Skip to contentSkip to conversation

cleanup: Remove NULL check from unconditional guards

PATCH Applied Dmitry Ilvokhin 5 participants 15 messages Jun 2 – Jun 5

Subsystems (4)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

v5 cover cleanup: Remove NULL check from unconditional guards

Unconditional guard destructors have dead NULL checks. The lock operation in the constructor would crash before the destructor ever runs with NULL.

- Patches 1-2 prepare guards that legitimately handle NULL.
- Patch 3 adds __nonnull_args() to guard constructors for compile-time enforcement.
- Patch 4 removes the dead checks.

As compiled by GCC-11 with defconfig on top of the locking/core:

    Total: Before=23889980, After=23834334, chg -0.23%

Changes in v5:

- Renamed __nonnull() attribute to __nonnull_args() to fix User Mode Linux build failures (kernel test robot).
- Dropped Acked-by tag from Miguel, since I renamed the attribute.

Changes in v4:

- Re-worded commit message paragraph about nonnull "compiler-enforced verification" (Miguel Ojeda).
- Fixed GCC documentation link for nonnull() attribute (Miguel Ojeda).
- Placed nonnull() before nonstring() in include/linux/compiler_attributes.h (Miguel Ojeda).
- Picked up tags, where appropriate.

Changes in v3:

- Audited usages of DEFINE_GUARD(), __DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD() and DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1() to make sure NULL check removal will work correctly (Peter Zijlstra).
- Moved NULL check into irqdesc_lock unlock expression (Peter Zijlstra).
- Added compiler-enforced nonnull() check for guard constructors.
- Converted nvdimm_bus guard to class.

Changes in v2:

- Expand commit message with detailed reasoning, why the proposed change is correct.
- Rebase on top of locking/core.

v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

See also [1] for relevant discussion.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

Dmitry Ilvokhin (4):
nvdimm: Convert nvdimm_bus guard to class
genirq: Move NULL check into irqdesc_lock guard unlock expression
cleanup: Annotate guard constructors with nonnull
cleanup: Remove NULL check from unconditional guards

 drivers/nvdimm/nd.h                 | 7 +++++--
 include/linux/cleanup.h             | 8 +++++---
 include/linux/compiler_attributes.h | 9 +++++++++
 kernel/irq/internals.h              | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0-Meta
#1 lore raw

PATCH v5 1/4 nvdimm: Convert nvdimm_bus guard to class

The nvdimm_bus guard accepts NULL and skips locking when NULL is passed. Convert from DEFINE_GUARD() to DEFINE_CLASS() + DEFINE_CLASS_IS_GUARD().

This is a preparatory change for making DEFINE_GUARD() constructors __nonnull_args(). nvdimm_bus legitimately passes NULL, so it must be adjusted to avoid a compile error.

No functional change.

---
 drivers/nvdimm/nd.h | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/nvdimm/nd.h +5 -2
index b199eea3260e..18b64559664b 100644
@@ -632,8 +632,11 @@ u64 nd_region_interleave_set_cookie(struct nd_region *nd_region,
 u64 nd_region_interleave_set_altcookie(struct nd_region *nd_region);
 void nvdimm_bus_lock(struct device *dev);
 void nvdimm_bus_unlock(struct device *dev);
-DEFINE_GUARD(nvdimm_bus, struct device *,
-	     if (_T) nvdimm_bus_lock(_T), if (_T) nvdimm_bus_unlock(_T));
+DEFINE_CLASS(nvdimm_bus, struct device *,
+	     if (_T) nvdimm_bus_unlock(_T),
+	     ({ if (_T) nvdimm_bus_lock(_T); _T; }),
+	     struct device *_T);
+DEFINE_CLASS_IS_GUARD(nvdimm_bus);
 
 bool is_nvdimm_bus_locked(struct device *dev);
 void nvdimm_check_and_set_ro(struct gendisk *disk);
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0-Meta
#2 lore raw

[tip: locking/core] nvdimm: Convert nvdimm_bus guard to class

The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     813e5598e5b551a1fb82b516428ce2f135921122
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/813e5598e5b551a1fb82b516428ce2f135921122
Author:        Dmitry Ilvokhin <[email protected]>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 02 Jun 2026 07:12:50 
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
CommitterDate: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 11:38:47 +02:00

nvdimm: Convert nvdimm_bus guard to class

The nvdimm_bus guard accepts NULL and skips locking when NULL is passed. Convert from DEFINE_GUARD() to DEFINE_CLASS() + DEFINE_CLASS_IS_GUARD().

