Thanks,

Chen

Quoted 71 lines · Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add driver for pwm controller of Sophgo SG2042 SoC.

Thanks,
Chen

---

Changes in v6:
Nothing major changes just rebased onto v6.13-rc1 and retested.

Changes in v5:
The patch series is based on v6.12-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [5].

Updated driver to add resets property for pwm controller node as per suggestion from Inochi.

Changes in v4:
The patch series is based on v6.12-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [4].

Updated driver to set property atomic of pwm_chip to true as per suggestion from Sean.

Changes in v3:
The patch series is catched up with v6.12-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [3].

Add patch #3 for dts part change.

Changes in v2:
The patch series is based on v6.11-rc6. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [2].

Fixed following issues as per comments from Yixun Lan, Krzysztof Kozlowski and Uwe Kleine-König, thanks.

- Some minor issues in dt-bindings.
- driver issues, use macros with name prefix for registers access; add limitations comments; fixed potential calculation overflow problem; add .get_state() callback and other miscellaneous code improvements.

Changes in v1:
The patch series is based on v6.11-rc6. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [1].

---

Chen Wang (3):
dt-bindings: pwm: sophgo: add PWM controller for SG2042
pwm: sophgo: add driver for Sophgo SG2042 PWM
riscv: sophgo: dts: add pwm controller for SG2042 SoC

  .../bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml       |  58 ++++++
  arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi        |   9 +
  drivers/pwm/Kconfig                           |  10 +
  drivers/pwm/Makefile                          |   1 +
  drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c               | 194 ++++++++++++++++++
  5 files changed, 272 insertions(+)

create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/sophgo,sg2042-pwm.yaml create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c

base-commit: 40384c840ea1944d7c5a392e8975ed088ecf0b37