This is a preparatory change for making DEFINE_GUARD() constructors __nonnull_args(). nvdimm_bus legitimately passes NULL, so it must be adjusted to avoid a compile error.

No functional change.

---
 drivers/nvdimm/nd.h | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/nvdimm/nd.h +5 -2
index b199eea..18b6455 100644
@@ -632,8 +632,11 @@ u64 nd_region_interleave_set_cookie(struct nd_region *nd_region,
 u64 nd_region_interleave_set_altcookie(struct nd_region *nd_region);
 void nvdimm_bus_lock(struct device *dev);
 void nvdimm_bus_unlock(struct device *dev);
-DEFINE_GUARD(nvdimm_bus, struct device *,
-	     if (_T) nvdimm_bus_lock(_T), if (_T) nvdimm_bus_unlock(_T));
+DEFINE_CLASS(nvdimm_bus, struct device *,
+	     if (_T) nvdimm_bus_unlock(_T),
+	     ({ if (_T) nvdimm_bus_lock(_T); _T; }),
+	     struct device *_T);
+DEFINE_CLASS_IS_GUARD(nvdimm_bus);
 
 bool is_nvdimm_bus_locked(struct device *dev);
 void nvdimm_check_and_set_ro(struct gendisk *disk);
#3 lore raw

PATCH v5 2/4 genirq: Move NULL check into irqdesc_lock guard unlock expression

In reply to Dmitry Ilvokhin

irqdesc_lock uses __DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD() directly with a custom constructor that can set .lock to NULL.

In preparation for removing the NULL check from __DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD(), move the NULL check into the irqdesc_lock unlock expression, making the NULL handling explicit at the call site.

No functional change.

---
 kernel/irq/internals.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/irq/internals.h +1 -1
index 9412e57056f5..347cb333b9fe 100644
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ void __irq_put_desc_unlock(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned long flags, bool bus)
 
 __DEFINE_CLASS_IS_CONDITIONAL(irqdesc_lock, true);
 __DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD(irqdesc_lock, struct irq_desc,
-		      __irq_put_desc_unlock(_T->lock, _T->flags, _T->bus),
+		      if (_T->lock) __irq_put_desc_unlock(_T->lock, _T->flags, _T->bus),
 		      unsigned long flags; bool bus);
 
 static inline class_irqdesc_lock_t class_irqdesc_lock_constructor(unsigned int irq, bool bus,
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0-Meta
maintainer Acked-by on v5 2/4
#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] genirq: Move NULL check into irqdesc_lock guard unlock expression

Quoted 10 lines · Dmitry Ilvokhin

irqdesc_lock uses __DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD() directly with a custom constructor that can set .lock to NULL.

In preparation for removing the NULL check from __DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD(), move the NULL check into the irqdesc_lock unlock expression, making the NULL handling explicit at the call site.

No functional change.

#5 lore raw

[tip: locking/core] genirq: Move NULL check into irqdesc_lock guard unlock expression

In reply to Dmitry Ilvokhin
The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     08d4a7837f008ea6031c1292aa839ad881d7b3f1
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/08d4a7837f008ea6031c1292aa839ad881d7b3f1
Author:        Dmitry Ilvokhin <[email protected]>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 02 Jun 2026 07:12:51 
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
CommitterDate: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 11:38:47 +02:00

genirq: Move NULL check into irqdesc_lock guard unlock expression

irqdesc_lock uses __DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD() directly with a custom constructor that can set .lock to NULL.

In preparation for removing the NULL check from __DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD(), move the NULL check into the irqdesc_lock unlock expression, making the NULL handling explicit at the call site.

No functional change.

---
 kernel/irq/internals.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/irq/internals.h +1 -1
index 9412e57..347cb33 100644
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ void __irq_put_desc_unlock(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned long flags, bool bus)
 
 __DEFINE_CLASS_IS_CONDITIONAL(irqdesc_lock, true);
 __DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD(irqdesc_lock, struct irq_desc,
-		      __irq_put_desc_unlock(_T->lock, _T->flags, _T->bus),
+		      if (_T->lock) __irq_put_desc_unlock(_T->lock, _T->flags, _T->bus),
 		      unsigned long flags; bool bus);
 
 static inline class_irqdesc_lock_t class_irqdesc_lock_constructor(unsigned int irq, bool bus,
#6 lore raw

PATCH v5 3/4 cleanup: Annotate guard constructors with nonnull

In reply to Dmitry Ilvokhin

Add __nonnull_args() to unconditional guard constructors so the compiler warns when NULL is statically known to be passed:

- DEFINE_GUARD(): re-declare the constructor with __nonnull_args().
- __DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(): annotate the constructor directly.

DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0() needs no annotation: its constructor takes no pointer arguments (.lock is hardcoded to (void *)1).

Define the __nonnull_args() macro in compiler_attributes.h, following the existing convention for attribute wrappers. Deliberately not named '__nonnull', to avoid clashing with glibc's __nonnull() when kernel and userspace headers are combined (User Mode Linux for example).

---
Miguel, I dropped your Acked-by due to the rename. Went with __nonnull_args() (over __knonnull()). Happy to restore your tag if that spelling works for you.

 include/linux/cleanup.h             | 4 +++-
 include/linux/compiler_attributes.h | 9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
include/linux/cleanup.h +3 -1
index ea95ca4bc11c..4e60d519713c 100644
@@ -397,6 +397,7 @@ static __maybe_unused const bool class_##_name##_is_conditional = _is_cond
 	__DEFINE_GUARD_LOCK_PTR(_name, _T)
 
 #define DEFINE_GUARD(_name, _type, _lock, _unlock) \
+	static __always_inline __nonnull_args() _type class_##_name##_constructor(_type _T); \
 	DEFINE_CLASS(_name, _type, if (_T) { _unlock; }, ({ _lock; _T; }), _type _T); \
 	DEFINE_CLASS_IS_GUARD(_name)
 
@@ -497,7 +498,8 @@ static __always_inline void class_##_name##_destructor(class_##_name##_t *_T) \
 __DEFINE_GUARD_LOCK_PTR(_name, &_T->lock)
 
 #define __DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(_name, _type, ...)			\
-static __always_inline class_##_name##_t class_##_name##_constructor(_type *l) \
+static __always_inline __nonnull_args()					\
+class_##_name##_t class_##_name##_constructor(_type *l)			\
 	__no_context_analysis						\
 {									\
 	class_##_name##_t _t = { .lock = l }, *_T = &_t;		\
include/linux/compiler_attributes.h +9 -0
index c16d4199bf92..cffe09387ea6 100644
@@ -230,6 +230,15 @@
  */
 #define   noinline                      __attribute__((__noinline__))
 
+/*
+ * Note: deliberately not named '__nonnull', to avoid clashing with glibc's
+ * __nonnull() when kernel and userspace headers are combined.
+ *
+ *   gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Attributes.html#index-nonnull
+ * clang: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#nonnull
+ */
+#define __nonnull_args(x...)		__attribute__((__nonnull__(x)))
+
 /*
  * Optional: only supported since gcc >= 8
  * Optional: not supported by clang
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0-Meta
#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] cleanup: Annotate guard constructors with nonnull

Quoted 4 lines · Dmitry Ilvokhin

Miguel, I dropped your Acked-by due to the rename. Went with __nonnull_args() (over __knonnull()). Happy to restore your tag if that spelling works for you.

I am fine with either, but thanks for the caution! :)

I assume _args() is meant as "the nonnull for the arguments, not the return"?

Cheers,
Miguel

#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] cleanup: Annotate guard constructors with nonnull

Quoted 7 lines · Miguel Ojeda
Quoted 4 lines · Dmitry Ilvokhin

Miguel, I dropped your Acked-by due to the rename. Went with __nonnull_args() (over __knonnull()). Happy to restore your tag if that spelling works for you.

I am fine with either, but thanks for the caution! :)

Thanks for confirmation, Miguel.

Quoted 3 lines

I assume _args() is meant as "the nonnull for the arguments, not the return"?

Yes, that is exactly what I had in mind.

#9 lore raw

[tip: locking/core] cleanup: Annotate guard constructors with nonnull

In reply to Dmitry Ilvokhin
The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     22302af28d3f7c3ca38536978c80db51d2a9e283
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/22302af28d3f7c3ca38536978c80db51d2a9e283
Author:        Dmitry Ilvokhin <[email protected]>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 02 Jun 2026 07:12:52 
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
CommitterDate: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 11:38:48 +02:00

cleanup: Annotate guard constructors with nonnull

Add __nonnull_args() to unconditional guard constructors so the compiler warns when NULL is statically known to be passed:

- DEFINE_GUARD(): re-declare the constructor with __nonnull_args().
- __DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(): annotate the constructor directly.

DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0() needs no annotation: its constructor takes no pointer arguments (.lock is hardcoded to (void *)1).

Define the __nonnull_args() macro in compiler_attributes.h, following the existing convention for attribute wrappers. Deliberately not named '__nonnull', to avoid clashing with glibc's __nonnull() when kernel and userspace headers are combined (User Mode Linux for example).

---
 include/linux/cleanup.h             |  4 +++-
 include/linux/compiler_attributes.h |  9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
include/linux/cleanup.h +3 -1
index ea95ca4..4e60d51 100644
@@ -397,6 +397,7 @@ static __maybe_unused const bool class_##_name##_is_conditional = _is_cond
 	__DEFINE_GUARD_LOCK_PTR(_name, _T)
 
 #define DEFINE_GUARD(_name, _type, _lock, _unlock) \
+	static __always_inline __nonnull_args() _type class_##_name##_constructor(_type _T); \
 	DEFINE_CLASS(_name, _type, if (_T) { _unlock; }, ({ _lock; _T; }), _type _T); \
 	DEFINE_CLASS_IS_GUARD(_name)
 
@@ -497,7 +498,8 @@ static __always_inline void class_##_name##_destructor(class_##_name##_t *_T) \
 __DEFINE_GUARD_LOCK_PTR(_name, &_T->lock)
 
 #define __DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(_name, _type, ...)			\
-static __always_inline class_##_name##_t class_##_name##_constructor(_type *l) \
+static __always_inline __nonnull_args()					\
+class_##_name##_t class_##_name##_constructor(_type *l)			\
 	__no_context_analysis						\
 {									\
 	class_##_name##_t _t = { .lock = l }, *_T = &_t;		\
include/linux/compiler_attributes.h +9 -0
index c16d419..cffe093 100644
@@ -231,6 +231,15 @@
 #define   noinline                      __attribute__((__noinline__))
 
 /*
+ * Note: deliberately not named '__nonnull', to avoid clashing with glibc's
+ * __nonnull() when kernel and userspace headers are combined.
+ *
+ *   gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Attributes.html#index-nonnull
+ * clang: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#nonnull
+ */
+#define __nonnull_args(x...)		__attribute__((__nonnull__(x)))
+
+/*
  * Optional: only supported since gcc >= 8
  * Optional: not supported by clang
  *
#10 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] cleanup: Annotate guard constructors with nonnull

In reply to Dmitry Ilvokhin
Quoted 14 lines · Dmitry Ilvokhin

Add __nonnull_args() to unconditional guard constructors so the compiler warns when NULL is statically known to be passed:

- DEFINE_GUARD(): re-declare the constructor with __nonnull_args().
- __DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(): annotate the constructor directly.

DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0() needs no annotation: its constructor takes no pointer arguments (.lock is hardcoded to (void *)1).

Define the __nonnull_args() macro in compiler_attributes.h, following the existing convention for attribute wrappers. Deliberately not named '__nonnull', to avoid clashing with glibc's __nonnull() when kernel and userspace headers are combined (User Mode Linux for example).

Quoted 6 lines

---
Miguel, I dropped your Acked-by due to the rename. Went with __nonnull_args() (over __knonnull()). Happy to restore your tag if that spelling works for you.

Sparse doesn't like an empty __nonnull_args() at all.

./include/linux/spinlock.h:608:1: error: an expression is expected before ')' ./include/linux/spinlock.h:619:1: error: an expression is expected before ')' ./include/linux/spinlock.h:631:1: error: an expression is expected before ')'

Shouldn't we specify the arguments which are non-NULL? __nonnull_args(1)?

regards,
dan carpenter

#11 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] cleanup: Annotate guard constructors with nonnull

Quoted 22 lines · Dan Carpenter
Quoted 14 lines · Dmitry Ilvokhin

Add __nonnull_args() to unconditional guard constructors so the compiler warns when NULL is statically known to be passed:

- DEFINE_GUARD(): re-declare the constructor with __nonnull_args().
- __DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(): annotate the constructor directly.

DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0() needs no annotation: its constructor takes no pointer arguments (.lock is hardcoded to (void *)1).

Define the __nonnull_args() macro in compiler_attributes.h, following the existing convention for attribute wrappers. Deliberately not named '__nonnull', to avoid clashing with glibc's __nonnull() when kernel and userspace headers are combined (User Mode Linux for example).

Quoted 6 lines

---
Miguel, I dropped your Acked-by due to the rename. Went with __nonnull_args() (over __knonnull()). Happy to restore your tag if that spelling works for you.

Quoted 8 lines

Sparse doesn't like an empty __nonnull_args() at all.

./include/linux/spinlock.h:608:1: error: an expression is expected before ')' ./include/linux/spinlock.h:619:1: error: an expression is expected before ')' ./include/linux/spinlock.h:631:1: error: an expression is expected before ')'

Shouldn't we specify the arguments which are non-NULL? __nonnull_args(1)?

Thanks for the report, Dan.

That is interesting, it seems sparse trips over the empty-parens form the guard macro expands to, nonnull(), but is fine with __attribute__((nonnull)) without explicit arguments, that a few places in-tree already use. GCC and clang accept both, so this probably deserves a fix in sparse too.

Meanwhile, spelling the argument out explicitly is a simple and reasonable fix (and arguably clearer). Patch below.

From 50f7e7eaad1d33773cee9a278625fdb4b451f53b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Ilvokhin <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 03:06:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] cleanup: Specify nonnull argument index

The guard constructors were annotated with an empty __nonnull_args(), relying on __nonnull__() marking every pointer parameter as non-NULL. Sparse cannot parse the empty argument list.

Both constructors take the lock pointer as their first parameter, so specify the index explicitly: __nonnull_args(1).

---
 include/linux/cleanup.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
include/linux/cleanup.h +2 -2
index 65416938e318..b1b5698cbf1b 100644
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static __maybe_unused const bool class_##_name##_is_conditional = _is_cond
 	__DEFINE_GUARD_LOCK_PTR(_name, _T)
 
 #define DEFINE_GUARD(_name, _type, _lock, _unlock) \
-	static __always_inline __nonnull_args() _type class_##_name##_constructor(_type _T); \
+	static __always_inline __nonnull_args(1) _type class_##_name##_constructor(_type _T); \
 	DEFINE_CLASS(_name, _type, _unlock, ({ _lock; _T; }), _type _T); \
 	DEFINE_CLASS_IS_GUARD(_name)
 
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static __always_inline void class_##_name##_destructor(class_##_name##_t *_T) \
 __DEFINE_GUARD_LOCK_PTR(_name, &_T->lock)
 
 #define __DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(_name, _type, ...)			\
-static __always_inline __nonnull_args()					\
+static __always_inline __nonnull_args(1)				\
 class_##_name##_t class_##_name##_constructor(_type *l)			\
 	__no_context_analysis						\
 {									\
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0-Meta
#12 lore raw

[tip: locking/core] cleanup: Specify nonnull argument index

The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     a40e0f8eadd44d7b0f856b54c876aea1b93415f4
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/a40e0f8eadd44d7b0f856b54c876aea1b93415f4
Author:        Dmitry Ilvokhin <[email protected]>
AuthorDate:    Fri, 05 Jun 2026 03:06:22 -07:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
CommitterDate: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 14:46:51 +02:00

cleanup: Specify nonnull argument index

The guard constructors were annotated with an empty __nonnull_args(), relying on __nonnull__() marking every pointer parameter as non-NULL. Sparse cannot parse the empty argument list.

Both constructors take the lock pointer as their first parameter, so specify the index explicitly: __nonnull_args(1).

---
 include/linux/cleanup.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
include/linux/cleanup.h +2 -2
index 6541693..b1b5698 100644
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static __maybe_unused const bool class_##_name##_is_conditional = _is_cond
 	__DEFINE_GUARD_LOCK_PTR(_name, _T)
 
 #define DEFINE_GUARD(_name, _type, _lock, _unlock) \
-	static __always_inline __nonnull_args() _type class_##_name##_constructor(_type _T); \
+	static __always_inline __nonnull_args(1) _type class_##_name##_constructor(_type _T); \
 	DEFINE_CLASS(_name, _type, _unlock, ({ _lock; _T; }), _type _T); \
 	DEFINE_CLASS_IS_GUARD(_name)
 
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static __always_inline void class_##_name##_destructor(class_##_name##_t *_T) \
 __DEFINE_GUARD_LOCK_PTR(_name, &_T->lock)
 
 #define __DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(_name, _type, ...)			\
-static __always_inline __nonnull_args()					\
+static __always_inline __nonnull_args(1)				\
 class_##_name##_t class_##_name##_constructor(_type *l)			\
 	__no_context_analysis						\
 {									\
#13 lore raw

PATCH v5 4/4 cleanup: Remove NULL check from unconditional guards

In reply to Dmitry Ilvokhin

The unconditional guard destructors check whether the lock pointer is NULL before unlocking. This check is dead code because unconditional guards guarantee a non-NULL lock pointer at destructor time.

DEFINE_GUARD() runs the lock operation unconditionally in the constructor. If the pointer were NULL, the lock operation (e.g. mutex_lock(NULL)) would crash before the constructor returns. The destructor never runs with a NULL pointer. All DEFINE_GUARD() users dereference the pointer in their lock. Verified by auditing every instance found by: git grep -n -A 1 'DEFINE_GUARD('. The only exception is xe_pm_runtime_release_only, whose constructor is a noop, but it has no callers.

__DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD() has only a few usages outside of include/linux/cleanup.h: tty_port_tty (NULL-checks in its tty_kref_put() call), irqdesc_lock (fixed earlier) and two guards in kernel/sched/sched.h (dereference the pointer unconditionally in their lock constructors).

DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1() sets .lock from its argument and runs the lock operation in the constructor. Same reasoning applies. All DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1() users dereference the pointer in their lock. Also, verified by auditing every match of: git grep -n 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1('.

DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0() hardcodes .lock = (void *)1 in the constructor, so it is never NULL by construction.

Conditional (_try) variants: DEFINE_GUARD_COND() and DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND() use EXTEND_CLASS_COND(), whose wrapper destructor returns early when the lock was not acquired, before reaching the base destructor since commit 2deccd5c862a ("cleanup: Optimize guards"):

    if (_cond) return; class_##_name##_destructor(_T);

As compiled by GCC-11 with defconfig on top of the locking/core:

    Total: Before=23889980, After=23834334, chg -0.23%
---
 include/linux/cleanup.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
include/linux/cleanup.h +2 -2
index 4e60d519713c..65416938e318 100644
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static __maybe_unused const bool class_##_name##_is_conditional = _is_cond
 
 #define DEFINE_GUARD(_name, _type, _lock, _unlock) \
 	static __always_inline __nonnull_args() _type class_##_name##_constructor(_type _T); \
-	DEFINE_CLASS(_name, _type, if (_T) { _unlock; }, ({ _lock; _T; }), _type _T); \
+	DEFINE_CLASS(_name, _type, _unlock, ({ _lock; _T; }), _type _T); \
 	DEFINE_CLASS_IS_GUARD(_name)
 
 #define DEFINE_GUARD_COND_4(_name, _ext, _lock, _cond) \
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ typedef struct {							\
 static __always_inline void class_##_name##_destructor(class_##_name##_t *_T) \
 	__no_context_analysis						\
 {									\
-	if (_T->lock) { _unlock; }					\
+	_unlock;							\
 }									\
 									\
 __DEFINE_GUARD_LOCK_PTR(_name, &_T->lock)
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0-Meta
#14 lore raw
The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     a13ab9dd6eb2a89f14b466c3884730ea7969253f
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/a13ab9dd6eb2a89f14b466c3884730ea7969253f
Author:        Dmitry Ilvokhin <[email protected]>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 02 Jun 2026 07:12:53 
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
CommitterDate: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 11:38:48 +02:00

cleanup: Remove NULL check from unconditional guards

The unconditional guard destructors check whether the lock pointer is NULL before unlocking. This check is dead code because unconditional guards guarantee a non-NULL lock pointer at destructor time.

DEFINE_GUARD() runs the lock operation unconditionally in the constructor. If the pointer were NULL, the lock operation (e.g. mutex_lock(NULL)) would crash before the constructor returns. The destructor never runs with a NULL pointer. All DEFINE_GUARD() users dereference the pointer in their lock. Verified by auditing every instance found by: git grep -n -A 1 'DEFINE_GUARD('. The only exception is xe_pm_runtime_release_only, whose constructor is a noop, but it has no callers.

__DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD() has only a few usages outside of include/linux/cleanup.h: tty_port_tty (NULL-checks in its tty_kref_put() call), irqdesc_lock (fixed earlier) and two guards in kernel/sched/sched.h (dereference the pointer unconditionally in their lock constructors).

DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1() sets .lock from its argument and runs the lock operation in the constructor. Same reasoning applies. All DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1() users dereference the pointer in their lock. Also, verified by auditing every match of: git grep -n 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1('.

DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0() hardcodes .lock = (void *)1 in the constructor, so it is never NULL by construction.

Conditional (_try) variants: DEFINE_GUARD_COND() and DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND() use EXTEND_CLASS_COND(), whose wrapper destructor returns early when the lock was not acquired, before reaching the base destructor since commit 2deccd5c862a ("cleanup: Optimize guards"):

    if (_cond) return; class_##_name##_destructor(_T);

As compiled by GCC-11 with defconfig on top of the locking/core:

    Total: Before=23889980, After=23834334, chg -0.23%
---
 include/linux/cleanup.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
include/linux/cleanup.h +2 -2
index 4e60d51..6541693 100644
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static __maybe_unused const bool class_##_name##_is_conditional = _is_cond
 
 #define DEFINE_GUARD(_name, _type, _lock, _unlock) \
 	static __always_inline __nonnull_args() _type class_##_name##_constructor(_type _T); \
-	DEFINE_CLASS(_name, _type, if (_T) { _unlock; }, ({ _lock; _T; }), _type _T); \
+	DEFINE_CLASS(_name, _type, _unlock, ({ _lock; _T; }), _type _T); \
 	DEFINE_CLASS_IS_GUARD(_name)
 
 #define DEFINE_GUARD_COND_4(_name, _ext, _lock, _cond) \
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ typedef struct {							\
 static __always_inline void class_##_name##_destructor(class_##_name##_t *_T) \
 	__no_context_analysis						\
 {									\
-	if (_T->lock) { _unlock; }					\
+	_unlock;							\
 }									\
 									\
 __DEFINE_GUARD_LOCK_PTR(_name, &_T->lock)